Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Laid Back

Why I believe our wait will be longer.

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Synopsis said:

 

:twothumbs: Thank You For Your Technical And Tactical Assessments As Well As Your Observations AND Highly Valued Opinions, Laid Back, AND The Very Best Of Your Weekend To You!!! :tiphat:

 

In TRUTH, NO ONE knows ANY more than ANY other and can ONLY offer personal bases AND opinions NO matter what OR who the source OR affiliation with ANY group.

 

In MY (NOTE: MY) opinion, SOMETHING OR NOTHING will happen WITH the Speculative Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar Investment.

 

I have been VERY prolific with my views ELSEWHERE so WILL NOT belabor the points made earlier. END of MY (NOTE: MY) assessment is a HIGHLY positive outcome !!!SUDDENLY!!!.

 

NOT to say THEY are necessarily correct BUT a construct of MY (NOTE: MY) rationale. For WHATEVER it is worth - OBVIOUSLY NOT more than ANYONE else's.

 

To be a Realist, I ACCEPT the notion of Technical AND Tactical completion of performance BEFORE a ReInstatement of the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar (speculative assessment, of course). OR Nothing.

 

Well, OK, I DID venture into THIS Speculative Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar Investment BELIEVING, based on MY (NOTE: MY) confident assessment SOMETHING positive WILL happen SOMETIME in the indeterminate future. Well, OK, I (NOTE: I) believe !!!SUDDENLY!!! is in order whereas the Technical AND Tactical assessments may be BABY the REAL Deal.

 

Of which, I HIGHLY appreciate YOUR input AND contributions AMONG others, of course.

 

Other "contestants" hmmmmmmmmmm................................................... HOW, prayed AND told, do I (NOTE: I) say, "NOT!!!"!!!

 

END OF DAY, I (NOTE: I) have a "big" "picture" assessment based on HISTORICAL AND CURRENT information for WHY, prayed and told, I (NOTE: I) believe SOONER RATHER THAN LATER. Unjustifiable, or course, from a shear Technical AND Tactical perspective WHEREAS I believe a Technical AND Tactical perspective COULD very well be the REAL Deal.

 

Thank You, Laid Back, My Friend for YOUR Highly Valued Contributions!!! :twothumbs:

 

I FULLY support system" rel="">support YOUR contributions Laid Back My Friend!!! :tiphat:

 

Go Moola Nova!

:pirateship:

 Synopsis, thanks for your input.

I know you did your research before entering in this investment you’re always been objective in all your analysis 

also you respect others people opinion even if you’re not agree with them.

In my opinion you’re a respectable and valuable members of DV community 

I support all your contributions 100% my Friend.

Looking forward to meet you in the near future

Enjoy the weekend

Go Moola Nova

Go $1:1

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Laid Back said:

 Synopsis, thanks for your input.

I know you did your research before entering in this investment you’re always been objective in all your analysis 

also you respect others people opinion even if you’re not agree with them.

In my opinion you’re a respectable and valuable members of DV community 

I support system" rel="">support all your contributions 100% my Friend.

Looking forward to meet you in the near future

Enjoy the weekend

Go Moola Nova

Go $1:1

 

:twothumbs: Oh, YES!!!, Kind Sir, Laid Back My Friend, I LOOK FORWARD To Meeting - Hopefully SOONER RATHER THAN LATER!!! :tiphat:

 

ALL The Best, Laid Back!!!

 

Just now, Laid Back said:

Go Moola Nova

 

YYYEEEAAAHHH BBBAAABBBYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

:pirateship:

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Botzwana said:

Not venting.  That is YOUR gimmick.  Not mine.  I am the positive one, remember. You are the one that has to say years.  Let´s stay in carácter.  Dont try to change mine.   I am so glad YOU think you have all the answers though.  What do they say?  Pride is before a fall?  

 

Remember I dont really believe that YOU believe it.  Why?  Because you are here EVERY single day.  That tells me you think it could be tomorrow.  If you really believed what you say, you would take a 6 month break.  BUUUTTT ya dont.  Therefore you are playing a part.
























 

 

Dear Botz, 

To be honest I don’t care what you believe. 

I have seen you doing the same thing with other members of the DV community, 

“Attacking” and calling names because you’re not agree with their comments 

looks like you are craving attention.

I’m sorry if my opinion about this investment hurt your feelings but I know you love

to read them. Because you learn from it.

 

  • Thanks 3
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Laid Back said:

Dear Botz, 

To be honest I don’t care what you believe. 

I have seen you doing the same thing with other members of the DV community, 

“Attacking” and calling names because you’re not agree with their comments 

looks like you are craving attention.

I’m sorry if my opinion about this investment hurt your feelings but I know you love

to read them. Because you learn from it.

 

What name did I call you besides I said you were negative?  Attacking people?  The only one that attacked me so I attacked back was the one that says bicraqi too much.  No, I think you are more like the desperate guy at the bar asking the blond girl out over and over thinking he has a chance...and she keeps shooting you down.  That is the same as coming here every day to say it Will be a long time away.  It is a psicosis.  And kind of….you are telling Adam Montana that he has no idea what he is talking about on HIS site.  Kinda ballsy.  Adam has said we were close.  So.....

 

Me?  I think it Will be this month.  If not this month, next month and so on.  Van life is close.

Edited by Botzwana
  • Thanks 3
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 8
  • Downvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you keep saying over and over "soon" or "this month or next month " you're basically saying it's going to be a little while longer. We are just saying it up front and you are just saying it in a different form. Even Adam has no idea. He just kind enough to give us his insight and info. He's been on the edge of his seat before and is now sitting back.  It's the way it goes with this investment.  But I think everyone can agree, ever day we are getting closer!   

 

In the end it doesn't matter what any of us say or think. It will happen when it happens. All the positive or negative vibes won't change that. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 4
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Laid Back said:

Dear Botz, 

To be honest I don’t care what you believe. 

I have seen you doing the same thing with other members of the DV community

“Attacking” and calling names because you’re not agree with their comments 

looks like you are craving attention.

I’m sorry if my opinion about this investment hurt your feelings but I know you love

to read them. Because you learn from it.

 

 

:twothumbs: Certainly An Accurate Observation AND Note, Laid Back, AND ALL The Best!!! :tiphat:

 

I did what I could to help THIS individual knowing what THIS individual is seeking AND needs. Namely Peace.

 

So, the internal conflict THIS individual has, lacking sought after Peace, is promulgated on a variety of others, including myself, in different venues and ways.

 

Yes, I do pray THIS individual will receive the Peace offered THIS individual.

 

THIS individual has falsely accused me of being abusive while I was ACTUALLY confronting the foundational issues THIS individual had been violating and abusing.

 

:facepalm3:   :facepalm3:   :facepalm3:

 

So, to prevent infringing on the fragile persona of THIS person WITH the subsequent cries of violation AND abuse, I put THIS individual on ignore. What is both interesting and disappointing is THIS person demonstrates the same tactics and general practices with others who have honest assessments that may not reflect the timing of benefit for or beliefs of THIS individual.

 

Same thing HERE and other venues with others.

 

I appreciate You noting the research I had done prior to entering THIS Speculative Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar Investment AND continue to do so with the best attempt to consider related historical events WITH implications on the benefits and timing.

 

Honestly, I accept that I may be way, way off but believe, nonetheless, THERE ARE compelling reasons necessitating the ReInstatement of the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar for NOT ONLY the Bicraqi Iraqi BUT, more importantly, the rest of the world.

 

It would be right to say I am a "sooner" rather than "later" person provided the critical circumstances and conditions are of sufficient integrity to sustain not ONLY the ReInstatement of the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar BUT PRIMARILY the ACTUAL purpose which is the facilitation of Trade Goods ALL the way from China to Europe AND back. EVERY Country tied into the newly ReEstablished Trade stands to BENEFIT enormously. My pre investment decision in Q4 2010 noted the vast Bicraqi Iraqi resources (far beyond JUST crude oil) AND a Strategically Located Economic "hub" (land AND sea). So,  the POTENCY of the Bicraqi Iraqi REAL ESTATE REALLY MUST INCREASE DRAMATICALLY to "power" "up" the Trade Route referred to as the Old OR New Silk Road being plowed with remaining (relatively minor stretches of) rail and road connectivity, with necessary infrastructure, to THIS end. Others may be able to comment on the sufficiency of Afghanistan to pass goods via rail. The rail lines alone would provide improved speed for passage of goods as well as ready access to trade for land locked Countries such as Afghanistan. I suspect Pakistan, Iran, AND Iraq AS WELL AS Syria have rudimentary rail in place with a few tens of kilometers of rail to be laid so China is connected through Turkey and Beyond. THAT is WHY, prayed and told, ISIS HAD TO BE ERADICATED North AND East of the Euphrates ESPECIALLY AND GENERALLY to TERMINATE Strength Regeneration Potential. Each Country along the way will receive duties at the borders so have a source of SIGNIFICANT income WITH VERY LITTLE associated cost to generate THIS income.

 

To summarize:

  • Former President Tricky visited Mousy Dung in China in 1972 to "open" "up" China. THIS started the ReEstablishment of the Old Silk Road AND, more importantly - THE CLOCK!!! (I am NOW surmising HERE) The United States Of America WAS SUPPOSED to establish the rail AND other infrastructure the following years to Turkey to ALLOW China the ability to MOVE BEYOND the 1960s "Cultural" "Revolution" AND become a reasonably peaceable INTERNATIONAL Trade Partner.
  • China ascended as a permanent UN Security Council Member in circa 1977.
  • Around 1986 is when China became a net exporter.
  • Ever since 1986 (or there abouts) The United States Of America Trade Deficit with the Chinese has increased to an astronomical level. WHY, pray tell???!!! YEP!!! The Old Silk Road WAS SUPPOSED TO BE OPERATIONAL AND GENERATING INCOME FOR THE CHINESE AND ALL ASSOCIATED!!! So, the Chinese HAD TO MAKE DUE with the Former President Tricky AND Mousy Dung nominal 1972 agreement FOR ALTERNATE TRADE with China HAVING BEEN "opened" "up" WITH THEIR MANUFACTURING SECTOR. The TRADE CASH COW was SUPPOSED to be OPERATIONAL!!! SO, The United States Of America BECAME the Chinese Trade Cash Cow via Trade.
  • Well, NOT everyone wants to see the Old, er, NEW Silk Road Operational.
  • ENTER bad actors Former President Flimsy Carter AND Former President George H. W. "Poppy" Bush. BOTH REALLY threw a monkey wrench IN the gear works with ascending the Insanians, to INCLUDE the Insanian IRGC, to State Sponsored Corruption AND Terrorism FROM Iran ALL Though Out the Muddle East. Former President George H. W. 'Poppy" Bush "went" "missing" during THE ENTIRE Former President Flimsy Carter Presidency - doing WHAT, pray tell???!!!
  • The Insanians took the The United States Of America hostages circa November 4, 1979 while the IRGC was formulated as a potent but corrupt force.
  • The Soviets entered Afghanistan in December of 1979.
  • The Bicraqi Iraqi AND Insanian war lasted nominally 1980 to 1988.
  • Notice how The United States Of America hostages were released SHORTLY AFTER Former President Ronald Reagan WON the 1980 election.
  • Notice how the Afghan (Soviets withdrew in circa April 1988)/Bicraqi Iraqi/Insanian conflicts DURING the Former President Ronald Reagan Presidency BUT basically went away JUST BEFORE OR SHORTLY AFTER the election of Former President George H. W. "Poppy" Bush.
  • The Opium War with China WAS AND IS REAL. So, Afghanistan was "converted" to a black ops producer of poppy/opium TO FURTHER OBSTRUCT COMPLETION of the Old Silk Road Route. WITH Illicit Trade, LEGITIMATE Trade is NEARLY impossible since the lawless locals WILL pilfer the LEGITIMATE TRADE rendering LEGITIMATE TRADE NON PROFITABLE.
  • So, the opium fields in Afghanistan WITH the manufacturing facilities HAVE BEEN recently decimated MOSTLY TERMINATING illicit drug trade for KINGPINS AND THE Insanians, to INCLUDE the Insanian IRGC.
  • Things are GETTING GOOD LIKE REAL, REAL GOOD WITH The United States Of America AND China Trade Deal NOW!!! WHY, pray tell???!!! I believe it is because the original Old, er, NEW Silk Road plan between Former President Tricky AND Mousy Dung IS NOW BEING REALIZED!!! The Chines ARE NOW on the verge of trading through the Old, er, NEW Silk Road so the "trade" "work" "around" since the mid 1980s WITH The United States Of America IS NO LONGER NEEDED!!! WHOOPSIES, the pesky Insanians, to INCLUDE the Insanian IRGC, ARE a MAJOR STUMBLING BLOCK CREATED BY ROUGE The United States Of America TREASONOUS AND TRAITOROUS ACTORS THAT MUST BE CLEANED OUT PRONTO TONTO!!! So, ALL the muscle IN the Muddle East BECAUSE of The United States Of America TREASONOUS AND TRAITOROUS BAD ACTORS. No WONDER the Allies ARE BACKING AWAY FROM THIS MESS AND THE CHINESE ARE DENOUNCING The United States Of America INFLUENCES IN THE Muddle East!!! I NEVER dreamed THIS would be so PROMINENTLY in the news. I thought ALL THIS would OCCUR BEHIND THE Scenes Quietly!!!
  • Hey, EVEN Xi Jinping RECENTLY announced the ReEstablishment of the Old, er, NEW Silk Road!!! NOW WHY, pray tell, would Xi Jinping do THAT UNLESS IT WERE REAL???!!!
  • So, in conclusion, TIME, SKILL, AND EFFECTIVENESS ARE OF THE ESSENCE!!! THAT IS WHY, prayed and told, I BELIEVE the !!!SUDDENLY!!! REALLY MUST BE UPON US TO PREVENT FURTHER CORRUPTION FROM IMPEDING THE REESTABLISHMENT OF THE Old, er, NEW Silk Road (i.e. NO MO BAD ACTORS) AND WILD REASONABLY ANTICIPATORY SPECULATION DETERRING THE ReInstatement of the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar VALUE INTERNATIONALLY!!!
  • As a post script note HERE, the corrupt weekday Bicraqi Iraqi CBI DAILY currency auctions ARE A KNOWN MAJOR SOURCE OF INCOME for the Insanians, to INCLUDE the Insanian IRGC, AND Corrupt Bicraqi Iraqi GOI AND OTHER APPOINTED Officials AND MUST BE TERMINATED PRONTO TONTO TO TERMINATE Insanian, to INCLUDE Insanian IRGC, funding of operations IN Iraq AND elsewhere in the Muddle East. (Hey, Hey, HEY Can YOU Say !!!SUDDENLY!!! :eyebrows:   :eyebrows:   :eyebrows:)!!!

Well, OK, MY (NOTE: MY) assessment(s) HERE!!!

 

Go Moola Nova (YEAH AND YEE HAW, BABY, READY WHEN YOU ARE BROTHER (OR SISTER) - LET 'ER BUCK!!!)!!!

:rodeo:   :pirateship:

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those are great thoughts, @Synopsis, thank you.  

However, I just read (in another thread) how the Iraqis are wanting to pass a law to get "compensation" from the U.S. and Israel for past wars and ruining their infrastructure, causing cancer to their people, and other complaints.  

To me, it looks like they never want to raise the price of the dinar and stand on their own.  They just complain and beg for money.

What a lowly bunch of people.  They are a disgrace.

I am very discouraged about the dinar today, after reading that article.

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW ! WOW !  WOW!  Has it come to this? It looks like patience has gone out the window. Can't we have a   little more civility and just have some fun with this adventure? What happened to the family of Dinarians that try to help each other ? Play nice kids and enjoy .... You will enjoy the "dessert" when it is served.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Floridian said:

Those are great thoughts, @Synopsis, thank you.  

However, I just read (in another thread) how the Iraqis are wanting to pass a law to get "compensation" from the U.S. and Israel for past wars and ruining their infrastructure, causing cancer to their people, and other complaints.  

To me, it looks like they never want to raise the price of the dinar and stand on their own.  They just complain and beg for money.

What a lowly bunch of people.  They are a disgrace.

I am very discouraged about the dinar today, after reading that article.

 

:twothumbs: Great Points, Floridian, AND The Very Best Of The Rest Of Your Weekend AND Up Coming Week To You!!! :tiphat:

 

HOW FAR, pray tell, WILL the Bicraqi Iraqi get with THAT???!!!

 

THEIR dysfunctional GOI???!!!

 

IF the Bicraqi Iraqi ACTUALLY passed THAT law IN Iraq, HOW, pray tell, WILL THEY be "compensated"???!!!

 

MY (NOTE: MY) opinion is THIS is a "show" "of" "ineptness" AND "insupportable" "bravado"!!!

 

I suspect WHEN Show Time !!!ARRIVES!!! !!!SUDDENLY!!! for INTERNATIONAL Trade AND A ReInstated Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar, the Bicraqi Iraqi WILL Say, "MOOLA, MOOLA, MOOLA!!!"!!! AND WILL forget about THIS AND/OR BE "strongly" " encouraged" "to" FORGET THIS!!!

 

I know, I know. Good News/Bad News. But, HEY, THIS is a Speculative Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar Investment!!! :o   :o   :o

 

NO need to get discouraged BECAUSE IT IS NOT ABOUT ANY OF US ANYWAY!!!

 

I would ALSO like to give the Red Rubymeisters a sincere AND heartfelt THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU for the Red Ruby Citations AS Badges Of Honor For ME For "Display Of Intellectual Speed AND Power"!!!

 

I KNOW it is EXTREMELY hard AND difficult for YOU to comprehend the breadth, height, width, AND length of WHAT I posted so I ALSO appreciate YOUR self designated AND displayed insecurities.

 

ALTHOUGH I NEVER INTENDED TO CALL ATTENTION TO YOUR INSECURITIES BUT to render my requisite perspectives as the presented information is posted for YOUR AND EVERYONE ELSE'S POSITIVE BENEFIT AND ENJOYMENT!!!

 

Go Moola Nova!

:pirateship:

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Synopsis said:

I know, I know. Good News/Bad News. But, HEY, THIS is a Speculative Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar Investment!!! :o   :o   :o

 

NO need to get discouraged BECAUSE IT IS NOT ABOUT ANY OF US ANYWAY!!!

 

 

Thanks for your reply, Synopsis.  I know this is not about any of us and I know this is a "speculative" investment, however I have so far wasted almost 10 years following this speculation and if it doesn't pay off soon I'm not going to be happy.  It will have been money and time wasted, and both are running out.  I'm starting to regret ever hearing about it.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Floridian said:

 

Thanks for your reply, Synopsis.  I know this is not about any of us and I know this is a "speculative" investment, however I have so far wasted almost 10 years following this speculation and if it doesn't pay off soon I'm not going to be happy.  It will have been money and time wasted, and both are running out.  I'm starting to regret ever hearing about it.

 

:twothumbs: I Hear You, Floridian, AND ALL The Best!!! :tiphat:

 

Maybe consider THIS - NO MATTER WHAT INVESTMENT(S) WAS MADE OTHER THAN the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar, THE OTHER INVESTMENT(S) MAY NOT HAVE PAID OUT EITHER IN THIS TIME!!!

 

One feature I looked at BEFORE entering THIS Speculative Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar Investment IS the capability of RECOVERING a SIGNIFICANT portion of the INITIAL investment albeit at SOMEWHAT of a loss on the order of 30 - 40%. NOT knowing WHAT WILL ACTUALLY happen WITH the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar INTERNATIONAL VALUE AND, of course, WHEN, I surmised THERE may be BABY gradual value improvement as happened in the first few years since 2003 AND I would be able to sell the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar at an equal OR greater value.

 

I would NOT get down on myself for the choice made to enter into THIS Speculative Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar Investment. NO ONE knew OR does know WHAT WILL happen OR when.

 

WE ARE ALL IN the SAME boat on THIS ONE!!! Granted, SOME have greater needs THAN others AND will need to make the responsible choices. NO ONE can help THAT. Time AND Chance happen to US ALL.

 

We can ALL pray THIS Speculative Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar Investment WILL BE OF GREAT BENEFIT AND !!!SUDDENLY!!! APPEAR for OUR individual benefit AND the Benefit Of Those The LORD calls to Bless in whatever form. ANONYMOUSLY, of course.

 

I feel Your pain, Floridian. I wish I could help more but we each have our burdens to bear while doing the best we can to support others.

 

Hope THIS helps bring SOME comfort to You. We ALL need comfort now AND then!!! :D   :D   :D

 

Go Moola Nova!

:pirateship:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Synopsis said:

 

:twothumbs: I Hear You, Floridian, AND ALL The Best!!! :tiphat:

 

Maybe consider THIS - NO MATTER WHAT INVESTMENT(S) WAS MADE OTHER THAN the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar, THE OTHER INVESTMENT(S) MAY NOT HAVE PAID OUT EITHER IN THIS TIME!!!

 

One feature I looked at BEFORE entering THIS Speculative Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar Investment IS the capability of RECOVERING a SIGNIFICANT portion of the INITIAL investment albeit at SOMEWHAT of a loss on the order of 30 - 40%. NOT knowing WHAT WILL ACTUALLY happen WITH the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar INTERNATIONAL VALUE AND, of course, WHEN, I surmised THERE may be BABY gradual value improvement as happened in the first few years since 2003 AND I would be able to sell the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar at an equal OR greater value.

 

I would NOT get down on myself for the choice made to enter into THIS Speculative Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar Investment. NO ONE knew OR does know WHAT WILL happen OR when.

 

WE ARE ALL IN the SAME boat on THIS ONE!!! Granted, SOME have greater needs THAN others AND will need to make the responsible choices. NO ONE can help THAT. Time AND Chance happen to US ALL.

 

We can ALL pray THIS Speculative Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar Investment WILL BE OF GREAT BENEFIT AND !!!SUDDENLY!!! APPEAR for OUR individual benefit AND the Benefit Of Those The LORD calls to Bless in whatever form. ANONYMOUSLY, of course.

 

I feel Your pain, Floridian. I wish I could help more but we each have our burdens to bear while doing the best we can to support system" rel="">support others.

 

Hope THIS helps bring SOME comfort to You. We ALL need comfort now AND then!!! :D   :D   :D

 

Go Moola Nova!

:pirateship:

 

That was very nice, Synopsis, and I appreciate the kind words.

I was not thinking about getting some of our money back if this doesn't pan out.  I'm glad you reminded me of that.

There has been a lot of good news lately and I have been encouraged, but then the Iraqis say or do something stupid and I get discouraged again.  It's such a totally different culture than ours.  I don't understand them at all.  They think so differently than we do in the West.

You would think they would catch on after all these years.  Hopefully, with the rise of the internet, the younger generation will be more modern in their thinking.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Floridian said:

 

That was very nice, Synopsis, and I appreciate the kind words.

I was not thinking about getting some of our money back if this doesn't pan out.  I'm glad you reminded me of that.

There has been a lot of good news lately and I have been encouraged, but then the Iraqis say or do something stupid and I get discouraged again.  It's such a totally different culture than ours.  I don't understand them at all.  They think so differently than we do in the West.

You would think they would catch on after all these years.  Hopefully, with the rise of the internet, the younger generation will be more modern in their thinking.

 

:lmao:   :lmao:   :lmao:

 

(hint) WHAT, pray tell, IF the ReInstatment of the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar INTERNATIONALLY is NOT about the Bicraqi Iraqi PRIMARILY AND the Bicraqi Iraqi ARE MORE LIKE "willing" "accomplices"???!!!

 

:lmao:   :lmao:   :lmao:

 

SURE, the Bicraqi Iraqi WILL HIGHLY benefit from a ACTUALLY INTERNATIONALLY VALUED ReInstated Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar BUT the CUMULATIVE INTERNATIONAL BENEFIT IS FAR GREATER!!!

