Adam Chat 9/21/11 11:00am "ish" :)

[Legolas]

Nice job Adam. Clear, concise and realistic. I think there's much to be done before we see a final release of Chapter 7 sanctions, but it's conceivable that it could happen this year IF they ever get their collective heads out of their butts.

[Shirley Hall]

This chat format was so much better. Thanks Adam

[abutchbaker]

No date ,no time 7yrs and still waiting it will happen some day...............

[hambones]

Adam:

I think your comments about Shabbi are,"Right On The Money".

Hambones

[DREAMER13]

very nice to finally understand the chat the new organized chat is much better

[Shick]

GOT A LOT OUT OF THIS SOME QUESTIONS ASKED WERE THOUGHT OF, GREAT RESPONSE ADAM. GO RV.

[Miss Peg]

Yes, that is what it means.Adam had to do today's chat earlier than planned but if you read this chat it is conducted in a MUCH more organized manner and I want to thank those responsible for making it happen. I too was aware of the time change but appreciate not having to wade thru the rubble

[Laid Back]

Well done kcw & Adam.. Thanks guys

[wealthhound]

KCW and Adam...great clear and concise chat thanx...also (was it KCW)? that posted about a plan B if the RV is initally low. That is very much food for thought! Thanx

[edbeach]

Thanks Adam as always enjoyed your chat and understand what you said concerning if come out low makes sense to me know.

This was much easier the way you conduct your chat today

[Caye98]

Thanks kcw, great post!

Adam, I REALLY like the new "chat" format and time lines (both for posting questions, and having the answers posted by 7PM!)

Looking forward to "THE" text... Shecky, get my jet!

[dog53]

Very positive and informative . Well done Adam Montana

Go RV !!!!!!!!

[Marko59]

Great new format. We all appreciate it.

Thank You

[glo]

Great Format !!!

ADAM TY ! and

kcw ty !

[PTguy]

Thanks Adam for changing the chat format and responding to everyones feedback. Great adjustment, concise, informative and easy to read.

[flboy]

Thanks Adam, This format is very good and I can follow and understand much better than the old way.

Again, Thanks.

Go R.V

[tandy]

Well Adam...if you don't have the big head after all these compliments...you didn't understand the feedback...good job and nice to have a man that understands leadership and the responsibilities that go with it....cheers

[Beachwalker]

Adan;

I appreciated the chat, again. They always help us to stay grounded and confident.

[genx4me]

Much easier to follow. Thanks for the change!

GO RV!!!

[peanut75]

Great chat adam id be a very happy man with a 10-30 cent rv.I would cash half and hold the for higher rate if given the chance.

[HF4237]

WOW -- I like the new format!

[xyzzy]

If you do not want to read anything at all straying from "great chat Adam", then please skip this post.

first, indeed thanks for the chat (the format is good) and for the site. I'm not paying and Im both learning and enjoying myself! There are however three points I'd beg to differ on wrt this evenings chat.

Everyone that I read on this site that speaks intelligently about an RD (a re-denomination) uses that term to mean the issuing of a new and different currency that over a period of a perhaps a year or two is exchanged with the existing currency at a fixed exchange rate (e.g. 1000:1). Yet Adam used it to mean just printing lower denominations of the existing currency. This is just poor terminology in my view which will lead only to confusion.

In the same point Adam refers to "L0psters" as folks that "can't understand how the Dinar could possibly go up in value ". But as has been expressed many times in these forums, those like myself that think an RD is coming fully accept that both current and new dinar can, and hopefully will go up in value. Just not as high as the 120x (to $0.10 USD) that Adam is guestimating let alone 1000x or 3000x as others envision. The disagreement is not about the possibility of change in value but about the degree of that change. I think 1.5x is pretty likely and 12x i.e. to a penny, is the outside limit.

There are many factors to consider in an analysis of how big of an RV might be workable and a chat is not the place to lay all that out. But my concern is that the chat flow followed a classic logical fallacy in that first he shows why $3 won't work, then uses that to say $0.10 is more likely, but offers no support that $0.10 isn't also unworkable. Its a very easy trap to fall into just due to time and space constraints. Maybe Adam is correct and a RV to a most wonderful $0.10 is workable, but in this chat all we saw is support that a $3 RV is unlikely, not that $0.10 is likely.

In such a chaotic situation as this investment its very hard to know what is going to happen (we'd all already be zillionares if we could make accurate predictions in this realm just in the "regular" world, let alone for Iraq) I think what is good about this site is good information and healthy debate and I hope my comments contribute to that. At least I hope i don't go on mod review for this , once was enough thank you very much! and now I must go make dinner! ... thanks again Adam.

[merc49]

Very good format, finally ...no confusion...orderly...concise..easy to follow and understand..Great Job...GO RV!!!!!

[Rossenbos]

And thanks to Linda Bowen for her question :-)...

That was hilarious....

From an Adam Sandler movie :-)

[Bobbydee]

Excellent chat thanks for posting KCW. Thank you Adam for your answers to the questions. God Bless Semper Fi