Climate Change Conference in Paris to Begin in 2 Weeks

[Whatshername]

Global Warming alarmists are about to gather in Paris for the biggest climate carnival in their 21 year history, the 2015 United Nations Climate Conferences, or COP 21.  Surely on their 21st birthday it is time they grew up and faced some adult world problems.
 

 

What will it take?  We need to stop asking liberals how dumb they can get... they're beginning to take it as a challenge!  The Global Hoax of Global Cooling Global Warming Climate Change must go FORWARD... IN PARIS... because they have so much invested, they need the weak-minded of the world to believe that it's the most pressing issue and biggest danger we face.  

 

http://www.wclimate.com/world-climate-summit-2015/

 

 

AL GORE IN PARIS: BROADCASTING FROM EIFFEL TOWER AS FRANCE PARIS ATTACK RAGES

 

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/11/13/al-gore-in-paris-broadcasting-from-eiffel-tower-as-france-paris-attack-rages/

 

 

 

 

Paris Attacks Won't Deter Coming Climate Talks, Officials Say

 

http://banned site link - malware reported.org/climate/2015/11/14/3722291/paris-climate-talks-security/

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

 

wow... depressing that he actually believes that...

whatta tool.  

wonder how many dead dinosaurs he'll burn up gittin' there to perpetuate yet

 another one of his great lies.  

[Texstorm]

I was thinking.......naw we couldn't be so lucky ! 

[Whatshername]

I was thinking.......naw we couldn't be so lucky ! 

 

I was thinkin' it too!  And NO... we couldn't be!  We should both be ashamed...

[Texstorm]

How come I don't feel bad ? 

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

 

the insensitive irony of it is absolutely sickening, actually.

 

proving once again hobummer and his ilk have no class.

[FlyHi]

Here are some comments worth looking at with link below text.

 

Good Hearts, Fooled Minds: 4 Fallacies of the (Hijacked) Environmental Movement

 

 

 

15th November 2015

By Makia Freeman

Contributing Writer for Wake Up World

The hijacked environmental movement is a symptom of the current general, collective state of humanity: good hearted but ignorant. Many people in the environmental movement are in it for the right reasons: they see the ongoing poisoning and destruction of the planet, led by corporations, and are determined to defend and speak out for the Earth. Yet, in spite of their good intentions, they have unwittingly allowed themselves to be channeled in a direction that is not really going to help the Earth, unintentionally supporting the very forces that are responsible for the pillaging of it.

By continuing to push notions that carbon dioxide is a poison, that global warming exists and all of mankind is responsible for it, that we need a worldwide carbon tax and that we require Agenda 21-style global governance, these people are unknowingly promoting the New World Order program – and unwittingly placing elite controllers in power who don’t care about the environment and view it merely as a resource to be exploited. It has even gotten to the point where those opposing popular beliefs about climate change (another Rothschild-Rockefeller creation) are being treated like criminal extremists – there have even been calls in the US for Obama to prosecute them!

Welcome to Planet Earth. If your opinion diverges too much from the mainstream, you could get locked up for thinking “wrongly”.

 

 

With the current focus being on the outcomes of the recent 2015 UN Summit, the hackneyed buzzword of sustainability is being thrown around like there’s no tomorrow. In this context, it’s worth revisiting how the environmental movement came to be so hijacked and co-opted.

Basis for the Hijack: Conspiracy Reports from The Iron Mountain and The Club of Rome

The basis for the hijacked environment movement lies within formerly secret military reports, and one of the elite Round Table groups that run the world: the Club of Rome. I wonder if those who believe in AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) or Manmade Global Warming have any idea that the elite came up with the idea of using mankind itself as the global threat against which we are all supposed to gather behind a One World Government? The 1966 Report from the Iron Mountain was commissioned by John F. Kennedy and considered by Lyndon B. Johnson as too dangerous to reveal to the public at the time when it was completed. This excerpt from it discusses how a global government could be imposed without war, and suggests the threat could instead be environmental pollution:

“

 The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power…

 An effective political substitute for war would require “alternate enemies,” some of which might seem equally farfetched in the context of the current war system. It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principal sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced, and at first glance would seem promising in this respect; it constitutes a threat that can be dealt with only through social organization and political power. But from present indications it will be a generation to a generation and a half before environmental pollution, however severe, will be sufficiently menacing, on a global scale, to offer a possible basis… [however] the rate of pollution could be increased selectively for this purpose”.

The Club of Rome is one of 6 groups that are close to the center of the Rhodesian Round Table (ultimately funded by Rothschild) which also includes The Bilderberg Group, the CFR, the RIIA, the United Nations and The Trilateral Commission. The Club of Rome’s 1991 document entitled The First Global Revolution? contains this passage:

“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together … all these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

Are You Being ‘Green Washed’?

The current environmental movement we see today was hijacked a long time ago. Let’s take a look at the top 4 fallacies the NWO conspirators have managed to get ‘greenies’ to believe.

The Hijacked Environmental Movement Fallacy #1: Carbon Dioxide is a Poison

Let’s start with the basics: carbon dioxide (CO2) is a nutrient, not a poison. We breathe out carbon dioxide every breath, but we also take some of it in on the inbreath. According to the IPCC (Interplanetary Panel on Climate Change), we are therefore poisoning ourselves every breath! Think about it – if CO2 were really a poison, why does it help plants grow so much? Why is it a key part of the fundamental equation of biology: sugar + oxygen = carbon dioxide + water + heat? How is it that those in the environmental movement are ignorant of basic biology?

As the website PlantsNeedCO2.org states, the more CO2 around, the better plants grow:

“In Idso and Idso’s (1994) analysis of soil nutrient limitations, the percentage growth enhancement due to a 300-ppm rise in the air’s CO2 content actually did exhibit a slight (but statistically non-significant) decline, dropping from 51% to 45% when nutrients went from non-growth-limiting to limiting in a group of 70 experiments. But when the atmospheric CO2 enrichment was 600 ppm, this slight negative trend reversed itself, going from a CO2-induced growth stimulation of 43% when nutrients were present in abundance to a 52% enhancement when their supply was sub-optimal. And for a 1200-ppm increase in atmospheric CO2, the percentage growth enhancement jumped from 60% when the soil nutrient supply was adequate to 207% when it was less-than-adequate.”

It’s a simple equation: the more CO2 you have, the more the plants like it, and the faster they will grow.

The demonization of carbon dioxide is not about helping the environment. The NWO idea has always been to attach the worsening condition of the environment to an individual’s energy usage – and even his or her breathing – so as to introduce a carbon tax. The Government literally wants to tax you for breathing – for merely being alive.

The Hijacked Environmental Movement Fallacy #2: The Manmade Global Warming Hoax

AGW or man-made global warming has been exposed as a giant scam. It still remains an open question whether the world is actually warming or cooling, given all the fakery and fudging of data, such as ClimateGate, where hackers found that scientists at the UK’s East Anglia University had deliberately distorted the figures. (See the work of Ian Plimer,Christopher Monckton and others in exposing this.) That is why the term global warming got changed to climate change – this way, no matter what happens with the weather, the IPCC can say the climate is changing. But climate change is a slick truism – you can’t argue against it. Of course the climate is changing. When has it not changed?

The great documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle years ago exposed the lies behind the very political climate change agenda. More than 1,000 dissenting scientists from around the globe have challenged the man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), undermined its claims of scientific consensus, and shredded its credibility in the process. Furthermore, changes in climate (whether human behavior is causing them or not) are not necessarily bad; in some cases studies have suggested recent changes in climatic conditions are responsible for re-greening parts of the world and changing lives for the better. (see Geospatial Sciences Center of Excellence, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007-3510)

The Hijacked Environmental Movement Fallacy #3: The Carbon Tax and Global Governance as Eco-Solutions

 

As pointed out above, all this focus on carbon is for one reason: taxation. The whole scheme to get people and corporations fixated on their carbon footprint – rather than how much actual benefit or harm they are doing the environment – is to pave the way for more taxation and centralization of power. To have a worldwide carbon tax, of course, you need a One World Government to enforce and collect it. The UN, ICLEI and its other subdivisions are constantly talking about global governance for this very reason.

In this context, “global governance” means centralizing vast amounts of power into a body destined to become the World Government, under the pretext of fighting man-made global warming or climate change. It also means extending the reach of the United Nations so that local bodies such as local councils and municipalities that belong to ICLEI, (the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, created in 1990 as a non-governmental spin-off of the United Nations) can implement its global directives and make it look ‘grassroots’, or like it was locally decided.

For further information on this topic, check out George Hunt’s work in exposing how Evelyn Rothschild and David Rockefeller were cooking up the cap-and-trade scheme in the 1980s. Hunt was present at some of the meetings where the carbon tax was first being discussed.

The Hijacked Environmental Movement Fallacy #4: Overpopulation

Mahatma Gandhi once said: “Earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s need, but not every man’s greed.” There is no doubt that rising populations can put a strain on resources, yet where is the proof that the Earth cannot support 7 billion people? Or 9 billion people? Is it really population that is the problem here, or is it rather self-centered greed and destructive environmental practices and technologies?

We can accept the world’s rising population not as a threat or a reason to justify killing (which goes by the euphemism of depopulation) but rather as a challenge. It can propel us into living more from the heart, to having more compassion for those less well off than us, to doing a better job of sharing, of distributing resources equitably. It can stimulate us into better modes of efficiency. Could the rising population help a critical mass of people awake to the truth of free energy, and the fact that free energy or over unity devices already exist which provide practically unlimited energy for free or very cheaply?

It has been known in many countries for a long time that as you increase education, you decrease population, naturally. There is no need for stealth sterilization programs, introducing contraceptives through vaccines or other depopulation murder programs. When people gain a higher education, they organically choose to have less kids. If the conspirators really cared about the planet’s population, why not use their money to help everyone access better education? The answer is, of course, that they don’t.

Underpinning the propaganda of overpopulation is eugenics. It’s the idea that some humans are superior to others, and that some humans don’t deserve to be here. This is really the philosophical and spiritual basis of the hijacking. As they have confessed, the conspirators in their delusions view the rest of the population as a virus that must be rid from the planet. Yet, the real virus is the fear mindset that runs the show in the brains of the elite controllers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.” ~ Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh

The Real Problem Isn’t Climate Change or Carbon

The real problem with the environment isn’t climate change or carbon, it’s that we as a collective species are trashing and degrading it. We spill oil in our oceans and rivers. We kill off species faster than we can even classify them. We make substances that don’t biodegrade and end up in giant landfills. We cut down forests without taking enough care to replace them. We use an economic system which incentivizes planned obsolescence and economically encourages us to throw things away rather than repair them. We let maniacal men rule out-of-control Governments that spray toxic weather-altering chemicals like barium, aluminum and strontium chemtrails all over the world – and get away with it.

What does any of this have to do with climate change or carbon? These 2 terms are a huge distraction and a deliberate way to trick people who genuinely care for the environment.

Solution: Get Informed Before You Demonstrate

Do you deeply care for the environment? Great! Then do your research first before joining any protests. Oppose fracking, GMOs, toxic energy systems, geoengineering, and corporate welfare to military companies (the Pentagon is the biggest polluter on planet).

Last year, in September 2014, around 400,000 people turned up in New York for the People’s Climate March – but what is the point of this activism if it gets diverted?

As journalist Naomi Klein wrote in an article for The Nation:

S

ome of the most powerful and wealthiest environmental organizations have… led the climate movement down various dead ends: carbon trading, carbon offsets, natural gas as a “bridge fuel” — what these policies all held in common is that they created the illusion of progress while allowing the fossil fuel companies to keep mining, drilling and fracking with abandon. We always knew that the groups pushing hardest for these false solutions took donations from, and formed corporate partnerships with, the big emitters. But this was explained away as an attempt at constructive engagement — using the power of the market to fix market failures. Now it turns out that some green groups are 

literally part owners of the industry causing the crisis they are purportedly trying to solve

.

When it comes to our environment, as David Icke says, we need streetwise spirituality. We need to have our hearts in the right places, but also put our thinking caps on, otherwise we will easily by led astray by tricksters. Only once the leaders of the environmental movement have their hearts and brains in alignment can we effect real change on the ecosystems of Planet Earth.

 

http://wakeup-world.com/2015/11/15/good-hearts-fooled-minds-top-4-fallacies-of-the-hijacked-environmental-movement/

[Whatshername]

How come I don't feel bad ? 

 

For the same reason that I do not feel bad!      It might be a bit 'too soon' but it's funny!   And wherever there is humor, there's some truth.  They're practically begging for it!   It would be just the thing to snap these doomsday alarmists into reality... like that's gonna happen... 

[FlyHi]

Cliff notes from article I brought over above.

 

Sorry I meant to hightlight the points/headings as this allows clarity to an otherwise long read.

 

 

Good Hearts, Fooled Minds: 4 Fallacies of the (Hijacked) Environmental Movement:

 

Are You Being ‘Green Washed’?

The current environmental movement we see today was hijacked a long time ago. Let’s take a look at the top 4 fallacies the NWO conspirators have managed to get ‘greenies’ to believe.

 

The Hijacked Environmental Movement Fallacy #1: Carbon Dioxide is a Poison

 

The Hijacked Environmental Movement Fallacy #2: The Man Made Global Warming Hoax

 

The Hijacked Environmental Movement Fallacy #3: The Carbon Tax and Global Governance as Eco-Solutions

 

The Hijacked Environmental Movement Fallacy #4: Overpopulation

 

"The Real Problem Isn’t Climate Change or Carbon

The real problem with the environment isn’t climate change or carbon, it’s that we as a collective species are trashing and degrading it. We spill oil in our oceans and rivers. We kill off species faster than we can even classify them. We make substances that don’t biodegrade and end up in giant landfills. We cut down forests without taking enough care to replace them. We use an economic system which incentivizes planned obsolescence and economically encourages us to throw things away rather than repair them. We let maniacal men rule out-of-control Governments that spray toxic weather-altering chemicals like barium, aluminum and strontium chemtrails all over the world – and get away with it.

What does any of this have to do with climate change or carbon? These 2 terms are a huge distraction and a deliberate way to trick people who genuinely care for the environment.

Solution: Get Informed Before You Demonstrate"

[Whatshername]

Cliff notes from article I brought over above.

 

Sorry I meant to hightlight the points/headings as this allows clarity to an otherwise long read.

 

 

Good Hearts, Fooled Minds: 4 Fallacies of the (Hijacked) Environmental Movement:

 

Are You Being ‘Green Washed’?...

 

Good article… Thanks FlyHi!  No doubt many good people have been hoodwinked.  Truth is… a simple Google search of “Climate Change Hoax” should give any thinking person enough information to at least be skeptical.

 

The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions.

 

[Whatshername]

Why can't the terrorists see that climate change is the most important security issue?

 

By Jack Hellner

 

 

We shouldn't allow this isolated event in Paris to take our eye off the ball. After all we have our President, Secretary of State and top Democratic candidate focused like a laser beam on the most dangerous threat to our freedom; climate change. They are showing true leadership. Al Gore was doing a 24 hour webcast at the Eiffel Tower Friday the 13th on climate change. If only the terrorists had been listening maybe they could have understood how much we cared and the attack wouldn’t have happened.

 

Thank goodness France is a gun free zone. That kept them safe.

 

As the President said Friday, ISIS is contained. As in 2012 when he said we have the terrorists on the run. His thoughts and talking points are obviously based on reality. After all we are sending in 50 advisors to Syria. That should handle it.

 

ISIS and other terrorist groups do not believe in economic freedom, political freedom, free speech, religious freedom or women's' rights but if we can control the temperature and sea levels that should change their minds.

 

The migrants from Africa would not be going to Europe if they could see all the work being done on climate change. If Africa could just reduce their quality and length of life by getting rid of fossil fuels they would stay. The secondary reason for them leaving is that tyrants and terrorists are killing them.

 

The World politicians can't handle a relatively small terrorist group like ISIS, can't figure out how to fix a small economy like Greece but yet are so arrogant they believe they can control the temperature within one or two degrees two hundred years out and absolutely control the levels of the sea.

 

When I heard about the Paris attack, I thought for sure it was caused by a video no one had seen.

 

Heaven help us!

[FlyHi]

This is another delightful

 

[Shabibilicious]

Everybody with an opinion should attend the Climate Change Conference...... Hot air windbag believers and Cold hearted deniers, coming together for the common good.    

 

GO RV, then BV

[bigwave]

Everybody with an opinion should attend the Climate Change Conference...... Hot air windbag believers and Cold hearted deniers, coming together for the common good.    

 

GO RV, then BV

What is the common good?

[Shabibilicious]

What is the common good?

 

The common good is what America always does......grid lock.    

 

GO RV, then BV

[dog53]

The planet has always heated up and cooled off.

It has always been this way it is the way that it will remain.

Everything is in cycles . Everything

birth death everything is a continuing circle .

Cold heat doesnt matter through each cycle mankind has adapted to the change.

The question should not be what do we do about it

It should be how do we live with it.

To think that we could actualy hurt the earth mother is just another

illusion of grandeur held by mankind. It is a foolish thought.

The mother can simply shrug her shoulders and we would be cast off like fleas

on a dog. She permits us to exist here.

To think any thing else is madness.

These are the words of the first nations.

Adapt or perish   

[Shabibilicious]

Well if I can't hurt her.....then tossing trash out the car window is once again a viable option.    

 

GO RV, then BV 

[dog53]

Well if I can't hurt her.....then tossing trash out the car window is once again a viable option.    

 

GO RV, then BV 

 

 

Go for it. If you like filth and garbage over laying the landscape.

Littering wont hurt the planet but it does tend to diminish its worth 

Kinda like Pi$$ing on the mona lisa.

know what I mean 

[Shabibilicious]

Go for it. If you like filth and garbage over laying the landscape.

Littering wont hurt the planet but it does tend to diminish its worth 

Kinda like Pi$$ing on the mona lisa.

know what I mean 

 

Thanks to litterers....my childhood beer can collection was AWESOME.     Falstaff....barf!!!   

 

GO RV, then BV