 

:o   :o   :o

 

SO, the CONDITIONS HAVE TO BE JUST SO BEFORE the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar IS REVVED UP!!!

 

Are WE THERE, yet???!!!

 

Iya dunno. Lookin' Good, THOUGH!!!

 

I about fell OUT OF MY CHAIR when I first saw Xi Jinping reference the Old Silk Road IN the news articles. I COULD BE (likely SO :lmao:   :lmao:   :lmao:) WRONG BUT I think THAT is REALLY, REALLY TIMELY NEWS!!!

 

:crossedfingers:   :crossedfingers:   :crossedfingers:

 

Go Moola Nova!

:pirateship:

Edited by Synopsis
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Synopsis said:

 

:lmao:   :lmao:   :lmao:

 

(hint) WHAT, pray tell, IF the ReInstatment of the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar INTERNATIONALLY is NOT about the Bicraqi Iraqi PRIMARILY AND the Bicraqi Iraqi ARE MORE LIKE "willing" "accomplices"???!!!

 

:lmao:   :lmao:   :lmao:

 

SURE, the Bicraqi Iraqi WILL HIGHLY benefit from a ACTUALLY INTERNATIONALLY VALUED ReInstated Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar BUT the CUMULATIVE INTERNATIONAL BENEFIT IS FAR GREATER!!!

 

:o   :o   :o

 

SO, the CONDITIONS HAVE TO BE JUST SO BEFORE the Bicraqi Iraqi Dinar IS REVVED UP!!!

 

Are WE THERE, yet???!!!

 

Iya dunno. Lookin' Good, THOUGH!!!

 

I about fell OUT OF MY CHAIR when I first saw Xi Jinping reference the Old Silk Road IN the news articles. I COULD BE (likely SO :lmao:   :lmao:   :lmao:) WRONG BUT I think THAT is REALLY, REALLY TIMELY NEWS!!!

 

:crossedfingers:   :crossedfingers:   :crossedfingers:

 

Go Moola Nova!

:pirateship:

 

Well, you're making a lot of sense here.  

You think of things I wouldn't think of.

That's why I like consulting with you.  LOL LOL

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When will Washington resort to military force against Tehran?

%D9%85%D8%AA%D8%AA%D9%89-%D8%AA%D9%84%D8

Iranian statements against the United States and the administration of President Donald Trump are rising, in exchange for the escalation measures taken by the administration in pressuring Iran to bow to US demands. Trump said the pressure on Iran was the biggest ever. The United States recently designated the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization, in the first action of its kind, in the classification of part of the armed forces of a state as a terrorist group. Washington has also decided to cancel the exceptions given to countries to buy Iranian oil, in order to prevent Iran from exporting oil completely. Other sanctions were added to the mining sector, the second in the Iranian economy after oil. The situation has become difficult for the Iranian regime, which is facing economic difficulties and popular discontent.
Iran has pursued a defiant policy, given a deadline for European states to deal with it, otherwise it will withdraw from the nuclear deal that Trump has withdrawn from, while Europe remains committed to it. The Iranian deadline was immediately rejected, but the United States has expressed concern about another measure taken by Iran , that it has given the green light to its associated groups in the Middle East to attack US interests. As a result America has entered a military and political warning. The US Fifth Fleet based in the Arabian Gulf announced a high alert, warning all American civilian ships that they could be targeted by Iran, and military reinforcements were sent to the area, most notably the giant aircraft carrier SS Abraham Lincoln. But all these measures are defensive and ready to respond to any attack, not preparations to start a war or a major blow to Iran so far. America is not aiming to start a war with Iran. More importantly, the Trump administration, despite its massive escalation of pressure on Iran, it does not aim to overthrow the Iranian regime, but to restrict it. Even Trump said at the height of the crisis a few days ago, he wants to be contacted by Iranian leaders to negotiate, and this is the only way to save Iran from its great economic difficulties. But he added, surprisingly, that he wants Iran to be strong and great! The Iranian responses were clear in rejecting Trump’s offer to negotiate, but in politics everything is possible and secret contacts may exist now with all this escalation.
The Iraqi arena is very important in the Iranian-American confrontation. Foreign Minister Pompeo canceled a visit to Germany and went to Baghdad. And his talks include defensive demands, that is to obtain an Iraqi commitment to protect US forces in Iraq from any attack by Iraqi groups associated with Iran. He used the term protection. Therefore, this is not talking about American pressure on Iraq to take America’s side in any military confrontation that might happen .Pompeo briefed Iraqi officials on Iran’s guidance to those associated with it to attack US interests, and then returned home passing to Britain, the closest US ally, and its partner in any war.
The situation is inflamed in the region. But there is no media mobilization in Washington for a war with Iran. The American strategy is to escalate economic pressure so that Tehran will bow to Trump and sign an agreement according to its terms. It may differ more or less from the nuclear agreement signed by the administration of his predecessor Obama and Trump withdrew from it. But America will not start a military strike; it is only increasing its readiness to respond.
However, General Qassem Soleimani, the commander of the Iranian Quds Force through his own channels, leaked an Israeli intelligence information Mossad, which in its turn leaked to the CIA about his meeting ( regular and repeated meetings)) with leaders of Iraqi factions described as loyal or allied to Iran within his plan to make division between the US administration’s hard-line war wing and President Donald Trump.
Sulaymani has extensive personal relations with various actors in regional conflict by virtue of his position as a leader of the Revolutionary Guard and his work in the strategic files related to the Iranian national security, especially in Iraq, Syria and Yemen, he also met with prominent leaders in the popular crowd during their presence in Ahwaz governorate to provide relief to the Iranians when exposed to floods. ” special” information was leaked about the scenes of the meeting in which Sulaimani aims to push the hardline team within the US administration into immediate action and push for escalation with Iran as specific Iraqi groups would kidnap US diplomats, officers and soldiers and thus threaten US interests in Iraq. This is what the hard-line American team, Pompeo and Bolton Brian Hawk, is looking for, the reason for the war against Iran, as Trump was told that Sulaimani has told the leaders of the Iraqi factions that they should prepare for the war, this meeting will be a reason to raise the levels and degrees of threat to US forces and military bases in Iraq to the maximum extent .
What Soleimani wanted was to increase the gap and divergence of views on the Iranian issue and ways to resolve it between the US president, who aspires to a second presidential term and his hardliners who want to escalate and change the Islamic Republic’s regime through a scenario of war and to move the Iranian interior .So far, the disparity has surfaced when a senior administration official familiar with Trump’s talks with national security adviser John Bolton and Foreign Secretary Mike Pompeo was quoted as saying that Trump was furious all week over what he saw as a war plan that went beyond his ideas which don’t go beyond the limits of pressure sanctions and military mobilizations and avoid being dragged into a military confrontation and this as referred to by New York Times Thursday by saying , that President Donald Trump had told Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Chanahan that he did not want to go to war with Iran.
Throughout the week, the US president, in his remarks and the moves of the Defense Ministry as if he were above the tree, could not get off even when his Foreign Minister Pompeo met with his Russian counterpart in Sushi and his vague references where Moscow was not reassured about Trump intentions towards the Iranian issue. Trump’s Republicans, who control the majority of seats in the Senate, are not happy with this situation and they have been in critical situation in front of their Democratic rivals on the eve of the 2020 presidential election, and preparations are underway in Congress for Trump officials to make secret statements about the situation with Iran. Lawmakers from both parties have asked for more information. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joseph Danford and Acting Defense Minister Patrick Chanahan will attend Tuesday’s hearing before the entire Senate, an embarrassment to Trump in front of supporters and opponents, as members of Congress complain weeks ago that Trump’s management did not inform them with sufficient information about the current escalation with Iran, even some Republicans say the administration did not show them anything on that issue. The question arises in this context: Is the US heading for war with Iran? There are two stories competing for the answer to this question. The first story, favored by the administration of President Donald Trump, is based on the fact that Iran has bad intentions and that there are preparations for a possible attack on US targets, although the details disclosed are few, and pushed US to send military reinforcements to the region, and the US is working to reduce the number of its non-essential diplomatic staff in Iraq and is reconsidering its war plans.
The message to Tehran is clear: any attack on an American target from any source, whether Iran or any of its many allies or proxies in the region, will be met with a huge military response. The other story blames Washington in this crisis. It is not surprising that Iran will stick to this story, but many who criticize the Trump administration’s way of thinking from interior prefer it too. But a number of major European Trump allies have concerns about this, but to varying degrees.

According to this story, the “hawks” in the US administration, such as US National Security Adviser John Bolton or Secretary Minister Mike Pompeo, see this as an appropriate opportunity. This story shows that the goal of those hawks is to change the regime in Tehran, and if the extreme degrees of economic pressure don’t succeed in doing so, they believe that military action is not ruled out according to circumstances.

These two stories reflect different interpretations of the truth. As is often the case, each works to highlight certain facts and to ignore others to prove that they are the correct ones. But perceptions here are as important as truth, and in many ways to be the reason to reach the truth.
That fact is that a conflict between the United States and Iran , even it was just a coincidence rather than something that has already been prepared , is more likely now than ever since Trump took over the presidency of the United States. The Middle East is certainly witnessing a rise in tensions. Iran is working to tackle this, although its economy is suffering from the re-imposition of sanctions that were lifted under a nuclear deal signed in 2015 with world powers. Iran has threatened that it will no longer abide by any restrictions on its nuclear activity.

Trump came to power is a turning point. He withdrew from the nuclear deal a year ago and worked to exert maximum pressure on the Iranian government.
However, Iran is fed up with this pressure, and it is working hard to push the Europeans to do more to help its deteriorated economy threatening that if they do not do so, and it is difficult to know what they can do, it will violate the terms of the nuclear agreement. This will give Trump a further reason to take an offensive stance. The situation now depends on the moves taking place within the Trump administration and on Tehran’s assessment of what is happening there.

The president himself has sought to underestimate the idea that officials in his administration are divided over the Iran issue. Reports indicated that Trump is not very enthusiastic about the war. He is known for his opposition to military conflicts abroad. But it is not likely that he will back down if its forces or installations are attacked. But Tehran does not have to look at things this way. Does Iran see that it can spoil the relationship between Bolton and his boss, heightening tension between the two parties, prompting Bolton to reveal his plans, which may hasten his fall? If that is Tehran’s assessment, it will be a strategy of high risk.
While Israel and Saudi Arabia, the two most important allies of the US administration in the region, are welcoming this step , but the administration’s partners in Europe are uncomfortable about what will happen. Spain, Germany and the Netherlands have taken steps to stop any military activities In the Middle East, in partnership with the Americans, due to rising tensions in the region.
This is not the time to see how the conflict between the United States and Iran will be. Moreover, comparing this conflict to the invasion of Iraq in 2003 will not be useful. Iran is a different example from the situation in Iraq under the rule of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. The idea of a full-scale invasion on Iran would not be among the options as a military conflict could arise by air and sea, which Iran’s way in dealing with will be different , which would ignite the region as a whole.

There were those who predicted a major foreign policy disaster with Donald Trump taking over as president of the United States. Instead, there is an ongoing multidimensional crisis involving a number of elements, all illustrated by Iran’s situation: there is a state of disdain for international conventions, excessive reliance on regional allies with their own plans to pursue, tensions with old NATO partners and, above all, the inability to resolve the decision and set priorities for Washington’s real strategic interests. With renewed competition among the superpowers, where the United States seeks to redirect the deployment of its forces and strengthen its capabilities facing the rise of China and the boldness of Russia, where is Iran standing now within priorities for Washington ‘s strategy ? Is the Iranian threat really worth fighting a major conflict? Many strategic analysts will reply by rejection . Many also accept that the idea of containing Tehran with strong retaliatory measures may be necessary in the event of its attack on US interests, but the sound of drums of war are not as necessary.
The war between Washington and Tehran remains excluded, especially as there are regional and international parties that have hastened to mediate in trying to drag the parties to the negotiating table and the direct dialogue that Trump wants and insists on. Tehran rejects it and does not close the door to it for sure on real legitimate demands and not on the terms of the UN Security Council resolution No. 2231 (2015), the last international resolution on the Iranian nuclear issue and provided to support of the nuclear agreement and lifting sanctions in relation to Iran’s nuclear program.
Although Khamenei has rejected direct negotiations with the current Trump administration because he has vetoed the nuclear deal and can not be trusted again, and is betting on his failure in the upcoming elections, he does not mind absolutely to maintain the ball rolling , perhaps Trump calculates it with (trader mentality) and therefore comply with Resolution 2231 and dismisses his national security adviser John Bolton, who deals with Iran as a member of the Iranian Mojahedin –eKhalq organization (People’s Mujahedin Organization ), the opposition accused since the Shah of terrorist acts against America itself, and consistent with the international consensus, especially the European pro-nuclear agreement, and to work with the Islamic Republic in regional and International files that were supposed to be opened with it after the conclusion of the nuclear agreement.
When Trump comes down from the tree, especially since the consensus in the leadership within Iran is not to give the hardliners the pretext to wage war on their country, Tehran will remain in the nuclear agreement and will not withdraw from it and will not achieve the desire of the team that pushed the US president to withdraw from it and incite him to attack Iran?

When the Supreme National Security Council, headed by the Iranian president, reinforces the internal front, Rohani begins the first steps of unity among the political factions in the country to overcome the circumstances he said , that are perhaps more difficult than the situation during the war with Iraq in the 1980s ?!

In summary, there are certain cases that accelerate the resort of the United States of America the use of military force against Iran, namely: Iran’s production of nuclear weapons, and Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz to oil tankers, targeting the US forces deployed in Iraq and the Arabian Gulf, these cases combined or alone may hasten to resort to a military option against Iran. Except that, all outstanding problems between the two countries can be resolved through diplomacy, direct diplomacy, third-party diplomacy or hotline diplomacy.

Iranian Studies Unit
Rawabet Center for Research and Strategic Studies

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Iraq pays the price of confrontation between Iran and the United States of America “the biggest loser”

%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82-%D9

Researcher Shatha Khalil *
Iraq stands in the middle between the United States and Iran, the two countries that have had the interest of overthrowing the regime and creating chaos in the country, and evidence remains that the two sides are still working to make Iraq the arena of their conflict and with Iraqi blood.
The strangest thing is the willingness of parties and (Iraqi politicians) to show a great enthusiasm to defend Iran. The parties, MPs and politicians showed support for Iran and prevented Iraq from complying with the new US sanctions imposed on Iran.
Some have even come to say that they are ready to fight alongside Iran in any future confrontation. Moreover, they are talking about drafting a resolution in parliament calling on US forces to leave Iraq.
On the other hand, the United States has supporters of its presence in Iraq, which makes it feel reassured about its influence there, and what raises more fears is the possibility of bloody confrontation with Iraqi hands and blood, this is happening now between the factions of the popular crowd and the liquidation of organizations inside it that are not loyal to Iran.
The conflict of influence and domination on Iraq between America and Iran through the control on projects does not reflect hostility between Tehran and Washington, as it has clear indications on strategies set to divide the interests and prioritize influence.
All because of the absence of an Iraqi national project and the involvement of Iraqis in sectarian and doctrinal conflicts because most of the parties and political names, whether they came with the occupier or have been incubated and produced domestically at home, do not carry a vision or national identity, and its first and last loyalty to external parties which have their own agendas , this is what made the battle and the conflict of foreign projects on the Iraqi arena a prevailing reality can not get out of its cycle , by an initiative to build a national Iraqi collective project , but the initiative is difficult in the near term because the inability of the Iraqi community machinery to overcome the past, and inability to diagnose the mistakes, this is on the one hand, and on the other, the important and most important, the dominance of the religious Marja decision on the collective consciousness in the street, and the dependency of the ruling junta and its symbols to these Marja and implementation of their decisions, in the service of their personal interests first, and their sick doctrinal second , and to maintain their positions third, and they no have the will, the national belonging, and not even the moral constant fourth and finally .

The power crisis in Iraq:
US sanctions on Iran put Iraq in trouble to rely on Iranian gas used to produce electricity, that is, Iraq must follow the steps of independence in the field of energy and politics.
The Iraqi electricity sector suffers from poor conditions after many years of financial and administrative corruption in the country, as well as more than three years of war on the organization of the terrorist ISIS, which led to the destruction of the infrastructure in many of the provinces occupied by the organization.
Iraq is currently importing about 28 million cubic feet of gas per day. The Iraqi Ministry of Electricity said that it is exempt from the sanctions imposed by Washington on Iran, and announced the continued flow of imported gas from Iran to feed the country’s production stations and the purchase of 1,200 MW of Iranian electricity.
The United States on Monday decided not to renew exemptions on Iranian oil imports by May 2 to eight countries it received in December.
The spokesman for the Ministry of Electricity Musab al-Mudaris , said that his country is currently importing from Iran about 28 million cubic feet of gas per day feeding a number of power plants to approximately 2800 MW, and is likely to increase quantities in June to 35 million standard cubic feet per day , to increase the production capacity to 3500 MW, and pointed to the continuation of the Iranian side to equip Iraq with 1200 MW of electricity every day feeding the national system, he said.

Thus, Iraqi energy imports from Iran are of great importance to the country to meet the challenges of increasing domestic and industrial consumption in the country.
As part of the deepening crisis, Iraq has signed contracts with Siemens, a leading German company worth $ 14 billion to renew the infrastructure in the country and the addition of new generation plants.
Iraq is seeking to sign contracts worth billions of dollars, with the General Electric Company in this regard.
The former Iraqi oil minister stressed the importance of the contracts signed with Siemens, saying: The German Company “can put an end to the suffering of the country in the field of electricity,” and it is possible to reach the stage of self-sufficiency, he said.
Iraq also signed an agreement to connect electricity with Saudi Arabia, which has a large surplus of electricity production.
The Ministry of Electricity spokesman Musab al-Mudaris that the total amount of energy imported by his country from Iran is 4,700 megawatts, which contributes to easing the Iraqi burden in the summer, adding that the goal of the ministry to provide eight thousand megawatts to be the volume of energy this summer in the highest history of Iraq, Iraq has no alternative to importing Iranian gas, adding that stopping imports would cost Iraq’s electricity grid 4,000 megawatts a day.
Iraq has agreed to a deal with China Petroleum Engineering and Construction Company to build and operate facilities to process the extracted natural gas, as well as oil in the giant Halfaya field, two oil officials said.
Iraq suffers from the waste of gas extracted from the burning process along with crude oil in its fields because of the lack of facilities to be treated and converted to fuel for domestic consumption or export.
In conclusion, the element of surprise remains within the limits of the data that dominates the regional and international arenas, especially the mood swings of the American president, and it is not ruled out that the common interests between Iran and Washington will be the case.

Economic Studies Unit
Rawabet Center for Research and Strategic Studies

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Washington warns Iraqi banks from monetary transactions with Iranian banks

%D9%85%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%81-768

Shatha Khalil *
Most countries seek to work within a precise and cautious system in monetary and banking transactions because they directly affect the economy of the state. It is the backbone of the economy of any country. It helps to generate capital and thus can be directed to investments that need a stable economic environment for growth and development. Banking system in Iraq is weak and needs a lot of reforms to serve the Iraqi economy, not to serve other countries.

The warning came during a visit of the Assistant Secretary of Treasury for the fight against the financing of terrorism, Marshall Billingsley , to Baghdad and his meeting with the three presidencies in the country, they were informed of the work to expel the Iranian banks (“Percian” and “Melli Iran”) and stop banking and monetary transaction with them, and the need to liquidate the Bank of Iraq, which is subject to US sanctions, against the background of the transfer of suspicious funds to the Lebanese Hezbollah.
Billingsley, when he met with the finance minister and the governor of the Iraqi central bank, they were told that the Iraqi funds “oil revenues” kept by the DFI Fund and transferred to Iraq each year worth 8 billion dollars in the form of cash that their value will be reduced to an unknown number. Information (especially for the Rawabet Center for Research and Strategic Studies)
Marshall Billingsley has provided Iraqi officials with a list of Iranian companies and banks that circumvent sanctions across Iraq and has warned that Iraq could be severely punished if it continues to provide safe havens for Iran’s banking activities and to overlook Iranian banks and companies with Iraqi fronts.

He stressed the need to develop the Iraqi banking sector and enhance the prospects for cooperation between Iraqi and US banks, and to carry out economic reforms through the activation of electronic systems in monetary exchange, and contribute to the development and revitalization of the infrastructure of the Iraqi economy.
In this context, Care must be taken in dealing with Iranian banks, which are working to exploit the hard currency in Iraq and turn it into Iran, and that monetary and banking transactions with banks which are subject to sanctions have a direct impact on the Iraqi economy.
The Iraqi economy since 2003 has not fully recovered after the sectarian incidents and the war against the organization ISIS and the liberation of Iraqi cities, as any tension or conflict will negatively affect the market and economy of Iraq, and the political situation in the Middle East is worrying and threatening economic and political security.
But Billingsley stressed that the developments in the political scene in the region and the measures taken by the United States to impose sanctions on the Islamic Republic of Iran are far from the bilateral relations between Iraq and America, especially in the fields of economy and finance. The agreement with Washington was to continue cooperation to protect the Iraqi economy and ensure its stability from any repercussions in the region.
Baghdad stressed its desire to resolve the outstanding problems by peaceful means, diplomacy, dialogue and negotiations, because any tension or conflict will affect negatively on all countries in the region, especially Iraq, and this will adversely affect the economy and the Iraqi market as it depends heavily on the import from the Iranian market, here we wonder when will the Iraqi economy rise (rich with resources and wealth ) and achieve economic independence and sustainable development at all economic levels and be independent and free and works for its own benefit first and not for the benefit of other countries.

Iranian banks wrap around the Iraqi economy to save itself :
The Iranian banks have been operating in Iraq for nearly ten years in the days of Maliki’s government in 2010 and are an important engine for trade between Iraq and Iran. They have branches in Baghdad, Najaf and Basra. They gave commercial and personal loans and provided banking services to Iraqi tourists, and most importantly are the Iranian branches : Persian and “Melli Iran” Bank.
In light of the bankruptcy faced by the branches of the Iranian banks in Iraq, “This requires urgent intervention by the Central Bank of Iraq, and comes the failure of work or bankruptcy because of US sanctions on Iran, and the difficulty of obtaining hard currency.” The orders were announced to the two banks, To implement the guardianship
Iran is exploiting the hard currency and is working on decisions that protect its interests only and are used and exploited and depleted the Iraqi economy, ie after the decline of Iranian exports to Iraq during the recent period, because of the difficulty of paying the value of exports in foreign currency and converted to Iran, in a new step decided the Central Bank of Iran to branches Iranian banks in Iraq to transfer the value of dues instead of cashiers, as the value of Iranian exports to Iraq during the past ten months about $ 7 billion and 515 million dollars.
The Iraqi-Iraqi Chamber of Commerce said that Iraqi importers had in the past paid foreign currencies to Iraqi bankers in order to turn them in to the Toman and pay the dues of exporters in Toman, while the Central Bank of Iran decided that the branches of Iranian banks in Iraq to replace the cashiers in such a process.
This means that the Iranian exporter can receive the dinar or dollar from the Iraqi importers and handed over to the branches of Iranian banks in Iraq, to receive Tuman instead of it at the price of discharge that day in Iran.
As the economic expert Abdul-Hassan al-Shammari stressed , that Iran is witty in the exploitation of the hard currency in Iraq, where it has been able to develop mechanisms to withdraw foreign exchange of Iraq and gave a very large interest rate exceeding 22%, as it benefit from hard currency to save its national currency, which deteriorated because of US sanctions.

The Iranian currency suffers from fluctuation and instability in price because of the economic embargo imposed on Tehran recently, these are all factors in Iran helped to attract foreign funds to deposit in its banks, conditions are easy and there is no complexity so that money can be deposited in the name of the owner of the money and not in the name of someone else , Iran benefits from this as it attracts the dollar and converts it to the Tuman, at the expense of the Iraqi economy and citizen.

Economic Studies Unit
Rawabet Center for Research and Strategic Studies

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.