Security Council ended its meeting on Syria without agreement

[yota691]

Security Council ended its meeting on Syria without agreement

New York - AFP

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Ended the meeting of the five permanent members of the Security Council, without reaching agreement on the situation in Syria.

And held by the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, which has the right of veto, again on Thursday evening closed consultations in New York, dealing with the Syrian file, according to the diplomats said. were ambassadors of the United States, France, Britain, China and Russia met on Wednesday, from without يتوافقوا on a draft resolution authorizing military intervention in Syria, with the continued refusal of Moscow and Beijing on this matter.

 

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

 

U.N.  wow... pretty effective bunch, huh...  can't even do what they were designed to.....

[yota691]

***///

 

U.N.  wow... pretty effective bunch, huh...  can't even do what they were designed to.....

The UN investigation team that in Syria are to report on Saturday, to Ban Ki Moon..so until then no decision will made... and GM ladies and all of DV...

Holland: military will not be a blow to Syria before next Wednesday

•  
•  

  

0-08-2013 12:54 PM

 

 

(News) .. ruled by French President Francois Hollande, the possibility that directed the United States and its allies blow to Syria before next Wednesday. considered Holland that the refusal of the British Parliament allowing the government to participate in a possible military operation against Syria, does not affect the will of his country to punish the regime of Bashar al-Assad because of attack a chemical weapons attack on the people. / End /

Berlin will not participate in a military operation against Syria

Berlin AFP

Friday, August 30, 2013

Said German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said his country would not participate in a military operation in Syria.

Westerwelle said in a newspaper interview be published "Noi Osnabruecker Zeitung" Local Saturday "did not ask us to" participate in a military operation against the Damascus regime "does not think" in such participation.

It came far announced by French President Francois Hollande that he does not rule out air strikes to the Syrian regime before Wednesday, pointing out that the British House of Commons refused to participate in a military operation against Syria will not affect the position of France's proposal to move "disproportionate and firm" against Damascus.

During a conference call .. White House, Congress provides new evidence on the use of chemical weapons in Syria

•  
•  

  

30-08-2013 11:15 AM

 

 

(News) .. Provided the administration of President Barack Obama, lawmakers Americans what she described as new evidence that the Syrian government is responsible for the attack with chemical weapons but faced stiff resistance to any military action from both the Republican and Democratic parties and flatly of Britain's main ally. During a conference call on Thursday at the end of day difficult for the White House, U.S. officials told members of Congress that they do not have 'no doubt' that used chemical weapons in Syria last week. Said Elliott Angel - the most prominent Democrats in the Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Representatives - that aides Obama pointed to the telecommunications Syrian officials were intercepted and evidence on the movements of the Syrian army around Damascus before the attack, which killed more than 300. participated in the conference call, which lasted 90 minutes and was organized by U.S. administration to inform the most prominent members of Congress on the developments in Syria, Foreign Minister John Kerry and Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and the national security adviser Susan Rice and other senior U.S. officials. said many lawmakers from both Republican and Democrat that the conference provided a convincing argument for military action. But many were not convinced many of them senior lawmakers from both parties. Among those Democrat Carl Levin, chairman of the Armed Services Committee in the Senate, which is usually a strong supporter of Obama. Said Levin after the conference on Thursday that he must be on the White House to freeze any military action until at least complements the UN inspectors investigations at the site of the attack. said Levin that the White House is also to rally international support for intervention in Syria, a condition that seems far-fetched increasingly after British House of Commons rejected military intervention during the vote on Thursday. At the same time, U.S. lawmakers gave others a series of complexities in the way of Obama. Has raised questions of whether military action 'limited' proposed by Obama will prevent Syrian President Bashar al-Assad really foot again on the use of chemical weapons against civilians and whether it could Pentagon bear the cost of attacking Syria after being approved by Congress to reduce government spending $ 85 billion earlier this year. seems to be doubts growing about Obama's call for military intervention in Syria are more likely to provide the United States to act alone, if it wants to launch a missile attack to punish Assad's government to violate international law by using chemical weapons. After the parliamentary vote, said British Defense Secretary Philip Hammond said Britain would not participate in any strike, but added 'I do not expect that the non-participation of Britain will stop any work.' Following the conference, said some lawmakers that he is still in front of the Obama administration a lot of work to convince the masses need to enter the United States militarily in Syria. / End /

Larijani accused Washington of preparation in advance of the attack on Syria

Tehran UPI

Friday, August 30, 2013

Accused the head of the Iranian Shura Council, Ali Larijani, the United States as prepared in advance for its possible attack on Syria, such as the war waged by Israel against Lebanon in 2006.

The agency quoted "dowry," the Iranian news agency, to Larijani, saying "it is impossible to be Americans had prepared during the past few days to conduct military operations against Syria, where they are prepared for it a few months ago .. and make America this is along the lines of the war 33 days (Israeli on Lebanon), which was planned in advance. "

He added that the "deal Americans toward Syria is striking, since claimed that based on the technical manuals that the Syrian government has used weapons chemical, which is why they do not need the permission of the United Nations to launch an attack on Syria .. This claim shows that they see themselves as an international police" .

Larijani said that "accusing the Syrian government of using chemical weapons is just an excuse."

Osborne: uncertainties in the global role of Britain after the parliamentary opposition to strike Syria

LONDON (Reuters)

Friday, August 30, 2013

Said British Finance Minister George Osborne said the British government's defeat in a ballot conducted by Parliament on participation in a military strike against Syria will provoke debate about whether London was still seeking to play a pivotal role in the world.

Oosbon told the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) "will be the process of soul-searching at the national level on our role in the world and whether Britain wants to play a major role in strengthening the international system."

Asked whether the defeat of the government of Prime Minister David Cameron in the ballot parliamentary happened yesterday would damage the alliance of London with the United States, he said, "there is some exaggeration in this matter during the twenty-four hours ago. Relationship with the United States are old and very deep and is working to several fronts. "  and rejected the House of Commons on Thursday evening a memorandum submitted by the government to justify a military strike against the Syrian regime in response to the use of chemical weapons, in a setback for Prime Minister David Cameron, who has pledged to comply with the will of the House of Representatives. Cameron said after the vote it was clear that the parliament " does not want military intervention Britain. has taken note of this matter and the government will act accordingly, "stressing his commitment to" respect the will of the House of Commons. "

The White House is facing stiff resistance in Congress for any military action against Syria

WASHINGTON (Reuters)

Friday, August 30, 2013

Provided the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama for U.S. lawmakers what she described as new evidence that the Syrian government is responsible for the attack with chemical weapons, but faced stiff resistance to any military action from both the Republican and Democratic parties and categorically from Britain's main ally.

During a conference call Thursday at the end of a difficult day for the White House, U.S. officials told members of Congress that they do not have "any doubt" that used chemical weapons in Syria last week.

Elliott said Angel - the most prominent Democrats, members of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Representatives - Obama's aides pointed to the telecommunications Syrian officials were intercepted and evidence on the movements of the Syrian army around Damascus before the attack, which killed more than 300.

And participated in the conference call, which lasted 90 minutes and was organized by the U.S. administration to inform the most prominent members of Congress on the developments in Syria, Foreign Minister John Kerry and Chuck Hagel Defense Minister and national security adviser Susan Rice and other senior U.S. officials.

He said many lawmakers from the Republican and Democratic parties that the conference provided a convincing argument for military action. But many were not convinced, including many senior lawmakers from both parties. Of these, Carl Levin, Democratic chairman of the Armed Services Committee in the Senate, which is usually a strong supporter of Obama.

Levin said after the conference Thursday that he must be on the White House to freeze any military action at least until UN inspectors complete their investigation at the site of the attack. He added that the White House is also to rally international support for intervention in Syria, a condition that seems increasingly elusive after the British House of Commons rejected military intervention during the vote on Thursday.

At the same time, U.S. lawmakers gave others a series of complexities in the way of Obama. Has raised questions of whether military action "limited" proposed by Obama will prevent Syrian President Bashar al-Assad really taking second on the use of chemical weapons against civilians and whether it could Pentagon bear the cost of attacking Syria after being approved by Congress to reduce government spending $ 85 billion earlier this year.

It seems that the growing doubts about Obama's call for military intervention in Syria, they are more likely to provide the United States to act alone if it wants to launch a missile attack to punish Assad's government to violate international law by using chemical weapons.

After the parliamentary vote and said British Defense Secretary Philip Hammond said Britain would not participate in any strike, but added, "I do not expect that the non-participation of Britain will stop any work."

Following the conference, some lawmakers said he was still in front of the Obama administration a lot of work to convince the public of the necessity of the United States military intervention in Syria.

Edited August 30, 2013 by yota691

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

 

The UN investigation team that in Syria are to report on Saturday, to Ban Ki Moon..so until then no decision will made... and GM ladies and all of DV...

Holland: military will not be a blow to Syria before next Wednesday

•  
•  

  

0-08-2013 12:54 PM

 

 

(News) .. ruled by French President Francois Hollande, the possibility that directed the United States and its allies blow to Syria before next Wednesday. considered Holland that the refusal of the British Parliament allowing the government to participate in a possible military operation against Syria, does not affect the will of his country to punish the regime of Bashar al-Assad because of attack a chemical weapons attack on the people. / End /

 

***///

 

Thanks, YOTA ! 

 

We'd heard a report supposedly "leaked" that the U.N.'s only job was to

determine if indeed CW had been used, not by "whom". 

 

And part of that same "leak" inferred that the CW had indeed been used - by 'rebel insurgents' aka

terrorists fighting with the anti-ASSad forces.

 

So we don't expect much out of the U.N.

 

We have yet to see them jump  in with their blue helmets to

protect the "innocent" masses of the world from the use of CW's....

 

The people the UN REALLY work for have no interest in stemming the tide of unrest in the region,

all a part of their effort to control world population....

 

More of their handiwork in this regard can be seen in the African nations.

[yota691]

Britain's Cameron: I don't need to apologize to Obama over Syria defeat

 

 

 

 

 

LONDON | Fri Aug 30, 2013 6:58am EDT

(Reuters) - Prime Minister David Cameron said on Friday he regretted the failure of the British parliament to support military action in Syria but that he hoped President Barack Obama would understand the need to listen to the wishes of the people.

"I think the American public, the American people and President Obama will understand," Cameron said just hours after parliament voted against a government motion to authorize the principle of military action in Syria.

"I haven't spoken to him (Obama) since the debate and the vote but I would expect to speak to him over the next day or so. I don't think it's a question of having to apologize," Cameron said in an interview aired on British television channels.

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

****///

 

That Cameron fella is one bright chap !  Thanks for the article, YOTA .

[sandfly]

HEHHEHEEEE

[Butifldrm]

Gathering of world peace calls for end to U.S. military intervention in Syria

 

30-08-2013 | (Voice of Iraq) -  Add a comment -  

 

Called the gathering of world peace. The international community and the Security Council to "protect civilians" in Syria 

Of the "threat of U.S. military intervention and terrorism and Wahhabi Saudi intervention blatant Turkish country on the Syrian people." 

The face of the gathering of world peace, based in the United States. 

Appeal to the Secretary General of the Organization of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon said in a statement it considered that "the Syrian people in real danger threatened to wage war by the armies of the world armed against the unarmed Syrian citizens. 

Saidi added, "We consider the entry of any soldier or any piece and any missile or military aircraft shell into Syria occupation state traveled to Syria and conspired against the Syrian people defenseless and contrary to international conventions and norms in peace and war." 

He called gathering of world peace, "the international community to take responsibility for international peace and security, and it rapidly to protect the defenseless Syrian people from the risk of U.S. military intervention and take action to protect civilians invite the Security Council to convene to this issue as a matter of urgency." 

Salem Abdullah Al-Saidi 

Secretary General of the gathering of world peace 

United States of America 

Westland MI USA 

August 30/2013

 

Read more: http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ar&tl=en&u=http://www.sotaliraq.com/mobile-news.php%3Fid%3D114113&usg=ALkJrhgQNPQWfVK2Fhi417-ja4EN3rzpHA#ixzz2dSt4bvYx

[Maggie123]

The face of the gathering of world peace, based in the United States. 

Appeal to the Secretary General of the Organization of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon said in a statement it considered that "the Syrian people in real danger threatened to wage war by the armies of the world armed against the unarmed Syrian citizens. 

Saidi added, "We consider the entry of any soldier or any piece and any missile or military aircraft shell into Syria occupation state traveled to Syria and conspired against the Syrian people defenseless and contrary to international conventions and norms in peace and war." 

 

WORLD PEACE!!!

 

 
 

Edited August 30, 2013 by Maggie123

[uncirculd]

Gathering of world peace calls for end to U.S. military intervention in Syria

 

30-08-2013 | (Voice of Iraq) -  Add a comment -  

 

Called the gathering of world peace. The international community and the Security Council to "protect civilians" in Syria 

Of the "threat of U.S. military intervention and terrorism and Wahhabi Saudi intervention blatant Turkish country on the Syrian people." 

The face of the gathering of world peace, based in the United States. 

Appeal to the Secretary General of the Organization of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon said in a statement it considered that "the Syrian people in real danger threatened to wage war by the armies of the world armed against the unarmed Syrian citizens. 

Saidi added, "We consider the entry of any soldier or any piece and any missile or military aircraft shell into Syria occupation state traveled to Syria and conspired against the Syrian people defenseless and contrary to international conventions and norms in peace and war." 

He called gathering of world peace, "the international community to take responsibility for international peace and security, and it rapidly to protect the defenseless Syrian people from the risk of U.S. military intervention and take action to protect civilians invite the Security Council to convene to this issue as a matter of urgency." 

Salem Abdullah Al-Saidi 

Secretary General of the gathering of world peace 

United States of America 

Westland MI USA 

August 30/2013

 

Read more: http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ar&tl=en&u=http://www.sotaliraq.com/mobile-news.php%3Fid%3D114113&usg=ALkJrhgQNPQWfVK2Fhi417-ja4EN3rzpHA#ixzz2dSt4bvYx

 

Why don't they gather to help the Syrian people.  What are they doing to help??????????  I don't want the US going in there, but I surely don't want to see the murdering of the people.  It's so hypocritical of the governments of the world speaking out both sides of their mouth.  It's a joke for some of these folks to be called "World Leaders".  Nothing but a bunch of gangsters and banksters.

[imgesing]

The one thing which really pisss m off is that our president said he drew the line in the sand on chemical war fair a very long time ago... This is two times and he has his hands tied. We Americansmlook like fools. He should have done something a while ago.

Tail between our legs as china and Russia threaten us to stay out!

Scary stuff...

We take our time on decisions made and we look weak. It's unfortunate. I'm not sure of what needs to be done now. Wish we went in swiftly before all the news now.

IMHO

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

 

A coward's stance on the International Stage is something to be ridiculed and reviled indeed.

 

Everyone is disappointed that a guy who was supposed to be SO great turns out to

be the most ineffective tool to come down the pike - EVER.

[MyLadiesDaddy]

Yota how much you wanna bet those UN inspectors never get out of Syria?

Either the dictator Obummer will have a cruise missile ,"ACCIDENTALLY", stray

Off course ("oh were so sorry Mr Moon this is such a tragedy that we will investigate

And find out what went wrong). Killing the inspectors and destroying whatever

Evidence that Dictator Obummer seems to want to cover up so much.

Something tells me that this entire Syrian thing goes back to Bengazi, and what

Really happened there. Something also tells me that because of all of this Obummer

wont Finnish his term. Whatever it is, it's clear that Obummer is doing whatever he

Can to make it go away.

[TBomb]

something we need to think about is the fact that Russia members of the UN have the controlling vote at present.