512,000 VOTES SWITCHED - 2,865,000 VOTES DELETED

[KristiD]

The Chart Lists Votes Switched from Trump to Biden and Votes That Were Lost by Trump

	Switched Votes	Lost Votes
Dominion Systems
Pennsylvania	220,883	941,248
New Jersey	80,242	20
Florida	21,422	456
Michigan	20,213	21,882
New York	18,124	623,213
Georgia	17,407	33,574
Ohio	14,965	5,102
Virginia	12,163	789,023
California	7,701	10,989
Arizona	4,492	0
Minnesota	2,766	195,650
Tennessee	2,330	0
Louisiana	2,322	0
Illinois	2,166	54,730
Wisconsin	2,078	3,408
Colorado	1,809	0
Utah	1,627	0
New Hampshire	973	116
Iowa	938	477
New Mexico	268	4,610
Missouri	0	20,730
Nevada	0	0
Alaska	0	0
Washington	0	0
Hawaii	0	0
	434,889	2,705,228
Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, Owned by Dominion
Texas	14,954	30,557
Kansas	1,674	2,154
	16,628	32,711
Election Systems & Software
Nebraska	30,086	50
Kentucky	8,129	23,849
Arkansas	3,664	20,748
South Carolina	2,779	2,119
Montana	2,330	1,276
South Dakota	1,347	1
North Dakota	234	681
Maryland	203	0
North Carolina	0	15
District of Columbia	0	0
	48,772	48,739
Unknown Systems
Connecticut	3,834	272
Massachusetts	3,613	51
Oregon	2,557	0
Alabama	1,170	408
Mississippi	355	0
Maine	271	35
Rhode Island	6	13
West Virginia	0	78,300
Idaho	0	0
Oklahoma	0	0
Indiana	0	0
Delaware	0	0
Vermont	0	0
	11,806	79,079
OVERALL TOTALS	512,095	2,865,757

Based on this initial analysis over 500,000 votes were identified that were switched from President Trump to Joe Biden. 

LINK

[Markinsa]

Got this from the below website:

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/

 

 

EVERY THING YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ IS VERIFIED AND WAS MADE BY THIS PEDE; HE DID ALL THE HEAVY WORK

🏆 https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/ 🏆

BTW IF YOU CAN HELP DOWNLOAD EVERYTHING AND KEEP A LOCAL COPY.. IN THE CODE WHERE YOU CAN GET INFO FOR ALL THE STATES, DOWNLOAD FOR ALL THE STATES.

REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR.

PEDES GET IN HERE. I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json] and I found this damning evidence [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all.

EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far.

EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know.

Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.

Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.

There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes.

Dominion Voting Systems :

Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248

New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20

Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456

Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882

New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213

Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574

Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102

Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023

California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989

Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0

Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650

Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0

Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0

Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730

Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408

Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0

Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0

New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116

Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477

New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610

Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730

Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.

Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557

Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154

Election Systems & Software :

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849

Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748

South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119

Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276

South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1

North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681

Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0

North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15

District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Unknown Systems:

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272

Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51

Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0

Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408

Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0

Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35

Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13

West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300

Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0

Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.

VERIFIED!!!!:

I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ]

And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ]

You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere.

SOURCES: Here is the data I used:

EDISON DATA: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p

The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well.

I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json ] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead.

Take this picture for example. [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]

It's like this:

Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888

Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32

Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost.

I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes.

Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh

[pede444wow] I took the json files that are included here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel:

python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N

result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK

3336 comments share save hide report block hide child comments

[Theseus]

 

[coorslite21]

5 hours ago, KristiD said:

The Chart Lists Votes Switched from Trump to Biden and Votes That Were Lost by Trump

	Switched Votes	Lost Votes
Dominion Systems
Pennsylvania	220,883	941,248
New Jersey	80,242	20
Florida	21,422	456
Michigan	20,213	21,882
New York	18,124	623,213
Georgia	17,407	33,574
Ohio	14,965	5,102
Virginia	12,163	789,023
California	7,701	10,989
Arizona	4,492	0
Minnesota	2,766	195,650
Tennessee	2,330	0
Louisiana	2,322	0
Illinois	2,166	54,730
Wisconsin	2,078	3,408
Colorado	1,809	0
Utah	1,627	0
New Hampshire	973	116
Iowa	938	477
New Mexico	268	4,610
Missouri	0	20,730
Nevada	0	0
Alaska	0	0
Washington	0	0
Hawaii	0	0
	434,889	2,705,228
Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, Owned by Dominion
Texas	14,954	30,557
Kansas	1,674	2,154
	16,628	32,711
Election Systems & Software
Nebraska	30,086	50
Kentucky	8,129	23,849
Arkansas	3,664	20,748
South Carolina	2,779	2,119
Montana	2,330	1,276
South Dakota	1,347	1
North Dakota	234	681
Maryland	203	0
North Carolina	0	15
District of Columbia	0	0
	48,772	48,739
Unknown Systems
Connecticut	3,834	272
Massachusetts	3,613	51
Oregon	2,557	0
Alabama	1,170	408
Mississippi	355	0
Maine	271	35
Rhode Island	6	13
West Virginia	0	78,300
Idaho	0	0
Oklahoma	0	0
Indiana	0	0
Delaware	0	0
Vermont	0	0
	11,806	79,079
OVERALL TOTALS	512,095	2,865,757

Based on this initial analysis over 500,000 votes were identified that were switched from President Trump to Joe Biden. 

LINK

Always Excellent.....thanks Kristi!

CL

[Markinsa]

 

[Synopsis]

MIT Scientists: Data Analysis Of Election Fraud In MI Shows 69,000 Votes Were TRANSFERRED From Trump To Biden!

by Michael Suede • November 10, 2020

 

 

Odysee backup link      BitChute backup link

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, who is a MIT trained data scientist and Fulbright Scholar, along with Bennie Smith a Democrat, who is a software engineer, data analyst and an election commissioner and Phil Evans, who is also a trained engineer and data analyst, discuss some very troubling findings after reviewing the election data coming out of Michigan. Dr. Ayyadurai is a US Senate candidate in Massachusetts, which is a contributing factor as to why he began looking into the integrity of our voting systems.

Dr. Ayyadurai’s discovered through a series of FOIA requests related to his own election that ballot counting machines don’t directly count ballots.  Instead, they take an image of the ballot that is submitted to them, and then they tabulate the votes based on the ballot images collected.

Federal election statues dictate that all election records must be held for 22 months.  However, Dr. Ayyadurai discovered that many states do not retain the ballot images produced by the machines.  The default settings of the machines automatically store the ballot images, so this means election officials are manually disabling the image storage feature.

Because ballot images are not being retained in states like MA and MI, the election results cannot be meaningfully audited, leaving ambiguity as to the actual election outcome.  The only way to audit the results of an election without ballot images would be to manually count the ballots, which is very difficult to do.

Dr. Ayyadurai learned that in 2001, a weighted race feature was added to Global Election Systems (GEMS 1.18.1) voting systems.  This feature allows elections to be skewed to one candidate or another based on the settings of the software.  This is not a hack, but a built-in FEATURE of the software.  Why this feature exists in US ballot tabulation machines has never been explained.

Not only does the software allow for the weighting of election outcomes, but the way votes are stored and counted is also problematic.  The systems store the votes as fractional decimals instead of whole numbers.  This means the machines can be set to tabulate half a vote, which makes no sense at all, yet that’s how they were designed.

After voting “glitches” were reported in Michigan, Dr. Ayyadurai’s team decided to analyze the top four counties in MI for irregularities. They looked at data from Oakland, Macomb, Kent and Wayne counties.  What they found was absolutely shocking. Data analytics show, at a minimum, 69,000 votes were TRANSFERRED from Trump to Biden in these four counties, in a pattern that is consistent with algorithmic weighting of a race.

In Michigan, there are two different kinds of ballots a person can chose to vote on.  A person can chose to vote a straight party ticket or they can chose to vote for each individual candidate separately.  They cannot do both.  This means straight party ballots and individual selection ballots are tabulated in separate piles which produces two sets of data.

The fact that party ballots and individual ballots are separate in MI allowed the data scientists to compare the differences between how often people in a given precinct voted for Trump vs how often people voted for a straight Republican ticket.

For example, in this image, the bottom X axis percentage indicates how often people in a given precinct voted a straight Republican ticket.  The Y axis indicates how often people voted specifically for Trump on an individual ballot minus the percentage who voted a straight Republican ticket.

So if a given precinct had 50% of people vote a straight Republican ticket and 50% of them vote for Trump on an individual ballot, we would see a dot at 50% on X axis and at 0% Y axis.  Intuitively, we would expect most dots to fall along the 0% Y axis line.

In other words, if a given precinct tends to vote 60% straight Republican tickets, we would most likely expect to see about 60% of people in that precinct who vote on the individual ballots to chose Trump as well.

Instead, what the data shows is a clear linear relationship that starts at about the 20% X axis mark, where the more Republican a precinct is, based on straight party tickets, the less likely people who vote on individual ballots in that precinct are to vote for Trump.

Not only is this relationship inverted from what we would expect to see, the manner in which it displays itself is what really gives the fraud away.  Notice the linearity of the slope.  This linearity can only be the product of an algorithm. The perfection of the slope and distribution is what gives the game away.

This same slope is observed in three of the counties that were analysed.  It shows up in early voting data as well as election day data.  The pattern is consistent spatially as well as temporally.  There is absolutely no way this is the product of anything other than an algorithm.

Consider what this data is telling us.  This data is telling us that the more likely a precinct is to be Republican, the more likely it is the Republicans in that district voted for Biden over Trump, and they did so at a mathematically perfect rate.

This is an impossibility. People are sent to jail in fraud cases with far less evidence than this.

If this was a legitimate election, we would expect to see a scatter distribution along the 0% Y axis where the red arrow is, with perhaps either a positive or negative bias along axis depending on how much people liked or hated Trump.

Here’s what Wayne county’s results look like where no algorithm was detected.  Wayne county is strongly Democratic, so its likely they didn’t bother rigging the votes here.  There could still be cheating going on here, but this what we would expect all the graphs to look like. We can see voters here liked Trump a lot more than the Republican party.

When Dr. Ayyadurai began complaining on Twitter about the lack of transparency and the fact that ballot images were being deleted, he was attacked by an organization called The National Association of State Election Directors.  This organization is funded by corporate interests with ties to the Rockefellers and other international business conglomerates.   The NASED actually contacted Twitter and tried to get him banned.  Keep in mind he’s a Senate candidate. This organization has been working with the election software companies involved in this fraud.

This software is in use far beyond the four counties that were analysed by Dr. Ayyadurai’s team.  It explains how Joe Biden, a man who couldn’t get more than a handful of people to turn up at one of his “rallies” managed to get more votes than Donald Trump, a man who routinely held rallies that drew over 50,000 screaming fans who were collectively chanting “WE LOVE YOU!”

Biden did not win this election, and now there is ZERO doubt about that fact.

[Synopsis]

Link to above post:

 

https://www.libertariannews.org/2020/11/10/dr-shiva-ayyadurai-mit-systems-scientist-data-analysis-of-voting-fraud-in-mi-shows-69000-votes-were-transferred-from-trump-to-biden/

[Sage449]

Posted another thread too - did not post entire article:

Puerto Rico finds 126 briefcases of uncounted ballots a week after election

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/nov/10/puerto-rico-finds-126-briefcases-uncounted-ballots/

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico — Puerto Rico‘s elections commission said Tuesday that it has discovered more than 100 briefcases containing uncounted ballots a week after the U.S. territory held its general election, drawing criticism and scorn from voters who now question the validity of the outcomes of certain races.

Francisco Rosado, the commission’s new president, said the briefcases were found in a secured vault and blamed the situation on what he said was an underfunded and understaffed administrative board responsible for counting a record number of absentee and early votes.

9 Bogus Burglary Myths You Might Still Believe Simplisafe

 

“We’ve identified, much to our regret, a disorganization in the handling of material in the vaults,” he said at a press conference. “Misplaced. Poorly organized. We have to admit that.”

Rosado said he didn’t know yet how many total votes are in the 126 briefcases, noting some contained three ballots and others 500 ballots. Officials initially said there were 182 briefcases but later revised the number.

“Every vote will be counted,” he said. “I have to tell the people of Puerto Rico to trust the transparency of the process.”

The discovery is the latest misstep for a commission that botched the island’s primaries in August so badly that a second round of voting was held, an unprecedented situation that led to the commission’s previous president to resign a month later. Then the commission was criticized for taking a record four days after the Nov. 3 general election to finalize counting nearly all votes, only to announce on Tuesday that it had discovered more briefcases. Traditionally, the commission releases final vote counts the night of the election.

Roberto Iván Aponte, electoral commissioner for Puerto Rico‘s Independence Party, said in a phone interview that he expects all votes inside the newly discovered suitcases to be counted by Thursday at the latest. He said those votes could affect races like the one for mayor of Culebra, a popular tourist island just east of Puerto Rico. The mayor elect won only by two votes, according to preliminary results.

Aponte and other officials blame the ongoing problems on a new law that Gov. Wanda Vázquez approved in June just two months before the primary that led to several changes including the softening of restrictions for absentee and early voting and eliminating departments and high-ranking positions within the elections commission, which led to the departure of longtime officials. This year, Puerto Rico received more than 220,000 absentee and early votes, a record for officials who have been overwhelmed by the paperwork.

Aponte warned that the commission’s ongoing problems is sowing doubt among voters.

“After these elections, there has to be a serious evaluation of how those votes will be handled,” he said, referring to absentee and early votes.

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times

[coorslite21]

9 hours ago, Sage449 said:

Posted another thread too - did not post entire article:

Puerto Rico finds 126 briefcases of uncounted ballots a week after election

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/nov/10/puerto-rico-finds-126-briefcases-uncounted-ballots/

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico — Puerto Rico‘s elections commission said Tuesday that it has discovered more than 100 briefcases containing uncounted ballots a week after the U.S. territory held its general election, drawing criticism and scorn from voters who now question the validity of the outcomes of certain races.

Francisco Rosado, the commission’s new president, said the briefcases were found in a secured vault and blamed the situation on what he said was an underfunded and understaffed administrative board responsible for counting a record number of absentee and early votes.

9 Bogus Burglary Myths You Might Still Believe Simplisafe

 

“We’ve identified, much to our regret, a disorganization in the handling of material in the vaults,” he said at a press conference. “Misplaced. Poorly organized. We have to admit that.”

Rosado said he didn’t know yet how many total votes are in the 126 briefcases, noting some contained three ballots and others 500 ballots. Officials initially said there were 182 briefcases but later revised the number.

“Every vote will be counted,” he said. “I have to tell the people of Puerto Rico to trust the transparency of the process.”

The discovery is the latest misstep for a commission that botched the island’s primaries in August so badly that a second round of voting was held, an unprecedented situation that led to the commission’s previous president to resign a month later. Then the commission was criticized for taking a record four days after the Nov. 3 general election to finalize counting nearly all votes, only to announce on Tuesday that it had discovered more briefcases. Traditionally, the commission releases final vote counts the night of the election.

Roberto Iván Aponte, electoral commissioner for Puerto Rico‘s Independence Party, said in a phone interview that he expects all votes inside the newly discovered suitcases to be counted by Thursday at the latest. He said those votes could affect races like the one for mayor of Culebra, a popular tourist island just east of Puerto Rico. The mayor elect won only by two votes, according to preliminary results.

Aponte and other officials blame the ongoing problems on a new law that Gov. Wanda Vázquez approved in June just two months before the primary that led to several changes including the softening of restrictions for absentee and early voting and eliminating departments and high-ranking positions within the elections commission, which led to the departure of longtime officials. This year, Puerto Rico received more than 220,000 absentee and early votes, a record for officials who have been overwhelmed by the paperwork.

Aponte warned that the commission’s ongoing problems is sowing doubt among voters.

“After these elections, there has to be a serious evaluation of how those votes will be handled,” he said, referring to absentee and early votes.

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times

Starting to look like we like in a "fake" country.....

Time to take it back!

CL

[KristiD]

Trump just tweeted this.  These numbers say only 435,000 votes were switched from Trump to Biden instead of 512,000.  Also, they say only 2.7 million votes were deleted from Trump's count as opposed to 2.865 million above.  Even these lower figures are still unimagineably huge voter fraud activity and are way more than enough to give the win to Trump.  The fact that OANN reported this with different totals, tells me OANN verifiied this theory and then came up with their own figures.  Since Trump retweeted it, that means he thinks it's true because he doesn't retweet stuff unless it is.  Just hope and pray Trump is able to take down these crooks who lie so blatantly and shamefully, and then get the MSM to back the them up. 

 

Trump has a big rally this Saturday in DC calling for 1 million MAGA supporters, I betcha he gets them.  I know a  caravan left San Diego either yesterday or today, so I'm guessing that's happening all across the country.      

 

[Dinarrock]

Awesome post Kristi, still more to come!! Can’t wait to see the states that were called for corrupt Biden switched back to Trump!! 

[nstoolman1]

7 minutes ago, Dinarrock said:

Awesome post Kristi, still more to come!! Can’t wait to see the states that were called for corrupt Biden switched back to Trump!! 

 

 

You are assuming the Never Trumpers in charge are going to do the right thing.

[yota691]

5 hours ago, KristiD said:

Since Trump retweeted it, that means he thinks it's true

I have to agree, same goes on election night when Trump said We Already Won. Trump speaks facts, regardless what The Hate Everything America Party like's to 🤮 🤮 

[yota691]

2.7 Million Votes Potentially Lost; Dominion Voting Strong Ties to CCP and Dems| Beyond The Noise
290,698 views•Premiered 11 hours ago

 

[yota691]

Dominion Voting Machines have the ability to mark a Ballot
181,541 views•Nov 13, 2020

 

[Dinarrock]

2 hours ago, yota691 said:

2.7 Million Votes Potentially Lost; Dominion Voting Strong Ties to CCP and Dems| Beyond The Noise
290,698 views•Premiered 11 hours ago

 

Great video Yota again there is going to be so many high level Demorats attending Guantanamo Bay for an life long vacation!!

[yota691]

Dr. Shiva and three Whistleblowers step forward about Dominion, the voting software switching votes

55,690 views

 

 

Front Page
10.4K subscribers
Three "whistleblower" employees from the company that developed the voting software Dominion, have come forward. They said that Dominion could have changed 38 million votes.  These three whistleblowers said their voting software is widely used in many U.S. states and the software can switch or simply erase more than 38 million votes.

President Trump tweeted, “REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.”

Dr. Shiva from MIT: after doing scientific research, he has publicly challenged Biden with scientific data. He said, "Our analysis in Michigan indicates a computer algorithm was likely used to transfer 69,000 votes. We are willing to subject our results to a critical & transparent review with your representatives. Are you open?”

Nobody wants to report that Pennsylvania and Michigan didn’t allow our Poll Watchers and/or Vote Observers to Watch or Observe. This is responsible for hundreds of thousands of votes that should not be allowed to count.