Hillarious Clinton Used Personal email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking the Rules

[Shabibilicious]

Well here we are at least a week into this deal, old lady clinton has already changed her sorry story. This old bag needs to be in jail. I cant stand the lyin clintons! Plus wild bill is a pervert, cant much blame him though, I wouldnt want anything to do,with that old bag he's married to either!!! 

 

Soooo....you're not going to vote for her?    

 

GO RV, then BV

[dantach]

 find it particularly objectionable to call her Hillarious. There is nothing funny about the damage she has done to this country.

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

 

What if someone - anyone in The USofA - had availed themselves of

 

The FOIA and requested an e-mail during her tenure...?

 

 

Would she have said then- as she was a servant of The People, mind you -  "...no can do, it's private..."  

 

WTH !?  

 

 

So how is it she's getting away with it now?

 

And Jen Psaki cannot find any docs signed by not-so-hillarious in HR...? Realllyyy.....?   

 

 

So not-so-hillarious was NOT LEGALLY our employee as SoS ...?   

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

 

BTW, Folks... hobummer just up and decided to ban FOIA from Our White House.

 

 

Remember when he screamed from the rooftops that BUSH was so horrible for doing this and 

 

HE SWORE THAT HE WOULD HAVE COMPLETE TRANSPARENCY unlike Bush...??????

 

 

Guess he's hiding under his desk now that his puppet-master valerie jarrett outed not-so-hillarious over the

 

e-mails and he's cowering because the gloves are off....!

[SnowGlobe7]

snake is all i can say.....

[Artitech]

Soooo....you're not going to vote for her?    

 

GO RV, then BV

I did participate in Rush's operation chaos, when she ran in 08. We voted for her, cause we knew the little "o" was going to get all the minority votes just because he is  mixed race. Half white and half black! He looks more black than white. His ole sorry mama's family raised him up around all those commies and marxist. His grandparents were a bunch of malcontents! Now the whole world can see whats been manifested! So to to the question We wouldnt vote for her for dog catcher!! The clintons are so very very SORRY!!! 

[Shabibilicious]

I did participate in Rush's operation chaos, when she ran in 08. We voted for her, cause we knew the little "o" was going to get all the minority votes just because he is  mixed race. Half white and half black! He looks more black than white. His ole sorry mama's family raised him up around all those commies and marxist. His grandparents were a bunch of malcontents! Now the whole world can see whats been manifested! So to to the question We wouldnt vote for her for dog catcher!! The clintons are so very very SORRY!!! 

 

I commend your truthfulness Artitech.  You're the first person I've heard admit race played a part in NOT voting for Obama.    

 

GO RV, then BV

[Artitech]

Race had nothing to do with it ! it was his polices!

[Shabibilicious]

Okay, sorry.....I was taking your words at face value.  It's all good.    

 

GO RV, then BV 

[yota691]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8gYMJ75m7I&t=36

Mark Halperin: Clinton Is No Longer 2016 Favorite Due to Awful Response to Email Scandal

[yota691]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvHGDSCvi00 

Stay Secretive, My Friends

[George Hayduke]

Most excellent!

[yota691]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kN-Kx1Zw47o

Scott Pelley: CBS Poll Shows Email Scandal Taking A Toll On Hillarious Clinton

[yota691]

March 25, 2015, 10:23 am

Clinton hit with racketeering lawsuit over emails
 


By Jesse Byrnes



The conservative group Freedom Watch has filed a racketeering lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillarious Clinton that accuses her of failing to produce documents under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
The civil suit, filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, argues that Clinton used her private emails to sell access to other officials in return for donations to the Clinton Foundation.
 


It alleges that, during her tenure, Clinton withheld documents requested under FOIA regarding State Department waivers given to businesses or individuals doing business with Iran, possibly undermining U.S.-imposed sanctions. 
 
The complaint, which lists Bill and Hillarious Clinton and the Clinton Foundation as defendants, alleges the Clintons sold access to other U.S. government officials in return for donations to their organization, which they concealed, allegedly, by using a private computer server for her emails operated from their home in Chappaqua, New York. 
Larry Klayman, the founder of Freedom Watch, launched dozens of lawsuits against former President Bill Clinton’s administration.
In the new lawsuit, he alleges that, during Hillarious Clinton's tenure, the State Department “clearly leaked” information to New York Times reporter David Sanger on U.S. and Israeli efforts to counteract Iran's nuclear weapons program.
“Public reports about plans to counter Iran’s nuclear weapons development programs undermined the effectiveness of those plans by revealing them to Iran and other terrorist organizations and states,” the complaint states.
The civil suit alleges the Clintons “systematically and continuously ... conducted a corrupt enterprise” over more than 10 years, allegedly in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act, which deals with abuse and misuse of organizations or businesses. 
In a statement, Klayman cast his lawsuit as “the first and only hard-hitting case to address the growing email scandal.”
“What Hillarious Clinton, her husband, and their foundation have done is nothing new. It is simply part of a criminal enterprise which dates back at least 10 years, all designed to enrich themselves personally at the expense of the American people and our nation. It's time, however, that they finally be held legally accountable,” Klayman said. 
Clinton acknowledged the private server earlier this month, explaining that she deleted more than 30,000 emails her aides deemed personal, and turned over the rest to the State Department for archiving.
The House select committee investigating the deadly 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya, has asked Clinton to turn over her server to an independent arbiter. Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) has also demanded Clinton turn over the server but has so far not directed House Republicans to subpoena her records.

[Big Newby]

While there is no doubt that Hillarious violated numerous laws, rules, and regulations, it is doubtful the plaintiff will be able to prove any basis for invoking RICO.  While RICO can be addressed in a civil suit, basis for RICO in a civil matter is tough:

 

"RICO, is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. The RICO Act focuses specifically on racketeering, and it allows the leaders of a syndicate to be tried for the crimes which they ordered others to do or assisted them, closing a perceived loophole that allowed someone who told a man to, for example, murder, to be exempt from the trial because he did not actually commit the crime personally."

 

I think it somewhat farfetched to expect a jury to accept that Hillarious's actions were part of an ongoing criminal organization.  (unless they can prove the State Department and White House are such!)  It seems possible only if evidence is uncovered in which Hillarious actually "ordered others to do or assisted them."  And maybe that will happen.

 

I fully believe there was massive intentional wrongdoing by Clinton and others who answer to her in this and probably other matters.  There is also very little doubt there was big time "quid pro quo" in her solicitations of foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation.

 

All that being said, it is highly unlikely that Trey Gowdy will be able to pin anything significant directly on Hillarious -- much like Bill's corrupt and immoral conduct while President.  At best she faces a plummeting public favorable opinion in national polls.  She is not stupid.  She is gambling that such negativism that has surfaced now will fade away from the minds of voters before the intense campaign season gets underway.  (like it normally does)  I for one will do my best to keep her actions top of mind for people I know.

Edited March 30, 2015 by Big Newby

[yota691]

Hillarious Clinton Emailed Aides' Personal Email - Judge Andrew Napolitano - The Kelly File

[yota691]

If Hillarious Thinks She’s Clear of Her Email Drama…Let Her Check Out Trey Gowdy’s Badass Ultimatum




BY JOSEPH PERTICONE (3 HOURS AGO) |

 

 

Getty - Gabriella Demczuk

Hillarious Clinton has been requested to appear before the Select Committee on Benghazi by Rep. Trey Gowdy, who sent her a formal letter on Tuesday.

 
The committee chairman disclosed the request for a “transcribed interview” in a press release regarding her “use of private email and a personal server” during her tenure as head of the State Department.
The letter, issued to David Kendall, an attorney for Clinton, lays out the Committee’s plan:

“Secretary Clinton’s refusal to allow the Inspector General to ensure the public record is complete is not only disappointing but portends to delay the ability of our Committee to complete its work as expeditiously as possible.
We, therefore, urge the Secretary to reconsider her position and allow a neutral, detached, and independent arbiter ensure the public record is complete and all materials relevant to the Committee’s work have been provided to the Committee.”

Gowdy’s letter continues, alluding to what consequences might arise should Clinton continue to dodge a neutral review:

 

“If the Secretary continues to reject the offer of a neutral review, the House of Representatives as a whole will need to consider its next steps.”

 

The South Carolina Republican also emphasized that the inquiry would be strictly professional. He added that the committee has no interest in Clinton’s personal emails:

 

“Although I have made this abundantly clear, it bears repeating: our Committee has no interest in any emails related to the Secretary’s personal, private matters nor is our Committee seeking documents unrelated to Libya and Benghazi during the relevant time periods.”

 

The letter even outlines the nature of the questions and lists five primary points of inquiry:

•  
• Her decision to bypass an official government email account;
• Whether she affirmatively turned over any relevant records during the pendency of the Accountability Review Board investigation or at any time after Congress first began investigating the Benghazi attack until December 2014;
• Her decision to retain those records upon separation from the Department of State;
• The methodology by which these emails were subsequently searched for evidence of official records; and
• Her decision to delete certain emails.

Clinton has been on defense for weeks after revelations of legally murky email practices came to light from her time as Secretary of State. Clinton’s poll numbers have substantially dropped as well, losing commanding favorability ratings in crucial 2016 swing-states.

[SnowGlobe7]

...and the hits just keep on coming....

[Shabibilicious]

March 25, 2015, 10:23 am

Clinton hit with racketeering lawsuit over emails

 

By Jesse Byrnes

The conservative group Freedom Watch has filed a racketeering lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillarious Clinton that accuses her of failing to produce documents under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

The civil suit, filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, argues that Clinton used her private emails to sell access to other officials in return for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

 

It alleges that, during her tenure, Clinton withheld documents requested under FOIA regarding State Department waivers given to businesses or individuals doing business with Iran, possibly undermining U.S.-imposed sanctions. 

 

The complaint, which lists Bill and Hillarious Clinton and the Clinton Foundation as defendants, alleges the Clintons sold access to other U.S. government officials in return for donations to their organization, which they concealed, allegedly, by using a private computer server for her emails operated from their home in Chappaqua, New York. 

Larry Klayman, the founder of Freedom Watch, launched dozens of lawsuits against former President Bill Clinton’s administration.

In the new lawsuit, he alleges that, during Hillarious Clinton's tenure, the State Department “clearly leaked” information to New York Times reporter David Sanger on U.S. and Israeli efforts to counteract Iran's nuclear weapons program.

“Public reports about plans to counter Iran’s nuclear weapons development programs undermined the effectiveness of those plans by revealing them to Iran and other terrorist organizations and states,” the complaint states.

The civil suit alleges the Clintons “systematically and continuously ... conducted a corrupt enterprise” over more than 10 years, allegedly in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act, which deals with abuse and misuse of organizations or businesses. 

In a statement, Klayman cast his lawsuit as “the first and only hard-hitting case to address the growing email scandal.”

“What Hillarious Clinton, her husband, and their foundation have done is nothing new. It is simply part of a criminal enterprise which dates back at least 10 years, all designed to enrich themselves personally at the expense of the American people and our nation. It's time, however, that they finally be held legally accountable,” Klayman said. 

Clinton acknowledged the private server earlier this month, explaining that she deleted more than 30,000 emails her aides deemed personal, and turned over the rest to the State Department for archiving.

The House select committee investigating the deadly 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya, has asked Clinton to turn over her server to an independent arbiter. Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) has also demanded Clinton turn over the server but has so far not directed House Republicans to subpoena her records.

 

Klayman is one tough cookie who fights for what he thinks is right.........he has also said even though he likes Ted Cruz, he is ineligible to be president.  Sorry, no link.    

 

GO RV, then BV 

[Markinsa]

Klayman is one tough cookie who fights for what he thinks is right.........he has also said even though he likes Ted Cruz, he is ineligible to be president.  Sorry, no link.    

 

GO RV, then BV 

 

Please stay on topic.

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

 

NOT-SO-HILLARIOUS  KLINTON  MUST GO TO JAIL.

 

 Period.   End of story. 

[George Hayduke]

Clinton, Holder and Obama is the perfect menage a trois - they've got so much dirt on each other, no one is going to prison...

Edited April 1, 2015 by George Hayduke

[Shabibilicious]

Please stay on topic.

 

Hahaha.....okay.    

 

GO RV, then BV

[yota691]

Statement on the Release of Secretary Clinton’s Benghazi Emails

May 22, 2015 

Press Release

Washington, DC— Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., today issued the following statement after the State Department released 300 self-selected emails from former Secretary Hillarious Clinton, over which the department had no control and no custody for nearly two years. These emails were turned over to the State by former Secretary Clinton in the fall of 2014 in reaction to a request from the Select Committee: 

“More than six months after the Select Committee first discovered Secretary Clinton’s unusual email arrangement with herself, and after the media discovered Secretary Clinton relied exclusively on a personal server housing a personal email account eschewing any official email address, State Department transferred 300 messages exclusively reviewed and released by her own lawyers,” Gowdy said. “These lawyers, it must be noted, owed and continue to owe a fiduciary responsibility to Secretary Clinton to protect her interests. To assume a self-selected public record is complete, when no one with a duty or responsibility to the public had the ability to take part in the selection, requires a leap in logic no impartial reviewer should be required to make and strains credibility."

“It is also important to remember these email messages are just one piece of information that cannot be completely evaluated or fully understood without the total record. The Committee is working to collect and evaluate all of the relevant and material information necessary to evaluate the full range of issues in context.  We will not reach any investigative conclusions until our work is complete, but these emails continue to reinforce the fact that unresolved questions and issues remain as it relates to Benghazi.”

“The Select Committee continues to believe the American people have a right to the full and complete record of her official emails and, therefore, asked Secretary Clinton to turn her server and the full body of emails over to a neutral, detached, independent third party for review. This is also why the State Department must comply with a months-old subpoena for emails of the former Secretary’s top aides, whose emails have never been received or reviewed by any congressional committee."

“The Committee’s interest is in building a complete record from which the final, definitive accounting regarding the terrorist attacks in Benghazi can be provided.  The best way to answer all questions related to the attacks in Benghazi continues to be having access to the full public record, not a "record" controlled, possessed and screened exclusively by Secretary Clinton's personal lawyers.”  Background Information on Released Emails:

Among the emails the Select Committee finds highlight the existence of significant investigative questions:

• September 24, 2012—“Compiled protest and Benghazi Statements.” A document that reinforces issues relating to characterization of the motives for the attacks. For example, Jake Sullivan noted, “You never said spontaneous or characterized the motives. In fact you were careful in your first statement to say we were assessing motive and method. The way you treated the video in the Libya context was to say that some sought to *justify* the attack on that basis.”  

• August 24, 2012 — “H: Intel on new Libya president. Sid.” In this document two and a half weeks before the attacks, Jake Sullivan writes to the Secretary, “Some warning signs,” in response to the deteriorating security situation in Benghazi, which forced the Red Cross to suspend activities, and reinforces questions about what was done in response to these warnings.

April 4, 2012—“Secretary Clinton’s Leadership on Libya.” This document characterizes Secretary Clinton’s ownership of U.S. policy in Libya. 

April 8, 2011—“UK game playing; new rebel strategists; Egypt moves in. Sid” In this document, Secretary Clinton responded to a Blumenthal memo with, “Fyi. The idea of using private security experts to arm the opposition should be considered.” There are several instances of State personnel notifying the Secretary about security concerns and issues:

• April 10, 2011 – Forwarded email about deteriorating security

• April 22, 2011 – Request for continuous coverage in Benghazi, “security permitting”

April 24, 2011 – Forwarded email about hotels being targeted

June 10, 2011 – Email including information about credible threat info against hotel and that personnel are evacuating to alternate locations

August 21, 2011 – Email regarding concerns about Islamist militias

January 9, 2012 – Email stating that disarming and reintegrating of militias isn’t going as well as they had hoped

February 24, 2012 – Email stating that militia rivalries are dangerous

August 24, 2012 – Email stating that there are “some warning signs”

 

The Committee also has an interest in understanding the inexplicable gaps in the Secretary’s emails during key times of her involvement in Libyan policy, including:

June 10-August 8, 2011—Time period where Secretary Clinton was heavily involved in Libya policy

September 14-October 21 2011—Dates of Secretary Clinton’s trip to Libya, when the now-famous picture of Clinton on her blackberry was taken

October 21, 2011-January 5, 2012—Time period when the State Department was extending the Benghazi mission for another year

April 27- July 4 2012—Time period of increased security during which an IED was thrown at the compound blasting a hole through the wall and during which the British ambassador was attacked

[Artitech]

People, like me, that DO NOT won't old lady clinton as the POTUS ! I'm going back to operation Rush and have to vote in demo. primary election. Hope the right person appears on the ballot for general election in Nov.. I know some states are different than Texas on voting rules. JMHO, if old lady clinton does win the POTUS. Its an every man for himself deal. Like have a plan and a plan to act! Plan A for me was these IQD. Now its on to plan B. Most all know the dinar is a while down the road. So start preparing another way to protect yourselves and families! That's the bottom line any way. Happy Memorial Day to All Veterans. Thank You, for your service to our great country! Peace & Love !