Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Atlanta's Mayor Signs Executive Order To "Mitigate" Impact Of Georgia's Voting Restrictions


Recommended Posts

Axios

Atlanta's mayor signs executive order to "mitigate" impact of Georgia's voting restrictions

8f56b08c7c8ec60d1d12b0ebff0a4a32
  • Laurin-Whitney Gottbrath
Tue, April 6, 2021, 6:49 PM
 
 

Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms on Tuesday issued an administrative order "to mitigate the impact of new voting restrictions imposed" by Georgia's recently enacted law curbing voting access.

Why it matters: Civil rights groups, Democrats and more than 100 businesses and CEOs have condemned the law.

Get market news worthy of your time with Axios Markets. Subscribe for free.

  • The legislation cuts the time period voters have to request absentee ballots and imposes new identification requirements, among other restrictions.

 

Details: The mayor's order directs Atlanta's chief equity officer to "develop a plan of action within the city's authority to expand opportunity and access to the ballot box."

  • This includes providing training to staff members on voter registration and general information on early, absentee, and in-person voting and disseminating information to residents on how to obtain the forms of identification required for absentee voting.

What she's saying: “The voting restrictions of SB 202 will disproportionately impact Atlanta residents — particularly in communities of color and other minority groups,” said Bottoms said in a statement, referring to the restrictions.

  • “This Administrative Order is designed to do what those in the majority of the state legislature did not — expand access to our right to vote.”

Bottoms told Axios Re:cap on Tuesday that the order is "going to give us the ability to do everything that we possibly can to help people" vote.

  • "We're also going to have to really continue to educate and encourage people to stand in the gap for voters across this state who may not have the ability to cast a vote, meaning we can't go and vote for the president and then wait an additional four years," she added.

  • "We've got to show up each and every time in record numbers because there will be some people who won't have access to their absentee ballots, who won't be able to turn their ballots in on time. We've got to stand in the gap for those folks and make a difference in this state."

 

https://news.yahoo.com/atlantas-mayor-signs-executive-order-224928057.html

 

GO RV, then BV

Edited by Shabibilicious
  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Shabibilicious changed the title to Atlanta's Mayor Signs Executive Order To "Mitigate" Impact Of Georgia's Voting Restrictions
  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Lets get the facts straight. Water and food can be given out at polling places by the Georgia state election committees. It can not be given out by partisan groups. It stays in line with the

So she is saying there are people that are so stupid, they can't vote without help from the Rats. And for sure dead people need the help voting. Can't amend the laws too much or you will prevent out a

What these conservative state legislatures are doing is preemptive against HR 1.   The left, and the establishment is looking to tip the scale permanently so the likes of an independent, or

So she is saying there are people that are so stupid, they can't vote without help from the Rats. And for sure dead people need the help voting. Can't amend the laws too much or you will prevent out and out fraud, corruption and thief of our next election. The Rats have almost completed their mission of totally destroying this once GREAT Nation and NOTHING will be allowed to stand in their way this time. Time for a second passport!!!

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
HuffPost

Jen Psaki Destroys Fox News 'Gotcha' Question About Georgia Voting Law

 
 
David Moye
·Reporter, HuffPost
Tue, April 6, 2021, 4:16 PM
 
 

Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy attempted to get White House press secretary Jen Psaki in a “gotcha” question on Tuesday only to end up humiliated by a pesky little thing called “facts.”

It happened after Doocy brought up Major League Baseball’s decision to move its 2021 All-Star Game from Atlanta to Denver in response to Georgia’s new restrictive voting law, which limits the use of drop boxes for absentee ballots and imposes ID requirements on those who vote by mail, among other restrictions.

“Is the White House concerned that Major League Baseball is moving their All-Star Game to Colorado, where voting regulations are very similar to Georgia?” Doocy asked.

Doocy was aping a new conservative talking point that the new law in Georgia isn’t that restrictive compared to voting laws in Colorado, since both states require ID to vote, and the Peach State offers 17 days of in-person early voting compared to 15 days in the Centennial State.

“First, let me say, on Colorado. Colorado allows you to register on Election Day, Colorado has voting by mail where they send, to 100% of people in the state who are eligible, applications to vote by mail,” Psaki said, adding that 94% of Colorado citizens voted by mail in the 2020 election.

Colorado also accepts 16 forms of identification, compared to Georgia’s six.

Psaki also made another distinction between Georgia’s new voting law and the existing one in Colorado.

“The Georgia legislation is built on a lie. There was no widespread fraud in the 2020 election, Georgia’s top Republican election officials have acknowledged that repeatedly in interviews,” she said. ”And what there was, however, was record-setting turnout, especially by voters of color. So instead, what we’re seeing here, for politicians who didn’t like the outcome, they’re not changing their policies to win more votes, they’re changing the rules to exclude more voters. And we certainly see the circumstances as different.”

President Joe Biden has criticized the Georgia law and its impact on voters of color, calling it “Jim Crow in the 21st century.”

Psaki ended the question by pointing out that in a free society, “It’s up to Major League Baseball to determine where they’re holding their All-Star Game.”

Doocy didn’t ask a follow-up question.

You can see the exchange below.

This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/jen-psaki-steve-doocy-georgia-colorado-voiting-law-201605032.html

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, md11fr8dawg said:

So she is saying there are people that are so stupid, they can't vote without help from the Rats. And for sure dead people need the help voting. Can't amend the laws too much or you will prevent out and out fraud, corruption and thief of our next election. The Rats have almost completed their mission of totally destroying this once GREAT Nation and NOTHING will be allowed to stand in their way this time. Time for a second passport!!!

 

As the Republican Georgia legislature does all it can to suppress voters.....the mayor is doing her best to keep citizens informed.  It would be awful for a voter to go through all the legal procedures to vote absentee, only to discover the usual drop box in the neighborhood is no longer available and the only other drop box is clear across the city.....Also, wouldn't want to get arrested for giving an ailing aged voter standing in line for hours a drink of water...People need to be aware of the ludicrous rules.  As always, just my opinion.

 

GO RV, then BV 

Edited by Shabibilicious
  • Like 1
  • Downvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets get the facts straight.

Water and food can be given out at polling places by the Georgia state election committees.

It can not be given out by partisan groups. It stays in line with the law of "No campaigning near a polling place".

An absentee ballot can be "mailed" from your home and delivered to the post office. 

Drop boxes are allowed. They will be authorized by the Georgia Election board and placed by them. No unauthorized boxes will be allowed. I would not want an unauthorized, fraudulant box to be used. Would not want ballot harvesting to take place, where those boxes could be stuffed with illegal votes would we.

Also a mayor is not authorized to change the state legislature rules on election no more than a judge. A pesky thing called the State Constitution and the U.S. Constitution prevent that.

People sworn to uphold both should be upset and voice that concern. 

  • Pow! 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, nstoolman1 said:

Lets get the facts straight.

Water and food can be given out at polling places by the Georgia state election committees.

It can not be given out by partisan groups. It stays in line with the law of "No campaigning near a polling place".

An absentee ballot can be "mailed" from your home and delivered to the post office. 

Drop boxes are allowed. They will be authorized by the Georgia Election board and placed by them. No unauthorized boxes will be allowed. I would not want an unauthorized, fraudulant box to be used. Would not want ballot harvesting to take place, where those boxes could be stuffed with illegal votes would we.

Also a mayor is not authorized to change the state legislature rules on election no more than a judge. A pesky thing called the State Constitution and the U.S. Constitution prevent that.

People sworn to uphold both should be upset and voice that concern. 

 

Nothing in her executive order changes anything.....it's simply establishing a strategy to keep voters completely informed so they aren't blindsided by heavy handed voter supressionists.  Nobody wants to go where their regular legal voting drop box has always been located to find out it's been moved across town, four bus changes away.

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

Nothing in her executive order changes anything.....it's simply establishing a strategy to keep voters completely informed so they aren't blindsided by heavy handed voter supressionists.  Nobody wants to go where their regular legal voting drop box has always been located to find out it's been moved across town, four bus changes away.

 

GO RV, then BV

 

 

 

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mitigate

Definition of mitigate

 

transitive verb

1: to cause to become less harsh or hostile : MOLLIFY aggressiveness may be mitigated or … channeled— Ashley Montagu
2a: to make less severe or painful : ALLEVIATE mitigate a patient's suffering
b: EXTENUATE attempted to mitigate the offense
 
The only way to do those thing is to "change" something. 
  • Pow! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, nstoolman1 said:

 

 

 

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mitigate

Definition of mitigate

 

transitive verb

1: to cause to become less harsh or hostile : MOLLIFY aggressiveness may be mitigated or … channeled— Ashley Montagu
2a: to make less severe or painful : ALLEVIATE mitigate a patient's suffering
b: EXTENUATE attempted to mitigate the offense
 
The only way to do those thing is to "change" something. 

 

Correct...."change" the level of information voters may or may not already have....an informed voter is a good voter, don't you think?

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

Correct...."change" the level of information voters may or may not already have....an informed voter is a good voter, don't you think?

 

GO RV, then BV

 

Yes an informed voter is a good voter.

 

Did all these voters get there tv, radios, newspapers turned off or stopped getting delivered? 

Did the mail service stop?

Why would they be any less informed because of legislation designed to stop fraud and get an honest election?

No one is being prevented from voting. You need an ID for just about everything today. Voting should be included. 

Request a ballot, fill out the ballot, include a form of ID, put in the envelope and mail it out. Easy peasy.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, nstoolman1 said:

 

Yes an informed voter is a good voter.

 

Did all these voters get there tv, radios, newspapers turned off or stopped getting delivered? 

Did the mail service stop?

Why would they be any less informed because of legislation designed to stop fraud and get an honest election?

No one is being prevented from voting. You need an ID for just about everything today. Voting should be included. 

Request a ballot, fill out the ballot, include a form of ID, put in the envelope and mail it out. Easy peasy.

 

She's just going to make sure the information the voters in her city are getting is accurate and complete, mitigate any guess work that may be unclear to some.

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

As the Republican Georgia legislature does all it can to suppress voters.....the mayor is doing her best to keep citizens informed.  It would be awful for a voter to go through all the legal procedures to vote absentee, only to discover the usual drop box in the neighborhood is no longer available and the only other drop box is clear across the city.....Also, wouldn't want to get arrested for giving an ailing aged voter standing in line for hours a drink of water...People need to be aware of the ludicrous rules.  As always, just my opinion.

 

GO RV, then BV 

Wow Shabs , you’re spreading lies just like Biden and Psaki

or at least perpetuating the lies !!!

who ends up suffering from all of this 

ALL the business owners of GA that now have lost their chance since the game is now moved to Colorado where voting is harder 

Edited by Shelley
  • Pow! 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Shelley said:

Wow Shabs , you’re spreading lies just like Biden and Psaki

or at least perpetuating the lies !!!

whi ends up suffering from all of this 

ALL the business owners of GA that now have lost their chance since the game is now moved to Colorado 

 

But the business owners in Denver are going to get a boost from MLB instead.,,,,which is still a good thing, don't you think?  :shrug: 

 

GO RV, then BV

Edited by Shabibilicious
  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Shabibilicious said:

 

But the business owners in Denver are going to get a boost from MLB instead.,,,,which is still a good thing, don't you think?  :shrug:

 

GO RV, then Bv

Not for the Black business owners in GA it’s not 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Shelley said:

Wow Shabs , you’re spreading lies just like Biden and Psaki

or at least perpetuating the lies !!!

whi ends up suffering from all of this 

ALL the business owners of GA that now have lost their chance since the game is now moved to Colorado 

 

Do you really believe MLB, the largest soft drink company on the planet, and a top 3 airline is not smart enough to understand politics on their own?

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shelley said:

Not for the Black business owners in GA it’s not 

 

It is for the Black business owners in Colorado though.  I guess the Georgia GOP should have thought it through....rather than ram it through.  As always, just my opinion.

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

Do you really believe MLB, the largest soft drink company on the planet, and a top 3 airline is not smart enough to understand politics on their own?

 

GO RV, then BV

Maybe they all need to reread the Bill 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

It is for the Black business owners in Colorado though.  I guess the Georgia GOP should have thought it through....rather than ram it through.  As always, just my opinion.

 

GO RV, then BV

Gee with only 9% of Black population 

your opinion sounds very racist to me 

  • Pow! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shelley said:

Maybe they all need to reread the Bill 

 

3 audits the state of Georgia performed on their 2020 election results.....almost zero evidence of fraud.  The state GOP is attempting to fix something that isn't broke....that can't win elections otherwise, face it.

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Shelley said:

Gee with only 9% of Black population 

your opinion sounds very racist to me 

 

So you've insinuated I'm a liar and a racist?  Is that how it works in the conservative world of 2021?

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

Are you going to boycott (cancel culture) those companies as Trump has asked his base to do?

 

GO RV, then BV

I do what I feel is the right thing for me to do for my own conscious  no one else’s 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Voter ID is not suppression nor will it ever be!!!!   So sick of hearing that BS!


You can’t tell me that the supposed people who are being suppressed NEVER:

 Drive, fish, hunt, buy a gun legally, get married, get social security, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment benefits, energy assistance, food stamps, welfare, fly in an airplane, take out a library book, rent a car, rent a movie, sign up for any television service, buy alcohol, buy cigarettes, rent a hotel room, go to a doctor/hospital etc, buy a car, apply for a job, apply for credit cards, rent an apartment/sign lease, apply for mortgages or other bank loans, get a safe deposit box, get a post office box,

pick up your mail if you had it stopped. 
 

long enough to prove my point. Five more minutes I can double the list.  
 

no one is being suppressed to do these things. Everyone does it every day without thinking about it. It also tells me the supposed oppressed all have ID anyways.  
 

All an ID being required to vote does is prove you are who you say you are and stop the fraud!!!!!


 Go to the DMV and they are free. Not complicated and certainly not suppressing anyone. I haven’t checked but you probably can do it online now days.  
 

 

  • Pow! 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

3 audits the state of Georgia performed on their 2020 election results.....almost zero evidence of fraud.  The state GOP is attempting to fix something that isn't broke....that can't win elections otherwise, face it.

 

GO RV, then BV

The very same people who violated their state constitution ran 3 audits useing the same faulty and suspect voting machines got the same faulty results. 

Since when is following the law and putting something through the process "ramming".

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, nstoolman1 said:

The very same people who violated their state constitution ran 3 audits useing the same faulty and suspect voting machines got the same faulty results. 

Since when is following the law and putting something through the process "ramming".

 

 

"Ramming"....as in, the GOP didn't realize corporations, i.e. their donors.....would push back.  

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.




  • Similar Content

    • By Shabibilicious
      Bipartisan group of senators reaches agreement on infrastructure proposal
        Axios Thu, June 10, 2021, 6:37 PM     A bipartisan group of 10 senators said Thursday they reached an agreement on an infrastructure spending framework they hope to sell to congressional leaders and the White House.
      Why it matters: The announcement comes just days after negotiations officially broke down between President Biden and a group of Republicans led by Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.).
       
      What they're saying: The latest agreement is a “realistic, compromise framework to modernize our nation’s infrastructure and energy technologies,” the statement released by Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) said.
      "This investment would be fully paid for and not include tax increases,” the senators added.
      “We are discussing our approach with our respective colleagues, and the White House, and remain optimistic that this can lay the groundwork to garner broad support from both parties and meet America’s infrastructure needs."
      The group consists of Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), Mitt Romney (R-Utah), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), Jon Tester (D-Mont.), and Mark Warner (D-Va.).
        Details: The group did not release any specific details about the plan, but multiple reports said the framework is focused on traditional infrastructure and includes $579 billion in new spending over five years. The plan would cost $974 billion over five years and $1.2 trillion over eight years, per the Washington Post.
      The big picture: The senators still must win over congressional leaders and the Biden administration.
      Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who was briefed on the plan on Wednesday, said he was "open" to it, Romney told reporters Thursday, per CNBC.
      "It is unclear now if the package will be comprehensive enough to appease Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Biden," CNBC notes.
       
      https://www.yahoo.com/news/bipartisan-group-senators-reaches-agreement-223729408.html
       
      GO RV, then BV
    • By Shabibilicious
      GOP Sens. Graham and Sasse praise Biden's purchase of 500M Pfizer vaccines to share globally
        Ivana Saric Thu, June 10, 2021, 4:01 PM     Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) on Thursday praised the Biden administration's decision to purchase 500 million doses of the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine to share with countries around the world, calling the decision the "right move."
      The big picture: Their statements represent a rare moment of praise of Biden by Republicans.
       
      Sasse has advocated for the U.S. to distribute 1 billion vaccines worldwide by Thanksgiving, and in a previous statement called the Biden administration's global vaccination plans "timid."
      What they're saying: “Health diplomacy is a smart investment and buying these vaccines is the right move. America should have an aggressive strategy to vaccinate a billion people around the world this year," Sasse said in a statement.
      "America should administer these vaccines directly in order to counter the Chinese Communist Party's strategy of using the pandemic to gain the upper hand."
      "We should move quickly to share these life-saving shots with friends in Asia and across the developing world with a simple message: Uncle Sam, not Chairman Xi, cares about your health.”
        Graham said in a statement that the "roughly $3.5 billion required to purchase and distribute 500 million doses of vaccine will help prevent a reemergence of the COVID-19 virus which makes America and the world safer."
      “I support the effort of the Biden Administration to donate vaccines to at-risk populations throughout the world and hope other countries will follow America’s lead. I believe this to be a good investment by the American taxpayer.
      “Again, I do hope other nations will contribute their fair share. The sooner we have vaccines available to the world, the better," Graham added.
      Editor's note: This story has been updated with Graham's statement.
       
      https://www.yahoo.com/news/gop-sen-ben-sasse-praises-185628862.html
       
      GO RV, then BV
    • By Shabibilicious
      Senate confirms Biden's first judicial nominee as Schumer vows to restore "balance" to courts
      Orion Rummler Tue, June 8, 2021, 12:18 PM     The Senate voted 66-33 on Tuesday to confirm Julien Xavier Neals to be U.S. District Judge for the District of New Jersey.
      Why it matters: Neals is President Biden's first judicial nominee to be confirmed, as Democrats begin a push to "restore the balance" of the courts after the GOP-led Senate confirmed a record number of conservative judges under former President Trump.
       
      Trump's aggressive judicial appointments were his most lasting, substantive legacy, as he appointed more than 200 judges to the federal bench — including three Supreme Court justices — in just one term.
      Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) pledged that Senate Democrats would bring "balance, experience and diversity back to the judiciary" with Biden's nominees.
        Background: Neals was previously nominated to serve on the district court by former President Obama in 2015, but his nomination expired after then-Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) declined to bring it for a vote.
      What to watch: There are currently 71 district court vacancies and nine appeals court vacancies, according to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. Liberal activists have pushed for 82-year-old Justice Stephen Breyer to retire while Democrats still have control of the Senate.
       
      https://news.yahoo.com/senate-confirms-bidens-first-judicial-161806527.html
       
      GO RV, then BV
    • By Shabibilicious
      Former Trump White House counsel Don McGahn agrees to House panel interview on Russia report
      Rebecca Falconer Wed, May 12, 2021, 11:17 PM     Former White House counsel Don McGahn agreed Wednesday to speak with the House Judiciary Committee about former President Trump's alleged attempts to obstruct the Russia investigation — with certain conditions, per a court filing.
      Why it matters: The agreement ends a two-year standoff after McGahn, a key player in former special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, repeatedly refused to agree to a subpoena for testimony — resulting in the matter being taken to court.
       
          Of note: One of the conditions is that the committee conducts a "transcribed interview" to happen behind closed doors, rather than calling for McGhan to testify at a public hearing, according to the filing.
      The big picture: The Judiciary committee and the Biden administration announced Tuesday they had "reached an agreement in principle" in the case of McGhan.
      The Mueller report found no evidence of a Trump campaign conspiracy with Russia, but his team compiled 10 different episodes where the former president may have potentially committed obstruction of justice. Trump was never charged over the matter.
      The Judiciary committee stressed in its Tuesday court filing that Trump isn't a party to the McGahn case and is "not a party to the agreement."
      What they're saying: Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) said in a statement Wednesday, "When the former President vowed to fight 'all of the subpoenas' aimed at his Administration, he began a dangerous campaign of unprecedented obstruction. We begin to bring that era of obstruction to an end today."
      The other side: Representatives for Trump did not immediately return Axios' request for comment. But his spokesperson Jason Miller said Tuesday that the former president hadn't agreed to the deal and he was reviewing his options as he regarded communications with close advisers as confidential, per Politico.
       
      https://news.yahoo.com/don-mcgahn-agrees-house-panel-013949547.html
       
      GO RV, then BV
    • By Shabibilicious
      Merrick Garland rapidly erasing Trump effect at Justice Department
        Zachary Basu Fri, April 30, 2021, 5:30 AM     Attorney General Merrick Garland is quickly negating the Trump administration’s law enforcement legacy, dismaying conservatives with a burst of aggressive reversals and new policies.
      Why it matters: As a former prosecutor and respected federal judge, Garland's devotion to the rule of law has always been core to his identity. That reputation has taken on new importance in his first 50 days on the job, after four years of allegations that Trump's DOJ was improperly politicized.
       
      Attorney General Bill Barr played a central role in the Trump administration's most high-profile controversies, from undermining the Russia investigation to intervening in the cases of indicted Trump associates to ordering the forcible clearing of protesters in Lafayette Square Park.
      DOJ's broad authority also overlaps with many of the issues at the top of President Biden's agenda, including restoring faith in government, promoting racial justice and police reform, and curbing gun violence.
        Driving the news: Liberal fears that the soft-spoken Garland might resist prosecuting Trump and his allies for the sake of unity were partially eased on Wednesday, when news broke that federal agents had raided the Manhattan home of Rudy Giuliani.
      The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, which Giuliani once led, is known to be highly independent.
      But under Attorney General Bill Barr, the department repeatedly blocked SDNY prosecutors from executing a search warrant for Giuliani's electronic records in the final months of 2020, according to the New York Times.
      The Justice Department also announced on Wednesday that three Georgia men were charged with federal hate crimes in the shooting of Ahmaud Arbery, whose death was a rallying cry during last year's racial-justice protests.
      In Michigan, a superseding indictment was filed against five men accused of plotting last year to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, with prosecutors referring to the alleged crimes as "domestic terrorism" for the first time.
      That shift comes amid new developments in the investigation of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, which has been described as the most complex probe in DOJ history. Garland, who played a leading role in the prosecution of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, has vowed to make prosecuting the Capitol rioters his "first priority."
      Other major steps taken in Garland's first 50 days include:
      "Pattern or practice" investigations into the Minneapolis and Louisville police departments, following the deaths last year of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor.
      A 30-day "expedited review" into how DOJ can better prosecute and track hate crimes amid a surge in violence against Asian Americans.
      The revocation of a Trump-era policy that restricted federal funding for "sanctuary cities."
      Responsibility for five of the six executive actions on gun control ordered by Biden.
      What to watch: Garland's commitment to depoliticizing DOJ will undergo a key test when a charging decision is made in the case of Hunter Biden, whose finances are under investigation.
      Special counsel John Durham is also expected to submit a report concerning alleged abuses by Obama-era intelligence officials during the Russia investigation.
       
      https://news.yahoo.com/merrick-garland-rapidly-erasing-trump-093008298.html
       
      GO RV, then BV
  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.