yota691 Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 State law shows surprise at the government failed to include the oil agreement within the 2016 budget BAGHDAD - Iraq Barre - November 7: showed a coalition of state law, on Saturday, was surprised at the government include the failed agreement with the KRG oil agreement within the 2016 budget, and wondered about the "fate of expenditure sent by the center to the region without receiving oil against which that is out of proportion of the 17 percent. " he MP for the coalition of law, high-Nassif, in a statement quoted its press office and received / Iraq Press / copy of which was "surprised by the Iraqi government to include the oil agreement within the 2016 budget, despite the failure of the agreement after a short period of concluded due to non-fulfillment of the territory of any of its obligations Despite the large losses suffered by the state treasury as a result of this agreement failed. " She explained: "The central government has already paid large sums of Peshmerga and 100 billion to support the electricity and 3 trillion to support the Government of Halabja, also paid the development of regions and expenses allocations province of Kirkuk in full (sovereign expenditure and the ruling), as well as it paid 17 percent of the region's share of the budget, If we assume that 17 percent receive government center in place of oil, what is the fate of the rest of the expenses paid to the province and that Ayatonna oil money? ". It continued: "It's also not unreasonable to increase the amount of oil exported by Basra and the southern provinces, while still the province issued the same 550 thousand barrels of oil without an increase, we also pay to the province of Kirkuk amounts of operational and investment projects while the oil is not us, Vajeeb started Today we austerity measures to reform Iraqi money we waste on the other hand. " And showed "that the House of Representatives bear legal and moral responsibility by not approve the inclusion of the oil agreement in the 2016 budget, with the need for the amendment of this budget the right way by hosting a representative government to be amended his presence to ensure that the appeal budget adjusted" .anthy a h. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandfly Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 HUMMM, I THINK IT IS IN IT. THEY ARE NO BEING TRUE HERE 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannie2g Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 I had a feeling articles like this were coming after all the good news we were getting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted November 7, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 Deputy surprising inclusion of the oil agreement between Baghdad and Erbil budget in 2016: We are wasting an Iraqi funds Saturday 07-11-2015 | 1:01:29 J p Twilight News / expressed high Nassif MP on Saturday astonishment from the federal government to include the oil agreement "failed" agreement with the Kurdistan Regional Government in the 2016 budget. Nassif said in a statement responded to Twilight News, it was "surprised by the Iraqi government to include the oil agreement within the 2016 budget, despite the failure of the agreement after a short period of concluded due to non-fulfillment of the territory of any of its obligations and despite the large losses suffered by the treasury State due to the failed agreement "according to its expression. She explained that "the central government has already paid large sums of Peshmerga and 100 billion to support the electricity and 3 trillion to support the Government of Halabja, also paid the development of regions and expenses allocations province of Kirkuk in full (sovereign expenditure and the ruling), in addition to all that pay 17 percent of the region's share of the budget, If we assume that the 17 percent received by the central government instead of oil, what is the fate of the rest of the expenditures made for the region, which does not give us oil against which "?, as in the statement. Nassif She "as it is unreasonable to increase the amount of oil exported by Basra and the southern provinces, while still the province issued the same 550 thousand barrels of oil without an increase, we also pay to the province of Kirkuk amounts of operational and investment projects while the oil is not us, Vajeeb we started Today we austerity measures to reform Iraqi money we waste on the other. " It showed that "the House of Representatives bear legal and moral responsibility by not approve the inclusion of the oil agreement in the 2016 budget, with the need for the amendment of this budget the right way by hosting a representative government to be amended his presence to ensure that the appeal budget as modified." The Baghdad and Erbil have signed last year stipulated that the second export an average of 550 000 barrels of crude oil through the Turkish pipeline Kurdish to the port of Ceyhan agreement 0.300 thousand barrels of them from the Kirkuk oilfields and the rest of the fields of the region compared to the first commitment to send Kurdistan's share of the Iraqi budget General, amounting to 17 percent of them, but the two sides often accused each other of acting Balaltvaq or not to abide by it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flamtap Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 Smoke gets in my eyes..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrativedoc Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 I think they are saying the agreement shouldn't continue in the budget because they are claiming the center isn't receiving all they oil promised. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captl1 Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 All speculation. She probably hasn't even seen it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregp Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 Taking this as the oil agreement is in the 2016 budget and she is upset about it. This is good news in my opinion. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrativedoc Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 Taking this as the oil agreement is in the 2016 budget and she is upset about it. This is good news in my opinion. Yes they copied last years agreement and everyone now wants to change the terms of the agreement for 2016 and run it again for a trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k98nights Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 07/11/2015 10:28 GMT High Nassif express surprise at the government's inclusion of the oil agreement within the 2016 budget Follow-up - and babysit -.. showed high MP Nassif surprise of the government include the oil agreement, which it called "failed" agreement with the Kurdistan Regional Government in the 2016 budget, wondering about the fate of expenditure sent by the center to the region without receiving oil against which that is out of proportion 17 percent. She said: "We are surprised by the Iraqi government to include the oil agreement within the 2016 budget, despite the failure of the agreement after a short period of concluded because of the region not to meet any of its obligations and despite the large losses suffered by the state treasury as a result of this agreement failed." She explained: "The central government has already paid large sums of Peshmerga and 100 billion to support the electricity and 3 trillion to support the Government of Halabja, also paid the development of regions and expenses allocations province of Kirkuk in full (sovereign expenditure and the ruling), and in addition to all that pay 17 percent of the region's share of the budget and, if we assume that the 17 percent receive government oil center instead, what the fate of the rest of the expenses paid to the province and that Ayatonna oil money? ". It continued: "It's also not unreasonable to increase the amount of oil exported by Basra and the southern provinces, while still the province issued the same 550 thousand barrels of oil without an increase, we also pay to the province of Kirkuk amounts of operational and investment projects while the oil is not us, Vajeeb started Today we austerity measures to reform Iraqi money we waste on the other. " And showed "that the House of Representatives bear legal and moral responsibility by not approve the inclusion of the oil agreement in the 2016 budget, with the need for the amendment of this budget the right way by hosting a representative government to be amended his presence to ensure that the appeal budget as modified." http://www.alrayy.com/158003.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magawatt Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 Kurdistan Regional Delegation Arrives in Baghdad More than a coincidence? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleEye Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 Nassif is a TOOL she has NEVER except once since I have been involved had ANYTHING GOOD to say about Oil & Gas !!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laid Back Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 (edited) She is not happy because the oil agreement was included in the 2016 Budget. Moving in the right direction >>> Go Iraq Go 2016 budget Go HCL Go CBI Go dinar Go increase exchange rate Go $1:1,17 Edited November 7, 2015 by Laid Back 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siberian_shaddow Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 (edited) Much appreciated Yota and K98, I can't help but wonder, if she is Maliki's, Monica Lewinsky. Edited November 7, 2015 by siberian_shaddow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djiboutikid Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 Much appreciated Yota and K98, I can't help but wonder, if she is Maliki's, Monica Lewinsky. Here I am all happy and reading all the posts, and you had to put that image in my mind *shudders uncontrollably* speaking of troll(s), she is scary looking! Unlike, I may add, Monica. I thought Bill should have dumped hilda beast for Monica a long time ago. stop harshing my buzz Sibes! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djgabrielie1 Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 HUMMM, I THINK IT IS IN IT. THEY ARE NO BEING TRUE HERE I thought Adam said that it was going to be included and it was backed up by several articles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncirculd Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 I have one word for that wo man....... skank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TennesseeCherokee Posted November 7, 2015 Report Share Posted November 7, 2015 What I find so comical is all these State of Law politicians and ex-finance minister don't have a clue how a democracy is supposed to operate because most of them were on Maliki's corrupt under the table payroll. I read an article yesterday where M's old finance minister was trying to tell the CBI how to roll out the new currency reform. Also, the parliament members are pissed because Abadi cut their salaries because the IMF required it to move ahead with the dinar reforms. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boozer Posted November 8, 2015 Report Share Posted November 8, 2015 I think she was surprised it WAS included in the 2016 budget Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts