Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content

Theseus

Members
  • Content Count

    1,987
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3,393 Excellent

About Theseus

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Recent Profile Visitors

6,098 profile views
  1. Investigators With ICE, FBI Reviewing Criminal Allegations Against Ilhan Omar, Report Says By Ryan Saavedra DailyWire.com Alex Wong/Getty Images Investigators with multiple federal agencies are reportedly reviewing evidence of alleged crimes committed by far-left Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) that center around her marital history. The Blaze reported that toward the end of last year, “the Department of Justice had assigned an FBI Special Agent in Charge, or SAC, to review Rep. Ilhan Omar’s apparent, astonishing spree of felonies from 2009 to 2017.” The Blaze noted that the “FBI SAC stated that the wide range of criminal activity suggested by the evidence against Rep. Omar may lead the FBI to expand the review to other federal departments” and that in recent weeks, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Education inspector general have reportedly joined the investigation. The Blaze’s report was authored by David Steinberg, who has extensively covered the criminal allegations against Omar for many months while at PJ Media. The Blaze reported that ICE’s involvement in the investigation pertains to “questions about [Rep. Omar’s 2009 marriage],” which allegedly includes “eight instances of perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, up to eight years of state and federal tax fraud, two years of federal student loan fraud, and even bigamy.” The Department of Education inspector general is reportedly looking into whether Omar’s 2009 marriage to a British citizen was “an attempt to facilitate federal student loan fraud, or other fraud involving higher education.” The Minnesota Star Tribune has reported the following timeline of Omar’s marital history: The Star Tribune’s report from last June stated that newly released “investigative documents released by a state agency have given fresh life to lingering questions about the marital history of Rep. Ilhan Omar and whether she once married a man — possibly her own brother — to skirt immigration laws.” Omar, who has repeatedly claimed that the allegations are baseless conspiracy theories, has refused to answer questions or turn over any documents to the Associated Press or the Star Tribune that could debunk what she claims is a conspiracy theory. Read more in: FBI , Ilhan Omar , Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
  2. Where was the demonrat outrage for this (notice the news source). Demonrats not too concerned about getting foreign money to get elected! Impeach! Johnny Chung says Chinese official gave him $300,000 for Clinton campaign Chung April 4, 1999 Web posted at: 9:43 p.m. EDT (0143 GMT) From CNN Senior White House Correspondent Wolf Blitzer WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, April 4) -- A controversial former Democratic Party fund-raiser has told federal investigators that China's chief of military intelligence funneled $300,000 through him to back President Bill Clinton's 1996 re-election campaign, CNN has confirmed. Johnny Chung has told investigators that Gen. Ji Shengde ordered the money transferred to Chung's bank account with the specific objective of helping Clinton's campaign, according to sources familiar with his testimony. The sources say only a portion of the money ever made it into Democratic Party coffers. Federal law prohibits financial contributions to political campaigns from sources outside of the United States. Word of direct involvement of a high-ranking Chinese official in Chung's fund-raising activities, first reported Sunday by The Los Angeles Times, comes on the eve of a visit to Washington this week by Chinese Prime Minister Zhu Rongji. A spokesman for the Chinese embassy denied the allegation, insisting his government was not involved in the American election. White House spokesman Jim Kennedy said that the administration has no knowledge about the source of Chung's donations to the Democratic Party. He declined to comment further, citing "allegations regarding intelligence matters." "The White House is appropriately briefed on national security matters," he added. Citing an "ongoing investigation," Secretary of State Madeleine Albright also refused to comment on the allegations during an appearance Sunday on NBC's "Meet The Press." Chung, a Taiwan-born American citizen, contributed some $400,000 to various Democratic campaigns and visited the Clinton White House about 50 times. Sources tell CNN that he was introduced to Ji by the daughter of another high-ranking Chinese military officer, Liu Chaoying. Last year, Chung pleaded guilty to election law violations and began cooperating with the Justice Department's investigation into alleged 1996 campaign fund-raising irregularities. In December, he was sentenced to probation and community service.
  3. Hey look over there...it's Roy and his horse ...Trigger!
  4. I saw you looking in Shabs and Umbertino's way when you said this.
  5. You need to do your research... the gulag comment is in response to current news. Maybe you need to get off of dinarvets once in awhile. And if we used your definition of a losing debate, then your demonrat debate has been the ultimate failure on here.
  6. Denying suponeas is not executive privilege. He was trying to get the demonrats to go to court to enforce the suponeas. People who do not have blinders on can see that this was not executive privilege. Demonrats need brain transplants. Maybe it is them that need the gulags for re-training of de-wussification.
  7. Well let's see who the demonrat candidate hopefuls are. Left the trail: Kamala Harris a black woman... gone. Cory Booker a black man.... gone. Bennett an old white man... gone John Delaney old white man... gone Amy Klobuchar old white woman.... gone Deval Patrick old black man... gone Andrew Yang asian man.... gone Steve Bullock old white man....gone Julian Castro latino man... gone Kirsten Gillibrand old white woman.... gone Mike Gravel old white man... gone Hickenlooper old white man....gone Beto O'rourke (latino name appropiater) white male .... gone Still on the trail: Bernie Sanders an old white man... still here. Elizabeth Warren a white old woman... still here Joe Biden an old white man ... still here Bloomberg an old white man.... still here Pete Buttigeig white man, married man of same gender, ... still here Tom Steyer old white man.... still here Tulsi Gabbard Hindu... questionable Looks like those who remain are old white people. Demonrats have chosen their candidates. Oh, the hypocrisy!
  8. 100% Wrong. Schifty Schiff was the only one who decided who the witnesses were and were not. This has caused problems for the faux House impeachment. Now the Demonrats want to call more witnesses in the Senate trial thus asking for a mulligan. Executive Privilege was not used in the House Impeachment star chamber trials.
  9. I'll reiterate this because it shows that you don't get it. You won't get it. Especially when you concluded that the answer is to kill them all. You will never get it. Why? Because of your mindset towards Iran and Islam. So the West has created all of those things. What has Iran discovered in space or invented in the last 1500 years that it did not steal and claim for their own? Like I said nothing has changed in the last 1500 years in Islam and it will not change until Islam changes. That might take another 1500 years. Hey I got an idea why don't we all sing Kumbaya and hope we don't get beheaded. Even Jesus said to his disciples on the eve of his imprisonment for them to sell their capes and buy a sword. And most don't even know that verse exists in the Bible. And most don't understand the verse because they don't believe the verse exists and argue , when shown the verse, that Jesus spoke as a parable in this instant. When you know the meaning of the verse, then you will know what Jesus justified and what he didn't when it came to fighting.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.