Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't want to be pessimistic about the RV happening,  but it seems that it is looking less and less likely every day.  

 

http://www.ammoland.com/2015/05/what-the-fall-of-ramadi-means/#axzz3bG9di9KO

 

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- The fall of Ramadi, capital of Anbar, largest province in Iraq, after a rout of the Iraqi army by a few hundred ISIS fighters using bomb-laden trucks, represents a stunning setback for U.S. policy.

When President Obama declared that we shall “degrade and defeat” the Islamic State, he willed the ends, but not the means. The retreat from Ramadi makes clear that the Iraqi army, even backed by 3,000 U.S. troops, cannot drive ISIS out of Anbar and Mosul and back into Syria.

Baghdad cannot alone reunite Iraq.

Republicans are almost gleeful in charging that Obama’s withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq created the vacuum the Islamic State has now filled.

Blaming Obama for ISIS in Iraq is shaping up to be the 2016 GOP attack line. But when it comes to the critical question — do Republicans favor reintroducing U.S. ground troops to retake Ramadi and Mosul and drive ISIS back into Syria? — no credible GOP presidential candidate is clamoring for a return to Mesopotamia.

None of the mice wants to bell that particular cat.

Yet, absent American leadership and U.S. troops, who is going to expel the Islamic State? The only forces in Iraq able to attempt that are the Shiite militias whose sectarian barbarity is exceeded only by that of ISIS itself.

For the Sunnis of Anbar to be liberated by Shiite militias is like the Catholic Poles being liberated by the Red Army in 1945. Many Sunnis fear a rescue by Shiite militias more than they do the domination of the Islamic State.

America’s choices in Iraq, none good, come down to these:
  • One: Reintroduce 10,000 ground troops and Marines to retake Ramadi and Anbar, and thousands more to retake Mosul and cleanse Iraq of ISIS. Another surge, like 2007.
    • Yet that does not solve the problem of the Islamic State, which would retreat to Syria and wait for the Americans to leave Iraq again.
  • Two: Adopt a policy of degrade-and-contain by continuing air strikes on the Islamic State in Iraq, while training and backing the Iraqi army and Kurds in keeping ISIS out of Baghdad and Irbil.
  • Three: Accept the inevitable — that the Shiite-led Iraq we created by dethroning Saddam and smashing his Baathist state and army is going to be in the orbit of Iran. For we cannot now, without a major and indefinite reintroduction of U.S. forces, alter the existing balance of military and political power in Iraq.

Before the United States replicates the epochal blunder Bush II and the neocons committed, we should look hard at the realities of Iraq and the region, as we failed to do before we invaded.

The relevant realities are these.

First, the Iraqis are incapable of reuniting and pacifying their country themselves. To hold Iraq together and keep it out of Iran’s sphere would require a large and indefinite presence of U.S. forces.

How much more American blood and treasure is that worth?

Second, while the reintroduction of U.S. ground forces may be cheered by our Western allies, no NATO troops will be there beside us. As far as the West is concerned, Iraq is America’s problem.

Nor will the Turks, Jordanians, Saudis or Gulf Arabs be sending troops to fight ISIS in Iraq or Syria. For them, the greater long-term dangers are: Iran, Hezbollah, Bashar Assad’s Syria, Shiite Baghdad, and the Houthi rebels of Yemen, the so-called Shiite Crescent.

Another reality is that neither Syria, nor Iraq, nor Libya, nor Yemen is likely, soon, to be brought together as a unified nation-state under a government supported by a great majority of its people.

Any regimes that rise in the capitals of these four nations seem certain to be seen by a significant slice of the population as illegitimate, and valid targets for revolutionary violence.

The Middle East is becoming a basket of failed states. And as we look around that region, every country is looking out for No. 1.

The Turks looked the other way as volunteers entered Syria to join ISIS. The Turks then let Kurds cross into Syria to keep ISIS out of Kobane. Now, according to Assad, the Turks are aiding al-Qaida (the Nusra Front) in establishing its own caliphate in Idlib. The Saudis and Gulf Arabs also, says Assad, aided the Nusra Front in taking Idlib.

And what of us?

Considering the millions of dead, wounded, uprooted, homeless, sick and suffering, American-born and native-born, have our wars and bombings in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen been, on balance, more a blessing than a curse to the people we went to help?

Before we plunge back into these Middle East wars from which, at long last, we have begun to extricate ourselves, we ought to recall the words of that anonymous U.S. officer in Vietnam:

“We had to destroy the village — in order to save it.”

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of the new book “The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority.

 


Read more: http://www.ammoland.com/2015/05/what-the-fall-of-ramadi-means/#ixzz3bG9peTdK 
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution 
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

  • Upvote 9
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More scare tactics being printed in articles........to all that want to get rid, dump, sell, burn, or use your dinar as toilet paper feel free........I'll be waiting right here with mines until it does RV, because it will. I'm in this for the long haul and I'm staying positive.........All with me, Give it the old Go RV, cheer!

Go RV!  

  • Upvote 11
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We patiently wait.!

Go Iraq

Go troops

Go security

Go stability

Go CBI

Go dinar

Go $.85+

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our troops have been in Afghanistan since 2001 and their Afghani AFN currency increased in value with the below example in 2010. Our troops are still in Afghanistan now in 2015, so I say smoke.

 

The New Afghani AFN currency shows up starting in May 1995 for exchange.

If you had spent 5,000.00 USD on Afghani AFN in Dec 2000 you would have gotten 23,750,000.00 AFN.
In 10 short years you could exchange it back to USD on Oct 2010 and receive $525,791.00 USD for a $520,791.00 profit.

This shows that an actual RV has occurred in history. It was not an overnight deal by no means, but it shows that our IQD can make some serious returns for us. Kuwait's currency was maybe the only overnight you got rich if you bought it at .10 scenario in history, but now I have more faith than ever that we will see a big return on what we have in IQD.

  • Upvote 9
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ISIS is like every other group on this planet. It is controlled by rich and powerful people with the same agenda. That agenda is universal, Power and Greed. ISIS is nothing more than a tool by which they can use to accomplish their goal to that end. When it is beneficial for ISIS to no longer be in the picture, they will fade away, only to be replaced with yet another tool to accomplish the same end. 

  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Afghanistan issued new currency with a new currency code in 2002...Pre-existing currency was exchanged at a rate of 1000/1 for conventional and 2000/1 for Northern Alliance notes. Wikipedia explains it in detail.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ISIS is like every other group on this planet. It is controlled by rich and powerful people with the same agenda. That agenda is universal, Power and Greed. ISIS is nothing more than a tool by which they can use to accomplish their goal to that end. When it is beneficial for ISIS to no longer be in the picture, they will fade away, only to be replaced with yet another tool to accomplish the same end. 

Maybe so...Only problem is that it looks like it's working fairly well ( for ISIS)....They defeat regular armies apparently.....

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...................''Really''..................................After the RV...You can get a real-life.....

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will be here until the Iraqi people grow a set of balls & the 30 million go out and kick these few thousand ISIS terrorist out of their country!

 

:)

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not getting rid of my dinar.I like the pictures on them.I truly do not believe that there will be an RV.They are printing larger notes NOT smaller ones.that is a telltale sign right there.these notes are NOT being printed for LARGE transactions.that doesn't even make any sense.nobody on earth hauls around pallets of paper money for big transactions.it,s all done by WIRE.WAKE UP GUYS.

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that my opinion means anything here but I no longer believe in an RV. I think we will see a gradual rise in value but no RV.

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it hard to believe that any political party wants to be known as the party that "lost Iraq", especially in an active election cycle.

Sumpin gotta happen soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I got a bunch of money on the Come Line! I'm just trusting in The Good Lord Jesus, now! I must admit the natural man in me see's a disaster approaching. I've said this before and I will repeat, anybody that's been in this for while knows what I'm saying is true. Their isn't anybody that knows anything about this R V deal! All anybody knows is the scuttle-butt that comes out of that $h-t hole! Everybody has opinion of what it means too! Then you have all these Poo-Roo's out there spewing their vial trash to anybody stupid enough to believe it, It really makes for a big disaster in the end, when we finally really know how the story ends! There are a couple of things that keep me in this, at the level I'm at, I learned a long time ago you NEVER change a bet! After all this a bet! All Texans, know a bet! I can tell you that for sure! With my knowledge of Mexican money and how it works, at the time 5 years ago it sounded like a bird nest on the ground. The main factor for me, is that if this deal does go down (R V), I'm going to be able to help a lot of hurting people and further the Great Commission! Also, I believe Adam has a very good plan as to how to make a lot more money with our seed money. I just need the R V, like everybody else here, that plans to be apart of the Great Commission. I know for a fact, that The Good Lord Jesus is coming very soon, I know we have been hearing this, our whole life, Anybody with half a brain can see, everything lining up with what was written a log time ago. Don't believe me, do a little research for yourself. Start with a book by a Dr. Eben Alexander, he is a neurosurgeon that had near death experience.  Do a little investigation, it might save yours and your families lives. To me it looks very bad which I stated last June & July. Now it looks even worse! I do Know that good all ways wins, I know ISIS is EVIL. I just hope we get our number, before a 7 is rolled. Do have a plan and a plan to act! Either way! I like everyone else want a R V, Its just through the natural eyes of man, It doesn't look good anytime soon!  :twocents:

