Impeach Obama

[endeavor1]

Does anyone have a suggestion of how we can impeach Obama? Please respond, I'll put my money where my mouth is.

[Unitedrich]

Does anyone have a suggestion of how we can impeach Obama? Please respond, I'll put my money where my mouth is.

Two words- Ben Ghazi

But it won't happen with the media surrounding him like a baby in a padded stroller unless something new and BIG comes out about it, and even then, I doubt it..

[parmenio]

I would rather see a coup by our military on the grounds of treason. (Wishful thinking)..., but don't think for a moment that it hasn't crossed the minds of many!

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

there is SO much proof out there that this guy is impeachable for....

he circumvents the law at every turn. He is a scofflaw.

Does no good to present it/put it out there....

all they do is say...

"so what, we do want we want in this administration...why are you being so racist...?"

We present all the facts of wrong-doing and that's always the same response...

Just look what his own justice department has gotten away with!

nobody has come forward with the cojones to sue him out of office...

(no lawyer(s) would even try, because they don't eat their own kind.)

[thesjeske]

RV then Impeach.

[dinar_stud]

If Bush was not impeached for lying about Iraq in which we lost 4000+ troops, Obama will not be impeached for telling it as he was informed by the CIA, which has been confirmed.

[sportfisher]

If Bush was not impeached for lying about Iraq in which we lost 4000+ troops, Obama will not be impeached for telling it as he was informed by the CIA, which has been confirmed.

:lol:

what?............by the national geographic show...............you are so media absorbed. Just keep believing the lies and explaining away the truth studmuffin.

[parmenio]

If Bush was not impeached for lying about Iraq in which we lost 4000+ troops, Obama will not be impeached for telling it as he was informed by the CIA, which has been confirmed.

Tell me exactly what Bush lied about!

[Lostenso]

Tell me exactly what Bush lied about!

We should have never been in Iraq to begin with.

[dontlop]

If Bush was not impeached for lying about Iraq in which we lost 4000+ troops, Obama will not be impeached for telling it as he was informed by the CIA, which has been confirmed.

you should change your name to dinar **** its more appropriate

[dinar_stud]

Tell me exactly what Bush lied about!

Does WMD in Iraq refresh your mind????

[parmenio]

Really!!! Do you remember Sadam's UN violations? Do you also remember the UN's report on WMD?

Is Iraq better off today than it was under Sadam's rule?

If everything is so bad in Iraq why have you purchased dinars and waiting to capitalize on this investment!

[dontlop]

Does WMD in Iraq refresh your mind????

no it doesnt please elaborate .. what about wmd

[Lostenso]

no it doesnt please elaborate .. what about wmd

There weren't any!

[dontlop]

this is something i never saw and it implicates bushs wmds in iraq and i always supported bush ..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ3Og6ts

[stonewall67]

If Bush was not impeached for lying about Iraq in which we lost 4000+ troops, Obama will not be impeached for telling it as he was informed by the CIA, which has been confirmed.

You fail to realize that prior to the war in Iraq, Congress was given the exact same info that Bush had. Info from England to Germany all the way to Russia that stated Sadam had WMD's. Congress ok'd military action BEFORE we went in! Biden voted FOR military action! Hillarious voted FOR military action! Please do research prior to posting.

[dontlop]

There weren't any!

whats that got to do with bush

[Ms.Bean]

Complaining about Bush sending our troops into Iraq on this particular website is in poor taste imo.

[dontlop]

colon powel said he knew exactly where the mobile labs were.. hes gone of course after that but .. bush didnt say anything besides he has intelligence reports stating saddam had wmds ,, and turned them over to congress for validation .. they came back with what is called //joint resolution 114 .. do you know what a joint resolution is ?

its a resolution to the problem . by both the house and senate .. to rectafy the problem ..its their answer .. ever read joint resolution .. im sure you were tied up with lies from the democrat party ..but heres one sample of one paragrah of joint resolution 114 .. that congress sent to the president after validating his intel reports he gave congress

Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;

its only one page you should read it >>> http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/hjres114/text

its in the libary of congress no matter how many lies you tell about bush .. FACTS ARE FACTS

[Maggie123]

Compliments Of RAYZUR

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yowqX2ngHl4&feature=player_embedded

[dontlop]

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2002/s237 <<< JOINT RESOLUTION 114 .. YOU CAN SEE ALL THE LOUD MOUTHS VOTING FOR USE OF FORCE ,, JOHN EDWARDS ,, JOHN KERRY ... Hillarious CLINTON .. HARRY REID .. .. YOU CAN BLAME THEM NOT BUSH .. BUSH WAS OUT NUMBERED BY DEMOCRATS BY 30 TO ONE ON WMDS IN IRAQ

[dinar_stud]

Really!!! Do you remember Sadam's UN violations? Do you also remember the UN's report on WMD?

Is Iraq better off today than it was under Sadam's rule?

If everything is so bad in Iraq why have you purchased dinars and waiting to capitalize on this investment!

They claimed Saddam had WMD's Bush and his administration lied to the world and to the country. The violations were not enough to put our troops on Iraqui soil, the lies about WMD's did that.

You fail to realize that prior to the war in Iraq, Congress was given the exact same info that Bush had. Info from England to Germany all the way to Russia that stated Sadam had WMD's. Congress ok'd military action BEFORE we went in! Biden voted FOR military action! Hillarious voted FOR military action! Please do research prior to posting.

And yet Obama was given the same information he passed on to the US public for 10 days in a row, by the CIA and security advisors. Now tell me whats the difference. Bush administratioon LIED to the US and to rthe world.

You fail to realize that prior to the war in Iraq, Congress was given the exact same info that Bush had. Info from England to Germany all the way to Russia that stated Sadam had WMD's. Congress ok'd military action BEFORE we went in! Biden voted FOR military action! Hillarious voted FOR military action! Please do research prior to posting.

And yet Obama was given the same information he passed on to the US public for 10 days in a row, by the CIA and security advisors. Now tell me whats the difference. Bush administratioon LIED to the US and to rthe world.

[sportfisher]

There weren't any!

yes there was.

[dinar_stud]

colon powel said he knew exactly where the mobile labs were.. hes gone of course after that but .. bush didnt say anything besides he has intelligence reports stating saddam had wmds ,, and turned them over to congress for validation .. they came back with what is called //joint resolution 114 .. do you know what a joint resolution is ?

its a resolution to the problem . by both the house and senate .. to rectafy the problem ..its their answer .. ever read joint resolution .. im sure you were tied up with lies from the democrat party ..but heres one sample of one paragrah of joint resolution 114 .. that congress sent to the president after validating his intel reports he gave congress

Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;

its only one page you should read it >>> http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/hjres114/text

its in the libary of congress no matter how many lies you tell about bush .. FACTS ARE FACTS

The war resolution was obtained by lied from the Bush administration, if the truth would have been provided I can tell you today we would not have ,lost 4000+ men and women in uniform or had thousands coming back maimed, with mental conditions. You can try to pass this on as proof to cover up Bush's lies but it proves how much of a good liar he was that he convinced congress in backing him up.

yes there was.

There were none, no WMD's were ever found and an unsourced document is not proof of it. You may believe the lies but 10+ years over there says quite different.

sportfisher, since you dont believe the facts, how about d\straight from Bushs's mouth back in 2006??? Listen between 22 and 28 sec mark.

Edited November 8, 2012 by dinar_stud

[dontlop]

The war resolution was obtained by lied from the Bush administration, if the truth would have been provided I can tell you today we would not have ,lost 4000+ men and women in uniform or had thousands coming back maimed, with mental conditions. You can try to pass this on as proof to cover up Bush's lies but it proves how much of a good liar he was that he convinced congress in backing him up.

There were none, no WMD's were ever found and an unsourced document is not proof of it. You may believe the lies but 10+ years over there says quite different.

I GUESS YOU WANT TO HEAR THE DEMOCRATS PRIOR TO GEORGE BUSHG EVEN RUNNING TO BE PRESIDENT ..

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."

--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."

Letter to President Clinton, signed by:

-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."

Letter to President Bush, Signed by:

-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."

-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."

-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

-- Sen. Hillarious Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

BUSH MADE THEM SAY IT .. ISNT IT THEIR JOB TO VALIDATE THE INTEL REPORTS NOT JUST VOTE THEM AS TRUTH .. THEY HAVE ACESS TO INTELL . BUT THEY CHOSE TO SEND BUSH JOINT RESOLUTION 114 .. WHY WOULD YOU SAY BUSH DID ANTHING BUT HIS JOB HERE