Diplomatic Sources: Trump Instructs Sending A US Delegation To Iraq And Syria To Address The Outstanding Problems !

[DinarThug]

JANUARY 20, 2017

US Senate approves the appointment of James Mattis, and the defense minister, the first member of the Trump department receives green light

 

WASHINGTON (AP) - The US Senate on Friday approved the appointment of General James Mattis, and the defense minister, to be the first in the management by Donald Trump receives the green light from the board.

Mathis and former officer in the US Marine Corps and, aged 66, is one of the most consensual figures in Trump's management.

 

http://www.raialyoum.com/?p=606870

[sandfly]

Mad dog is one man that will take them out 

[fancy]

oh yes!!! Things will move now. DJT said he'd get rid of those IS sickos, and he will. Albadi and DJT the best combination for Iraq!

[siberian_shaddow]

Much appreciated Thugs,  Isis your about to meet the new A-team

Edited January 21, 2017 by siberian_shaddow

[ChuckFinley]

Thanks Thug. The world as you know it is about to get ugly.  

[DinarThug]

Masum congratulates Trump and Barzani calls for the survival of the US military in Kurdistan

21/01/2017 03:39 

 

Direction Press / special

He congratulated President Fuad Masum, the Sabbath, the new US president Donald Trump on his assumption of the presidency of the United States, expressing hope that the new administration is working to strengthen the fight against terrorism and to support global stability.

Masum said office, in a statement received "direction Press" a copy of it, that "the President of the Republic on Friday sent a congratulatory telegram to the forty-fifth president of the United States of America Donald Trump on his assumption of his constitutional duties".

President expressed according to the statement, "the American people friendly sincerest congratulations on your assumption of your duties as President of the United States of America".

He stressed the "depth of the strategic cooperation between Iraq and the United States of America relations at all levels," adding that "we are confident that it will see a new breakthrough in the coming period so as to promote the eradication of terrorism and service stability, peace and development at the regional and international level

 In turn , he called on the President of Kurdistan, Massoud Barzani , on Saturday, the US military to stay in the region

Barzani said during a meeting with the media US media, he "told US military commanders in 2010 and 2011 that the US military withdrawal from Iraq will give the opportunity for the growth of terrorism," pointing out that "If what is left of a number of American soldiers in Iraq, the Daesh not controlled Ramadi and Mosul" .

Barzani said he must "do not restore the United States has done wrong in 2011 to withdraw its troops after the battle of Mosul," expressing his support for the survival of the US military in the Kurdistan region because "this move will support the expansion of Irbil in preventing terrorism" .

Barzani described the attack by the US military in 2003 to topple Saddam Hussein's regime as "the best decision," adding that "the United States and coalition committed Throwaway that two mistakes. The first was a lack of commitment to the outcome of the London Conference, and the second US military shift from the editor to the occupying force strength

http://aletejahtv.org/permalin.....47369.html

[Big_J]

GM DT AND DV.

[Texstorm]

Under the  President Trump administration there will be no quarter, there will be no surrender or no retreat, ISIS is "fixin" to be repurposed for chicken shiite ! Mad Dog will unleash a rain of fire on these Islamic terrorists ! God Bless America Again !

[Bama Girl]

17 minutes ago, DinarThug said:

 In turn , he called on the President of Kurdistan, Massoud Barzani , on Saturday, the US military to stay in the region

Barzani said during a meeting with the media US media, he "told US military commanders in 2010 and 2011 that the US military withdrawal from Iraq will give the opportunity for the growth of terrorism," pointing out that "If what is left of a number of American soldiers in Iraq, the Daesh not controlled Ramadi and Mosul" .

Barzani said he must "do not restore the United States has done wrong in 2011 to withdraw its troops after the battle of Mosul," expressing his support for the survival of the US military in the Kurdistan region because "this move will support the expansion of Irbil in preventing terrorism" .

Barzani described the attack by the US military in 2003 to topple Saddam Hussein's regime as "the best decision," adding that "the United States and coalition committed Throwaway that two mistakes. The first was a lack of commitment to the outcome of the London Conference, and the second US military shift from the editor to the occupying force strength

Truth spoken. This world is better without Saddam and I, for one, will never condemn Bush for doing it, and yes, "Mission Accomplished" !!! Jmho, of course 😔

[SnowGlobe7]

once Trump finishes talking to the Kurds..they will GLADLY sign whatever Bagdad wants them to...incuding the HCL!!!!!!!

[tigergorzow]

31 minutes ago, SnowGlobe7 said:

once Trump finishes talking to the Kurds..they will GLADLY sign whatever Bagdad wants them to...incuding the HCL!!!!!!!

SG7,  100% Correct!!

[bigwave]

On 1/20/2017 at 0:31 PM, CaptainBVI said:

Still love this one and it is especially appropriate today.

I very much doubt the new US Delegation will take long to resolve this issue.

 

 

 

As soon as I saw the picture I forward it to several connections - Zero offense here.

Thanks CaptainBVI

[DinarThug]

 

Trump: We have no choice but to eliminate Daesh   Saturday January 21, 2017 23:30         Alsumaria News / Baghdad He said US President Donald Trump , Saturday, he had no choice but to eliminate the organization " Daesh " extremist.   Trump said during his visit to the headquarters of US intelligence, "I support these devices fully work," noting that "the work of these agencies contribute to the protection of many lives."     Trump said, "I have not seen evil similar to that shown by Islamic extremism," noting that "we have no choice but to eliminate Daesh."   He said Trump "If we kept the oil of Iraq there would have been Daesh."   http://www.alsumaria.tv/news/192790/link

[DinarThug]

(by don961)

Iraq calls Donald Trump to hold on to the security agreement between the two countries

Are GMT 05:17 2017 Sunday, January 22

 

 

President Donald Trump sworn in

Baghdad-Najla al-Taie

Issued Iraq 's first official attitude toward the new American president , Donald Trump, who took office on Friday. He said Foreign Minister Ibrahim al - Jaafari, who is visiting the Lebanese capital Beirut Currently, in replying to a question about taking the new American president , Donald Trump and the extent of change in dealing with the terrorism file in the region, "for dealing with the terrorist file, it binds us Agreement since the era of former Republican President George W. Bush, has committed itself to Democratic President Barack Obama, and now has returned the presidency to the Republican Party, and a fortiori to adhere to the Convention. "

He added, "everything is possible in politics and are subjected to changes, but Iraq today is holding the reins of security control at the pace and achieve impressive victories because of the unity of the Iraqi armed forces movement of the army and the popular crowd and the peshmerga." He pointed out that "international and regional factor plays a role but the real factor is Iraq, which decide their fate and controls to confront extremist enemy in the whole world and many countries have not been able to finish it, but Iraq was able to twist his arm and being taught a lesson they will never forget, and you hear the victories that have occurred in Iraq  It continues, and the day will come soon to cleanse the land of Iraq, "Daesh."

He said the Foreign Minister, that "States have a system and institutions and are governed by regulations, when altered Prime comes another, gets changed, but a limited margin, the state is governed by the Constitution and the Congress and other institutions, however, we do not expect nothing but rely on the cohesion of our political and our strengths and stand our brothers with us." . And the expiry date of the battle of liberation of Mosul, al-Jaafari said: "In the next few months at the maximum."

And the Turkish intervention in Iraq confirmed that "the Turkish position was surpassing the Iraqi's will, despite the good relationship between us and them, and although they state next to a geographical, severe unfortunately surprised us Login forcibly depth of one hundred and ten kilometers in the Iraqi Ba'shiqah, has mobilized the Arab and international grade, and has taken the Arab League for the first time in its history a united stand unanimously against the penetration of Turkish forces, became Turkey not only in front of an Iraqi position, but in front of an Iraqi Arab position size, so our advice to the Turkish government to rectify this error and not repeat. "

He said: "It was our views on the issue of Syria is very close, and we are keen to heal the Arab combination of the Arab League, and if it has marginalized any Arab country we are with her return to the university, and at the same time, Syria's position and its experience and its strategic location and international relations, and may not be overfed, Syria or any other country, and I think that asceticism and complacency in any region of the Arab territories will be presented to the Arab world and other excesses. "

In a related development, Foreign Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, on his visit to Beirut with Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, on the situation in the region and bilateral relations. Jaafari said after the meeting: "I met the President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, and now Speaker Berri, and was talking to him a multi-faceted, and we dealt with relations Iraqi-Lebanese and ways of developing them, and asked to raise the level of the Lebanese representation in Baghdad to ambassador level, and we confirmed this request also with the President, and drew congratulations the blessing election of the President, we hope to elevate the relations between our two countries on more than one level. "

Jaafari said after the meeting that "the meeting with President al-Hariri aboard the relations between the two brotherly Iraq and Lebanon, all that carrying of common issues, despite the geographical distance, we two Mtaaontan and enjoy a very strong relationship between the Iraqi people and the Lebanese a long time ago, and we invest in the strengthening of relations, considering Mr. Hariri is the head of the executive branch and the Prime Minister, and it was natural to talk about matters of an operational nature. "

He Jaafari for "happiness through these meetings held and found a letter to Lebanese common, despite the multiplicity of speakers, ranging from the President of the Republic and, through the President of the Parliament and the end of the Prime Minister, and this speech will rejoice and reported it to Prime Minister Hariri that we are happy to see Lebanon strong exceeded previous challenges and ended the preceding space , and we have blessing and congratulations to resolve the issue of the presidency and we consider this step to not only force for Lebanon but also force us, and we look forward to seeing each of brotherly and friendly countries in the best of us than they do. " The Foreign Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari arrived on Saturday to the Lebanese capital, Beirut, and met with the country, General Michel Aoun, and discussed bilateral relations and the war on terrorism and the face of al-Jaafari to Own an invitation from the President of the Republic Fuad Masum, to visit Baghdad.
 
http://www.arabstoday.net/37/051754-link

[davis411]

On 1/20/2017 at 3:31 PM, CaptainBVI said:

Still love this one and it is especially appropriate today.

I very much doubt the new US Delegation will take long to resolve this issue.

 

 

 

offend me offend me

i love being offended

do it again

 

[tigergorzow]

US has no option but to get rid of ISIS, says Trump

January 22 2017 12:17 PM

Donald Trump

 

The United States has no other choice but to get rid of ISIS and radical terrorism, the new US President Donald Trump said. 

"We've been fighting these wars for longer than any wars we've ever fought. We have not used the real abilities that we have. We've been restrained. We have to get rid of ISIS. Have to get rid of ISIS. We have no choice," Trump told members of the CIA community at its headquarters in Langley. 

Speaking against about terrorism, Trump said, "it has to be eradicated."

"This is evil. This is evil," he told the CIA officials. 

"I can understand the other side. We can all understand the other side. There can be wars between countries, there can be wars. You can understand what happened. This is something nobody can even understand. This is a level of evil that we haven't seen. You're going to go to it, and you're going to do a phenomenal job," he said. 

http://www.thebaghdadpost.com/en/story/5290/US-has-no-option-but-to-get-rid-of-ISIS-says-Trump

Edited January 22, 2017 by tigergorzow

[tigergorzow]

A new US administration should move to cut losses in Iraq

"President DJT Will Win in Iraq & All of The ME, America will recoup the money spent on the War in Iraq....You can definitely take that to the Bank & Cash In For An RV / RI of The IQD"

January 22 2017 07:54 PM

US President Donald Trump

 

 

One question that should be high on the foreign policy agenda of President-elect Donald Trump is whether America should continue the war in Iraq, which now risks having ensnared three US presidents, The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported.
 

The Iraq War has now cost the taxpayers $2 trillion. Nearly 4,500 Americans have died, the conflict arguably spawned ISIS and some 5,000 American troops are still engaged there. Iraq’s predominantly Shiite government, led by Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi, still has not gained the support or even the acquiescence of Iraq’s mixed population. It was formerly constituted, under Saddam Hussein, of roughly 20 percent Sunni Arab Muslims, on top of the heap, 17 percent Kurds, also Sunnis, and 60 percent Shiites.

The invasion in 2003 and subsequent occupation put Shiites on top, in principle based on Western democracy’s one-person, one-vote formula, but the Sunnis have never accepted the new order and continue to struggle against it; some back the mostly Sunni Islamic State.

Deadly bombs go off in Baghdad and elsewhere in the country, almost certainly directed by Sunnis against the ruling Shiites. ISIS has held Mosul, Iraq’s second city, since June 2014. An offensive led, in principle, by Abadi government forces  to take back Mosul — accompanied by an odd collection of Iranian-backed Shiite militias, Kurds and US troops — has been underway for three months.

The Mosul offensive was originally billed as a military cakewalk, but has turned out to be tough sledding. On Friday the taking by government forces of part of the eastern part of Mosul, a city divided into east and west sections, was portrayed as a significant victory for the government side. Subsequent victory in the Syrian city of Raqqa, the nominal capital of the Islamic State, was portrayed months ago as an easy follow-on battle to win for the US-supported side after Mosul.

The question now is whether the incoming Trump administration will continue to keep the United States on the hook in Iraq. President George W. Bush tried to withdraw from the conflict starting in 2008. President Barack Obama, in spite of passionate promises, was unable to resist Iraqi government and domestic pressure, including by military leaders still in quest of redefined victory, to keep forces and assets committed. US involvement is now coming up to 14 years, way out of proportion to the importance of the country to the United States, or to anybody but Iraqis themselves.

If Trump looks at Iraq as an investment of US assets, including military personnel as well as money, he could sensibly conclude that enough is already far more than enough and pull forces and other assets out, leaving the Iraqis to sort out their situation themselves. As a US investment, Iraq now looks a lot more like today’s Atlantic City than like another California gold rush.

http://www.thebaghdadpost.com/en/story/5307/A-new-US-administration-should-move-to-cut-losses-in-Iraq

[MyLadiesDaddy]

1 hour ago, tigergorzow said:

If Trump looks at Iraq as an investment of US assets, including military personnel as well as money, he could sensibly conclude that enough is already far more than enough and pull forces and other assets out, leaving the Iraqis to sort out their situation themselves. As a US investment, Iraq now looks a lot more like today’s Atlantic City than like another California gold rush.

This libretard trash paper is so ignorant that they don't  themselves know what they are saying. Liberals need to be institutionalized for the safety of themselves and others, because the ignorance of the quote above is beyond comprehension. What these freaking idiots are saying Trump should do IS EXACTLY WHAT OBUTTHEAD DID! 

And THAT is why we now have ISIS. And that is why Iraq still hasn't come together, because Obutthead is, was, and always will be the divider in chief. 

[10 YEARS LATER]

16 minutes ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said:

This libretard trash paper is so ignorant that they don't  themselves know what they are saying. Liberals need to be institutionalized for the safety of themselves and others, because the ignorance of the quote above is beyond comprehension. What these freaking idiots are saying Trump should do IS EXACTLY WHAT OBUTTHEAD DID! 

And THAT is why we now have ISIS. And that is why Iraq still hasn't come together, because Obutthead is, was, and always will be the divider in chief. 

For real - Sure thing, lets cut an run, and like Obama . . . call it a " Victory."

With the New Sheriff in town . . .  THESE COLORS DON'T RUN ! ! ! !

[dwells92250]

 

I believe that this is a similar scene in more countries than we know.  Go Mr. President and take the action necessary to root out those who still want to destroy us.  May their destruction be quick and thorough.

[gregp]

On Friday, January 20, 2017 at 2:31 PM, CaptainBVI said:

Still love this one and it is especially appropriate today.

I very much doubt the new US Delegation will take long to resolve this issue.

 

 

 

That's one mean mother!!

On Friday, January 20, 2017 at 6:59 PM, DinarThug said:

            

 

That's one mean other mother!!

[tigergorzow]

Protests against Trump raise questions over Democrats' deals in the Middle East

"The Real Truth Is Being Revealed"

January 23 2017 01:46 AM

US President Donald Trump

 

 

Democrats plan to disrupt Trump’s inauguration
 

 

 

Democrats, who have striven to prove that the electoral college have been manipulated, seemed to wage a new war on the newly established president Donald Trump whose inaugural ceremony coincided with fierce protests in Washington and other states.
 

 

More than 65 Democrats in the House of Representatives — one-third of the caucus — have publicly announced they are boycotting the inaugural festivities that took place on Friday, breaking with custom in a reflection of their alarm about Mr. Trump’s assumption of power.
 

 

The Democrats antagonist attitude has raised questions over the democrats’ deals in the Middle East region, especially the nuclear deal of Iran which is the first to blame for spreading terrorism in the region via its armed militias and sectarian gangs.
 

 

Why the Democrats and their supporters did not stage protests over former US President Barack Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran and the US’s slackening in fighting the Daesh terrorist group in the region.

 

Trump has harshly criticized the Democrats for their policy and their squandering of the American money and efforts on wars in the Middle East region that has drained the US coffers.
 

 

He said US should have confronted Daesh militants when they started operating in Iraq and should have drained their resources by seizing the oil fields of Iraq that have been sold in return for money to spread terrorism and endanger the whole region.
 

 

Terrorism should have been confronted in Syria, Trump noted in one of his speeches in which he slammed the former US administration over its strategy in handling the Syrian crisis.

 

Are Democrats Supporting A Terrorist State?
 

One should question why Democrats did not protest Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran – mastermind of terrorism in Middle East. Iran Militias in Iraq and Iran (IMIS) has been involved in the war in Syria and Iraq and their crimes have been documented by Iraqi and Syrian civilians who have been tortured on the hands of their barbaric militants that are currently in control of various areas in Iraq and Syria under the pretext of fighting against Daesh or ISIS terrorist group.
 

 

Trump’s announcement that he would cancel the nuclear deal with Iran is seen by many of his supporters as a step in what Republicans considered a new turn to “A New American” or “Make American Great Again’ as has been promoted in Trump electoral campaign.
 

 

Why should Democrats be worried over an intention of Trump to annul a deal with a terrorist state. What is even worse is that Democrats are rallying against Trump in a defiance to all meanings of democracy that has been cheered by the US over a long time. They have even garnered up efforts to sue Trump’s administration over any measures concerning his business or intended annulment of laws, especially issues including immigration, climate change and health care, that they have viewed as contrary to their policies in the US and abroad.

 

Media Campaign Against Trump
 

On the other hand, The New York Times has published an article about Trump’s policy regarding Iran. The article has warned against all scenarios of canceling Iran’s deal. It said “In all these scenarios, the United States will be seen as undermining the deal and provoking Iran to walk away from its obligations. The sympathy of the rest of the world in this case will be with the Iranians.”
 

 

It will be Mr. Trump, as president, who will have to deal with these repercussions. Because the international coalition that previously supported sanctions on Iran will not be put back together, America’s economic leverage on Iran will be much weaker, increasing the likelihood that Iran will ramp up its nuclear program, and in turn, increasing the risk of American military action.”
 

 

In the meantime, the paper has urged international leaders, the public and major world powers to immediately convey to the incoming administration the importance of preserving the deal.
 

 

On the contrary, the paper did not even mention any of the Iranian breaches in the region, its involvement in Syria war, especially the battle by Syrian regime to regain Aleppo with the support of his sectarian militias or its endeavors to control the Iraqi territories via its armed militias, its armament of the Houthi rebels in Yemen as well as its running of several terrorist groups in a bid to hegemonize the whole Middle East region and spread its Shiite thoughts and restore the Persian Empire.
 

 

New York Times and CNN have been known for their bias to Democrats candidate Hillarious Clinton all over the US presidential campaign. All their reporting during the presidential campaign has been tilting in favor of Hillarious and opinion polls have also indicated a victory of Hillarious over its Republican rival.
 

 

In another biased reporting by the New York Times, the paper said that President Trump used his first full day in office on Saturday to unleash a remarkably bitter attack on the biased news media, claiming that he has falsely accused journalists of investing a rift between him and intelligence agencies and deliberately understating the size of his inauguration crown. Meanwhile, Trump in his visit to the CIA intended to showcase his support for the intelligence community which he pledged to support as many as 400 intelligence workers and told them “I am with y 1,000%”.

http://www.thebaghdadpost.com/en/story/5319/Protests-against-Trump-raise-questions-over-Democrats-deals-in-the-Middle-East

[ChuckFinley]

Some people just want to hate no matter what.  

[chinadawg]

these democrats are just a bunch of cry babies that had there milk bottle taken from them.

[DinarThug]

BREAKING: Reports that ISIS leader Baghdadi is injured in airstrikes
22/01/2017

Local sources are claiming that ISIS leader Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi has been wounded by airstrikes in Al-Ba'aj in northern Iraq.

Al-Ba'aj is currently the third largest ISIS bastion left in Iraq after Mosul and the Turkmen majority city of Tal Afar.

Both cities are currently in the process of being liberated by pro-government forces.

Local sources have not yet verified whether the airstrikes were by the Iraqi government or the US-led coalition.

The authenticity of these reports could not be independently verified by Al-Masdar News at this time.

https://mobile.almasdarnews.com/article/breaking-reports-isis-leader-baghdadi-injured-airstrikes/