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Similar Content

    • By Adam Montana
      Published: May 19, 2017 6:12 a.m. ET

      AFP/Getty Images Saudi Arabia's minister of energy Khalid A Al-Falih in Vienna, on June 2, 2016. By
      SARASJOLIN
      MARKETS REPORTER   BIMANMUKHERJI
        Oil futures moved sharply higher on Friday, as investors showed some optimism about what will come out of next week’s meeting of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.
      Up for final discussion by the cartel is whether to extend the current six-month production-cut deal beyond the mid-2017 expiration, and if so, for how long and whether the reductions should be increased.
      It is widely expected an extension will occur, and energy officials from Saudi Arabia and Russia this week signaled they back a nine-month extension. That helped give oil a start-of-week gain that’s been built on since, putting crude on pace to modestly top the 3.5% jump logged last week.
      After settling Thursday at three-week highs, light, sweet crude futures for delivery in June CLM7, +1.64%  jumped 59 cents, or 1.2%, to $49.93 a barrel. The contract briefly topped $50 a barrel for the first time since April, according to FactSet data.
      July Brent crude LCON7, +1.77%  on London’s ICE Futures exchange also gained 59 cents, or 1.2%, to $53.10 a barrel.
      Li Li, energy research director at ICIS China, attributed Friday’s advance to pre-meeting optimism, but said she doesn’t “expect prices to jump hugely from the current trading range.”
        The presidential election in Iran was also grabbing oil trader’s attention on Friday. Commerzbank analysts said the result could have “major consequences for the oil market” if conservative cleric Ebrahim Raisi wins the vote. Raisi and reform-oriented incumbent Hassan Rouhani are leading the polls.
      Read: Iranians head to the polls in high-stakes presidential election
      Raisi has expressed criticism of the nuclear agreed in 2015 that paved the way for the U.S.-led sanctions to be lifted and allow Iran to sell oil on the international energy markets.
      If Raisi wins “the agreement in its current form would risk being overturned. New sanctions would then very likely be imposed by the US and the West, which could reduce the oil supply from Iran even in the short term,” the Commerzbank analysts said.
      “An election victory for Raisi would therefore drive oil prices up noticeably,” they added.
      Read: The overlooked upside for oil in Iran’s election
      Later on Friday, oil prices would also be steered by the latest weekly U.S. rig-count data from Baker Hughes. That report has shown 17-straight weeks of growth in active oil-drilling rigs.
      But government figures on Wednesday showed the first week-to-week drop in domestic oil production since February, a development which also helped lift crude prices this week and get light, sweet crude back toward $50.
      To some, the past two weeks’ price rebound was to be expected after April’s slide. That drop “was a case of sentiment over substance,” said BMI Research. It sees more price gains to come the next several months, but they “are more likely to be incremental rather than exponential.”
      As for oil products, Nymex June gasoline futures RBM7, +1.72%  rose 1% to $1.62 a gallon, while ICE gasoil gained 1% to $469.75 per metric ton.
      Natural gas futures NGM17, +2.36%  advanced 0.8% to $3.21 per million British thermal units.
       
    • By ladyGrace'sDaddy
      Iran sanctions could soon push oil prices above $90 a barrel, Bank of America Merrill Lynch says
      “We are in a very attractive oil price environment and our house view is that oil will hit $90 by the end of the second quarter of next year,” Hootan Yazhari, head of frontier markets equity research at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, said. On Tuesday, the U.S. demanded that all countries halt imports of Iranian crude from early November. The Trump administration’s hardline position comes as part of a broader push to try to further isolate Tehran both politically and economically. International benchmark Brent crude traded at around $78.18 on Thursday, up around 0.7 percent while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) stood unchanged at $72.72. Sam Meredith | @smeredith19  

      President Donald Trump’s sustained bid to disrupt Iran’s petroleum exports could soon help to push oil prices above $90 a barrel, analysts told CNBC on Thursday.
      Crude futures were seen hovering close to multi-year highs during early afternoon deals, after a bigger-than-expected drop in U.S. stockpilesadded to a rally fueled by a major Canadian supply outage, concerns about Libya’s exports and efforts by the Trump administration to cut off funds from Iran.
      “We are in a very attractive oil price environment and our house view is that oil will hit $90 by the end of the second quarter of next year,” Hootan Yazhari, head of frontier markets equity research at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, said.
        “We are moving into an environment where supply disruptions are visible all over the world… and of course President Trump has been pretty active in trying to isolate Iran and getting U.S. allies not to purchase oil from Iran,” he added.
      International benchmark Brent crude traded at around $78.18 on Thursday, up around 0.7 percent while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) stood unchanged at $72.72.
      Saudi Arabia is ‘genuinely worried’
      On Tuesday, the U.S. demanded that all countries halt imports of Iranian crude from early November. The Trump administration’s hardline position comes as part of a broader push to try to further isolate Tehran both politically and economically.
      Nonetheless, most major importers of Iranian crude have balked at Washington’s almost unilateral policy towards Iran.
       
          The move followed OPEC’s decision to ramp up crude production last week. The Middle East-dominated cartel is looking to moderate oil prices after a rally of more than 40 percent over the last 12 months.
      The 14-member producer group took action as Venezuela's dwindling output, the looming disruptions to Iran's supplies, and production declines elsewhere raised concerns about crude futures rising enough to dent global demand.
      “You do not want to give Jeff Bezos a seven-year head start.” Hear what else Buffett has to say   “Saudi Arabia is genuinely worried, perhaps even panicked, about supply losses from Iran — something it simply cannot be seen to say publicly — and the likely price spike that will result,” analysts at Energy Aspects said in a research note published Thursday.
       
    • By normala rashid
      tommy opinion
       
      I think you fail to understand the relationship between the Vietnamese dong and the US dollar. Although the dong is not freely convertible, it remains loosely pegged to the dollar in an arrangement known as a ‘crawling peg’. The USA is Vietnam’s top trading partner, so why would they jeopardise that foreign investment coming in by making it more expensive for them to buy Vietnamese goods?
      Fluctuations in Vietnamese inflation also alter the difference in the inflation rates of Vietnam and its trading partners. This will have an impact on the exchange rate of the two currencies. If Vietnam’s inflation rate exceeds that of its trading partner then there will be upward pressure on the real exchange rate. There would be a consequent deterioration of Vietnam’s competitive position, with all the subsequent negative effects on the economy. To prevent a rise in the real exchange rate, the dong has to depreciate relative to the foreign currency in order to reflect the inflation differential.
      However, since the beginning of 2013, the real exchange rates of the dong with the US dollar and the renminbi have both been larger than one. This means that Vietnam’s competitive positions in its bilateral export markets with China and the United States have deteriorated. To improve competitiveness, the SBV could tighten monetary policy to reduce inflation. Alternatively, it could allow its currency to depreciate faster. Both entail short-term pain and long-term gain. The SBV will likely justify this by saying that it is necessary to bring jobs to Vietnam in the age of globalisation.
       
      my opinion 
      Iraq as big export of crude oil . Inflation will less faster than you expected. I have seen a once that cbi put  1.2 dollar rate in the website . I think iraq will make adjustments rate and delete 3 zero  and reduce the rate and peg dollar to boost export . 
       
      I really hope  global  currency reset could be happens and  vietnam reinstant their currency . I will put my money in vietnam stock before gcr be happens . 
       
    • By Half Crazy Runner
      Can anyone explain to me why must they pass the HCL law before there can be a revaluation of the dinar?  What is the connection? It certainly doesn’t look like the GOI will ever agree on this or even bring it up for a vote. They keep pushing it off to the “next session” year after year...  Is it at all possible that we can ever see an RV without the HCL law passing?
  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.