Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Sidney Powell Drops BOMB! Military Can Determine Election Outcomes


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, coorslite21 said:

The judge cast doubt on Powell and Lindell’s assertions they have evidence proving their voter fraud claims, noting Powell “faces an obvious hurdle” because she’s never actually produced a key piece of evidence she claims to have, and said “a reasonable juror could conclude” Lindell’s claims of a “vast international conspiracy that is ignored by the government but proven by a spreadsheet on an internet blog is so inherently improbable that only a reckless man would believe it.”

Crucial Quote

“A reasonable juror could conclude” that Powell’s allegations of election fraud “were either statements of fact or statements of opinion that implied or relied upon facts that are provably false,” Nichols ruled.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 4
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, miraj said:

The judge cast doubt on Powell and Lindell’s assertions they have evidence proving their voter fraud claims, noting Powell “faces an obvious hurdle” because she’s never actually produced a key piece of evidence she claims to have, and said “a reasonable juror could conclude” Lindell’s claims of a “vast international conspiracy that is ignored by the government but proven by a spreadsheet on an internet blog is so inherently improbable that only a reckless man would believe it.”

Crucial Quote

“A reasonable juror could conclude” that Powell’s allegations of election fraud “were either statements of fact or statements of opinion that implied or relied upon facts that are provably false,” Nichols ruled.

 

You can believe what you chose to believe....I mean your screen name is revealing..  "Mirage"...

 

Everything isn't what you see and believe..  Especially if you're relying on the MSM as your information source...    CL

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, coorslite21 said:

 

You can believe what you chose to believe....I mean your screen name is revealing..  "Mirage"...

 

Everything isn't what you see and believe..  Especially if you're relying on the MSM as your information source...    CL

That's a two way street.  People tend to believe what ever news fits their agenda or belief.   Why is your news source anymore valid than someone else? Besides the fact someone elses may be the MSM. Aren't most news sources a little bias or have their own agenda? Telling someone they what they believe is wrong based on your news source , is like someone telling you you're wrong based on their news source.  It just goes back and forth forever. Yet nothing has been proven one way or the other. Just speculation plain and simple. Just my opinion

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe truth. When my sources prove truthful I will continue listening to them. When a news source lies and twist to paint a false picture for the masses that is criminal. There are lazy people who don't check the info and then base their voting decisions on the info. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 5
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, miraj said:

The judge cast doubt on Powell and Lindell’s assertions they have evidence proving their voter fraud claims, noting Powell “faces an obvious hurdle” because she’s never actually produced a key piece of evidence she claims to have, and said “a reasonable juror could conclude” Lindell’s claims of a “vast international conspiracy that is ignored by the government but proven by a spreadsheet on an internet blog is so inherently improbable that only a reckless man would believe it.”

Crucial Quote

“A reasonable juror could conclude” that Powell’s allegations of election fraud “were either statements of fact or statements of opinion that implied or relied upon facts that are provably false,” Nichols ruled.

 

Please provide links to what you are quoting.  Consider this an unofficial warning.

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/08/11/dominion-lawsuits-against-sidney-powell-mypillow-ceo-mike-lindell-and-giuliani-can-move-forward-court-rules/?sh=5124a3615d21

 

.

  • Thanks 4
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, cranman said:

That's a two way street.  People tend to believe what ever news fits their agenda or belief.   Why is your news source anymore valid than someone else? Besides the fact someone elses may be the MSM. Aren't most news sources a little bias or have their own agenda? Telling someone they what they believe is wrong based on your news source , is like someone telling you you're wrong based on their news source.  It just goes back and forth forever. Yet nothing has been proven one way or the other. Just speculation plain and simple. Just my opinion

 

 

And your opinion is appreciated!

CL

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/29/2021 at 10:03 PM, cranman said:

That's a two way street.  People tend to believe what ever news fits their agenda or belief.   Why is your news source anymore valid than someone else? Besides the fact someone elses may be the MSM. Aren't most news sources a little bias or have their own agenda? Telling someone they what they believe is wrong based on your news source , is like someone telling you you're wrong based on their news source.  It just goes back and forth forever. Yet nothing has been proven one way or the other. Just speculation plain and simple. Just my opinion

 

Wish I could you 1000 pows!👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 3
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/29/2021 at 9:03 PM, cranman said:

That's a two way street.  People tend to believe what ever news fits their agenda or belief.   Why is your news source anymore valid than someone else? Besides the fact someone elses may be the MSM. Aren't most news sources a little bias or have their own agenda? Telling someone they what they believe is wrong based on your news source , is like someone telling you you're wrong based on their news source.  It just goes back and forth forever. Yet nothing has been proven one way or the other. Just speculation plain and simple. Just my opinion

 

 

The MSM pushed the Russian Collusion hoax for four years, without regard for the truth and now they are pushing the COVID and Vaccine Lie.  Now why on earth would ANYONE keep following these news sources when it has been proven that they are lying to YOU and EVERYONE else?

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Markinsa said:

 

The MSM pushed the Russian Collusion hoax for four years, without regard for the truth and now they are pushing the COVID and Vaccine Lie.  Now why on earth would ANYONE keep following these news sources when it has been proven that they are lying to YOU and EVERYONE else?

 

 

 

You're missing the point.  Both sides have sources other than MSM. But  no one will belive the other news source unless it states what they want to be true. The facts can easily be glossed over, or interpreted, so people don't have to admit they are wrong.  Not all MSM is wrong. How can it be when there are left and right leaning televised sources? 

  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, cranman said:

Not all MSM is wrong. How can it be when there are left and right leaning televised sources? 

 

How may times do you let the MSM lie to you before you understand that's what they do?  They are feeding us a narrative to hide what is going on.  They are programming us.  Com'on take the red pill!

 

.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Markinsa said:

 

How may times do you let the MSM lie to you before you understand that's what they do?  They are feeding us a narrative to hide what is going on.  They are programming us.  Com'on take the red pill!

 

.

Can you prove any of that comment? All MSM is wrong and lying all the time?  Have you been able to verify your news sources credibility, and if so, how? 

 

I don't care what side of the political spectrum any one resides on. This is not about that. This is about how anyone knows there news source is valid.

  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bigwave said:

So you are saying your news sources have no agenda?  Has your news sources ever stated they were wrong and the Democrats were right? That Trump will not be reinstated? That the earth is round? Sounds implausible they could be right all the time.  Or do you only listens to news sources that tend to lean towards your beliefs?  How have you verified any of what your news sources say is true? After all, they are going to report what you want to hear. Any other news source that says otherwise is wrong, correct?

  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, cranman said:

Can you prove any of that comment? All MSM is wrong and lying all the time?  Have you been able to verify your news sources credibility, and if so, how? 

 

I don't care what side of the political spectrum any one resides on. This is not about that. This is about how anyone knows there news source is valid.

 

Just look at the Durham indictment of Sussman.  It takes a while to build a case, but the MSM swallowed it hook link and sinker. 

 

.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cranman said:

So you are saying your news sources have no agenda?

All have an agenda.

 

Truth seekers try to avoid the nooz because they have research it out.

 

Check out some of the following if you like. If not quite okay with me.

 

image.png.05603b22052b1b8fb9325457b36dcaaa.png

 

Operation Mockingbird was a program created by Allen Dulles (Cousin to Walt Disney).

 

So what are the dangers of only having six individuals telling the media what they’re permitted to print or air to the public?

 

 

 

  • Here is a partial list of movies that were produced and directed by the Pentagon/C_A, either for predictive programming purposes or for propoganda purpose.
  • Walk in the Sun
  • The Unbeliever,
  • Towering Inferno
  • Tears of the Sun
  • Stripes
  • Transformers 13
  • True Lies
  • Twisters Revenge
  • Twelve O’Clock HIgh
  • We Were Soldiers
  • Last Action Hero
  • The Visiting
  • The Innocent
  • Golden Eye
  • Last Plane Out
  • Silence of the Lambs
  • Karate Kid 2 & Next
  • Lone Survivor
  • United 93
  • Pitch Perfect 3
  • Iron Man
  • Twister
  • Argo
  • Pearl Harbor
  • Zero Dark 30
  • Captain Phillips
  • American Sniper
  • Sum of All Fears
  • Above the Law
  • Air Force One
  • Biloxi Blues
  • The Client
  • Deep Six
  • Giant
  • Battle Cry
  • Apollo 13
  • Bridge of Spies
  • Armagheddon
  • Annapolis
  • Convoy
  • Deep Six
  • Forever Young
  • Deep Impact
  • Enemy Below
  • Godzilla
  • Captain America
  • In Harms Way
  • Perfect Storm
  • Killing Fields
  • Jurassic Park III
  • Renaissance Man
  • Hunt for Red October
  • License to Kill
  • Pet Cemetary
  • Sleepless in Seattle
  • Startrek I & II
  • Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
  • Patriot Games
  • Red Dawn
  • A Time to Kill
  • Taps
  • Red Dawn
  •  
  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, cranman said:

And your news sources fit yours. See how this works.

No, I DON"T see how it works. I see a world where greedy bastards want to destroy our freedoms and individual way of life. They want a one world government controlled by a few ruling class elitists and the rest living as their obedient servants and slaves, (good little sheep that take the jabs on time, thank them for making the jabs avaiable and free and wait for their next marching order) They want to eliminate God, guns & individualism from our lives. The say one thing and do another all the while urinating on the Constitution I love and swore to defend with my life (as did most ALL of my family and my wife's family). And it matters not what the lying media says is right, wrong or true, every damn one of us that has any ethics and morals know DAMN well something is wrong in this country and we know where the hell it is coming from. We are on an expressway to communist HELL and it wasn't Trump that put us there. This destroy AMerica shiite was started long ago, but it really got it's footing under "The One" and now is on steriods under "Joke and "Heels Up"! Can you imagine of Joke got impeached and we had to live with the "cackling Kumala" for 3 years?? Well at least we'd have enough egss to feed the country!!

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Markinsa said:

 

Just look at the Durham indictment of Sussman.  It takes a while to build a case, but the MSM swallowed it hook link and sinker. 

 

.

Your sources also said Susan Powell was supposed to release the kraken and had indisputable proof of election fraud that would get it decertified. But yet nothing has happened besides the courts saying she had nothing. 

  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cranman said:

Powell was supposed to release the kraken

Sidney, and many others, is doing it daily.

 

The swamp is deep and wide.

 

Before 2016 nobody was talking about any of this.

 

The elite have been hammering We The People drip-by-drip since the dawn of time.

 

This is all part of the "Great Awakening" you may have heard about.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bigwave said:

Sidney, and many others, is doing it daily.

 

The swamp is deep and wide.

 

Before 2016 nobody was talking about any of this.

 

The elite have been hammering We The People drip-by-drip since the dawn of time.

 

This is all part of the "Great Awakening" you may have heard about.

 

 

This guy talks about a great awakening in a interview from 2013. This vid is a shorter synopsis of the original 2:30hour vid. 
 

his chess analogy is a little eerie when you think about what’s going on now. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.