coorslite21 Posted December 29, 2018 Report Share Posted December 29, 2018 57 minutes ago, yota691 said: Thanks Yota....another great example of what we're up against....a totally lawless government.....with hired goons to ride herd over the sheep and any who oppose them....CL 1 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted December 29, 2018 Report Share Posted December 29, 2018 ***/// You're right, COORS. The deep state left these monstrous criminals embedded to take US down ! The highly ILLEGAL acts of these operatives MUST be addressed -- and SOON. We're sick & tired of waiting for it to crumble under it's own weight - like EVERY kommie regime does eventually. . 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonangler Posted December 29, 2018 Report Share Posted December 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, SgtFuryUSCZ said: The highly ILLEGAL acts of these operatives MUST be addressed -- and SOON. Do you really believe either of the two parties are going to do anything? B/A 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted December 29, 2018 Report Share Posted December 29, 2018 ***/// We do. It's only right, just and LAWFUL. Of course, you lefties don't respect The Rule of Law, (see: Kavanaugh Hearings) But that will never stop US from coming after your mental deviant kommie pals. If they don't get what's coming to them here, There's a Higher Authority. . 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butifldrm Posted December 31, 2018 Report Share Posted December 31, 2018 #JamesComey #Russiagate #SteeleDossier British spy Steele blows apart entire Trump-Russia collusion hoax 44,087 views 1.9K42SHARE The Duran Published on Dec 20, 2018 SUBSCRIBE 52K The Duran Quick Take: Episode 43. The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss MI6 spy, Christopher Steele's, shocking testimony in a British court which details how Hillarious Clinton and the DNC had the entire fake dossier lined up as the ultimate insurance policy to discredit Donald Trump should he somehow win the US Presidential elections. Meanwhile James Comey continues to lie to Congress on his involvement in the slow walking coup targeting Trump, as Michael Flynn battles to exonerate himself from Mueller's witch hunt. 1 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texstorm Posted December 31, 2018 Report Share Posted December 31, 2018 (edited) Lock them all up and hang their asses for treason ! This is the largest lie in all of American history. I want justice ! Enough is enough show us what you got Mueller ! If they all go down America will triumph ! The truth and facts are already on the table. The only collusion I've seen is so far is that the top level DOJ and FBI and the Obama administration and the Hillarious foundation, have colluted to the destruction of the President of the United States. WTF ! Edited December 31, 2018 by Texstorm 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted December 31, 2018 Report Share Posted December 31, 2018 ***/// Will SCOTUS Justice John Roberts stick a fork in MULE-er....? Or.... Is Roberts ALSO a deep state tool who stuck it to The American People with ho'bummer-lack-o-care...? Are we about to find out...? Ya'll stand by... tick, tick, tick... . 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted December 31, 2018 Report Share Posted December 31, 2018 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted December 31, 2018 Report Share Posted December 31, 2018 ***/// GREAT video, YerYOTAness ! If the little kommie tools still had control of their own minds , maybe they could experience a much needed epiphany & see what their slave masters are REALLY up to.... But with dead eyes & co-opted minds, there's little chance they'll come around... their zombie enslavement complete. The one-note narrative bored into their brains... "hate Trump, hate Trump, hate Trump..." So they'll continue to parrot the party narrative, perpetuating the rape of the Democrat Party by their globalist kommie masters. Tools. , 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coorslite21 Posted December 31, 2018 Report Share Posted December 31, 2018 1 hour ago, yota691 said: Perfect.....thanks Yota and a Happy New Year to you! CL 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted December 31, 2018 Report Share Posted December 31, 2018 12 hours ago, Butifldrm said: #JamesComey #Russiagate #SteeleDossier British spy Steele blows apart entire Trump-Russia collusion hoax 44,087 views 1.9K42SHARE The Duran Published on Dec 20, 2018 SUBSCRIBE 52K The Duran Quick Take: Episode 43. The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss MI6 spy, Christopher Steele's, shocking testimony in a British court which details how Hillarious Clinton and the DNC had the entire fake dossier lined up as the ultimate insurance policy to discredit Donald Trump should he somehow win the US Presidential elections. Meanwhile James Comey continues to lie to Congress on his involvement in the slow walking coup targeting Trump, as Michael Flynn battles to exonerate himself from Mueller's witch hunt. ***/// Thanks, our BEAUTY ! This little rat weasel was exposed, sang like a bird & outed the klinton cartel and still, KILLary & her deviant henchmen run free. MULE-er has NO credibility. Everyone his evil witch hunt touched should be fully exonerated... except Trump's lawyer... the other little rat weasel who likes to illegally tape people & break the law to line his own coffers with fancy Taxi medallions. He needs a time out behind bars just for being a sleazy weasel, too. . 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted December 31, 2018 Report Share Posted December 31, 2018 ***/// Another "gee, i'm so confused" imogee ! Great, another one of our posts manages to confuse the co-opted brainless AGAIN ! Maybe you shouldn't go around clicking that thing on our posts until you EDUCATE yourself. . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted January 2, 2019 Report Share Posted January 2, 2019 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butifldrm Posted January 3, 2019 Report Share Posted January 3, 2019 "Secret" Evidence Vindicates Michael Flynn's "Treasonous" Dinner With Putin by Tyler Durden Thu, 01/03/2019 - 09:22 17 SHARES TwitterFacebookRedditEmailPrint Over the last month we have learned much more about the circumstances surrounding the departure of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn. Flynn pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI about a conversation with then-Russian ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak; one on December 29, 2016 in which Flynn urged the Russians to "refrain from escalating the situation in response to sanctions that the US had imposed against Russia," and another conversation in which Kislyak told Flynn that Russia had decided to moderate its response following the request. Nothing earth shattering, illegal, or collusive in the "witch hunt" sense - but Flynn was not forthcoming with the Justice Department, or Vice President Mike Pence. He was fired from his post and subsequently pleaded guilty in December 2017 to making false statements to the FBI. Flynn has been painted as a Russian stooge ever since - with critics pointing to his sitting next to Russian President Vladimir Putin at a Russia Today (RT) dinner as "Exhibit A" that he was clearly a Kremlin puppet. US Green Party candidate Jill Stein was also in attendance. Except the Obama administration knew everything about the dinner, and Flynn briefed US intelligence officials on the trip, according to The Hill's John Solomon - whose claims his sources told him the contents of a classified briefing to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) in May 2017, which Grassley begged to be released to the public. "It appears the public release of this information would not pose any ongoing risk to national security. Moreover, the declassification would be in the public interest, and is in the interest of fairness to Lt. Gen. Flynn," wrote Grassley in an August 25, 2017 letter to James Mattis and DIA Director Gen. Vincent Stewart. Via The Hill: Were the information Grassley requested made public, America would have learned this, according to my sources: Before Flynn made his infamous December 2015 trip to Moscow — as a retired general and then-adviser to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign — he alerted his former employer, the DIA. He then attended a “defensive” or “protective” briefing before he ever sat alongside Vladimir Putin at the Russia Today (RT) dinner, or before he talked with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The briefing educated and sensitized Flynn to possible efforts by his Russian host to compromise the former high-ranking defense official and prepared him for conversations in which he could potentially extract intelligence for U.S. agencies such as the DIA. When Flynn returned from Moscow, he spent time briefing intelligence officials on what he learned during the Moscow contacts. Between two and nine intelligence officials attended the various meetings with Flynn about the RT event, and the information was moderately useful, about what one would expect from a public event, according to my sources. In other words - when Obama's former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates publicly claimed Flynn had possibly been "compromised" by Moscow, the American public was denied the context surrounding the controversial RT dinner as the Justice Department remained silent. Solomon notes that "Rather than a diplomatic embarrassment bordering on treason, Flynn’s conduct at the RT event provided some modest benefit to the U.S. intelligence community, something that many former military and intelligence officers continue to offer their country after retirement when they keep security clearances." Would the central character in a Russian election hijack plot actually self-disclose his trip in advance? And then sit through a briefing on how to avoid being compromised by his foreign hosts? And then come back to America and be debriefed by U.S intelligence officers about who and what he saw? And would a prosecutor recommend little or no prison time for a former general if that former military leader truly had compromised national security? Highly unlikely. -The Hill Of course, "there's no sugar-coating the mistakes Flynn did make," writes Solomon - noting that he misled the FBI and Pence - and that Flynn didn't file foreign-lobbying paperwork for money he received from Turkish business (of course, neither did "Steele Dossier" author Christopher Steele, who influenced the 2016 US election with his largely unverified anti-Trump opposition research). That said - the narrative that Flynn was a Russian stooge "as evidenced" by the RT dinner is now dead. Moreover, Flynn was never charged with anything remotely related to the event, and he came back to the United States and reported intelligence which would ultimately benefit his country. As Solomon puts it, "the first accounts of the Russia-Flynn story — like many others in the still-unproven collusion narrative — should be amended to reflect that the retired general acted like a patriot, not a traitor, when he visited Moscow for the RT event." https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-03/secret-evidence-vindicates-michael-flynns-treasonous-dinner-putin 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butifldrm Posted January 16, 2019 Report Share Posted January 16, 2019 Federal Judge Orders Rhodes, Rice, & Other Obama Officials To Respond Over Clinton Benghazi/Email Scandal by Tyler Durden Wed, 01/16/2019 - 09:00 342 SHARES TwitterFacebookRedditEmailPrint In what Judicial Watch describes as a "major victory for accountability," a federal judge ruled Tuesday that former national security adviser Susan Rice and former deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes must answer written questions about the State Department's response to the deadly 2012 terror attack in Benghazi, Libya, as part of an ongoing legal battle over whether Hillarious Clinton sought to deliberately evade public record laws by using a private email server while secretary of state. As Fox News' Samuel Chamberlain reports, the judge's order amounts to approval of a discovery plan he ordered last month. In that ruling, Lamberth wrote that Clinton's use of a private email account was "one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency"and said the response of the State and Justice Departments "smacks of outrageous misconduct." Judicial Watch announced last night that United States District Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled that discovery can begin in Hillarious Clinton’s email scandal. Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers, and Clinton aides will now be deposed under oath. Senior officials - including Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, Jacob Sullivan, and FBI official E.W. Priestap - will now have to answer Judicial Watch’s written questions under oath. The court rejected the DOJ and State Department’s objections to Judicial Watch’s court-ordered discovery plan. (The court, in ordering a discovery plan last month, ruledthat the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”) Judicial Watch’s discovery will seek answers to: Whether Clinton intentionally attempted to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by using a non-government email system; whether the State Department’s efforts to settle this case beginning in late 2014 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request. Discovery is scheduled to be completed within 120 days. The court will hold a post-discovery hearing to determine if Judicial Watch may also depose additional witnesses, including Clinton and her former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills. Judge Lamberth ordered written responses under oath to Judicial Watch’s questions from Obama administration senior officials Rice, Rhodes and Sullivan, and former FBI official Priestap. Rice and Rhodes will answer interrogatories under oath on the Benghazi scandal. Rejecting the State and Justice Department objections to discovery on the infamous Benghazi talking points, Judge Lamberth reiterated: Yet Rice’s talking points and State’s understanding of the attack play an unavoidably central role in this case: information about the points’ development and content, as well as their discussion and dissemination before and after Rice’s appearances could reveal unsearched, relevant records; State’s role in the points’ content and development could shed light on Clinton’s motives for shielding her emails from FOIA requesters or on State’s reluctance to search her emails. Judicial Watch also may serve interrogatories on Monica Hanley, a former staff member in the State Department’s Office of the Secretary, and on Lauren Jiloty, Clinton’s former special assistant. According to Lamberth’s order, regarding whether Clinton’s private email use while Secretary of State was an intentional attempt to evade FOIA, Judicial Watch may depose: Eric Boswell, the former Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security.… Boswell’s March 2009 memo to Mills … discusses security risks Clinton’s Blackberry use posed more generally. And Boswell personally discussed the memo with Clinton. So, he plainly has relevant information about that conversation and about his general knowledge of Clinton’s email use. Judicial Watch may depose Boswell. Justin Cooper. the Clinton Foundation employee who created the clintonemail.com server. In its proposal, Judicial Watch noted Cooper’s prior congressional testimony “appears to contradict portions of the testimony provided by Huma Abedin in the case before Judge Sullivan.” … Cooper repeatedly told Congress that Abedin helped set-up the Clintons’ private server, e.g., Examining Preservation of State Department Federal Records: [before a Congressional hearing] Abedin testified under oath she did not know about the server until six years later.… Judicial Watch may depose Cooper. Clarence Finney, the former deputy director of State’s Executive Secretariat staff…. [T]his case’s questions hinge on what specific State employees knew and when they knew it. As the principal advisor and records management expert responsible for controlling Clinton’s official correspondence and records, Finney’s knowledge is particularly relevant. And especially given the concerns about government misconduct that prompted this discovery, Judicial Watch’s ability to take his direct testimony and ask follow-up questions is critical. Additionally, Judicial Watch states that it seeks to go beyond cursory, second-hand testimony and directly ask Finney what he knew about Clinton’s email use. This includes asking about emails suggesting he knew about her private email use in 2014, and emails he received concerning a December 2012 FOIA request from Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington (CREW) regarding senior officials’ personal email use-topics State’s 30(b)(6) deposition in Judge Sullivan’s case never addressed. Judicial Watch may depose Finney. 4. Heather Samuelson. the former State Department senior advisor who helped facilitate State’s receipt of Hillarious Clinton’s emails.… [T]his case turns on what specific government employees knew and when they knew it. Judicial Watch must be able to take their direct testimony and ask them follow-up questions. Judicial Watch may depose Samuelson. 5. Jacob Sullivan. Secretary Clinton’s former senior advisor and deputy Chief of Staff. The government does not oppose Sullivan’s deposition. Regarding whether the State Department’s settlement attempts that began in late 2014 amounted to “bad faith,” Judicial Watch was granted depositions from the State Department under Rule 30(b)(6); Finney; John Hackett, the former deputy director of State’s Office of Information Programs & Services; Gene Smilansky, an attorney-advisor within State’s Office of the Legal Advisor; Samuelson; and others. Judicial Watch was also granted interrogatories on whether the State Department adequately searched for responsive records, as well as several document requests. “In a major victory for accountability, Judge Lamberth today authorized Judicial Watch to take discovery on whether the Clinton email system evaded FOIA and whether the Benghazi scandal was one reason for keeping Mrs. Clinton’s email secret,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Today, Judicial Watch issued document requests and other discovery to the State Department about the Clinton email scandal. Next up, we will begin questioning key witnesses under oath.” The court-ordered discovery is the latest development in Judicial Watch’s July 2014 FOIA lawsuit filed after the U.S. Department of State failed to respond to a May 13, 2014 FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Judicial Watch seeks: Copies of any updates and/or talking points given to Ambassador Rice by the White House or any federal agency concerning, regarding, or related to the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Any and all records or communications concerning, regarding, or relating to talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack given to Ambassador Rice by the White House or any federal agency. The Judicial Watch discovery plan was in response to a December 6, 2018, ruling by Judge Lamberth. Incredibly, Justice Department attorneys admit in a filing opposing Judicial Watch’s limited discovery that “Counsel for State contacted the counsel of some third parties that Plaintiff originally included in its draft discovery proposal to obtain their client’s position on being deposed.” This collusion occurred despite criticism from the Court that the DOJ engaged in “chicanery” to cover up misconduct and that career employees in the State and Justice Departments may have “colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this Court.” Judicial Watch countered that “[t]he government’s proposal, which is really nothing more than an opposition to [Judicial Watch’s] plan, demonstrates that it continues to reject any impropriety on its part and that it seeks to block any meaningful inquiry into its ‘outrageous misconduct.’” As a reminder, this Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-16/federal-judge-orders-rhodes-rice-other-obama-officials-respond-over-clinton 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted January 16, 2019 Report Share Posted January 16, 2019 I found irrefutable proof that Trump colluded with Russian Agents. Just for you @Shabibilicious 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabibilicious Posted January 16, 2019 Report Share Posted January 16, 2019 58 minutes ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said: I found irrefutable proof that Trump colluded with Russian Agents. Just for you @Shabibilicious Admission is good thing, perhaps there's hope for you yet. Looks to me like Hils is in total control of both those puppets....wash your hands Hils. GO RV, then BV 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cranman Posted January 16, 2019 Report Share Posted January 16, 2019 Ha! Gross! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karsten Posted January 16, 2019 Report Share Posted January 16, 2019 Karsten 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butifldrm Posted February 17, 2019 Report Share Posted February 17, 2019 Citizens Charge James Comey with 28 Counts of Treason (1-8) 8,710 views 8657SHARE American Intelligence Media Published on Feb 17, 2019 SUBSCRIBED 92K On February 18, 2018, we posted an article “We the People make Official Charges of 28 Counts of Treason,” https://aim4truth.org/2018/02/18/we-t.... 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.