k98nights Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Al-Maliki: what happened in Mosul was because Arab spring Editor Kris. Thursday 15 January 2015 17: 18 Alsumaria news/Baghdad Vice President Nouri al-Maliki, on Thursday, the fall of the city of Mosul early last month but the "daash" was because "the wind black titled" Arab spring. Al-Maliki said in a statement issued today, during his visit to Basra University, and received "alsumaria news" copy that "Iraq today is rise from rubble after the devastation because of the policies of the Baath regime toppled", stating that "Iraq has returned to its regional and international, and we held a Summit in Arabic and became effective on Iraq the Arab and international level". Al-Maliki said that "Iraq is still at the heart of the formula, and is targeted by systems that do not believe in freedom and democracy," adding that "what happened in Mosul and was caused by the wind black region and titled the Arab spring and left behind events in Syria." "The other is pleased to see a strong and healthy Iraq, so the conspiracy got after we have passed the stage of resurrection of the deceased, and succeeded in restoring security and stability and we embarked on the process of reconstruction". Maliki stressed that, in (11 June 2014), army troops and police stationed in the province of Nineveh is stronger than the elements Organizer daash ", arguing that what happened in the" plot ", one day after they hit but management. On subsequent occasions, some lawmakers accused the State of law coalition led by Al-Maliki, Kurdish President Massoud Barzani in "conspiracy," Barzani's Office in said (20 December 2014), the latter warned Al-Maliki when he was Prime Minister organized the "risks and threats, daash" movements in Western Nineveh province and Mosul, Al-Maliki responsible for the fall. MP revealed the State of law Coalition to Subhi Al-Maliki, in (21 December 2014), the leader of his coalition has the documentation sent to leaders of the KDP Peshmerga books instructing them to not interfere in the battle of Mosul, the command said this was behind the fall of Mosul but gangs "daash". The House voted on (8 January 2015), a special investigative Committee on the causes of the fall of the city of Mosul is composed of 26 members from the various parliamentary blocs headed by the leader of the sadrist MP, Governor of Iraq who said after his election as Chairman of the Committee that its members agreed not to make statements to the media until the investigation is complete. Select speaker Salim Al-jubouri, in (12 January 2014), a period of two months to submit its report, and invited them to be professional and work as a cohesive team. http://www.alsumaria.tv/news/121958/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D9%8A-%D9%85%D8%A7-%D8%AD%D8%B5%D9%84-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B5%D9%84-%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%B3%D8%A8%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B9/ar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new york kevin Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Liar, liar, pants on fire. That may have been the vail, the justification, the propaganda for it's occurring that you Mr Maliki used to allow it to happen, but that's all. If what you said were true then why did you fail to supply and re-supply the Peshmerga who are fellow Iraqis in their fight against ISIS. Is it because they were fighting your political and spiritual opponents? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kennyc Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Mr Maliki, your cover-up will not work. Eventually you will go down! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Maliki after 7 months of the fall of Mosul: black wind was behind what happened THURSDAY, 15 JANUARY 2 / JANUARY 2015 18:19 XYZ Twilight News / Deputy President Nouri al-Maliki, on Thursday, that the "black wind that came under the title of the Arab Spring" was behind the fall of the city of Mosul, however, the organization of the Islamic State "Daash." Mosul fell 7 months ago in the hands of militants Daash when he was running al-Maliki as prime minister and then threw the blame on the army officers who were appointed by himself and what was considered a "conspiracy" without revealing secretes they contain. Maliki said in a statement reported for "Twilight News" that "Iraq today rise from the rubble after the devastation suffered because of the defunct Baath regime's policies," noting that "Iraq has returned to the regional and international environment, and we held the Arab summit and became Iraq effective at the Arab and international level." . He added, on the sidelines of his visit to the University of Basra, "Iraq is still in the heart of the equation which is targeted by regimes that do not believe in freedom and democracy." Maliki said that "what happened in Mosul and the subsequent black, which was due to hit the region, which came under the title of the Arab spring wind, and the resulting events in Syria." Many blamed on al-Maliki's policies "sectarianism" in the management of the country, including the military establishment in the collapse of the army and the flight of tens of thousands of soldiers without killing in the summer of last year, before creeping militants. But the deputy head of the current Republican has never recognized its responsibility for the fall of a single Iraqi cities after the other in a few days and strengthen fork Daash after the seizure of large quantities of arms and money worth billions of dollars. Maliki said in his statement that "some people are not pleased to see that Iraq is strong and healthy, so it got conspiracy after we had gone beyond the stage of the Baath buried, and we managed to restore security and stability and we embarked on the construction and reconstruction process." And the form of the House of Representatives last month, a commission of inquiry into the causes of the fall of the city of Mosul, is composed of 26 members from various parliamentary blocs headed by the leader of the Sadrist movement of quitting. And before the committee two months to submit its report to the Presidency of the Council of Representatives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontlop Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Liar, liar, pants on fire. That may have been the vail, the justification, the propaganda for it's occurring that you Mr Maliki used to allow it to happen, but that's all. If what you said were true then why did you fail to supply and re-supply the Peshmerga who are fellow Iraqis in their fight against ISIS. Is it because they were fighting your political and spiritual opponents? You must not remember the kurds threatening to take over part iraq and declare it their own state at the same time , maliki would of been a fool to arm them to do it He had to financially destroy the kurds before they would again rejoin iraq The Kurds were only protecting the kurdish territory and the new territory they took Kirkuk as they claimed it was there's now and would never leave The Kurds thought they could just sell Iraqs oil as their own But once they found out that wasn't happening they gave in to baghdad I would still be Leary about arming the Kurds I wouldn't trust them While the nation was under attack the Kurds threatened the nation even further Whether ya like him or not It's the way they are and that's just logical thinking on his part to protect his agenda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theseus Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 dontlop you intentionally left out the part where Malarki blamed the Kurds on ISIS. Malarki is just trying to blame everyone and anything that he can to avert what he has coming. Malarki can play the blame game all he wants but its all full bs malarki on his part. And the fact of the matter, he lost power so his so-caled friends are dwindling now. The only friends he will have his is right hand and left hand because everyone else has had enough of him screwing them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontlop Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 It has absolutly nothing to do with the point I was making Intentionally left out what a joke The Kurds were threatoning to take over a part of iraq and make it into their own country before isis came into iraq The federal govt would have to be fools to supply them arms The Kurds been threatoning the same thing in three other neighboring country's ... Shoukdnt those govts supply the kurds with arms in those country's too? Ignorance isnt the key Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueskyline Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Black Wind Is What Happened ! Yes ! That's The Ticket ! Black Wind ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deniscanada Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 excuses, excuses. tisk, tisk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TennesseeCherokee Posted January 16, 2015 Report Share Posted January 16, 2015 Yeah, we hear all your bullshiite, Nouri. M, has got to be really demented to think that he is going to cheat the hangman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandfly Posted January 16, 2015 Report Share Posted January 16, 2015 HE WONT T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncirculd Posted January 16, 2015 Report Share Posted January 16, 2015 What a clown. Kiss my bahooka mr lying man. It's over for you and you still dont get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theseus Posted January 16, 2015 Report Share Posted January 16, 2015 Man the Kurds have been threatening to autocracy since the days of the Ottaman Empire. The problem with a Kurdistan is that in order to have a Kurdistan then territory in neighboring countries would have to be forfeit. All countries do not like just giving up their land so another competitive country can make a home. If the land is wanted it must be taken. That is the law of the land. Usually this is done through force or contrivance. Kurds will not be happy until they have all of what they deem is their lands. For Iraq this means the loss of some very profitable oil wells. The Kurds were kept in line by Sadam and before Sadam came to power, since the creation of Iraq, by killing them through various means (gas and bullets come to the forefront). You can distrust the Kurds all you want but they seem to have a better head on their shoulders than 99% of the idiot politicians in Baghdad. The Kurds are like no other group who claims their lands were stolen and want it back. I know you are going to bring up the Palistinkians, the difference here is that there is no such thing as a Palestinian until the 20th century. Palestinkians were given land its called Jordan. If the Palestinkians want their land back go fight the King of Jordan for it. Oh wait they did. They lost over 70K trying to over throw Jordan's King. Now they sit in refugee camps in delapitated conditions in Jordan and Lebanon. They aren't allowed out of those camps only for business. So distrust the Kurds all you want, the Kurds in my book deserve more of a country than the Palistinkians who never had a country and were basically thrown out of their real countries. If you want to go down the road of who stole which lands, be careful its frought with nails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RV on my mind Posted January 16, 2015 Report Share Posted January 16, 2015 Shut up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts