Federal: members of the parliamentary opposition exercise full constitutional guarantees

[yota691]

Details of the session of the Federal Court on 01 July 2018 and the most prominent decisions taken in it

01-07-2018 02:13 PM

Readers

 

Baghdad News -

 

 

The Federal Supreme Court confirmed on Sunday that the provincial councils must abide by the general contexts of the Council of Ministers, pointing out that the approval of the competent minister to appoint senior positions in the provinces does not contradict with the Constitution.

 

"The court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and all the members of the judiciary, and considered the appeal against the unconstitutionality of paragraph (1) of Article (2) of Article (4) Of the Third Amendment Law of the Governorate Law, which includes the requirement that the Minister approve the appointment or rejection of senior positions in the governorate if the conditions for the candidate are not available.

 

"The court found that the text of the appeal does not conflict with the provisions of the Constitution. The conditions that must be met by the candidates for senior positions in the province require coordination with the federal government that set these conditions," the statement said.

 

The statement added that "the approval of the Council of Ministers on this context is the same for the degree of Director-General and above, so the text subject to appeal does not contradict with the provisions of the Constitution."

 

The statement pointed out that "the plaintiff - the President of the Council of Maysan province, in addition to his job - also challenged his claim to the unconstitutionality of Article (11) of the amendment law, which requires the province to maintain public contexts set by the Council of Ministers.

 

The statement said that "the Federal Court found the Council of Ministers and based on the provisions of Article (80 / I) of the Constitution is to plan and implement the general policy of the state, so the obligation contained in the article subject to appeal based on the article mentioned in the Constitution, The Federal Supreme Court decided to respond to the case because it is not based on the Constitution. "

 

 

 

[Butifldrm]

• Sweetened

Federal issued a provision on the commitment of the provinces in the general contexts of the Council of Ministers and appointments

13:36 - 01/07/2018

0

 

  

Information / Baghdad ..

The Federal Supreme Court confirmed on Sunday that the provincial councils must abide by the general contexts of the Council of Ministers, pointing out that the approval of the competent minister to appoint senior positions in the provinces does not contradict the Constitution.

"The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all the members of the judges and considered the appeal against the unconstitutionality of paragraph (1) of Article (II) of Article (4) of The third amendment law of the law of the provinces, including the need to approve the minister to appoint senior positions in the province or reject it if the conditions for the candidate is not available in it.

Al-Samok added that "the Federal Supreme Court found that the text of the appeal does not contradict with the provisions of the Constitution. The conditions that must be met by the candidates for senior positions in the province require coordination with the federal government that set these conditions. The approval of the Council of Ministers is a context for Is the rank of director general, so effective that the text subject to appeal does not conflict with the provisions of the Constitution.

He pointed out that "the plaintiff - the President of the Council of Maysan province, in addition to his job - also challenged his claim to the unconstitutionality of Article (11) of the amendment law, which requires the province to maintain public contexts set by the Council of Ministers.

And between Samok, that "the Federal Supreme Court found the Council of Ministers and based on the provisions of Article (80 / I) of the Constitution is to plan and implement the general policy of the state, so the object contained in the article subject to appeal based on the article mentioned in the Constitution, The Federal Supreme Court decided to respond to the case because it is not based on the Constitution. " Ending / 25

http://www.almaalomah.com/2018/07/01/322602/

[Butifldrm]

the Federal Court determines the competent authority to decide on the disputes of the electoral candidates

 

 Twilight News    

 

 50 minutes ago

 

 

The Supreme Court ruled that the competent authority to adjudicate disputes between candidates for elections to the membership of the Council of Representatives is the Independent High Electoral Commission and that the decision issued by it can be challenged before the judicial body of the elections formed in the Federal Court of Cassation. 
"The Federal Supreme Court held a session headed by Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all members of the judges, and considered a lawsuit filed by one of the candidates for membership of the House of Representatives objecting to the results of another candidate."
He added that "the Federal Supreme Court found that the law of the Independent High Electoral Commission No. (11) for the year 2007, in Article (8) thereof, has limited the competence to decide disputes between the candidates (the Electoral Administration for the resolution of disputes), which form the Independent High Electoral Commission, That the decision it makes on this dispute is subject to appeal before the Electoral Judicial Court, which is the problem in the Federal Court of Cassation. Accordingly, it was decided that the plaintiff's request to settle the dispute between him and his opponent would be outside the jurisdiction of the Federal Supreme Court provided for in Article 93 of the Constitution Article (4) of the law Ha No. (30) for the year 2005 ".

 

Keywords: 

http://www.shafaaq.com/ar/Ar_NewsReader/d77384f3-883b-4cbd-bc28-725a1d81ac25

[Butifldrm]

The Federal Court shall determine the competent authority to decide disputes between the candidates of the elections

12:29 - 02/07/2018

 

  

Information / Baghdad ..

The Supreme Federal Court ruled on Monday that the competent authority to adjudicate disputes between candidates for elections to the membership of the Council of Representatives is the Independent High Electoral Commission and that the decision issued by it can be challenged before the electoral tribunal formed in the Federal Court of Cassation.

"The Federal Supreme Court held a session headed by Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all the members of the judges, and considered a lawsuit filed by one of the candidates for membership of the House of Representatives objecting to the results of another candidate," the spokesman of the court, Ayas al-Samuk, said in a statement.

He added that "the Federal Supreme Court found that the law of the Independent High Electoral Commission No. (11) for the year 2007, in Article (8) thereof, has limited the competence to decide disputes between the candidates (the Electoral Administration for the resolution of disputes), which form the Independent High Electoral Commission" .

Al-Samok said that "the decision issued by the court on this dispute can be challenged before the Federal Electoral Court, and accordingly it is decided to dismiss the case. The plaintiff's request to settle the dispute between him and his opponent is outside the jurisdiction of the Supreme Federal Court, (93) of the Constitution and Article (4) of its Law No. (30) of 2005 ". Ending / 25

http://www.almaalomah.com/2018/07/02/322866/

[yota691]

02-07-2018 01:08 PM

Federal Supreme Court The Commission is responsible for deciding disputes between election candidates

 

 

 

The Supreme Federal Court ruled on Monday that the competent authority to adjudicate disputes between candidates for elections to the membership of the Council of Representatives is the Independent High Electoral Commission and that the decision issued by it can be challenged before the electoral tribunal formed in the Federal Court of Cassation.

"The Federal Supreme Court held a session headed by Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all the members of the judges, and considered a lawsuit filed by one of the candidates for membership of the House of Representatives objecting to the results of another candidate," the spokesman of the court Ayas al-Samuk said in a statement received by the news agency.

The statement added that the Supreme Federal Court found that the law of the Independent High Electoral Commission No. 11 of 2007 and Article 8 of it limited the competence to decide disputes between candidates (Electoral Administration for Dispute Resolution) The decision to issue this dispute shall be subject to appeal before the (Electoral Judiciary) formed by the Federal Court of Cassation. Accordingly, it shall be decided that the application of the plaintiff to settle the dispute between himself and his opponent shall be outside the jurisdiction of the Federal Supreme Court provided for in Article 93, Of the Constitution and Article (4) Of its law No. (30) for the year 2005 '.

[yota691]

URGENT The Federal Court determines the competent authority to decide disputes between candidates for elections

Release date: 2018/7/2 12:25 • 296 times read

The Federal Supreme Court ruled that the competent authority to adjudicate disputes between candidates for elections to the membership of the Council of Representatives is the Independent High Electoral Commission and that the decision issued by it can be challenged before the judicial body of the elections formed in the Federal Court of Cassation.

"The Federal Supreme Court held a session headed by Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all the members of the judges, and considered a lawsuit filed by one of the candidates for membership of the House of Representatives objecting to the results of another candidate," the court spokesman Ayas al-Samuk said in a statement.
He added that "the Federal Supreme Court found that the law of the Independent High Electoral Commission No. 11 of 2007, and in Article 8 of it, limited the competence to decide disputes between candidates in the Electoral Administration to resolve disputes, That the decision it makes on this dispute can be challenged before the Electoral Judicial Court in the Federal Court of Cassation. Accordingly, it was decided to dismiss the case. The plaintiff's request to resolve the dispute between him and his opponent is outside the jurisdiction of the Federal Supreme Court provided for in Article 93 of the Constitution Article {4} of the law Ha No. {30} for the year 2005 ".

[yota691]

Federal Court: Applications for ratification of elections are not possible before the final results are received

 

 

 

Number of readings: 313 03-07-2018 12:50 PM

 

 

03-07-2018 12:50 PM 

 

The Federal Supreme Court announced that it is not possible to consider applications related to the ratification or non-ratification of the results of the election of the membership of the House of Representatives before receiving the final results from the Independent High Electoral Commission. 

The court spokesman Ayas al-Samuk said that the Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the attendance of all members of the judges, and considered a request not to ratify the results of one of the candidates on the grounds that the decision of the National Commission for Accountability and Justice, which was issued in his favor has lost its main and essential elements, The quorum of the body '. 

He added that 'the Federal Supreme Court decided to respond to the request because it is premature, as the Federal Supreme Court can not make such requests only after receipt of the final results of the elections of the House of Representatives and since it has not received from the Electoral Commission for the elections so far, .

[yota691]

Federal Court: The 2018 elections can not be ratified before the implementation of this requirement

03-07-2018 01:36 PM

Readers

 

Baghdad News -

 

 

The Supreme Federal Court announced on Tuesday that it is not possible to consider applications related to the ratification or non-ratification of the results of elections to the membership of the House of Representatives before receiving the final results from the Independent High Electoral Commission. 

The spokesman of the court Ayas al-Samuk in a statement received 'Baghdad News' a copy of it, that' the Federal Supreme Court held its session headed by Judge Medhat Mahmoud and the presence of all members of the judges, and considered a request not to ratify the results of one of the candidates on the grounds that the decision of the National Commission for Accountability and Justice, Loss of its main and essential elements, particularly in relation to the non-completion of the quorum of the body '.

The statement added that 'the Federal Supreme Court decided to respond to the request because it is premature, as the Federal Supreme Court can not take such requests only after the final results of the elections of the House of Representatives, and since it has not received from the Electoral Commission for elections so far, the demand'.

 

 

 

[yota691]

URGENT Federal Court: Requests for ratification of elections are not possible before final results are received from UNHCR

Release date: 2018/7/3 12:02 • 147 times read

(Baghdad: Al Furat News) The Federal Supreme Court announced that it is not possible to consider applications related to the ratification or non-ratification of the results of the election of the membership of the House of Representatives before receiving the final results of the Independent High Electoral Commission.

"The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all members of the judges, and considered a request not to ratify the results of one of the candidates on the grounds that the decision of the National Commission for Accountability and Justice issued in his favor Loss of its basic and essential elements, especially in relation to the non-completion of the quorum of the body. " 
He added that "the Federal Supreme Court decided to respond to the request because it is premature, as the Federal Supreme Court can not make such requests only after receiving the final results of the elections of the House of Representatives and since it has not received from the Electoral Commission for elections so far, so decided to respond to the request" .is over

[yota691]

Federal Court: The chapter on the ratification of the elections after the receipt of final results from the Commission

 2018-07-03 10:28:12

Baghdad / Baghdadiya ... The Supreme Federal Court announced that it is not possible to consider applications related to the ratification or non-ratification of the results of the election of the membership of the House of Representatives before receiving the final results of the Independent High Electoral Commission. 
The court spokesman Ayas al-Samuk said in a statement that "the Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all members of the judges, and considered a request not to ratify the results of one of the candidates on the pretext that the decision of the National Commission for Accountability and Justice issued in his favor is missing the basic and essential elements, Concerning the non-completion of the quorum of the Commission. " 
He added that "

[ChuckFinley]

This has been one long ride. I hope they can put this to bed. 

[Butifldrm]

2018/07/08 13:21

Number of readings 67

Section: Iraq

The Federal Government provides simplified means for the exercise of legislative and supervisory powers

 

 

Baghdad / Al-Masala: On Sunday, July 8, 2018, the Federal Court clarified its role in drawing up simplified means to exercise legislative and supervisory powers, while the adversaries are satisfied with the rulings they issue to resolve their political differences as evidence of the status of the constitutional judiciary. 

"The days before the end of the third parliamentary session, as is known to the public opinion, has seen the session of several crises, the most severe split the House of Representatives to two chambers, as well as the threat of territorial integrity of Iraq, and among those Disputes and disputes emerged the role of the Federal Supreme Court in resolving the highest judicial body in the country responsible for the preservation of the constitutionality and legitimacy of what is issued by state institutions.

He added Samok, "The Supreme Federal Court has exercised during the last four years a pivotal role and contributed to political stability, economic and financial, and has exceeded that to the security side," explaining, "The beginning of the role of the Federal Supreme Court during the third session of the parliamentary through its constitutional competence to ratify the results The elections, and examined the names of the winners where it postponed the ratification of some even resolved claims filed against them before the competent courts, and refused to ratify others for the reasons of constitutional and legal.

He continued Samok, "The court also strengthened the last session the subject of legislative jurisdiction of the House of Representatives, through the application of Article (61) of the Constitution, and the exception of certain cases that the House of Representatives refer to the relevant authorities when the legislation of the laws, And the separation of powers, as well as the laws of the federal judicial authority, the other is that the Council can legislate any of the laws required by the approval of the Constitution. 

"The Federal Supreme Court clarified the issue of the supervisory mechanisms of the House of Representatives in the interrogation, as well as the parliamentary question to the officials in the executive authority, the concept of parliamentary immunity, and the mechanisms of amending the constitution. To exercise legislative and regulatory powers, "explaining" Perhaps the most important challenges faced by Iraq related to the crisis that resulted from the fragmentation of the House of Representatives to two chambers, and the inability of everyone to resolve the crisis, and then decided to dispute the parties to the Federal Supreme Court T returned in its life back to the House of Representatives united, which is for a period of disruption is not a small figure. "

Al-Samok said, "As the country was hit by another crisis, its impact could extend to social peace, a referendum of the Kurdistan region for separation from Iraq, and the rule of this regard stressed the unity of Iraq and the inadmissibility of the division of its territory, and the constitutionality of the referendum resolution, Believes in the safety of the Iraqi territory and its unity and the need to abide by what is stated in the Constitution, "pointing out that" in the face of attempts to postpone the general elections, the Federal Supreme Court also spoke, by ruling the need to adhere to the constitutional terms relating to the life of the parliamentary session as four calendar years From the start of the first session, and the necessity of holding elections before (45) days of termination. "

The Samok, that "despite the legislation of the House of Representatives three amendments to the Law of the elections of the House of Representatives No. (45) for the year 2013 during a record period, some resorted to the objections to those amendments one by one before the Federal Supreme Court, which settled the appeals and kept the texts that agree with the Constitution, "The most important thing to note is the confidence that the adversaries have to resort to the Federal Supreme Court to resolve the complex differences that the policy has failed to resolve, and the satisfaction they show," he said. After the issuance of the letters As well as proof of the status of the constitutional judiciary in Iraq and full conviction that what is issued is consistent with the Constitution in letter and spirit.

The obelisk

http://almasalah.com/ar/news/143225/الاتحادية-ترسم-وسائل-مبسطة-لممارسة-الاختصاصات-التشريعية-والرقابية

[Butifldrm]

Federal Supreme Court: This is our role in shaping the general policy of the state during the last period

 

BAGHDAD - The Federal Supreme Court issued a statement on the nature of its work in shaping the general policy of the state over the past period. " The days

before the end of the third session, as is known to the public opinion, The most prominent of these differences and disputes emerged the role of the Federal Supreme Court in settling it as the highest judicial body in the country responsible for the preservation of the constitutionality and legitimacy of what is issued by state institutions.

"The Supreme Federal Court exercised during the last four years a pivotal role and contributed to the political, economic and financial stability, and this has exceeded the security aspect," he continued. The beginning of the role of the Federal Supreme Court during the third parliamentary session through its constitutional competence to ratify the election results, The names of the winners have been examined, and some of them have been rejected until the cases against them have been settled before the competent courts and they have refused to ratify others for constitutional and legal reasons.

In the last session, the Court also strengthened the subject of the legislative jurisdiction of the House of Representatives through the application of Article (61) of the Constitution and exempting certain cases that the House of Representatives should refer to the relevant authorities when legislating the laws. The authorities, as well as the laws of the federal judicial authority, or the other, the Council can legislate any law as long as it agrees with the Constitution.

The Supreme Federal Court clarified the subject of the supervisory mechanisms of the House of Representatives in the interrogation, as well as the parliamentary question to the officials in the executive authority, the concept of parliamentary immunity and the mechanisms of amending the constitution.

The most important challenges faced by Iraq concerned the crisis that resulted from the split of the House of Representatives into two chambers, and the inability of everyone to resolve the crisis, and then the opponents decided to resort to the Federal Supreme Court, which re-ruled life again to the House of Representatives unified, which was interrupted for a period not a few.

And the ruling of this regard stressed the unity of Iraq and the inadmissibility of the division of its territory, and the constitutionality of the referendum resolution, and thus the Federal Supreme Court has enshrined the constitutional concept that believes in the safety of Iraqi territory Unity and the need to abide by the provisions of the Constitution.

In the face of attempts to postpone the general elections, the Federal Supreme Court also had its say, through its ruling on the necessity of complying with the constitutional terms relating to the age of the parliamentary session as four calendar years starting from the first session and the need to hold the elections 45 days before its expiry.

Despite the legislation of the House of Representatives three amendments to the Law of the elections of the House of Representatives No. (45) for the year 2013 during a record period, some resorted to the objections to those amendments one by one before the Federal Supreme Court, which settled appeals and kept the texts that conform to the Constitution, and ruled unconstitutional other articles Concerned the right of citizens to vote and the impossibility of canceling the results of a whole segment.

On the economic side, the Federal Supreme Court has played an important role in clarifying the concept of the state's fiscal policy in accordance with the Constitution, through the consideration of the appeals contained in the budget laws for fiscal years.

The Federal Supreme Court dealt with the issue of administrative decentralization through several provisions that showed the direction of the constitutional legislator in drawing up the relationship between the federal authorities and the local administrations in the exercise of their powers, especially with regard to the appointment of senior office holders in the provinces and control them and keep local councils and the possibility of dispensing others according to the options Legislative Council of Representatives.

The most important thing to note is the confidence that the adversaries have to resort to the Federal Supreme Court to resolve the complex differences that the policy has failed to resolve and the satisfaction they show after the verdicts. This is evidence of the status of the constitutional judiciary in Iraq and the full conviction that what it issues conforms to the constitution in letter and spirit .And finished

https://www.iraqpressagency.com/?p=278684

[yota691]

08-07-2018 04:09 PM

Samok: Federal court has exercised a pivotal role during the last four years

 

 

 

The Supreme Federal Court reviewed the most prominent achievements in the last four years.

The spokesman of the court, Elias Samok said in a statement, 'the days before the end of the third session of the parliament, as is known to the public opinion, has seen that the cycle of many crises, the most fragmented House of Representatives to two chambers, as well as the threat of territorial integrity of Iraq, And the interactions emerged in the role of the Federal Supreme Court in settling it as the highest judicial body in the country responsible for the preservation of the constitutionality and legitimacy of what is issued by state institutions.

"The Supreme Federal Court has exercised a pivotal role in the last four years and contributed to political, economic and financial stability, and this has gone beyond the security aspect."

He continued Samok 'was the beginning of the role of the Supreme Federal Court during the third session of the parliamentary through its constitutional competence to ratify the election results, has examined the names of the winners where it postponed the ratification of some even resolved claims filed against them before the competent courts and refused to ratify others for constitutional and legal reasons' .

He pointed out that the court has also strengthened the subject of the legislative jurisdiction of the House of Representatives through the application of Article 61 of the Constitution and the exception of certain cases that the House of Representatives should refer to the relevant authorities when legislating the laws. The authorities, as well as the laws of the federal judicial authority, or the other, the Council can legislate any laws as long as it agrees with the Constitution '.

Samok pointed out that 'the Federal Supreme Court has clarified the subject of the supervisory mechanisms of the House of Representatives in the questioning, as well as the question of parliamentary representatives of the executive authority, the concept of parliamentary immunity, mechanisms to amend the Constitution, and laid down rules for these procedures in accordance with constitutional contexts, And control '.

He continued 'Perhaps the most important challenges faced by Iraq related to the crisis that resulted from the fragmentation of the House of Representatives to two chambers, and the inability of everyone to resolve that crisis, and then decided to resort to the Supreme Federal Court, which re-ruled life again to the House of Representatives unified, which was interrupted for a period not a few' .

Al-Samok said, "As the country was hit by another crisis, its impact could extend to community peace, a referendum of the Kurdistan region for separation from Iraq, and the rule of this regard emphasized the unity of Iraq and the inadmissibility of the division of its territory, and the constitutionality of the referendum resolution, The territorial integrity and unity of Iraq and the need to abide by what is stated in the Constitution '.

He pointed out that "and in light of the attempts to postpone the general elections, the Federal Supreme Court also had its word, through its ruling on the need to adhere to the constitutional terms relating to the age of the parliamentary session as four calendar years starting from the first meeting and the need to hold the elections 45 days before its expiration.

"Despite the legislation of the House of Representatives three amendments to the Law of the elections of the Council of Representatives No. 45 of 2013 during a record period, some resorted to the objection to those amendments one by one before the Federal Supreme Court, which settled appeals and kept texts that conform to the Constitution, and ruled unconstitutional other articles Concerned the right of citizens to vote and the impossibility of canceling the results of a whole segment.

On the economic side, the Federal Supreme Court has played an important role in clarifying the concept of the state's fiscal policy in accordance with the Constitution, by considering the appeals contained in the budget laws for the financial years.

He added, 'The Federal Supreme Court addressed the issue of administrative decentralization through several provisions that showed the direction of the constitutional legislator in drawing up the relationship between the federal authorities and the local administrations in the exercise of their powers, especially with regard to the appointment of senior office holders in the provinces and control them and keep local councils and the possibility of dispensing with Other according to the legislative options of the House of Representatives'.

He concluded by saying that "the most notable thing is the confidence that the adversaries have to resort to the Federal Supreme Court to resolve the complex differences that the policy has failed to resolve and the satisfaction they show after the verdicts. This is evidence of the status of the constitutional judiciary in Iraq and the conviction that what it issues Conforms to the Constitution in letter and spirit '.

[yota691]

Federalism: satisfaction of the opponents of our judgments is evidence of the status of the constitutional judiciary

09/7/2018 12:00 am  Baghdad / Al-Sabah   The Federal Supreme Court Reza Al-Khattoum for the rulings issued by the Supreme Court to resolve their political differences evidence of the status of the constitutional judiciary, explaining its role in drawing up simplified means to exercise legislative and supervisory powers  .  The spokesman of the Federal Court, Iyas Samok, in a statement received by "morning": "The days before the end of the third session of the parliament, as is known to public opinion, has seen that the cycle of many crises hit the most fractured House of Representatives to two houses, as well as the threat of territorial integrity of Iraq , And amid these differences and interactions emerged the role of the Federal Supreme Court in settling the judiciary as the highest in the country responsible for the preservation of the constitutionality and legitimacy of what is issued by state institutions  . He added Samok, "The Supreme Federal Court has exercised during the last four years a pivotal role and contributed to political stability, economic and financial, and has exceeded that to the security side," explaining, "The beginning of the role of the Federal Supreme Court during the third session of the parliamentary through its constitutional competence to ratify the results The elections, and examined the names of the winners where it postponed the ratification of some even resolved claims filed against them before the competent courts, and refused to ratify others for the reasons of constitutional and legal. He continued Samok, "The court also strengthened the last session the subject of legislative jurisdiction of the House of Representatives, through the application of Article (61) of the Constitution, and the exception of certain cases that the House of Representatives refer to the relevant authorities when the legislation of the laws, And the separation of powers, as well as the laws of the federal judicial authority, or the other, the Council can legislate any laws as long as it agrees  with the Constitution.  "The Federal Supreme Court clarified the issue of the supervisory mechanisms of the House of Representatives in the interrogation, as well as the parliamentary question to the officials in the executive authority, the concept of parliamentary immunity, and the mechanisms of amending the constitution. To exercise legislative and supervisory powers, "pointing out that" Perhaps the most important challenges faced by Iraq related to the crisis that resulted from the fragmentation of the House of Representatives to two chambers, and the inability of everyone to resolve the crisis, and then decided to resort to the court court Supreme friendly that returned in its life back to the House of Representatives united, which is for a period of disruption is not  a  small figure. " Al-Samok said, "As the country has been hit by another crisis, the impact of which extends to the social ladder, the referendum of the Kurdistan region for separation from Iraq, and the rule of this regard stressed the unity of Iraq and the inadmissibility of the division of its territory, and the constitutional constitution of the referendum, The integrity of the Iraqi territory and its unity and the need to abide by what is stated in the Constitution, "noting that" in the face of attempts to postpone the general elections, the Federal Supreme Court also had the word, through its ruling to adhere to the constitutional terms relating to the life of the parliamentary session as four years And the beginning of the first meeting, and the need to hold elections before (45) days of extinction. " The Samok, that "despite the legislation of the House of Representatives three amendments to the Law of the elections of the House of Representatives No. (45) for the year 2013 during the record period, some resorted to object to those amendments one by one before the Federal Supreme Court, which settled the appeals and kept the texts that conform to the Constitution, "The most important thing to note is the confidence that the adversaries have to resort to the Federal Supreme Court to resolve the complex differences that the policy has failed to resolve, and the satisfaction they show," he said. After the issuance of the Which is evidence of the status of the constitutional judiciary in Iraq and the full conviction that what is issued is consistent with the Constitution in letter and spirit.

[yota691]

URGENT The Federal Court is challenging a budget article authorizing the House of Representatives to build a building for him

Date of release: 2018/7/10 12:13 • 296 times read

(Baghdad: Al Furat News) The Federal Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional article in the federal budget law of 2018 authorizes the House of Representatives to build a building with two billion dinars.

"The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all the members of the judges, and considered a lawsuit to challenge some articles of the General Budget Law for the fiscal year 2018, which was established by the Prime Minister / In addition to his job on the Speaker of the House of Representatives / in addition to his job. 
He added that "the lawsuit included eight appeals, two of them were rejected, and six were judged by the unconstitutionality of articles in the budget because they violate the Constitution." 
He added that "of the articles contested is Article (57 / first) of the law and provided for the allocation of about 300 billion dinars, including two billion dinars of the investment budget allocated for the construction of a building of the House of Representatives.
He explained that "the Federal Supreme Court found that the allocation of the House of Representatives for this amount and add it to the draft budget law for the year 2018 without reference to the Council of Ministers to take his approval contrary to Article {62 / II} of the Constitution, and obtaining the approval of the Economic Committee in the Council of Ministers on the project does not mean The approval of the Council of Ministers in accordance with the requirements of Article 62 / II of the Constitution and therefore ruled unconstitutional article. "

[yota691]

Ruling on the unconstitutionality of a substance in the budget authorizing the House of Representatives to construct a building for it

 2018-07-10 11:15:43 

 

The Supreme Federal Court ruled unconstitutional article in the budget authorizes the House of Representatives to build a building with two billion dinars.

"The court has considered a lawsuit to challenge some articles of the General Budget Law for the fiscal year 2018, which was set up by the Prime Minister, in addition to his job on the Speaker of the House of Representatives, in addition to his job," the court spokesman Ayas al-Samuk said in a statement. Was rejected, and six were judged by the unconstitutionality of articles in the budget because they violate the Constitution.

He added that "the material contested is Article (57 / first) of the law and provided for the allocation of about 300 billion dinars, including two billion dinars of the investment budget allocated for the construction of a building of the House of Representatives.

He explained that "the Federal Supreme Court found that the allocation of the House of Representatives for this amount and add it to the draft budget law for the year 2018 without reference to the Council of Ministers to take his approval contrary to Article (62 / II) of the Constitution, and therefore ruled unconstitutional article.

[Butifldrm]

Iraqi judicial policy ruled unconstitutional construction of the House of Representatives building

 

 Twilight News    

 

 2 hours ago

 

 

The Supreme Federal Court ruled unconstitutional article in the federal budget law of 2018 authorizes the House of Representatives to build a building for him two billion dinars. 
"The Supreme Federal Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the attendance of all the members of the judges, and considered a lawsuit to challenge some articles of the General Budget Law for the fiscal year 2018, which was established by the Prime Minister, in addition to his job on the Speaker of the House of Representatives, . 
He added that "the lawsuit included eight appeals, two of them were rejected, and six were judged by the unconstitutionality of articles in the budget because they violate the Constitution." 
He said that "of the articles contested is Article (57 / first) of the law and provided for the allocation of about 300 billion dinars, including two billion dinars of the investment budget allocated for the construction of a building of the House of Representatives.
He explained that "the Federal Supreme Court found that the allocation of the House of Representatives for this amount and add it to the draft budget law for the year 2018 without reference to the Council of Ministers to take his approval contrary to Article (62 / II) of the Constitution, and obtaining the approval of the Economic Committee in the Council of Ministers on the project does not mean The approval of the Council of Ministers in accordance with the requirements of Article (62 / II) of the Constitution and therefore ruled unconstitutional article ".

 

Keywords: 

http://www.shafaaq.com/ar/Ar_NewsReader/82ae989a-3761-4336-a2cd-4e02f647e738

[Butifldrm]

Federal Court ruled unconstitutional paragraph in the budget

1 minute ago

On Wednesday, the Federal Supreme Court ruled unconstitutionality in one of the paragraphs of the Budget Law of 2018, which would impede the implementation of investment projects .

"The Federal Supreme Court considered today's appeal the article (2 / II / 19) of the General Budget Law, which states that all sovereign guarantees of investment projects With the approval of the Council of Ministers and the ratification of the House of Representatives) .

The Samok, the court found that the House of Representatives added the last paragraph, which is the need to ratify the House of Representatives on the sovereign guarantees, to the draft law to be challenged without reference to the Council of Ministers .

He pointed out that "the court explained that this text would restrict the movement of the executive authority in contracts related to investment projects, and this interference in the affairs of the executive authority and contrary to the principle of separation of powers provided for in Article (47) of the Constitution, (I) of the Constitution . "

The spokesman added that "the Federal Supreme Court stated that it is not the competence of the House of Representatives to ratify the sovereign guarantees of investment projects, but it exercise its powers to control the performance of the executive authority in this area, and resort to constitutional means if there is a defect in performance, The movement of the executive authority by requiring the ratification of sovereign guarantees for investment projects. "

He added that "based on it decided the court to rule unconstitutional the last part of the article mentioned including the ratification of the House of Representatives on the guarantees of sovereignty . "

R.

http://www.nrttv.com/AR/News.aspx?id=2243&MapID=2

[yota691]

Federal Court overturns one of the paragraphs of the budget law added by Parliament

11:27 - 11/07/2018

 

 

 

BAGHDAD - Mawazine News 
The Federal Supreme Court ruled Wednesday, unconstitutional section in one of the paragraphs of the budget law for the year 2018, which would impede the implementation of investment projects. 
"The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat Al-Mahmoud, and the presence of all the members of the judges, and considered the appeal contained in Article (2 / II / 19) of the Budget Law," Ayas al-Samuk, the court's spokesman, said in a statement received by Mawazine News. Which states: (All sovereign guarantees for investment projects shall be approved by the Council of Ministers and approved by the House of Representatives) ". 
The Samok, "The court found that the House of Representatives added the last paragraph, which is the need to ratify the House of Representatives on the sovereign guarantees, to the draft law to be challenged without reference to the Council of Ministers.
He added that "the court explained that this text would restrict the movement of the executive authority in the contracts relating to investment projects, and this is interference in the affairs of the executive authority and contrary to the principle of separation of powers provided for in Article (47) of the Constitution, (I) of the Constitution. " 
The spokesman pointed out that "the Federal Supreme Court stated that it is not the competence of the House of Representatives to ratify the sovereign guarantees of investment projects, but it exercise its powers to control the performance of the executive authority in this area, and resort to constitutional means if there is a defect in performance, Restriction on the movement of the executive authority by requiring the ratification of the sovereign guarantees for investment projects, and accordingly the court decided to rule unconstitutional the last part of the said article including the ratification of the House of Representatives on the sovereign guarantees. "Ended 29 / a 43

[yota691]

Federal Court ruled unconstitutional one of the paragraphs of the budget

12/7/2018 12:00 am  BAGHDAD / Al-Sabah  The Supreme Federal Court has ruled unconstitutionality in one of the paragraphs of the budget law for 2018, which would impede the implementation of  investment projects  .  "The Supreme Federal Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat Al-Mahmoud, and the presence of all the judges, and considered the appeal contained in Article (2 / II / 19) of the General Budget Law Which states: (All sovereign guarantees for investment projects with the approval of the Council of Ministers and the ratification of the House of Representatives).  He added that "the Federal Supreme Court found that the House of Representatives added the last paragraph, which is the need to ratify the House of Representatives on the sovereign guarantees, to the draft law to be challenged without reference to the Council of Ministers." He explained that "the court explained that this text would restrict the movement of the executive authority in the contracts relating to investment projects, and this is interference in the affairs of the executive authority and contrary to the principle of separation of powers provided for in Article 47 of the Constitution, First) of the Constitution. "  Al-Samok added that "the Federal Supreme Court stated that it is not the competence of the House of Representatives to ratify the sovereign guarantees of investment projects, but it exercise its powers to control the performance of the executive authority in this area, and resort to constitutional means if there is a defect in performance, The movement of the executive authority by requiring the ratification of sovereign guarantees for investment projects, and accordingly the court decided to rule unconstitutional the last part of the said article including the ratification of the House of Representatives on the sovereign guarantees.

[Butifldrm]

The Federal Supreme Court launches a service (analytical index) that facilitates access to its provisions electronically

 

BAGHDAD, July 12 (UPI) - Judge Medhat al-Mahmud issued an "analytical index" to the rulings of the Federal Supreme Court.

The Samuk, that "this index on the homepage of the website of the Supreme Federal Court ( www.iraqfsc.iq ), includes the principles of the provisions and numbers and dates of the easily accessible by the users and in a very short time," noting, "The Federal Supreme Court is keen to inform Public opinion on its provisions and decisions, and easily and without the trouble of searching the electronic pages. "

He pointed out that "trends of the judge came after increased requests to the Information Office of the Federal Supreme Court by Iraqi researchers and foreigners to obtain the provisions and decisions published by the website in both Arabic and English." End Ah

https://www.iraqpressagency.com/?p=279077

[Butifldrm]

Federal Court launches an electronic service to facilitate access to its provisions

+ -

NRT

The Federal Supreme Court on Thursday launched an "analytical index" to facilitate access to all its provisions through its website .

"The President of the Supreme Federal Court Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud today directed the release of (analytical index) to the provisions of the Federal Supreme Court," said the spokesman of the court, Ias al-Samuk, said today (12 July 2018) that this index is on the main page of the website of the Court Federal High.

He added that the index contains the principles of the rules and figures and dates, making it easy for the users to access them in a very short time.

 The official spokesman of the court, "The Federal Supreme Court is keen to inform the public opinion on its provisions and decisions and easily and without the trouble of searching the electronic pages."

 He pointed out that "the directions of the President of the Court came after increasing requests to the Information Office of the Federal Supreme Court by Iraqi researchers and foreigners to obtain the provisions and decisions published by the website in both Arabic and English ."

Mr

http://www.nrttv.com/AR/News.aspx?id=2273&MapID=2

[yota691]

Federal Court launches electronic service facilitates access to its provisions

Editorial date: 2018/7/12 11:03 • 164 times read

{Baghdad: Al Furat News} The Federal Supreme Court has launched an {analytical index} that facilitates access to all its rulings through its website.

"The president of the Federal Supreme Court, Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud, today ordered the release of an" analytical index "of the provisions of the Federal Supreme Court," the court spokesman Ayas al-Samuk said in a statement received by the agency {Euphrates News}. 
"This index, which is on the homepage of the Supreme Federal Court websitewww.iraqfsc.iq , contains the principles, figures and dates of the sentences that are easy for the users to access and in a very short time." 
The Samok, "The Federal Supreme Court is keen to inform the public opinion of its provisions and decisions and easily and without the trouble of searching in the electronic pages."
He explained that "the directions of Judge Mahmoud came after increasing requests to the Information Office of the Federal Supreme Court by Iraqi researchers and foreigners to obtain the provisions and decisions published by the website in both Arabic and English."

[yota691]

Federal Court: The government submitted eight appeals against the budget law

01:51 - 12/07/2018

 

 

 

BAGHDAD - Mawazine News 
The Federal Court revealed on Thursday that the government submitted eight appeals to the General Budget Law. 
The spokesman for the court, Ayas al-Samok, in a press statement informed / Mawazin News / it, "The total appeals submitted by the Prime Minister in addition to his function on the Federal Budget Law for the year 2018 amounted to eight appeals." 
Samok added that "the court settled these appeals during a record period, which is three sessions only after hearing the lists of parties, the Deputy Prosecutor of the Council of Ministers, in addition to his job, and the defendant, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, in addition to his job. 
The Spokesman pointed out that "a section of appeals extended allocations in the House of Representatives of the budget of 290 billion dinars." Ended 29 / a 43