Al-Maliki Shows his readiness to visit Kuwait for solving the pending issues and his refusal to internationalize the Syrian crisis in the Security

[k98nights]

Al-Maliki Shows his readiness to visit Kuwait for solving the pending issues and his refusal to internationalize the Syrian crisis in the Security Council

20/12/2011 ad-12: 46 | readers number: 3 2

Prime Minister nouri Al-Maliki expressed his readiness to visit Kuwait to resolve the issues العالقية between the two countries.

Al-Maliki Said during his meeting with a delegation from the Kuwaiti journalists " We want to mutual trust between the two countries and the two peoples the Kuwaiti and Iraqi, and not the adventurous like Saddam ليسيء to the relations between the two countries, and there are a lot of these adventurers of Arab nationalism, of those who claim they want to repeat the painful past experiences, but does not affect their resolution in Iraq, who is clear in the direction of where he wants the country's sovereignty and does not allow the one in its affairs and does not want to interfere in the affairs of others."

He added "I welcome any Kuwaiti call directed me to visit Kuwait and we want to return to host Prime Minister Sheikh Jaber Al-Mubarak in Baghdad for talks on ways of enhancing bilateral relations," he said, adding that " the pending issues between the two countries as a matter of the Mubarak al Kabir and other issues all of these things can be حلحلتها, Transient, like the issue after political."

Al-Maliki Said that "the relationship between Iraq and Kuwait have affected the Iraqi political mood, including the arrest of the Iraqi Airways in London and detention of Iraqi planes in Canada and Great Britain," he pointed out that " the most important issue now is the issue of water if we find it a solution could be to resolve the remaining outstanding issues."

With regard to the incident of firing rockets from the area of the southern province of Basra in the direction of Kuwait News that it was targeting the Mubarak told the prime minister that " a commission of inquiry was set up were seized from the car, which fired its missiles and it is not نرضاه at all and he has firmly strongly would strike any acts of this kind will not allow these groups to do everything that would التاثيرعلي our relations with brotherly countries."

It is worth mentioning that port project Mubarak, who Kuwait started out in the month of April last year, has a great dissatisfaction among many political and economic iraqis, considering that a violation of the rights of the Iraq.

A committee of experts, headed by the chief adviser in the office of the prime minister, Thamir ghadhban, made a visit to Kuwait, during the month of the past, during which he discussed Kuwaiti officials the issue of the Mubarak expected effects on Iraqi ports, as well as the other committee headed by Hasan Al-Sunaid to Kuwait in order to discuss the issue of this port.

He said experts in the affairs of the Iraqi navigation that this project is a violation of international agreements, as it has a large amount of water from the port of Umm Qasr, which lead to a reduced its sharply, as سيصادر the so-called the land navigation open to all countries.

File developments, Syrian affair, including the Arab League's decision to impose economic sanctions on Syria, Al-Maliki said during his meeting with Kuwaiti media delegation, " We are against the siege imposed on Syria as we have the experience of similar bitter, the blockade does not harm the ruling but the people and not to the layers of reasonable to نحاصر the Syrian people also reject foreign military intervention in Syria or the Syrian to refer the file to the Security Council, is not acceptable."

He added that "a chance should be given to the rest of solutions, we have a meeting with the Syrian opposition and accepted بوساطتنا as well as the Syrian government also agreed to what was transferred by our delegation who visited Damascus recently to the Iraqi initiative we can collect the Syrian parties at one table," he said, adding that " the American side informed that mediation did not object and they want to find a solution to the crisis Syria."

And on the internal situation Iraqi Al-Maliki reviewed the latest developments on the Iraqi arena after the US withdrawal, saying " we reassure everyone that the security situation will not be affected by the US to withdraw confident are ready and security forces to maintain security and stability in Iraq today, we are now a fully sovereign country, and we have a good relationship with the United States and Iran at the same time, and there are those who ask about how احتفاظنا these ties

http://www.burathanews.com/news_article_144643.html

[fastarnie]

Gotta love that last paragraph. It's got entertainment value.

[Abarvets]

When did this happen "we are now a fully sovereign country"? Is he referring to the troop withdrawl, or something better?

[leanonme]

Maliki has been using the sovergn word since he went to Washington. Don't get too excited yet.

[OregonHopeful]

When did this happen "we are now a fully sovereign country"? Is he referring to the troop withdrawl, or something better?

There is a difference between sovereign and "fully" sovereign. Fully sovereign would be with no UN sanctions and released from Chapter 7.

[pattyangel]

Our last chat Adam did say that, Fully Sovereign has to be declared by the UN and only the UN. Not "Maliki" or "O"

[Elixirbaby]

Why doesn't Al-Maliki just hop in his car and go. geesh. Pack those bags. Get er done.

Go RV

[Stryker365]

Why doesn't Al-Maliki just hop in his car and go. geesh. Pack those bags. Get er done.

Go RV

That would be to easy.........this may be the replacement to the TV Soap Opera decline...

[Carrello]

When did this happen "we are now a fully sovereign country"? Is he referring to the troop withdrawl, or something better?

Abarvets, it is all in the translation. Sovereign is screwed in Arabic.... "we are now a fully screwed country"

Edited December 20, 2011 by Carrello

[Alex38]

Abarvets, it is all in the translation. Sovereign is screwed in Arabic.... "we are now a fully screwed country"

Yup. Seems like one step forward.... 2 steps back.

[uncirculd]

Again, all talk no action. Why is he still sitting there? What is he waiting for? He has had ample time to fix things with kuwait. He is full of smoke! Fix it then. Freak! Quit lying and do something. We will Check!

[Stryker365]

Abarvets, it is all in the translation. Sovereign is screwed in Arabic.... "we are now a fully screwed country"

Agreed

[wavggg]

Our last chat Adam did say that, Fully Sovereign has to be declared by the UN and only the UN. Not "Maliki" or "O"

Actually - any people may declare themselves independent and sovereign at any time - and once stated is REAL. The question then comes to bear as to whom will acknoledge and recognize that Declaration. Think back to the US Declaration of Independence where the colonies Declared themselves Sovereign and immediately were by that Declaration alone. France and other countries acknowledged it immediately but Britain did not and fought to keep their prize. So to say that the UN is the arbiter of Sovereinty is either naive', shows a lack of understanding of "The Law of Nations" or is an admission that one believes that there is only that damned NWO already in place to keep everyone from truly exercising their God-given rights.

Frankly, if the Body Politic of DinarVets wanted to declare independence and Sovereinty - we Could! LOL!

Happy Holidays!

gg

[emmet]

Actually - any people may declare themselves independent and sovereign at any time - and once stated is REAL. The question then comes to bear as to whom will acknoledge and recognize that Declaration. Think back to the US Declaration of Independence where the colonies Declared themselves Sovereign and immediately were by that Declaration alone. France and other countries acknowledged it immediately but Britain did not and fought to keep their prize. So to say that the UN is the arbiter of Sovereinty is either naive', shows a lack of understanding of "The Law of Nations" or is an admission that one believes that there is only that damned NWO already in place to keep everyone from truly exercising their God-given rights.

Frankly, if the Body Politic of DinarVets wanted to declare independence and Sovereinty - we Could! LOL!

Happy Holidays!

gg

Yes, gg it is a matter of knowing who you are, where you live and who is in control. I find most Americans do not know any of the above, especially the young ones. The next time you go to pay your bill at the grocery store, with cash ask the clerk if they accept Federal Reserve Notes in payment. My experience is about 90% of the time they will refuse them. Then I pull out the FRN's and "yes we will take those".