Neapolitan Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Link to new CNTV broadcast dated September 8th regarding the RV: http://english.cntv.cn/program/bizasia/20110908/104798.shtml :) 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leggman24 Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Link to new CNTV broadcast dated September 8th regarding the RV: http://english.cntv.cn/program/bizasia/20110908/104798.shtml :) Its kinda funny that one reporter calls it a revalue, while another calls it a redomination. Sounds like even they dont have a clue how its going to happen. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildinar Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 i just wish they would do something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bamagirl Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Its kinda funny that one reporter calls it a revalue, while another calls it a redomination. Sounds like even they dont have a clue how its going to happen. EXACTLY, they don't know.....but at least they are talking about it. Iraq is not gonna let it get out that they are gonna straight up revalue. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterset Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Educating the people of Iraq was one of the things we were to watch for before the revalue and it seems like they are all aware of whats going to happen. This is great news! Thanks for the post. GO RV!!!!!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlintNPebbles Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Sounds promising to me. At least there is talk about it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inheritance Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kennyc Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 This is A GREAT POST.They are saying w/ their own mouth this IS COMING. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoopdog Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 NO LOP NO LOP NO LOP"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'WHY DOES EVERY LINK AND EVERY VIDEO APPEAR TO MEAN LOP?????? SERIOUS QUESTION SO PLS GIVE SERIOUS ANSWERS. Because they are going to remove the three 0's, that's no secret and that's what an RD (LOP) is. I am believing that they will RD(remove the three 0's) and then RV, so some will make a small profit. If it happens differently to where it benefits us all in a greater manner, than I will be pleasantly surprised. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carrello Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 This is A GREAT POST.They are saying w/ their own mouth this IS COMING. Yes, but let's hope it is a cruise liner, rather than a freight train. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIZIOIRAQI Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 I posted this Last Night 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chances Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Its kinda funny that one reporter calls it a revalue, while another calls it a redomination. Sounds like even they dont have a clue how its going to happen. I think because it is kinda of both. RD 25000 x $.0009 = $22.5 (current rate rounded) 25 x $.9 = $22.5 (removal of zero's "lop") Then RV if it goes 1-1 then 25 x $1 = $25 You don't lose anything. You just don't gain the anticipated... Example: if they RV first then it could look like this... 25,000 x $.9 = $22,500 25,000 x $1 = $25,000 There's a huge difference between $2.50 gain and $22,500 gain.. hope this makes sense.. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKLAHOMA Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Chances- this is the best way to explain it that ive seen, ive tried to explain this to people and it still wasnt coming out clear. but the first scenerio seems quite real the way there releasing there articles to the public. hope not though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinarBam Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Because they are going to remove the three 0's, that's no secret and that's what an RD (LOP) is. I am believing that they will RD(remove the three 0's) and then RV, so some will make a small profit. If it happens differently to where it benefits us all in a greater manner, than I will be pleasantly surprised. Hoopdog, I don't know why somwone feels the need to neg you for speaking openly about a real possibility. I evened you out. You may very well be correct even though all of us don't wish for that outcome. Until something actually happens, all we can do is wait and see. Maybe we'll get lucky and it will go well for us. Your guess is as good as anyone elses. Peace. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unirod Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 I think because it is kinda of both. RD 25000 x $.0009 = $22.5 (current rate rounded) 25 x $.9 = $22.5 (removal of zero's "lop") Then RV if it goes 1-1 then 25 x $1 = $25 You don't lose anything. You just don't gain the anticipated... Example: if they RV first then it could look like this... 25,000 x $.9 = $22,500 25,000 x $1 = $25,000 There's a huge difference between $2.50 gain and $22,500 gain.. hope this makes sense.. Chances, Your qoute is well explained.But of what value would your explaination be, to the value of the Dinar being held by both the US Treasury and the Fed? they are holding Tillions of Dinar. Your math does not help their bottom line at all. They hold Dinar because it is worth serious $$$ . Your explaination only returns their original investment 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKLAHOMA Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 I believe people are still trying to find a link that the ust has dinar, no one has proven that yet. i personally have my doubts since all this time theres no proof. but maybe someone can provide a link or some doc that it is true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chances Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Chances, Your qoute is well explained.But of what value would your explaination be, to the value of the Dinar being held by both the US Treasury and the Fed? they are holding Tillions of Dinar. Your math does not help their bottom line at all. They hold Dinar because it is worth serious $$ . Your explaination only returns their original investment I heard somewhere along the line, no link to support it.. ??Maybe someone else will have one??.. That the US is talking or has talked about a $30 per barrel 10 year Oil contract with Iraq. Don't know this to be true or not true. But it would explain why this investment would not matter as much.. However Trillions of dollars x 2.50 is still alot of money regardless if the Oil Contract is true or not. I don't like it regardless, I got in this investment hoping for the 25000 x .9 scenario... I personally would be sadden to see the RD/RV scenario that seems to be the information we are receiving.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chances Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 I heard somewhere along the line, no link to support it.. ??Maybe someone else will have one??.. That the US is talking or has talked about a $30 per barrel 10 year Oil contract with Iraq. Don't know this to be true or not true. But it would explain why this investment would not matter as much.. However Trillions of dollars x 2.50 is still alot of money regardless if the Oil Contract is true or not. I don't like it regardless, I got in this investment hoping for the 25000 x .9 scenario... I personally would be sadden to see the RD/RV scenario that seems to be the information we are receiving.. To clarify what I mean... To keep it simple let's say it's 1 Trillion the US has.. 1 Trillion - 3 zero's = 1 Million 1 Million x .9 = 900,000 Now further.... 900,000 x however many trillion dinar i think I saw 72 trillion at one time so lets use that number 72 Trillion becomes 72 Million 900,000 x 72 = 64,800,000 pretty sure the US would make out regardless.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realdinar Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 To clarify what I mean... To keep it simple let's say it's 1 Trillion the US has.. 1 Trillion - 3 zero's = 1 Million 1 Million x .9 = 900,000 Now further.... 900,000 x however many trillion dinar i think I saw 72 trillion at one time so lets use that number 72 Trillion becomes 72 Million 900,000 x 72 = 64,800,000 pretty sure the US would make out regardless.. They could pave some roads in topeka kansas. I guess every little bit helps! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhosCrazy Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 To clarify what I mean... To keep it simple let's say it's 1 Trillion the US has.. 1 Trillion - 3 zero's = 1 Million 1 Million x .9 = 900,000 Now further.... 900,000 x however many trillion dinar i think I saw 72 trillion at one time so lets use that number 72 Trillion becomes 72 Million 900,000 x 72 = 64,800,000 pretty sure the US would make out regardless.. If this is true what would happen to someone with a 50 dinar note? Are you saying that a 25k note would be worth less then a 50 dinar note at that point??? At this point I dont care anymore, I just want it to be over but it would suck after all these years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chances Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 (edited) If this is true what would happen to someone with a 50 dinar note? Are you saying that a 25k note would be worth less then a 50 dinar note at that point??? At this point I dont care anymore, I just want it to be over but it would suck after all these years. Okay I think I miss understood what you asked. So to clarify.. are you asking if a now 25k note would be worth less than a new RD 50 note after a possible RD? If that is the question then yes. a 25000 would become a 25 a new 50 would be 50 25 x .9 = 22.5 50 x .9 = 45 If this is what you are asking??? Edited September 9, 2011 by Chances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridewithme38 Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 (edited) If this is true what would happen to someone with a 50 dinar note? Are you saying that a 25k note would be worth less then a 50 dinar note at that point??? At this point I dont care anymore, I just want it to be over but it would suck after all these years. No a 25000 note would go to 25 diner a 50 diner note would also lose three zeros and would be about 50 fil Edited September 9, 2011 by Ridewithme38 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chances Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 To clarify what I mean... To keep it simple let's say it's 1 Trillion the US has.. 1 Trillion - 3 zero's = 1 Million 1 Million x .9 = 900,000 Now further.... 900,000 x however many trillion dinar i think I saw 72 trillion at one time so lets use that number 72 Trillion becomes 72 Million 900,000 x 72 = 64,800,000 pretty sure the US would make out regardless.. They could pave some roads in topeka kansas. I guess every little bit helps! The point I was making is they will get a return on there money regardless. If they own 72 Trillion Dinar and have since 2004-2005 the exchange rate back then was .00027 72,000,000,000 x .00027 = 19,440,000 $64,800,000 -$19,440,000 ------------------- $45,360,000 Just saying that's a pretty good return on their money.. 45 million isn't chump change.. No a 25000 note would go to 25 diner a 50 diner note would also lose three zeros and would be about 50 fil That's what my original reply said, but I wasn't sure if they meant a now 50 dinar (which I thought were non existent) or after RD 50... I see why people get so confused in this forum.. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thatoneguy Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Seems like if you were a good journalist and researched thoroughly, you would know that 250 isn't the lowest denom as stated, and maybe even go out on a limb and show a transaction between a merchant and customer.... With lots of dinar being exchanged to pound home your "hyperinflation" theory. I'm sticking to my original idea that got me into this investment, and have a very good feeling I/we won't be disappointed. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua Dude Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 The point I was making is they will get a return on there money regardless. If they own 72 Trillion Dinar and have since 2004-2005 the exchange rate back then was .00027 72,000,000,000 x .00027 = 19,440,000 $64,800,000 -$19,440,000 ------------------- $45,360,000 Just saying that's a pretty good return on their money.. 45 million isn't chump change.. That's what my original reply said, but I wasn't sure if they meant a now 50 dinar (which I thought were non existent) or after RD 50... I see why people get so confused in this forum.. lol 45 million doesn't even buy an air craft carrier for a country it is chump change 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts