"The New York Times:" U.S. officials would welcome the defeat of al-Maliki in the elections

[yota691]

"The New York Times:" U.S. officials would welcome the defeat of al-Maliki in the elections

 

   

Posted       30/04/2014 09:51 AM

 

Washington - "arenas of liberation" of Ali Al-Shammari

Said the newspaper "New York Times" today that "many American officials would welcome the defeat of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki in the elections.

 

 

 

She explained that the "ratings CIA believes that the re-election of al-Maliki may increase sectarian tensions and even raise the likelihood of civil war, citing his failure to compromise with the Iraqi factions other - Sunni or Kurds - and the failures of the military has against Islamic extremists. Also in the custody, accused the army Iraqi trained by the Americans of committing serious violations against activists and opponents of his government, including torture, arbitrary arrest and operations for the year claiming their rights and taking bribes for the release of detainees. "

The paper in its report that "al-Maliki has lost the support of references Shiite religious authorities in Najaf, the holy city in southern Iraq, who hold sway heavily on the Shiite majority in Iraq."

 

 

[waterman13]

THE MALIKI

 

Wm13

[calkid11]

Thank youYota

[AmericaInc]

Maliki was put in originally by the previous administration even though they knew he was Iranian backed and he hated the US and had at one time actively worked against us.

[dontlop]

Who's buddy is he I forget

It was John Kerry I believe

But hey we all know what Kerry is about anti USA of course

That's why Obama appointed him

[Indraman]

It is what it is...with Maliki I mean.

 

I happen to be of the opinion that the US used Maliki like a pawn in a chess board to get at Iran and expose the counterfeiters with terrorist ties. Now that they understand the money trail and the intricacies of the funding channels for the terrorist organizations, they are through with Maliki. The US administration is now saying to Maliki, "Don't let the door hit you on the way out."

 

 

Indy

[Dee-NarZ]

I found the NPR audio report on Iraqi very interesting. It seems the election of Maliki came only due to the disinfransihment of other candidates for various readons.

[Carrello]

I think it is interesting that there is no link for this "article", NO story at The New York Times on this, and the cartoon cover is dated November 4, 2011. That makes this propaganda and not news,

[DWitte]

Funny how the car has about 200 bullet holes in it and only one in the windshield.  Probably only only need one if you're shooting at a head that big.  Bobbleheads.

[AmericaInc]

Maliki was put in originally by the previous administration even though they knew he was Iranian backed and he hated the US and had at one time actively worked against us.

the only reason I brought this up is to put it in perspective if the liberal bashers want to start up...don't mean to cause a ruckus

[SnowGlobe7]

i agree...his usefulness to us is finished.

[yota691]

Here the Link to the Article to your complaint MS. C. I regretfully didn't realize that the Link was missing....as far as the rest of your complaining here a Link to the Editor, you can take that up with them...Contact info 

 

Correspondence

 

editor@altahreernews.com

[RAGARCIA62]

Everyone seems to dislike numb nuts Maliki, but it seems they may vote him back in. How messed up is that, especially if they know all this civil war and what else might happen. I just don't get it, pure craziness.

[Indraman]

Everyone seems to dislike numb nuts Maliki, but it seems they may vote him back in. How messed up is that, especially if they know all this civil war and what else might happen. I just don't get it, pure craziness.

The only way Maliki will get back in as PM is if his faction wins a majority of the MP seats. His faction has already split (as evidenced by the Hakim block) along with the fact that Maliki has lost the support of the religious factions (namely Sadr) and his chances of being nominated for PM again are about as likely as the Antarctic becoming a tropical vacation spot.

 

Indy

[Dinarian64]

the only reason I brought this up is to put it in perspective if the liberal bashers want to start up...don't mean to cause a ruckus

What ruckus?

Only liberal bashing I see is Donlop...no war started - yet.