yota691 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 21 Tweets Mock Team Obama for Stripping Redskins of Their Trademark with Clever #NewRedskinsNames By Kyle Becker 12 hours ago After the Washington Redskins’ trademarks were cancelled by the Obama administration without due respect for the team’s intellectual property, #NewRedskinsName became the top-trending hashtag on Twitter. If it’s anything Twitter is good for, it’s heaping mockery on the absurd. Iowahawk rips off a few out of the gate: David Burge @iowahawkblog Follow #NewRedskinsName The US Patent and Trademark Office-Approved Nicknames 10:25 AM - 18 Jun 2014 David Burge @iowahawkblog Follow #NewRedskinsName The Otherwise Unemployable Poli-Sci Majors 10:40 AM - 18 Jun 2014 112 RETWEETS 69 FAVORITES David Burge @iowahawkblog Follow #NewRedskinsName The Washington Helmet Warning Stickers 11:41 AM - 18 Jun 2014 David Burge @iowahawkblog Follow #NewRedskinsName The Because We Said Sos 10:38 AM - 18 Jun 2014 A lot of other great ones: Legal Immigrant @votermom Follow #NewRedskinsName The Iraqis Are Being Slaughtered But Lets Start Banning Team Names 12:09 PM - 18 Jun 2014 Iraq=BO's_Vietnam @WNeiljohnson Follow #NewRedskinsName Washington VA Waiting List Killers 12:08 PM - 18 Jun 2014 Adam Baldwin ✔ @AdamBaldwin Follow #NewRedskinsName: “Washington Thinskins” (per @RushLimbaugh) 11:59 AM - 18 Jun 2014 TakingHayekSeriously @FriedrichHayek Follow #NewRedskinsName the Incompetent Overlords 11:20 AM - 18 Jun 2014 BiasedGirl @BiasedGirl Follow #NewRedskinsName RT @ThePantau: Washington Debtskins? 11:20 AM - 18 Jun 2014 Shawn has a really good question: Shawn @ShawnLivingLife Follow So will the Kansas City Chiefs be known as the Kansas City Chefs now? #NewRedSkinsName 11:58 AM - 18 Jun 2014 And Drunk Predator Drone already has a team logo: Drunk Predator Drone @drunkenpredator For your consideration. pic.twitter.com/FAQMWBtKJ9 Gary Black @GaryBlackal Follow Very Nice @drunkenpredator @Gatorgirl4vr MT For your consideration. pic.twitter.com/GH2HjESWZ3 #NewRedskinsName 12:18 PM - 18 Jun 2014 The fact is that a lot of people associate the Washington Redskins with an honorable legacy and a tribute to Native Americans who once did not refer to themselves as “redskins” in a demeaning way, according to a Smithsonian Institute linguist publishing in the Washington Post. But hey, how about that Bergdahl trade, the IRS “losing” emails, the implosion of Iraq… 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinar_millions Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 The only people who should use redskins are Native Americans..not a corporate entity.. 1 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted June 19, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 Why stop.....Dallas Cowboys...they got rid of the Indians let them do away with cowboys.....Cleveland Browns..sure someone has racist thoughts on that name...has to do with color.......49ers represent Calif so lets do away San Francisco...someone could find a reason to change every team names...It's amazing the priority of this administration....and the things folks get all hyped up over... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Man_Kind Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 Hockey team, Chicargo Black Hawks ? hobum city. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodandStaff Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 (edited) This is just another in a long list of overstepping their authority in Washington..if we as citizens continue to let them get away with these absurdities we won't have any freedoms left...not even the freedom to name a private football team for cryin' out loud!!!! Edited June 19, 2014 by RodandStaff 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lutie Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 These are the things that are important to Obama and his henchmen? And McCaskill has the time to attack Dr. Oz about a diet pill? ( which it looks like she could use) OMG please please people get out and vote in every election no matter how small. When will this nightmare be over? 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captl1 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 Our government surely has more important things to do than worry about the Redskins....Like free a Marine from Mexican jail. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted June 19, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 We’ve Seen This Story Before: Redskins Respond to Obama Admin’s Ruling On ‘Disparaging’ Team Name By Kyle Becker 1 min ago After the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office cancelled trademark protectionsfor the NFL’s Washington Redskins franchise, deciding that the team name and logo were “disparaging,” the Redskins once again provided a reality check for the Obama administration. The Washington Redskins’ attorney Bob Raskopf replied to the ruling in a statement (via the Washington Post): “We’ve seen this story before. And just like last time, today’s ruling will have no effect at all on the team’s ownership of and right to use the Redskins name and logo. ‘Redskins Are Denied Trademarks’ -Washington Post, April 3, 1999 ‘Redskins Can Keep Trademark, Judge Rules’ -Washington Post, October 2, 2003 We are confident we will prevail once again, and that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s divided ruling will be overturned on appeal. This case is no different than an earlier case, where the Board cancelled the Redskins’ trademark registrations, and where a federal district court disagreed and reversed the Board. As today’s dissenting opinion correctly states, “the same evidence previously found insufficient to support cancellation” here “remains insufficient” and does not support cancellation. This ruling – which of course we will appeal – simply addresses the team’s federal trademark registrations, and the team will continue to own and be able to protect its marks without the registrations. The registrations will remain effective while the case is on appeal. When the case first arose more than 20 years ago, a federal judge in the District of Columbia ruled on appeal in favor of the Washington Redskins and their trademark registrations. Why? As the district court’s ruling made clear in 2003, the evidence ‘is insufficient to conclude that during the relevant time periods the trademark at issue disparaged Native Americans…’ The court continued, ‘The Court concludes that the [board’s] finding that the marks at issue ‘may disparage’ Native Americans is unsupported by substantial evidence, is logically flawed, and fails to apply the correct legal standard to its own findings of fact.’ Those aren’t my words. That was the court’s conclusion. We are confident that when a district court review’s today’s split decision, it will reach a similar conclusion. In today’s ruling, the Board’s Marc Bergsman agreed, concluding in his dissenting opinion: It is astounding that the petitioners did not submit any evidence regarding the Native American population during the relevant time frame, nor did they introduce any evidence or argument as to what comprises a substantial composite of that population thereby leaving it to the majority to make petitioner’s case have some semblance of meaning. The evidence in the current claim is virtually identical to the evidence a federal judge decided was insufficient more than ten years ago. We expect the same ultimate outcome here.” U.S. attorney and conservative radio host Mark Levin pointed out that Common Law legally prevents other parties from commercially using the Redskins’ team name and logo. The Washington football team’s name has not been “cancelled” and they are not being forced to use a different name and logo. No team picks a name & logo that they find to be insulting or demeaning – that simply defies credulity. The Washington Redskins’ history bears this out and the team has stated repeatedly that its name is a tribute, not a “slur.” Former team owner George Marshall, the man who changed the team name from the Boston Braves to the “Redskins” in the 1930s, is now buried on Indian Mound Cemetery in Romney, West Virginia. Indeed, the team fight song is “Hail to the Redskins” – so much for its name being “disparaging”! Of course, the selective way in that the Obama administration chooses whose rights to protect and whose rights not to protect raises serious questions. In no way does the perceived offense of any group overrule the equal rights of all Americans to free speech and intellectual property rights. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caz1104 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 Because of our PC society.................eventually no one will be able to speak in fear of offending 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indraman Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 Who was in office the last time this happened? If the legal ruling came down in '99, then by my estimates this would have been the Clinton Administration. Indy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flatdawg Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 Washington Tyrants 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caz1104 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 I was talking to some BEARS the other day, and they are waiting to see how this plays out. They say they feel degraded every time someone mentions the Chicago Bears...............SeaHawks, Falcons, Dolphins, Texans, Titans,.............................etc are lining up for action as well..........................smh 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muleslayer Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 Washington Foreskins 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caz1104 Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 Nothing could be more OFFENSIVE than being a Dallas Cowboy fan. Have you seen them play? 4 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billy goat Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 I don't believe it's the job of the Patent and Trademark office to regulate what is politically correct, insulting or demeaning. Their job is to register intellectual property and support the rights of ownership. What about the Yankees? That name carries less favorable connotation in southern states and should be changed also. And then you have the Vikings. They couldn't buy a Super Bowl win to save their souls and in Minnesota - Scandinavian people are the brunt of all the jokes. "Superfluous" is an adjective that aptly describes the Obama administration. (watch out....Obama will strike it from the lexicon) 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billy goat Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 The Washington Senators are now the Washington Nationals. 'Senator' can be an embarrassing label especially in this day and age but - how do you derive an anthropomorphic identity from the word 'national'? Fans need catchy names and logos to extract some level of ownership and support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caz1104 Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 WOW!!! -2 ......................touchy crowd-lol.............Did I OFFEND someone? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted June 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 9 Team Names That Would Have To Change If Liberals And The P.C. Police Had Their Way…by David Rufful on June 18, 2014 in Comical Conservative Nonpolitical, Trending IJReview compiled 20 “allegedly offensive” team names that the Left isn’t complaining about… yet. Here are 8 of my favorites plus #9, which we added: 1. San Francisco Giants Clearly this team name is meant as an insult to short people. Justen Charters at IJReview suggests we rename them the “San Francisco One Size Fits All.” 2. Notre Dame Fighting Irish What we have here is a classic case of discrimination. Do all Irish people get drunk and start fights? This name must be changed immediately. 3. Chicago Blackhawks Do you know which symbol is for the Redskins and which is for the Blackhawks? 4. Miami Hurricanes This team name is offensive to people affected by real hurricanes. Incredibly insensitive. 5. Tampa Bay Buccaneers This team name is offensive to pirates. Pirates only raid ships because they’re victims of society and capitalism. No one would steal if we just embraced communism. 6. San Diego Padres So now we’re mocking Catholic priests? Blasphemy. 7. Boston Celtics We’re still attacking the Irish, huh? As if they are all a bunch of leprechauns with shamrocks. 8. Los Angeles Angels More mocking of religion. Is this team owned by Bill Maher? As a Christian, I’m offended. 9. Providence Friars Dude, again with the religion. The right-wing extremists who support these team symbols are out of control. What did we miss? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caz1104 Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 (edited) Uh OH did I offend those that may have had the misfortune of not having hands to clap? If so I apologize Edited June 20, 2014 by caz1104 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted June 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sxsess Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 The only people who should use redskins are Native Americans..not a corporate entity.. Your an idiot 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabibilicious Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 WOW!!! -2 ......................touchy crowd-lol.............Did I OFFEND someone? Self proclaimed "America's Team".......residing in a state that no longer wishes to be part of America. There is no rhyme or reason to their thought process, my friend . Peace, Cazzy. GO RV, and NO BV 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sxsess Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 WOW!!! -2 ......................touchy crowd-lol.............Did I OFFEND someone? Caz I got 1 back for you brother. Dallas deserves to be railed on. With all that talent and they still look mediocre. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabibilicious Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 (edited) Caz I got 1 back for you brother. Dallas deserves to be railed on. With all that talent and they still look mediocre. You are one smart Texan, sxsess......That's one!!! To all you Redskin fans out there, all I can say is..........."Hey!! How are ya? Hey!! How are ya?" GO RV, and NO BV Edited June 20, 2014 by Shabibilicious 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sxsess Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 You are one smart Texan, sxsess......That's one!!! To all you Redskin fans out there, all I can say is..........."Hey!! How are ya? Hey!! How are ya?" GO RV, and NO BV I'm smart? You must have me mistaken for someone else shabiblicious!! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts