Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Fox News Catches Kellyanne Conway Lying for Trump About Cutting Entitlements


Recommended Posts

“Oh, we’ll be cutting.” 

 

 

 

Those four words—spoken in response to a question about entitlements during a Fox News town hall on Thursday—are likely to haunt President Donald Trump for the rest of his re-election campaign. 

 

 

But don’t worry, Kellyanne Conway said Friday morning on Fox News, the president didn’t actually say what you heard him say.

Fox News host Ed Henry brought those comments, referring to them as something Trump “seems to be trying to clean up this morning,” during the White House counselor’s latest appearance on the network

“Kellyanne, the president this morning promising he’ll protect Social Security and Medicare,” Henry said. “You were there at that town hall, he said the opposite. He said that he, in a second term, would cut Social Security and Medicare and he would cut entitlement programs. Why did he say that?” 

“He didn’t say that,” Conway replied with a straight face. “You’re misquoting him, respectfully.” She went on to explain that when she brought up the reaction to the comments with Trump directly, he told her, “No, I’m talking about cutting deficits.” 

Stephen Colbert Grills CNN’s Chris Cuomo on His ‘Friend’ Kellyanne Conway

Henry could have let it go at that, but instead he played the video clip of the moment, which clearly contradicts that explanation. 

At the town hall, Fox host Martha MacCallum told the president, “If you don’t cut something in entitlements, you’ll never really deal with the debt.” 

“Oh, we’ll be cutting,” Trump said in response. “But we’re also going to have growth like you’ve never had before.” 

“So Martha MacCallum said right there, but you’re going to have cut entitlements to cut the deficit and he said, ‘We’ll be cutting,’” Henry said after the clip finished.

And yet, in the face of video evidence, Conway maintained her spin. “But that wasn’t what he was talking about, he wasn’t talking about cutting entitlements,” she insisted, pointing to a statement from Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham that similarly tried to clean up those comments. 

She then deftly pivoted to blaming President Barack Obama, and the show moved on to the coronavirus. 

But despite Conway’s misleading protestations, Trump’s words have already become a major issue in the 2020 presidential campaign with both Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders tweeting their respective vows to protect entitlements on Thursday evening. 

Now, The Daily Beast has learned that American Bridge 21st Century will become the first Democratic Super PAC to use the clip against Trump, launching a five-figure digital ad buy highlighting the president’s “promise” to cut entitlements and targeting to older voters in counties surrounding Scranton, Pennsylvania, where the town hall took place.

“We want to ensure that local voters who didn’t catch Trump’s town hall see Trump’s most important answer of the night and know what’s in store for a second Trump term—cuts to Social Security and Medicare,” American Bridge President Bradley Beychok said in a statement. “This made-for-TV moment exposed Trump for who he really is—someone willing to play with seniors’ lives.” 

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-catches-kellyanne-conway-195710137.html

 

 

 

It must have been a lip sync with Rich Little doing a Trump impression... Maybe the Deep State has invented a fake Trump to do these statements about screwing his base...  Or maybe Kellyanne is just a liar.

 

B/A

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Negging a news story of blatant lying... Why does that not surprise me? Have you seen Pence trying fix Trump's lies on Corona testing? You're gonna love that one too...

It is sad how throughout history party members always deny facts about their leaders...

 

 

B/A

  • Thanks 2
  • Downvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bostonangler said:

Negging a news story of blatant lying... Why does that not surprise me? Have you seen Pence trying fix Trump's lies on Corona testing? You're gonna love that one too...

It is sad how throughout history party members always deny facts about their leaders...

 

 

B/A

 

 

Mr. negger is going through his period....A permanent one.....

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have personally seen a serious change in Trump. God has baptized him with his Holy Spirit. He’s getting humble and will lead this country with honesty and an iron fist. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, gregp said:

I have personally seen a serious change in Trump. God has baptized him with his Holy Spirit. He’s getting humble and will lead this country with honesty and an iron fist. 

 

Based on your avatar with Trump as a Chippendale's dancer I would have to agree.  😎

 

 

B/A

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw the tape. Nowhere does he say the words I am cutting SS or MC. The word entitlements can mean other things. Welfare, food stamps, free Micah for illegals to name a few. People assume things then print it and say that what was said.

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

nstoolman1, pointless to argue with these three or four! They wake up and look for YAHOO and USA today, N.Y. Times swamp news and put it up to get our goats. Pointless to even respond. Nobody is changing anyone's mind round here anyways IMO....  ;)

  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 2
  • Upvote 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

That is the problem with the liberals.  They can read mind and interpret Trump's words and intentions. lol. We have seen this throught out Trump's impeachment fiasco, where they injected their opinions to made make it seems the truth. Yes, Trump could cut spending on many different spending programs such as food stamp and medicals because more people are working, and also make it stringent for qualification for others. I've seen it where some people came from different countries and within few years, they are qualified for SSI and free medical.  How is that?  They never contributed to the system, yet received money from the government. This has to be changed. It is not fair for working American people. lol

  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, 64jaguar said:

nstoolman1, pointless to argue with these three or four! They wake up and look for YAHOO and USA today, N.Y. Times swamp news and put it up to get our goats. Pointless to even respond. Nobody is changing anyone's mind round here anyways IMO....  ;)

 

Maybe I am posting to get their goat?  :eyebrows:

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 64jaguar said:

nstoolman1, pointless to argue with these three or four! They wake up and look for YAHOO and USA today, N.Y. Times swamp news and put it up to get our goats. Pointless to even respond. Nobody is changing anyone's mind round here anyways IMO....  ;)

 

Agreed. Lines are drawn. Good to see Trump filed a lawsuit against the clown network. Kim Clements prophecies are 100% coming true.   

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, 64jaguar said:

nstoolman1, pointless to argue with these three or four! They wake up and look for YAHOO and USA today, N.Y. Times swamp news and put it up to get our goats. Pointless to even respond. Nobody is changing anyone's mind round here anyways IMO....  ;)

 

:lmao:   :lmao:   :lmao:

 

Amazing how ACTUAL facts and ACTUAL data coupled with the Founding Principles of THIS Great Nation adhered to by our Founding Fathers AND subsequent True The United States Of America Patriots exercising Decency, Reason, AND Common Sense "excite" THEE Dr. Spock "case" "file" "poster" "children" "pettifogging" "keyboard" "combatants" SO "readily"!!!

 

:o   :o   :o

 

Most people are great fun. ALL one needs to do is find out what makes them tick and get 'em wound up. NO tellin' what THEY are going to SAY or DO or FOR how long OR HOW much fun one can HAVE!!!

 

- Synopsis

 

Kinda like watchin' an 'lectricuted kangaroo in a rubber room....................................................................

 

On a more serious note, though....................................................................................................................

 

Image result for defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic

 

Image result for defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic

 

Image result for nikita khrushchev quotes

 

THEE "gullible" have NOT the nous to see THEY are Socialist Activists who Nikita Khrushchev ONLY dreamed of.

 

:facepalm3:   :facepalm3:   :facepalm3:

 

Now, WHO, pray tell, would NOT support The United States Of America in THIS???!!!

 

THEE Rooskers AND Chinese are existential threats to The United States Of America AND THEE WHOLE WORLD!!!

 

Well, OK, I likie THIS development. Space Force Arsenal???!!!

 

YYYEEEAAAHHH BBBAAABBBYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Newsweek

Russia Says New U.S. Weapon Threatens Nuclear War

 
 
 
Tom O'Connor
 
5 hrs ago

Russia has criticized the Trump administration's pursuit and deployment of low-yield nuclear warheads, arguing it may raise the prospects of a nuclear conflict. At the same time, however, the United States estimates its top foe has up to 2,000 such warheads.

a large ship in the rain: The Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarine USS Tennessee arrives at the Trident Refit Facility dry dock at Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay, Georgia, for a maintenance period, August 13, 2019. The vessel is capable of carrying up to 20 submarine-launched ballistic missiles with multiple warheads, one or two of which are believed to be equipped with the W76-2 warhead, according to the Federation of American Scientists.© Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Ashley Berumen/Commander, Submarine Group Ten/U.S. Navy The Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarine USS Tennessee arrives at the Trident Refit Facility dry dock at Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay, Georgia, for a maintenance period, August 13, 2019. The vessel is capable of carrying up to 20 submarine-launched ballistic missiles with multiple warheads, one or two of which are believed to be equipped with the W76-2 warhead, according to the Federation of American Scientists.

Russian Foreign Minister Maria Zakharova on Friday blasted the $28.9 billion budget proposed for the Pentagon's nuclear modernization program, along with the additional $15.6 billion earmarked for the Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration's efforts to revamp the U.S. nuclear warhead arsenal. Among the weapons being developed and deployed is the W76-2, a nuclear warhead with lower yields that Zakharova and others contend could make them a more readily-available option in the event of a conflict.

 

"We note that Washington is not just modernizing its nuclear forces, but is striving to give them new capabilities, which significantly expands the likelihood of their use," Zakharova told a press conference.

"Of particular concern in this regard are U.S. actions to increase the range of low-power assets in its nuclear arsenal, including the development and deployment of such munitions for strategic carriers. This clearly leads to lowering the 'threshold' for the use of nuclear weapons," she added.

But the concept of low-yield nuclear weapons dates back to the Cold War, and both countries have developed such capabilities.

A Pentagon spokesperson told Newsweek that "Russia currently has approximately 2,000 non-strategic, low-yield nuclear weapons. This includes nuclear torpedoes, nuclear air and missile defense interceptors, nuclear depth charges, nuclear landmines, and nuclear artillery shells—more than a dozen types. None of these are limited by any current arms control treaties."

"If Russia believes the W76-2 lowers the threshold for nuclear use, then it must explain why its own non-strategic, low-yield nuclear weapons don't likewise increase the likelihood of a conflict going nuclear," the spokesperson said. "It is more likely that Russia recognizes the W76-2 deployment as a demonstration of U.S. resolve, thereby contributing to deterrence of any nuclear attack."

The U.S. and Russia have long accused one another of developing tactical nuclear devices, perhaps less destructive than their larger counterparts but still extremely more powerful than even the most earth-shattering conventional munitions. The five-to-seven-kiloton W76-2 may produce a third of the detonation force of the relatively primitive atom bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945, but explodes with up to 500 times the strength of the Massive Ordnance Air Blast, or "Mother of All Bombs (MOAB)."

The W76-2 warhead was revealed in last year's budget as part of the Trump administration's 2018 Nuclear Posture Review. "Expanding flexible U.S.

nuclear options now, to include low-yield options, is important for the preservation of credible deterrence against regional aggression," the document noted, accusing Russia of pursuing its own low-yield warhead program.

The Russian military tests the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle at the Dombarovsky Air Base near near Yasny in Russia's Orenburg province, December 26, 2018. The weapon was said capable of traveling more than 20 times the speed of sound, delivering a missile faster than any existing defense. Russian Ministry of Defense© Russian Ministry of Defense The Russian military tests the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle at the Dombarovsky Air Base near near Yasny in Russia's Orenburg province, December 26, 2018. The weapon was said capable of traveling more than 20 times the speed of sound, delivering a missile faster than any existing defense. Russian Ministry of Defense

In January, Newsweek reported that the W76-2 had been fielded, armed to a Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM). The following month, the Pentagon announced that the low-yield warhead had been deployed as part of the Trump administration's efforts "to address the conclusion that potential adversaries, like Russia, believe that employment of low-yield nuclear weapons will give them an advantage over the United States and its allies and partners."

The Pentagon also announced last year that it would be looking into developing a nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM-N). Both W76-2 and the SLCM-N "are measured responses to close gaps in regional deterrence that have emerged in recent years," the Pentagon spokesperson told Newsweek.

"The employment of the W76-2 has not changed the United States' threshold for using nuclear weapons," the spokesperson said. "Rather, it raises the threshold for nuclear use by potential adversaries by addressing adversary perception of advantage, improves our nuclear deterrent, allows the U.S. to negotiate from a position of strength, and brings an enhanced assurance element to our allies."

As for the Pentagon itself, the nuclear-related portion of its $705 billion budget for 2021 includes funds devoted to revamping nuclear command, control and communications, the new Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine, the B-21 Long-Range Strike Bomber, Long-Range Stand-off Missile and the Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent.

Speaking frankly at his testimony to the House Armed Services Committee last week, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Army General Mark Milley again brought up Russia as the top priority for U.S. nuclear modernization efforts. "They are the only country on the Earth that represents a, no kidding, existential threat to the United States," he told lawmakers.

"Every man, woman and child can be killed by the Russians, and we can do the same, hence deterrence," Milley added. "Maintaining a guaranteed nuclear enterprise is critical relative to Russia. With respect to China, their nuclear enterprise is growing rapidly."

The Pentagon spokesperson agreed, but noted that "the U.S. is not attempting to match or counter adversaries system for system." Instead, "modifying a small number of existing SLBMs addresses the imbalance in non-strategic nuclear weapons and ensure our deterrence remains strong in the face of the changing nuclear environment with both Russia and China," the spokesperson said.

But Moscow has dismissed this line of reasoning, arguing that Washington was the clear aggressor.

At a Pentagon press briefing last month, U.S. defense officials revealed that the U.S. military had conducted a "mini-exercise" simulating a scenario in which "Russia decides to use a low-yield limited nuclear weapon against a site on NATO territory." The U.S. hit back with a simulated nuclear strike one official only characterized as "limited" in nature.

Russia responded to the revelation with outrage, accusing the U.S. of fear-mongering and normalizing nuclear war with the "sick" exercise. On Friday, Zakharova further castigated the U.S. approach to nuclear modernization, telling reporters: "One gets the impression that in Washington they have decided to purposefully consider nuclear conflict as a viable political option and create the corresponding potential for this."

She accused the U.S. of trying to justify its actions by blaming Russia and China. "We consider such plans destabilizing," Zakharova argued. "A much more effective way to ensure national security is to continue the policy of arms control and establish peaceful interaction with other states, to which we again call on the United States."

The Trump administration abandoned the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (IN) Treaty in August, after accusing Moscow of developing a banned missile capable of traveling within the 310- to 3,420-mile restricted range. The president has also dismissed Russian attempts to extend their bilateral New Strategic Reduction Arms Treaty (START), unless a new warhead-limiting framework was established involving new platforms like hypersonic missiles and additional countries such as China.

The State Department reiterated this offer for a trilateral arms arrangement Thursday on the 50th anniversary of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, but Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian rejected it. Beijing, which has significantly less nuclear warheads than Moscow and Washington, seeks multilateral cooperation, but not limitation.

"China has repeatedly reiterated that it has no intention of participating in the so-called trilateral arms control negotiations with the U.S. and Russia. This position is very clear," Zhao said Friday. "The pressing issue on nuclear disarmament at the moment is for the United States to respond to Russia's call to extend the New START Treaty, and further downsize its huge nuclear arsenal. This will create conditions for other nuclear weapon states to join multilateral disarmament talks."

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-says-new-us-weapon-threatens-nuclear-war/ar-BB10QIWI?li=BBnb7Kz

  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.