Parliament is preparing to host Abadi on the survival of the Americans

[yota691]

 

 

 

Iraqi general: Foreign troops will not leave in 2018

 

 

Baghdad Mohammed Ali

31 December 2017

 

 

A senior Iraqi general said on Sunday that the US- led international coalition would focus on a number of issues during2018 , not including any  direct combat activity on Iraqi territory, stressing that  " talk about leaving foreign forces for  the country during the new year is not True, its presence is necessary . " 

This comes as statements by the right-wing parties close to Iran within the ruling coalition in Iraq, calling for "a timetable for the withdrawal  of US troops after the collapse of the page of the organization" called "terrorist" and the liberation of all Iraqi territory from his control.


"The coalition forces will continue to provide intelligence on areas and outposts," he said, adding that "the movement will continue to provide intelligence about the areas and outposts" and "move its cells, secure the border by air with Syria, ensure its full closure, and provide logistical support." In the process of building army teams and intelligence services and training new volunteers, and will participate in the reconstruction efforts and stability of liberated cities in northern and western Iraq. 

"The Iraqi situation is still fragile, and can not demand the departure of US forces in particular and the International Alliance in general, so it is certain that the year 2018 will be important for Iraq and sensitive, and can not talk about the exit of US troops from it." 

The US military in Iraq has 11,800 military personnel, including more than 6,000 military personnel.

The decision of the Committee on Security and Defense in the Iraqi parliament, Iskandar and Tut, the intention of the Committee to ask an official question from parliament to the government on the fate of US forces in the country, and discuss the feasibility of survival, indicating in a statement to a local television that a meeting will be held with Prime Minister, , On this matter. 

For his part, said Deputy Chairman of the Security Committee in Parliament, Nayef al-Shammari, that "Iraq does not need the presence of US ground forces or building bases," adding that "US forces did not have a physical presence during the battles that took place during the previous period against the organization" "But its role was limited to air support and logistical support." The Americans  did not offer any casualties during the fighting because they were not originally in combat lines as ground forces. "

Al-Shammari called for "the partial American military presence in Iraq to remain until the Iraqi air force is fully completed and developed in line with current challenges." 

In the meantime, the leader of the civil current, Hossam al-Issa, said that "the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq at this time specifically a great risk, the situation is still fragile," indicating, in an interview with the "new Arab" that "Iran is pushing forces close to pressure The government in this file within the conflict known on the Iraqi file, so the exit of Americans militarily from Iraq means swallowing Iran fully and all joints in the state, "describing Iraq as" living a transition period sensitive and reversible. "

[yota691]

Washington is taking a series of new measures in Iraq

Editorial date:: 2017/12/31 21:45 • 409 times read

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The US-led international coalition will take a series of actions in western Iraq to prevent a new version of the United States from emerging, a US special envoy to the United States said Friday.

"Our work next year will focus on revitalizing efforts to stabilize liberated areas," McGork said in a statement to US partners in the International Alliance. 
He pointed out that "the number of Iraqis who returned to their homes after the defeat of the organization amounted to about 8.2 million people, and the organization could not recognize the control of one meter of land that was recovered from Mosul to the city of Tikrit." 
He added that "the initiatives of the Bank and the International Monetary Fund and the reforms carried out by the Iraqi government contributed to the stability of the local economy and the injection of billions of dollars in areas most in need," pointing out that "the coalition forces will continue to focus on a confrontational outside Iraq and Syria, by eliminating the funding channels of the organization And his media machine used to attract fighters from all over the world. "

[jeepguy]

looks as the  noose  is  just about to  pull too the end , around the neck of the  " organization " 

[DinarThug]

Happy New Years Brother Yota - Here’s A Highlighted One !  

 

     

 

 

Washington is taking a series of new measures in Iraq

 

12/31/2017 1:58:01 PM

 

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The US-led international coalition will take a series of measures in western Iraq to prevent a new version of the populace from appearing, a US special envoy to the United States said on Sunday (December 31, 2017).

"Our work next year will focus on revitalizing efforts to stabilize liberated areas," McGork said in a statement to US partners in the International Alliance.

He pointed out that "the number of Iraqis who returned to their homes after the defeat of the organization amounted to about 8.2 million people, and the organization could not recognize the control of one meter of land that was recovered from Mosul to the city of Tikrit."

He added that "the initiatives of the Bank and the International Monetary Fund and the reforms carried out by the Iraqi government contributed to the stability of the local economy and the injection of billions of dollars in areas most in need," pointing out that "the coalition forces will continue to focus on a confrontational outside Iraq and Syria, by eliminating the funding channels of the organization And his media machine used to attract fighters from around the world. "

link

[DinarThug]

The United States deals with 4 files in Iraq and Syria after a preacher

Al Furat News:
 
Washington has forged relations with rival groups in order to defeat an oppressive organization, but "you see what will happen when this common enemy is eliminated.

This is the question posed by Joshua Glitzer, former director of the US National Security Council's Counterterrorism Bureau, in The Atlantic magazine, pointing to Washington's "deliberate ambiguity" strategy on a number of key issues in the region. "The achievements of the first three years of the US-led international campaign to defeat a fanatic in Iraq and Syria, most notably the elimination of senior leaders of the organization, the overthrow of the" dual capitals "of Damascus in Mosul and Raqqa, and undermine the safe havens used by the Da'is Perimeter terrorist attacks. And then Prime Minister Haider al-Abbadi had some justification to declare victory over a preacher in Iraq on the ninth of December. "

Glazer considers it "naive to celebrate this victory at the start of the new year, not only because the last stage of defeating any terrorist group may be the most difficult (as the US has learned this lesson well from the remnants of al Qaeda in Iraq), but also because the challenges The United States dealt with the policy of strategic ambiguity, can no longer be ignored and it is difficult to continue to deal with it as such. "

"Strategic ambiguity" means that deliberate ambiguity or lack of clarity in the formulation of US policy on regional challenges is used to allow different audiences to interpret the same policy in different ways in order to create the flexibility to achieve the desired goals. Washington has resorted to a policy of strategic ambiguity because it proved useful and necessary for the success of the campaign against Daqash, especially in the care not to involve large numbers of American forces in the task of defeating a sympathetic.

"Washington has made no mistake in pursuing this continuing ambiguity in its positions on regional issues in the Middle East. We (my colleagues in the Obama administration) have been keen to keep this ambiguity in the main stages, but it is an unsustainable policy, The United States to the injury of some who believed that they can rely on it disappointed, and to confront others Washington has tried to postpone the conflict with them.

"At the same time, the inability to maintain this ambiguity should not be seen as evidence of the failure of the Trump administration, which has already maintained the momentum of the campaign against Saddam in Iraq and Syria. In any event, that ambiguity was only an interim strategy, We are concerned about foolish diplomacy that may have serious consequences. " He outlined four major issues that the United States has pursued a strategy of strategic ambiguity: 

first: the future of the Iraqi Kurds
The United States has identified the Kurds as "key partners" in the campaign against Da'ash, but at the same time has repeatedly reaffirmed its commitment to a unified Iraqi state, a precondition for a close relationship with Baghdad, another crucial partner against Da'ash. For years, Washington has deliberately refused to deal with the dispute between Baghdad and the Kurds because of their quest for independence. "But the US position is no longer ambiguous in recent months after Baghdad tanks continued to occupy Kurdish oil fields following the Iraqi Kurdistan vote for independence. The American admission suggests that Washington is leaning towards Baghdad. " 

Second: Syria's response
The Syrian Kurds have played a crucial role in curtailing the sanctuary of terrorist attacks throughout the world, but the Syrian Kurds also have ambitions for autonomy, if not complete independence, raising concerns in other regional capitals such as Damascus, which seeks To restore control over all Syrian territory, and Ankara, which considers the Kurds as terrorists responsible for the bloody attacks inside Turkey. 
Glitser explains that Washington continues to pursue a vague policy on this issue to ensure a vital partnership with the Syrian Kurds to clear up the strongholds of Damascus and to maintain relations with Turkey to ensure the launch of its military operations against a supporter of Angerlik air base. , Washington will soon have to show its support for Syrian Kurds. 

Third: Iran's influence in Syria
"Of course, Washington has not adopted a vague policy regarding its position on condemning certain aspects of Tehran's behavior, such as its support for terrorist groups (Hezbollah, for example), but with regard to Iran's role in Iran, In Syria, the United States has resorted to ambiguity, based on the principle of enemy enemy of my friend in some respects and for some time. " 
But now time is running out, and as the various military forces struggle in places where they are no-brainer in Syria, US forces are dropping Iranian drones into Syrian airspace. Such action means that there is no clarity about how the US is dealing with Iran in Syria. 

Fourth: Syria's future
Gleitzer's fourth and final issue is the future of Syria and the role of Bashar al-Assad and his supporter Vladimir Putin. It seems that dealing with the United States' position on this issue is ambiguous in light of Washington's repeated calls for Assad to leave power. But despite the brutality of the Assad regime, this has not happened. 
Regardless of whether the real thing for Syria's future from Washington's point of view is a new constitutional structure in which Assad is not at least president of the country in formality, even if he keeps the dominant ruler in the country or the Kurds gain autonomy, To the United States will become clear quickly, especially with the decline of the presence of an advocate who was imposing a specific approach to deal with the Russian forces and forces of the Assad regime, which was provoking US forces increasingly within the Syrian border.

Glazer warns that Washington 's weak coordination, foreign policy, and ideological approaches to foreign policy are likely to accelerate the US' s strategic ambiguity over regional challenges in the Middle East in 2018, and turn them into unnecessarily serious issues. For example, the explicit call by US Secretary of State Rex Tilerson (at a bad time) for the dismantling or departure of Iranian-backed militias has exacerbated the serious conflict between Baghdad and Iraqi Kurds. Moreover, the poor handling of key issues in US-Turkish relations is exacerbating the future issue of the Syrian Kurds and raising the prospect of a crisis between Washington and Ankara.

Glazer concludes that the United States has good reasons not to take a clear stance on the region's heated rivalries and conflicts, and that withdrawing from the policy of strategic ambiguity would be a difficult route for any American administration, especially the Trump administration, which is suffering from a lot of chaos, not to mention the fragile state of the State Department. , And the absence of the primary focus necessary to meet these challenges and lay the foundations for the stability of the region

---

link

[DinarThug]

 

LINK

A senior general in joint operations: US forces remain in Iraq in 2018

09:01 - 01/01/2018  

 

A senior general in the joint operations command said US forces would remain in Iraq during the new year 2018, denying reports that they had left Iraq this year.

"The Iraqi situation is still fragile, and can not demand the departure of US forces in particular and the international coalition in general, so it is certain that 2018 will be important for Iraq and sensitive," the newspaper quoted the general as saying. And there is no possibility of talking about the withdrawal of American troops from it. "

The general said that "the international coalition, led by the United States, will focus on a number of things during 2018, not including any direct combat activity on Iraqi territory," stressing that "talk about the departure of foreign forces of the country during the new year is incorrect, Necessary".

For his part, Deputy Chairman of the Security Committee in Parliament, Nayef al-Shammari, that "Iraq does not need the presence of US ground forces or the construction of bases," adding that "the US forces did not have a physical presence during the battles that took place during the previous period against the organization" , But only its role on the air support and logistical support.

Al-Shammari said in a statement that "the Americans did not make any casualties during the fighting because they were not originally within the lines of the fighting as ground forces." 

Edited January 1, 2018 by DinarThug

[fancy]

Thanks Thuggie you're the best. Moving along nicely. We know the USA wants Iraq to succeed. Just a matter of time. 

[ChuckFinley]

1 hour ago, fancy said:

Thanks Thuggie you're the best. Moving along nicely. We know the USA wants Iraq to succeed. Just a matter of time. 

  and Happy New Year to you. 

[yota691]

01-01-2018 01:14 PM

When will US troops leave Iraq?

 

 

 

"The Iraqi situation remains fragile, and can not demand the departure of US forces in particular and the international coalition in general, so it is certain that 2018 will be," said a senior general in the Joint Operations Command. No matter how Iraq and the sensitive, and no possibility to talk about the exit of US troops from it. "

The general said that "the international coalition, led by the United States, will focus on a number of things during 2018, not including any direct combat activity on Iraqi territory," stressing that "talk about the departure of foreign forces of the country during the new year is incorrect, Necessary".

For his part, Deputy Chairman of the Security Committee in Parliament, Nayef al-Shammari, that "Iraq does not need the presence of US ground forces or the construction of bases," adding that "the US forces did not have a physical presence during the battles that took place during the previous period against the organization" , But only its role on the air support and logistical support.

 

Al-Shammari said in a statement that "the Americans did not make any casualty during the fighting because they were not originally within the lines of the fighting as ground forces

[DinarThug]

What does Washington want from Iraq in 2018?

 

 

 

 

2017/12/31 06:51:55 PM 
Iraq folded page 2017, triumphing over «urging». This is not a particular event but a shift in the course of the conflicting projects in Mesopotamia since the fall of the former regime in April 2003. There is a vacuum in the field scene left by the organization after its crushing defeat, as Western estimates hoped to extend the "war on terror" for three decades! The question is: Is there a successor to the Caliphate?

On these days, seven years ago (late December 2011), US troops left Iraq after an eight-year occupation. The accelerated factors for the "humiliating exit" of these forces can be summed up in three: 1) a "decisive" position of the Supreme Religious Reference Council (Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani) that rejects the survival of the occupation forces; 2) severe blows to the resistance factions against it. 3) The "clear" political will of most of the forces, led by the government of Nuri al-Maliki, demanding their exit.

A great political reference describes the scene at the time: "We brought US troops out of the door," he said, referring to the news, "from their strong return, through the fight against an oppressive organization, as a result of the current government policy."

The latest exit of US forces is "a stigma" in the dignity of its leadership, something that was not comfortable for it. The novel "return" of Americans to the active presence in the Iraqi field, some see with the response of Abbadi to the presidency of the federal government, who believes in the need to "use the West, specifically Washington in the war on terrorism, and eliminate it.

(June 2014), and Baghdad is in the throes of a war that resulted in a final victory over the most extremist organizations in the world (December). 2017), there is a vacuum behind him «urged» in the field map, which leads to the question about the «successor to the Caliphate»; in particular that «Mesopotamia» is the link between the countries of the axis of resistance, and the role of the «Da'ash» was breaking this line extending from Tehran, Baghdad, Damascus ... and up to Beirut.

We do not want Hezbollah ... an Iraqi

A few months ago (June 2017), as Baghdad approached its victory in the battle of Mosul, and the American Axis states warned of the possibility of the Popular Gathering forces reaching the Iraqi-Syrian border, an American delegation toured Iraqi leaders to discuss the country's affairs.

He asked a great political reference: What do you want from us? The response was "we want to achieve two points." First, the "popular mobilization" forces should not turn into forces similar to the Lebanese Hezbollah, which "adheres to the Iranian agenda in the conflict in the region." The second is the increase in the number of US bases and the number of troops deployed in Iraq, particularly in the center and west of the country.

He explained that the goal was to control the Iraqi-Syrian border and to prevent Iran's allies from reaching there. "The nature of the conflict here is different from the conflict in Lebanon, and the nature of the sectarian and political components is also different," he said. "In the first place, the crowd can not turn into forces similar to Hezbollah. And the tasks of the specific crowd, a military security institution committed to government decision ». The reference to the second point, based on the mood of the public street, rejecting the presence of any foreign force in the country, to ask: «Do you think that the Iranians will accept such demand? Tehran maintains its national security, enter into confrontation with you, and make sure that the crowd and the people who will attack you, and destroy those rules ... ».

The answer was "shocking" to the Americans. Responded to the questions of that reference "later" that his "advice" to turn a blind eye to those demands was "right" and that the relationship between Washington and Baghdad should be clear and transparent, and the first respect for the sovereignty of the second and non-interference in its affairs.

It was not only the author who heard these demands, but the audience heard the demands of Uncle Sam.Apart from the "advice," the US demand was a little late, after the "crowd" managed to reach a number of border points and the Syrian army, which was a blow to Washington and its allies. As the transfer of high security sources in Iraq that the American found in his occupation an opportunity to hit the axis of resistance, especially as the Iraqi-Syrian borders constitute the strategic depth of this axis. Washington's policy required the dismantling of the geographical link between these countries, and the beginning of their disintegration one by one, and then to the center of the "Arab moderation", at a later stage.

Americans are growing ... lasting

The vacuum created by the "filling" of the field fills it quickly. There are those who believe that the "crowd" will carry out this task, which is a "wrong belief" according to the leaders of the "crowd." "We can not turn into an enemy against the Iraqi people," the sources told Al-Akhbar. Here, the replies intersect at a point articulated, that the US forces alone can fill this vacuum, many of the nature and spread and distribution on the one hand, and the lack of acceptance of the Iraqi street for its presence on the other hand, despite the adherence of the government of Abadi to stay, and «If the latter came out with statements calling for its exit With the announcement of victory over the preacher », according to an Iraqi security source (see« News », number 3149).

According to the estimates of the government of Abadi, the number of US troops in the country does not exceed eight thousand, while the transfer of the commander of the Quds Force in the Revolutionary Guards, Qassem Soleimani, "The number of US forces in Iraq is about twenty thousand ... and more, A number that did not exist before 2014, has become a reality with a "push-up", and Ebadi believes that Washington and its allies are capable of "providing valuable support in the war on terror ... especially as our potential is weak," he says, "The elimination of Dahesh was a purely Iraqi effort, and the Americans have greatly hindered our progress H extremist organization »(see« News », the number of 3096).

confrontation?

2018 will not be normal for Iraq and the Iraqis. Political entitlements as "wholesale", but the field has its own reality. The "provocative" presence of US forces in Iraq may pose a confrontation between them and the resistance factions, and behind them Iran (see "News," number 3313). In front of this hypothesis, there are questions that should be asked, most notably: Do Iraq and the Iraqis accept a new return to the American occupation, new names and different addresses? («An international coalition», advisers, security companies ...) Are some leave their weapons for electoral interests at the expense of its history of the resistance? Does the political class have a radical solution to such a dilemma, especially since the openness (politically, militarily, security, economically ...) to Mesopotamia has reached the limit that Abadi has a clear vision for the next phase and its challenges!
link

[fancy]

10 hours ago, ChuckFinley said:

  and Happy New Year to you. 

To you too my friend and everyone here. 2018 is going to be our year. Peace and blessings to  everyone.

[ChuckFinley]

25 minutes ago, fancy said:

To you too my friend and everyone here. 2018 is going to be our year. Peace and blessings to  everyone.

I hear you. In all the years I have been here, this year shows the most promise . 

[ChuckFinley]

Just looked at my avatar, think I may want to add a white beard there.  

[TexasMike1958]

On 12/31/2017 at 3:57 PM, yota691 said:

Washington is taking a series of new measures in Iraq

Editorial date:: 2017/12/31 21:45 • 409 times read

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The US-led international coalition will take a series of actions in western Iraq to prevent a new version of the United States from emerging, a US special envoy to the United States said Friday.

"Our work next year will focus on revitalizing efforts to stabilize liberated areas," McGork said in a statement to US partners in the International Alliance. 
He pointed out that "the number of Iraqis who returned to their homes after the defeat of the organization amounted to about 8.2 million people, and the organization could not recognize the control of one meter of land that was recovered from Mosul to the city of Tikrit." 
He added that "the initiatives of the Bank and the International Monetary Fund and the reforms carried out by the Iraqi government contributed to the stability of the local economy and the injection of billions of dollars in areas most in need," pointing out that "the coalition forces will continue to focus on a confrontational outside Iraq and Syria, by eliminating the funding channels of the organization And his media machine used to attract fighters from all over the world. "

 

One of the new measures can be putting a boot in their gluteus maximus and tell them to RV their amday currency

[1lucdog]

Chuck Finley...I just looked in the mirror and discovered one there...what happened? Back to shaving 

[DinarThug]

2018/01/02 (00:01 PM) - Number of readings: 99 - Number (4101)

 

 

Trump's envoy: Iraq's reconstruction depends on his government's reforms

Baghdad / Range 

US special envoy to the Middle East, Brett McGurk, said that the international coalition is trying to take a number of measures in western Iraq to prevent the return of the organization again, and stressed that the efforts of the coalition during the next phase will focus on restoring stability to the liberated areas.

"We enter 2018 and realize that we must continue to work together through coalition states, international organizations and law enforcement agencies, as well as the private sector, so that we can continue to progress," said McGowork. "The collective goal of the international coalition Is to put pressure on the organization of an advocate and defeat it and prevent its members from healing again. " 

"The process will be focused in the first quarter of next year on the end of the organization and then the focus will shift to stability, and the United States is preparing to stay in Syria to make sure that The organization of the preacher was defeated and will not return again. " 

"The number of Iraqis who returned to their homes after the defeat of the organization amounted to about two million and 800 thousand people, and could not raise awareness of his control of one meter of the land that was recovered from the Mosul to the city of Tikrit." "It will take years," he said. "It will depend on Iraqi reforms, funding from the international community and regional trade with neighboring countries, as well as investment facilitation measures in Iraq to attract foreign investment." 

On the sources of funding adopted by the organization of Daqash, McGork said that "the coalition forces will continue to focus on a confrontation outside of Iraq and Syria, by eliminating the funding channels of the organization and its media used to attract fighters from all over the world," noting that "these efforts contributed In thwarting many of the terrorist attacks during the past year, and will increase significantly during the next year, "pointing out at the same time," pointing out that "there are 43 thousand names of the organization calling in the databases of INTERPOL." 

The US envoy praised the "initiatives of the Bank and the International Monetary Fund and the reforms carried out by the Iraqi government," adding that "these actions contributed to the stability of the local economy and pumping billions of dollars in areas most in need." 

On the development of Iraq's relations with its regional and international environment, the Special Envoy of the US President welcomed "the return of Saudi-Iraqi relations once again." Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom initiated a fight against the Internet and exposed media lies to the terrorist organization.

[yota691]

2018/01/02 (00:01 PM)   -   Number of readings: 611   -   Number (4101)

 

 

Trump's envoy: Iraq's reconstruction depends on his government's reforms

Baghdad / Range 
 

US special envoy to the Middle East, Brett McGurk, said that the international coalition is trying to take a number of measures in western Iraq to prevent the return of the organization again, and stressed that the efforts of the coalition during the next phase will focus on restoring stability to the liberated areas. 

"We enter 2018 and realize that we must continue to work together through coalition states, international organizations and law enforcement agencies, as well as the private sector, so that we can continue to progress," said McGowork. "The collective goal of the international coalition Is to put pressure on the organization of an advocate and defeat it and prevent its members from healing again. " 
"The process will be focused in the first quarter of next year on the end of the organization and then the focus will shift to stability, and the United States is preparing to stay in Syria to make sure that The organization of the preacher was defeated and will not return again. "
"The number of Iraqis who returned to their homes after the defeat of the organization amounted to about two million and 800 thousand people, and could not raise awareness of his control of one meter of the land that was recovered from the Mosul to the city of Tikrit." "It will take years," he said. "It will depend on Iraqi reforms, funding from the international community and regional trade with neighboring countries, as well as investment facilitation measures in Iraq to attract foreign investment."
On the sources of funding adopted by the organization of Daqash, McGork said that "the coalition forces will continue to focus on a confrontation outside of Iraq and Syria, by eliminating the funding channels of the organization and its media used to attract fighters from all over the world," noting that "these efforts contributed In thwarting many of the terrorist attacks during the past year, and will increase significantly during the next year, "pointing out at the same time," pointing out that "there are 43 thousand names of the organization calling in the databases of INTERPOL." 
The US envoy praised the "initiatives of the Bank and the International Monetary Fund and the reforms carried out by the Iraqi government," adding that "these actions contributed to the stability of the local economy and pumping billions of dollars in areas most in need."
On the development of Iraq's relations with its regional and international environment, the Special Envoy of the US President welcomed "the return of Saudi-Iraqi relations once again." Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom initiated a fight against the Internet and exposed media lies to the terrorist organization.

[yota691]

Mattis: The war against a preacher in Iraq has not ended and its members still have weapons and are planning to restore chaos

02-01-2018 03:20 PM

Readers

 

Baghdad News -

 

 

US Defense Secretary James Mathes said the United States was still pursuing small pockets of Da'ash in Iraq, adding that the group still had weapons and plans to restore chaos. 

The NPR website quoted Matisse as saying that 'the duel no longer controls the cities, and has already destroyed its large ranks,' noting that 'the survivors of the elements of the organization have spread in the desert, yet is still an advocate with weapons and plans to restore chaos.' 

"We have said many times that the war is not over," he said, adding that "US forces are still tracking small pockets of Da'ash fighters in Iraq." 

"The United States is working closely with the Iraqi security forces, in the hope that it will be able to take full control of the country's territory," he said, adding that "there may be twelve men who find each other finally, meet and live in one house, Wounds and thinking '.

[Butifldrm]

06-01-2018 02:49 PM

Parliament is preparing to host Abadi on the survival of the Americans

 

 

 

MP on the coalition of state law, Ahmed Salal al-Badri, Saturday, near the hosting of Prime Minister Haider Abadi to discuss the US military presence in Iraq after the rollback, "Daash," pointing out that the majority of deputies against the survival of the Americans . 

Al-Badri said in a press statement that "the House of Representatives will soon host the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces Haider al-Abbadi to discuss the American presence in the country and know their numbers and places of deployment and their presence after the defeat is urging ."

He added that "the majority of members of the House of Representatives are not with the survival of US forces in the country, especially after the full victory on the call by the security forces and popular mobilization," noting that "there is no need to require the survival of Americans in the country ."

Al-Badri said that "the government claims that the forces on Iraqi soil are advisers," adding that "the nature of the US military presence during the hosting of Abadi will be known ."

 

The parliamentary bloc "Sadikon" confirmed yesterday, Thursday, that the current legislative chapter of the House of Representatives will see the resolution of the issue of US military presence in Iraq, noting that there are many questions need clear answers from the government .

 

http://www.ikhnews.com/index.php?page=article&id=163600