WISKY291 Posted December 23, 2017 Report Share Posted December 23, 2017 They better bring there A game. It would be like slaughtering pigs!! Now that I think about it, they cant even bring a C game. LMAO!!! 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
429 Posted December 23, 2017 Report Share Posted December 23, 2017 3 hours ago, Markinsa said: I saw the word Iran, but read it as Iraq! Nevermind! But it’s the same thing, Mark. Without the steady supply of disposable parts for those Iraqi F16s, they won’t be flying either. And I wouldn’t be surprised if there were some sort of kill switch built into the armaments we supply to them. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markinsa Posted December 23, 2017 Report Share Posted December 23, 2017 29 minutes ago, 429 said: But it’s the same thing, Mark. Without the steady supply of disposable parts for those Iraqi F16s, they won’t be flying either. Agree! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupraRacer Posted December 23, 2017 Report Share Posted December 23, 2017 Really??? I mean REALLY??? Maybe Iran doesn't study history much if at all. Which part of the revolutionary war, WW1, WW2, Korea, Desert Storm, Iraqi Freedom, and ISIS do they not get???? Just drop a nuke on the whole country and forget it. They are just with narcissist of the world and life would be better off without Iran. Maybe they need to change it to Uran after Trump and Mad dog are done with them. Insert Col. Jessop on the stand here. You messed with the wrong marine. SR 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new york kevin Posted December 23, 2017 Report Share Posted December 23, 2017 (edited) 18 hours ago, Markinsa said: Just thinking out loud... Do our soldiers have a US forces only signal to automatically switch communication frequencies when we believe Iraq has turned against us? And do we have the capability to shut down/disable our equipment/tanks/planes operated by Iraq? 18 hours ago, markb57 said: 1. cut all funding to middle east 2. spin up the nukes. I am done with this Like mark57 said: 1. Cut of all funding to the Middle East 2. Bombs and nukes 3. Use of 2 handfuls of our MOAB EMP Weapons 4. Full use of our Cyber Warfare capacities 5. Target and destroy all their Russian bought fighter jets, weapons, and weapon systems Edited December 23, 2017 by new york kevin 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinarham Posted December 23, 2017 Report Share Posted December 23, 2017 Iran against US ? Ha ! They would be like china in a bull shop 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donziman Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 If i were to guess about the use of the 6 billion Knowing the history of these camel jockeys , im sure the leaders stole it for their own use and it is now in swiss bank accounts. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted December 25, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 25, 2017 Iraq Some of Iraq's fighters look to next target: the US military By Rudaw yesterday at 10:30 Fighters from the popular mobilization forces wait near the front lines during the ISIS war. Photo: Al-Hashd ERBIL, Kurdistan Region — Some in the Shiite-dominated Iraqi paramilitary forces who served essentially as reserves for the Iraqi army in the ISIS war are looking for their next fight: US troops. “America should only be here for embassy, any military presence and we will target them,” Saif Ali, a 37-year-old member of the PMF’s Harakat Hezbollah al-Nujaba told Fox News. Several groups and individuals are sanctioned by the United States treasury for their attacks on US and international coalition troops after the 2003 invasion of Iraq to oust the Baathist regime. Some have openly admitted plans to build a 'Shiite crescent' from Tehran to Beirut. “I fought the Americans after 2003, and the British in southern Iraq, and I am happy about that. I don't hate the American people, only hate the US military, and I have killed many of them," added Ali. While the PMF's are primarily comprised of Shiite paramilitias, they have also paid Iraqis from other groups like the disenfranchised Christian and Yezidi minorities to join their ranks. Rayan al-Kildani is the leader of the Babylon Brigades based out of Nineveh province. He told Fox that although he has relatives in the United States and has visited, he threatened to attack US intelligence personnel who he met after the Mosul liberation. “Our stand is clear,” Mohand al-Eqqaby asserted. “America was not there at the beginning of this ISIS crisis when we needed them most. We are strong now, and as long as we are fighting, Iraq does not need Americans on our land.” Locals, especially, Kurdish and Arab Sunni leaders have tried to warn the West of the growing influence of the Iran-backed PMFs, mainly comprised of the Shiite Hashd al-Shaabi paramilitaries. The US-led Coalition to Defeat ISIS was not able to provide air support to the Hashd during the ISIS war. Their fighters were accused of recruiting minors to fight, forced displacements, and summary executions by watchdogs like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. With Iraq's Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi having declared a victory over ISIS in early December while calling Hashd al-Shaabi "the pride of the nation," the PMFs are at a crossroads in Iraq where they can disband, make a grab for power, or further integrate into the traditional Iraqi Security Forces. They were formed from more than 60 groups who came together mid-2014 following a fatwa from Shiite Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani to drive out ISIS militants who were quickly gaining control of the country. Most of the groups began as political organizations which date back decades. It is against Iraqi law to hold political office and hold a military position. With elections upcoming in May, top Shiite clergy have spoken out about the groups. Iraq's firebrand cleric Muqtada al-Sadr advocated for not allowing Hashd al-Shaabi’s name to be used in the elections and preventing its leaders from running in the elections while in still their post in a December 11 speech. Sadr also called for the dismantling of “some unorganized forces within the Hashd al-Shaabi and … punishing some others in order to protect the position, name, and dignity of jihad, jihadists, and the blood of the martyrs." Top cleric Sistani has called on the Shiite forces to come under the command of the official Iraqi military, adding that the state must have exclusive authority over all armed forces. Sistani, however, stopped short of calling for the Shiite forces to be dismantled. "It is necessary to continue to use the service of this section [the Hashd al-Shaabi] within the legal framework that exclusively puts the arm under the command of the state," Sistani said in a statement that was read by his representative on December 15. Tom Hardie-Forsyth, who has extensive experience of Kurdistan and UK security interests, wrote a damning letter on December 14 to his government calling Britain "thoroughly blindsided by Iran," referring to the Shiite militia in Iraq. The letter disputed foreign office assertions that Baghdad's seizure of disputed territory caused "limited clashes and loss of life," and also challenges the Iraqi Embassy's assertion of totally false allegations about the presence of non-Iraqi forces or irregular militias or groups backed by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. The United States has mostly been silent on the role of the PMFs in Iraq. "That's a question for the government of Iraq," said the spokesperson for the international anti-ISIS coalition, US Army Col. Ryan Dillon on December 20 " I mean, they are the ones who have constitutionally, you know — you know, said that, you know, the PMF are a subset of the Iraqi Security Forces. "So it'll be completely up to them on what happens to the PMF as they transition, whether that be, you know, blended into the other elements of the Iraqi Security Forces. But that's clearly a government of Iraq for them to answer." 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new york kevin Posted December 25, 2017 Report Share Posted December 25, 2017 A lota talk for a group of folks that we trained. We taught them everything they know. We did not teach them everything we know. Iraq and Iran on a one to one fight will loose big-ly. We will break their bank literally, and destroy their ability to produce significant amounts of oil. Iran will not be able to maintain wars and war lordships on multiple fronts after we are done with them.Their only hope is that we have a Commander in Chief that will hog tie our troops on the ground. That won't be the case for the next 7 years. Well they can be wusses again and cloth all their fighters in civilian clothes so they can claim we killed civilians when we kick their butts all over the dessert . if they suck us into a war with them they will regret it. Personally, they can fall off of the face of the earth for all I care ... after they RV at 1-1, or better. If Saudi Arabia and Iran go after it ... who cares. Iraq will step in and benefit from their inability to produce oil, and make up the difference. If Iran and Iraq go after us we will blockade the straits from Iran on up to Iraq. Neither of them will make oil or money, just Saudi Arabia and us. Yup the USA will crank up our oil production, LNG, et al and make up the difference and supply the world; and make alot of money. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted January 2, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 Report: US green light for Sulaimani liquidation Washington and Israel resolve their dispute after 3 years ... 01/01/2018 - 19:27 After a three-year dispute over the commander of the Quds Force responsible for external operations in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, Maj. Gen. Qassim Soleimani, who runs the battles of Iran and its affiliated or pro-military forces in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and elsewhere, , The US intelligence agencies gave Israel the green light to liquidate Soleimani, if it could. A well-informed source told Al-Jarida that a former senior official in the Israeli intelligence service (Mossad) reported that Israel was close to the liquidation of Soleimani three years ago near Damascus, but the United States, which learned of the plan, warned the Iranian leadership "In a way," which led to its failure, pointing out that a sharp dispute broke out between the Israeli and American security and intelligence services on this matter. The source said that there is a US-Israeli consensus today on the seriousness of Sulaimani and the threat of the interests of the two countries in the region, revealing that Israel is pursuing the brigade close, and was about to kill him more than once. In a related context, Al-Jarida obtained information confirming that the Iranian leader No. 2 in Syria after Soleimani, who is directly related to him, is Mohammad Reza Falahzadeh, nicknamed "Abu Bakr". He is the deputy commander of "Battalion 18000". The sources reported that Abu Bakr gave wide powers in the Syrian field and participated in the Astana conference within the framework of the Iranian delegation. He pointed out that this leader, who has appeared in more than one place in Syria recently, is the coordinator of visits of Iranian delegations from military, combat experts, Quds Force "and others to Syria. The discovery of the identity of Abu Bakr is a breach of the Corps's secrets, especially since this man, who was wounded in the Battle of Aleppo, is a target for Syrian dissidents and possibly for Israel and other active forces in Syria. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synopsis Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 5 minutes ago, yota691 said: The US intelligence agencies gave Israel the green light to liquidate Soleimani, if it could. YES, YES, YES!!! The Israeli Mossad is going to make quick work of this!!! Qassim Soleimani should have opened the CIA envelop when it was presented to him!!! we'll see what happens to the other Iranian rats in Iraq once the Mossad goes into action!!! This just may be the accelerated end to Iran in Iraq!!! We'll see what the news articles bear out!!! "if it could" pffft. Yeah, right. Mossad are some of the baddest on the planet. Mossad knows what they are doing and can make it happen. Go Moola Nova! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted January 2, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 18 minutes ago, yota691 said: United States, which learned of the plan, warned the Iranian leadership Wonder who did the warning... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floridian Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 22 minutes ago, yota691 said: Report: US green light for Sulaimani liquidation Washington and Israel resolve their dispute after 3 years ... 01/01/2018 - 19:27 After a three-year dispute over the commander of the Quds Force responsible for external operations in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, Maj. Gen. Qassim Soleimani, who runs the battles of Iran and its affiliated or pro-military forces in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and elsewhere, , The US intelligence agencies gave Israel the green light to liquidate Soleimani, if it could. A well-informed source told Al-Jarida that a former senior official in the Israeli intelligence service (Mossad) reported that Israel was close to the liquidation of Soleimani three years ago near Damascus, but the United States, which learned of the plan, warned the Iranian leadership "In a way," which led to its failure, pointing out that a sharp dispute broke out between the Israeli and American security and intelligence services on this matter. The source said that there is a US-Israeli consensus today on the seriousness of Sulaimani and the threat of the interests of the two countries in the region, revealing that Israel is pursuing the brigade close, and was about to kill him more than once. In a related context, Al-Jarida obtained information confirming that the Iranian leader No. 2 in Syria after Soleimani, who is directly related to him, is Mohammad Reza Falahzadeh, nicknamed "Abu Bakr". He is the deputy commander of "Battalion 18000". The sources reported that Abu Bakr gave wide powers in the Syrian field and participated in the Astana conference within the framework of the Iranian delegation. He pointed out that this leader, who has appeared in more than one place in Syria recently, is the coordinator of visits of Iranian delegations from military, combat experts, Quds Force "and others to Syria. The discovery of the identity of Abu Bakr is a breach of the Corps's secrets, especially since this man, who was wounded in the Battle of Aleppo, is a target for Syrian dissidents and possibly for Israel and other active forces in Syria. What is the logic of "advertising" this in the newspaper? Why not just do it, without warning? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synopsis Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 Just now, Floridian said: What is the logic of "advertising" this in the newspaper? Why not just do it, without warning? 11 minutes ago, Synopsis said: The Israeli Mossad is going to make quick work of this!!! Qassim Soleimani should have opened the CIA envelop when it was presented to him!!! Just my opinion, Floridian, AND The Best Of Your New Year To You! Making a public announcement like this could produce chatter on the communications networks leading to Qassim Soleimani and only accelerating his demise. That should be quick. The "CIA envelop" was likely a last offer to Qassim Soleimani for the most amicable terms (like leave Iraq immediately with all the Iranian militias) or else. I suspect the Israeli Mossad is the "or else". Qassim Soleimani should have opened the CIA envelop and left Iraq with all the other Iranian militias when he had the chance to do so. What was he thinking??? Ole Donald did make mention through Ole T Rex that the Iranians in Iraq have got to go. So, here we see the plan unfolding. Iran in Iraq is not a good thing at all. The Iranians will disrupt Security and Stability and make foreign investment difficult if not impossible in Iraq. What is happening here is a good thing. The Israeli Mossad knows what they are doing. Go Moola Nova! 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floridian Posted January 2, 2018 Report Share Posted January 2, 2018 Oh, I see. Thanks, Synopsis. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.