Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

7,462 Excellent


About Indraman

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Boise, ID
  • Interests
    Basketball, golf, family

Recent Profile Visitors

6,272 profile views
  1. MICHAEL FLYNN Published 10 hours ago Michael Flynn's defense team says new DOJ documents contain 'shocking exculpatory evidence' FBI 'did not believe General Flynn was acting as an agent of Russia' the documents state By Michael Ruiz | Fox News Facebook Twitter Flipboard Comments Print Email Video Can Michael Flynn sue for malicious prosecution? Notes from Peter Stzrok show Obama and Biden weighed in on Flynn case as Comey appeared to downplay the former national security adviser's calls with the Russian ambassador; former U.S. Attorney Brett Tolman reacts. Newly released documents about the investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn show additional “exculpatory evidence” linked to a Justice Department review of the case investigators built against him shortly after President Trump’s election, his lawyers argued in a court filing Friday. “These documents establish that on January 25, 2017 – the day after the agents ambushed him at the White House – the agents and DOJ officials knew General Flynn’s statements were not material to any investigation, that he was ‘open and forthcoming’ with the agents, that he had no intent to deceive them, and that he believed he was fully truthful with them,” Flynn’s attorneys wrote. “In short, there was no crime for many reasons.” Flynn’s lawyers said that top Justice Department officials and the special counsel’s office knew about the documents for three years before they were able to obtain them, following U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri Jeffrey Jensen’s review of the case. JUDGE REFUSES TO DISMISS FLYNN CASE, PETITIONS FULL APPELLATE COURT That review was ordered by Attorney General Bill Barr and eventually led the DOJ to drop the charges that former special counsel Robert Mueller had filed against Flynn. And the documents echo statements that former FBI Director James Comey made to lawmakers about Flynn’s FBI interview as early as 2017, Politico reported. FILE - In this Feb. 1, 2017, file photo, then-National Security Adviser Michael Flynn speaks during the daily news briefing at the White House, in Washington. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File) Portions of the documents are redacted, but one paragraph, pertaining to an early FBI interview of Flynn, states that “FBI advised that based on this interview, they did not believe General Flynn was acting as an agent of Russia.” The report acknowledged that some of what Flynn said during the interview was “inconsistent” with surveillance records of his calls – but that investigators “believed that Flynn believed what he was telling them.” Another section of handwritten notes draws similar conclusions. NEWLY UNCOVERED STRZOK NOTES TURNED OVER TO FLYNN'S LAWYER “These disclosures evince … even more reasons requiring dismissal of the case against General Flynn,” his legal team wrote. Just two weeks ago, Flynn’s team received former FBI agent Peter Strzok’s notes as part of the review, which the defense lawyers also said provided evidence to “further exonerate” him. Video Flynn pleaded guilty in 2017 to making false statements to the FBI about his communications with Russia's ambassador, but his legal team later sought to withdraw his plea. Earlier this year, the DOJ moved to drop its case against the general as part of the review Barr ordered. DOJ officials said they concluded that Flynn's interview by the FBI was "untethered to, and unjustified by, the FBI's counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn" and that the interview was "conducted without any legitimate investigative basis.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP But the federal judge who has the authority to make the final decision over whether to dismiss the case refused to do so this week even after being ordered to by an appeals court. Instead, he filed a petition for the entire D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to review the case – a move that could drag the proceedings on beyond Election Day. Fox News’ Brooke Singman and Gregg Re contributed to this report.Read
  2. TITLE: From Fox News - Missouri couple who defended home have rifle seized during police search: report Authorities in St. Louis executed a search warrant Friday evening at the home of Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple who made headlines last month when they took up arms to defend their home from protesters. During the search, police seized the rifle that Mark McCloskey was shown holding during the June 28 incident, KSDK-TV of St. Louis reported, citing information from a source. The couple claimed the pistol that Patricia McCloskey held during the June confrontation was already in the possession of their attorney, the station reported. There was no immediate indication the McCloskeys were arrested or charged with a crime. The warrant applied only to a search for the guns, KSDK reported. On Monday, the McCloskeys appeared on Fox News’ “Hannity” and disclosed that protesters had returned to their neighborhood July 3 – but the couple was alerted in advance and hired a private security company to protect their residence. The previous night, “we started hiding valuables and securing the house,” Mark McCloskey told host Sean Hannity. Last week’s protest was loud but non-violent, the homeowner said. In the June incident, Patricia McCloskey said, the couple was startled just before dinnertime when “300 to 500 people” entered the gated community where they live. "[They said] that they were going to kill us," Patricia McCloskey told Hannity on Monday night. "They were going to come in there. They were going to burn down the house. They were going to be living in our house after I was dead, and they were pointing to different rooms and said, 'That’s going to be my bedroom and that’s going to be the living room and I’m going to be taking a shower in that room’.”" The couple said protesters also threatened to harm their dog, which was outside the home at the time. The protesters claimed they were passing the McCloskeys' home while heading toward the home of Mayor Lyda Krewson, to demonstrate there. Soon after the June incident, Kimberly Gardner, circuit attorney in St. Louis, announced that her office and the St. Louis Police Department would be conducting an investigation into the McCloskeys’ display of firearms. The couple’s attorney at the time, Albert Watkins, said in a statement that the couple did not arm themselves until after they began feeling threatened. "My clients didn't sit on their front stoop with guns. ... No firearms were on them at the time that they, were, as property owners standing in front of their home," Watkins said at the time. "It was not until they basically were in a position of seeing and observing violence, recklessness, lawbreaking, and knowing that the police were not going to be doing anything." Late Friday, KSDK reported that Watkins was no longer representing the couple and had been replaced by attorney Joel Schwartz, who confirmed a search warrant was issued at 8 p.m. Friday. Schwartz would not confirm if authorities took anything from the home and said he was unaware of the location of the couple's handgun, KSDK reported. The couple's new lawyer also said he hopes to meet with Gardner's office next week but said no appointment had yet been scheduled, according to KSDK. Dom Calicchio is a Senior Editor at Reach him at *****/END OF THE ARTICLE\***** (IMHO) It's instances like these that are "Red Pilling" Americans all across this great land. The Democrat Party has lost its mind and has gone FULL "Marxist", "Fascist", "Authoritarian", and is now the enemy of the people and NOT for "Middle America"!!! Indy
  3. TITLE: Goya CEO Refuses To Apologize In Face Of Boycott For Praising Trump SOURCE: TimCast Indy
  4. TITLE: Judge Jeanine Gets Into Heated Argument With Juan Over Goya Boycott SOURCE: Fox News | The Five Indy
  5. TITLE: Goya Boycott Is Hillarious! SOURCE The Amazing Lucas Indy
  6. TITLE: Halle Berry APOLOGIZES For Taking Transgender Role SOURCE: The Daily Wire Indy
  7. TITLE: Ghislaine Maxwell is DONE SOURCE: The Amazing Lucas Indy
  8. TITLE: Leftist 'Journalist' CANCELLED, And Then Mocked By His Own Coworkers SOURCE: TimCast Indy
  9. TITLE: "Black Privelage" Ten Quick Examples, Here Me Out! SOURCE: Blue Collar Logic Indy
  10. TITLE: Leftists Caught Lying About SUV They Attacked Claiming, "It Plowed Into Them", No Charges For Driver SOURCE: TimCast Indy
  11. TITLE: Liberal Says Their Voting For Trump, FACEBOOK Deletes Video??! SOURCE: TimCast IRL Indy
  12. TITLE: LEFTIST Struck By Car On Highway They Blocked, One Critical, Trump Announces He's Fighting Back SOURCE: TimCast So let me get this straight. LEFTIST Protestors (blocking the freeway) get hit by car trying to get through, and who do they call? 911? Indy
  13. Exactly what I thought when I heard they had arrested her. Namely, when is she going to 'commit suicide' (transition: when will they 'off her')? Indy
  14. Quote: "Democrats are saying, 'Get on your knees and bow to the movement,' and Trump saying, 'Live Free!'" When these voters walk into the voting booth, who will they vote for? Indy
  15. TITLE: Lifelong Democrat Goes FULL MAGA, Tells Me That Trump Must Win And Republicans Must Take The House! SOURCE: TimCast Indy
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.