dinar_stud Posted September 12, 2012 Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 Foreign Policy Hands Voice Disbelief At Romney Cairo Statement Mitt Romney's sharply-worded attack on President Obama over a pair of deadly riots in Muslim countries last night has backfired badly among foreign policy hands of both parties, who cast it as hasty and off-key, released before the facts were clear at what has become a moment of tragedy. Romney keyed his statement to the American Embassy in Cairo's condemnation of an anti-Muslim video that served as the trigger for the latest in a series of regional riots over obscure perceived slights to the faith. But his statement — initially embargoed to avoid release on September 11, then released yesterday evening anyway — came just before news that the American Ambassador to Libya had been killed and broke with a tradition of unity around national tragedies, and of avoiding hasty statements on foreign policy. It was the second time Romney has been burned by an early statement on a complex crisis: Romney denounced the Obama Administration's handling of a Chinese dissident's escape just as the Administration negotiated behind the scenes for his departure from the country. "They were just trying to score a cheap news cycle hit based on the embassy statement and now it’s just completely blown up," said a very senior Republican foreign policy hand, who called the statement an "utter disaster" and a "Lehman moment" — a parallel to the moment when John McCain, amid the 2008 financial crisis, failed to come across as a steady leader. He and other members of both parties cited the Romney campaign's recent dismissals of foreign policy's relevance. One adviser dismissed the subject to BuzzFeed as a "shiny object," while another told Politico that the subject was the "president's turf," drawing a rebuke from Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol. "I guess we see now that it is because they’re incompetent at talking effectively about foreign policy," said the Republican. "This is just unbelievable — when they decide to play on it they completely bungle it." Romney has not backed off the response — "It's never too early for the United States government to condemn attacks on Americans and to defend our values," he said Wednesday — but his campaign faces a near consensus in Republican foreign policy circles that, whatever the sentiment, Romney faltered badly. "It’s deeply unfortunate when the circumstance of the statement becomes the story," said Rick Perry's former foreign policy adviser, Victoria Coates, who is now an adjunct fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, and who suggested that Romney should simply have "gone earlier rather than save it for midnight" to avoid appearing to play politics on September 11. "It’s unfortunate that it’s playing out this way, and hopefully they can get back on message, because their point is sound," she said. Other conservatives were less sympathetic. "It's bad," said a former aide to Senator John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign. "Just on a factual level that the statement was not a response but preceding, or one could make the case precipitating. And just calling it a 'disgrace' doesn't really cut it. Not ready for prime time." A third Republican, a former Bush State Department official, told BuzzFeed, "It wasn't presidential of Romney to go political immediately — a tragedy of this magnitude should be something the nation collectively grieves before politics enters the conversation." But the third official defended the substance of Romney's words: "Romney's attack is spot-on — disgusting that the first Obama administration impulse was to apologize instead of condemning violent religious intolerance. Obama's gotten a real pass on his intervention in Libya, his failed strategy in Afghanistan, and his lack of leadership in the aftermath of the Arab Spring. By trying to cut it down the middle in his foreign policy, no one knows where or for what Obama or America stands in the world these days." The Republicans declined to speak for attribution, for fear of being publicly disloyal to their party's nominee. Veteran Democratic foreign policy hands, operating under no such restriction, called Romney's quick move all but disqualifying. "He did jump the gun. It revealed yet again that his foreign policy team is not ready for prime time," said David Rothkopf, a former Clinton State Department official. "It is ugly and amateurish. It also seems strangely out of character with Romney who elsewhere in the campaign seems inclined to be restrained to a fault." Heather Hurlburt, who heads the National Security Network, a Democratic group, said the statement "shows not just poor judgment and a willingness to use tragedy for political gains, regardless of the security consequences — but also poor management. He has policy people on his team who know better. Clearly they weren't consulted." "As someone who worked at state and with diplomats for many years, it makes me feel sick," she said. "Romney blew it and revealed how seriously maladroit he is when it comes to foreign affairs and national security," said Steve Clemons, the founder of the American Strategy Program at the New America Foundation. "An attack on an Embassy, the murder of U.S. officials including an Ambassador, is an attack on all Americans and the idea of America — and Romney gave terrorists what they want — a divided country still torn emotionally and politically by the events of 9-11. Romney talks of leadership but with his reckless commentary when events were fragile and still unfolding, he belly-flopped." 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cris Posted September 12, 2012 Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 Its completely unimportant what a Liberal thinks ....Its also unimportant that they are trying to put the focus on anything other than the responsible party......The current President. The Libs spent 3 days telling us all how they killed Bin Laden....Romney and the video are distractions from the real problem....Years of O'blahs & Clintons foreign policy mistakes. Zawahiri's Brother at Cairo Embassy Assault 11:21 AM, SEP 12, 2012 • BY THOMAS JOSCELYN During the assault on the U.S. embassy in Egypt, demonstrators reportedly chanted “Obama! Obama! We are all Osama!” They yelled this obvious reference to Osama bin Laden as an al Qaeda-style flag was hoisted and the American flag brought down. At least one of the protesters at the anti-American rally knows a thing or two about al Qaeda: Mohammed al Zawahiri, who is the younger brother of al Qaeda’s emir, Ayman al Zawahiri. Mohammed al Zawahiri has even claimed credit for sparking the anti-American protest. “We called for the peaceful protest joined by different Islamic factions including the Islamic Jihad (and the) Hazem Abu Ismael movement,” he said, according to CNN. Islamic Jihad is most likely the Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ), a core part of al Qaeda’s international jihadist coalition. http://www.weeklysta...ult_652217.html 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoonRover Posted September 12, 2012 Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 anybody but the muslim obama... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eastcreek Posted September 12, 2012 Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 Foreign Policy Hands Voice Disbelief At Romney Cairo Statement Mitt Romney's sharply-worded attack on President Obama over a pair of deadly riots in Muslim countries last night has backfired badly among foreign policy hands of both parties, who cast it as hasty and off-key, released before the facts were clear at what has become a moment of tragedy. Romney keyed his statement to the American Embassy in Cairo's condemnation of an anti-Muslim video that served as the trigger for the latest in a series of regional riots over obscure perceived slights to the faith. But his statement — initially embargoed to avoid release on September 11, then released yesterday evening anyway — came just before news that the American Ambassador to Libya had been killed and broke with a tradition of unity around national tragedies, and of avoiding hasty statements on foreign policy. It was the second time Romney has been burned by an early statement on a complex crisis: Romney denounced the Obama Administration's handling of a Chinese dissident's escape just as the Administration negotiated behind the scenes for his departure from the country. "They were just trying to score a cheap news cycle hit based on the embassy statement and now it’s just completely blown up," said a very senior Republican foreign policy hand, who called the statement an "utter disaster" and a "Lehman moment" — a parallel to the moment when John McCain, amid the 2008 financial crisis, failed to come across as a steady leader. He and other members of both parties cited the Romney campaign's recent dismissals of foreign policy's relevance. One adviser dismissed the subject to BuzzFeed as a "shiny object," while another told Politico that the subject was the "president's turf," drawing a rebuke from Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol. "I guess we see now that it is because they’re incompetent at talking effectively about foreign policy," said the Republican. "This is just unbelievable — when they decide to play on it they completely bungle it." Romney has not backed off the response — "It's never too early for the United States government to condemn attacks on Americans and to defend our values," he said Wednesday — but his campaign faces a near consensus in Republican foreign policy circles that, whatever the sentiment, Romney faltered badly. "It’s deeply unfortunate when the circumstance of the statement becomes the story," said Rick Perry's former foreign policy adviser, Victoria Coates, who is now an adjunct fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, and who suggested that Romney should simply have "gone earlier rather than save it for midnight" to avoid appearing to play politics on September 11. "It’s unfortunate that it’s playing out this way, and hopefully they can get back on message, because their point is sound," she said. Other conservatives were less sympathetic. "It's bad," said a former aide to Senator John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign. "Just on a factual level that the statement was not a response but preceding, or one could make the case precipitating. And just calling it a 'disgrace' doesn't really cut it. Not ready for prime time." A third Republican, a former Bush State Department official, told BuzzFeed, "It wasn't presidential of Romney to go political immediately — a tragedy of this magnitude should be something the nation collectively grieves before politics enters the conversation." But the third official defended the substance of Romney's words: "Romney's attack is spot-on — disgusting that the first Obama administration impulse was to apologize instead of condemning violent religious intolerance. Obama's gotten a real pass on his intervention in Libya, his failed strategy in Afghanistan, and his lack of leadership in the aftermath of the Arab Spring. By trying to cut it down the middle in his foreign policy, no one knows where or for what Obama or America stands in the world these days." The Republicans declined to speak for attribution, for fear of being publicly disloyal to their party's nominee. Veteran Democratic foreign policy hands, operating under no such restriction, called Romney's quick move all but disqualifying. "He did jump the gun. It revealed yet again that his foreign policy team is not ready for prime time," said David Rothkopf, a former Clinton State Department official. "It is ugly and amateurish. It also seems strangely out of character with Romney who elsewhere in the campaign seems inclined to be restrained to a fault." Heather Hurlburt, who heads the National Security Network, a Democratic group, said the statement "shows not just poor judgment and a willingness to use tragedy for political gains, regardless of the security consequences — but also poor management. He has policy people on his team who know better. Clearly they weren't consulted." "As someone who worked at state and with diplomats for many years, it makes me feel sick," she said. "Romney blew it and revealed how seriously maladroit he is when it comes to foreign affairs and national security," said Steve Clemons, the founder of the American Strategy Program at the New America Foundation. "An attack on an Embassy, the murder of U.S. officials including an Ambassador, is an attack on all Americans and the idea of America — and Romney gave terrorists what they want — a divided country still torn emotionally and politically by the events of 9-11. Romney talks of leadership but with his reckless commentary when events were fragile and still unfolding, he belly-flopped." ..and uh, just who put together this little article, dinar ? Please quit posting here. You're such an O shill , and it's readily apparent. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinar_stud Posted September 12, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 For those that did not read the article but replied here is the summary 3 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cris Posted September 12, 2012 Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 For those that did not read the article but replied here is the summary To answer the question.... Does the USA need a President who is a pathological liar? No....Thats why we are getting rid of O'blah 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grand pubah Posted September 12, 2012 Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 I agree 100% with Romney's statement and am embarrassed as an American citizen at Pres. Obama's handling of foreign affairs. In the Muslim community it is seen as weakness and the only thing they understand is strength and conviction. In what universe is it ok to kill someone because you were offended at a rogue video someone posted?? Seriously this article is liberal BS. I am glad to see someone take a stand against these extremists and call them what they are. An axis of evil! +1 to Romney for his kahoonas -1 to Obama for his weakness in dealing with these terrorists GP telling it like it is baby 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pattyangel Posted September 12, 2012 Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 Grand Pubah, thank you for your statement. With this election it looks as though anything goes. Romney needs to stay steadfast and aggressive and move America in the right direction. I would think the families who lost love ones in this tragedy are thinking otherwise. Bravo Romney 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butifldrm Posted September 12, 2012 Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 I agree 100% with Romney's statement and am embarrassed as an American citizen at Pres. Obama's handling of foreign affairs. In the Muslim community it is seen as weakness and the only thing they understand is strength and conviction. In what universe is it ok to kill someone because you were offended at a rogue video someone posted?? Seriously this article is liberal BS. I am glad to see someone take a stand against these extremists and call them what they are. An axis of evil! +1 to Romney for his kahoonas -1 to Obama for his weakness in dealing with these terrorists GP telling it like it is baby 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grand pubah Posted September 12, 2012 Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 For those that did not read the article but replied here is the summary seriously stud, that is like the pot calling the kettle black. Obama has continually lied, misrepresented himself and policies, and not followed through with his campaign promises, and Romney is the pathological liar???? Good luck with that one..... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasGranny Posted September 12, 2012 Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 dinar_stud - you really should read your own article. Romney made his statement in regards to the Cairo incident and before the Ambassador was killed in Libya. So your cute graphic is an out and out lie itself. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted September 12, 2012 Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 (edited) A mind is a terrible thing to waste Edited September 12, 2012 by yota691 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simple Posted September 12, 2012 Report Share Posted September 12, 2012 dinar_stud - you really should read your own article. Romney made his statement in regards to the Cairo incident and before the Ambassador was killed in Libya. So your cute graphic is an out and out lie itself. He doubled-down when he could have just released another intelligent statement. He's desperate to make a difference in the election. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts