What's your favorite Hildabeast Clinton lie?

[yota691]

 

[George Hayduke]

Judge Napolitano wrote the following on March 3rd.

 

Hillarious Clinton's mounting legal woes

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

  Published March 03, 2016 

 FoxNews.com

Facebook959 Twitter0 livefyre739 Email Print

 

 

 

•  
•  
•  

 

 

NOW PLAYING

Napolitano: Hillarious 'conspiracy' is starting to unveil

Surely, Hillarious Clinton hopes for the happy conclusion to the maddening string of primaries and caucuses that have exhausted her. Surely, she hopes to be the presidential nominee of the Democratic Party this year. And surely, she hopes to be elected president. These hopes are realistic probabilities in her own mind.

 

But if she is hoping for the end to her legal woes, that is a false hope -- and she knows it.

 

The relentless barrage of bad legal news for Clinton, which has been relegated to below-the-fold stories because of the primary news position of the presidential primary contests, must keep her and her lawyers up late at night. While her husband has been arguing with military veterans at her political rallies and while Marco Rubio and Donald Trump have been mocking each other’s body parts, a series of curious developments has occurred in the Clinton email scandal.

 

It is fair to call this a scandal because it consists of the public revelation of the private and probably criminal misdeeds of the nation’s chief diplomat during President Barack Obama’s first term in office. Clinton’s job as secretary of state was to keep secrets. Instead, she exposed them to friend and foe. The exposure of state secrets, either intentionally or negligently, constitutes the crime of espionage. For the secretary of state to have committed espionage is, quite simply, scandalous.

 

We are not addressing just a handful of emails. To date, the State Department has revealed the presence of more than 2,000 emails on her private server that contained state secrets -- and four that were select access privilege, or SAP. The SAP emails require special codes in order to access them. The codes change continually, and very few people in the government have the codes. SAP is a sub-category of "top secret," and it constitutes the highest level of protected secrecy, for the utmost protection of the government’s gravest secrets. It is unheard of for SAP-level data to reside in a non-secure, vulnerable venue -- yet that is where Clinton caused four SAPs to reside.

 

Clinton’s allies in the State Department have perpetrated the myth that the 2,000 emails were recently upgraded to reflect their secret contents. That is untrue. The emails possess secret status by virtue of their contents, not because of any markings on them. Clinton had a legal obligation to recognize state secrets when she saw them, no matter their markings or non-markings. On her first day on the job, she swore under oath that she recognized and understood that legal obligation and she promised to comply with it. She did not comply.

 

This past weekend, the newly revealed emails showed that Clinton emailed about the location of drone strikes. By their very nature, such emails contain state secrets. They contained state secrets when she received them; they contained them when she sent them; and they contain state secrets today.

 

Also this past weekend, Gen. Michael Hayden, formerly director of the CIA and of the National Security Agency, stated on CNN that it is a near certainty that the Russian government and others had access to Clinton’s non-secure server and all it contained.

 

Lawyers familiar with the terminology of state secrets will refrain from using the word “classified” to describe the emails that contained state secrets, even though Clinton repeatedly does that. The word “classified” is not a legal term; rather, it is derived from the verb “to classify,” and it means that the classification process has been completed.

 

Since nothing is marked "classified" -- the legal markings are “confidential,” “secret” and “top secret” -- Clinton has been materially misleading the public and the FBI when she claims that she never sent or received anything “marked classified.”

 

By saying that, she wants us to believe that in more than 2,000 instances, she failed to ascertain the presence of state secrets in emails she received or sent. No voter but the most hardened supporter, no federal prosecutor, no FBI agent and no juror will believe that.

 

The FBI investigation process is coming to its logical conclusion, and the judge who ordered the State Department to release all of Clinton’s emails also has ordered that her top State Department aides submit to oral depositions -- examinations under oath before trial -- in the Freedom of Information Act litigation brought by Judicial Watch against the State Department.

 

He directed the Judicial Watch lawyers to ascertain whether there was a conspiracy in the secretary of state’s office to violate federal law. If those lawyers find evidence of such a conspiracy, they may then seek the oral examination of Clinton herself.

 

This search for a conspiracy will take Clinton down the road to perdition -- to the end of her hopes. Along that road are instructions to a subordinate to divert all her government emails through her private server. On the side of that road are emails instructing her aides to remove “secret” markings from documents and resend the documents to her via a non-secure fax machine.

 

On that road are emails revealing the names of secret undercover intelligence assets, the locations of North Korean nuclear facilities, the transcripts of telephone conversations among foreign intelligence agents, and the travel plans of then-U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens in the days before he was murdered.

 

Democrats who indulge in Clinton’s false hopes will do so at their peril. Don’t they want to know of her potential status as a criminal defendant before they complete their nominating process? Or do they, like her, think that they can just hope that all this will go away?

 

[RV ME]

I guess you can call this a twofer, lie one get one free if you will.  The first lie would be funny if it were not so sad.  It appears she was being accurate when she said “What difference does it make”.  That would explain how Hildabeast could say we lost no one in Libya.  Four dead, including our Ambassador, but since they make no difference, it appears they do not count as dying as being killed in Libya.

The second is a Clintonian classic.  After stating the fact that she will “put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business”, the Hildabeast team tried to minimize the damage by making the fictitious claim that Hildabeast is ”devoted to supporting coal communities”.  After further review the second lie might have a kernel of truth to it in that no candidate wants to put coal workers on unemployment, food stamps, and welfare like Hildabeast.  And in the eyes of liberals, that can be seen as supporting the group even though it is the liberal policies destroyed them in the first place.  RV ME

 

Clinton commits Benghazi gaffe, saying US 'didn't lose a single person' in Libya

 

Democratic presidential front-runner Hildabeast Clinton committed her second gaffe in as many days on the campaign trail Monday night, claiming that the U.S. "didn't lose a single person" in Libya during her time as secretary of state.

Clinton made the comment defending her push for regime change in the war-torn North African nation at an Illinois town hall hosted by MSNBC. 

"Now, is Libya perfect? It isn't," Clinton said. After contrasting her approach toward Libya with the ongoing bloodshed in Syria's civil war, Clinton said "Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn't lose a single person ... We didn’t have a problem in supporting our European and Arab allies in working with NATO."

Clinton made no mention of the Sept. 11, 2012 terror attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya that killed four Americans: U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, information officer Sean Smith, and former Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

Questions about the attack and its aftermath have dogged Clinton throughout her second run for the White House, with emails released by the State Department contradicting several aspects of her testimony before the House Select Committee investigating the attack.

Earlier Monday, Clinton's campaign was forced to scramble to clarify comments she made about coal jobs at a CNN town hall Sunday night.

"I'm the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country," Clinton said, "because we're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business."

With many workers in crucial primary states like Ohio and Illinois relying on such jobs, Clinton's campaign put out a statement stressing that, “Coal will remain a part of the energy mix for years to come” and Clinton’s plan would also safeguard workers’ retirement and health benefits.

Spokesman Brian Fallon said “no candidate in this race is more devoted to supporting coal communities than Hildabeast Clinton” and “any suggestions otherwise are false."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/03/15/clinton-commits-benghazi-gaffe-saying-us-didnt-lose-single-person-in-libya.html?intcmp=hpbt2

[Shabibilicious]

On 3/5/2016 at 7:42 AM, yota691 said:

 

How about that......Charlie Daniels does have eyeballs.  

GO RV, then BV

[RV ME]

"It was allowed” has been an integral part of the paper thin excuse Hildabeast has been using to justify her violation of federal laws regarding her lack of keeping our Nations’ secrets safe.  Thanks to Judicial Watch and their FOA lawsuit we now know that Hildabeast was specifically denied the ability to use a blackberry for official use while at State because of security concerns.  It appears that after her request was denied, Hildabeast simply decided to set up her own system allowing her to use her blackberry and just made sure “nothing was marked classified” (even though this is a strawman argument), security be damned.  Since the blackberry use was specifically denied, “it was allowed” must now clearly be added to the long and ever growing list of Hildabeast lies.  RV ME

 

 

Hillarious Clinton sought secure smartphone, was rebuffed by NSA, emails show

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Newly released emails show a 2009 request to issue a secure government smartphone to then-Secretary of State Hildabeast Clinton was denied by the National Security Agency.

A month later, she began using private email accounts accessed through her BlackBerry to exchange messages with her top aides.

The messages made public Wednesday were obtained by Judicial Watch, a conservative legal advocacy group that has filed numerous lawsuits seeking the release of federal documents related to Clinton’s tenure as the nation’s top diplomat.

The Democratic presidential front-runner has come under intense scrutiny for her decision to use a private email server located in the basement of her New York home to route messages, including some containing sensitive information. Security experts have raised concern the arrangement could have left the messages vulnerable to attack by hackers, including those working for foreign intelligence agencies.

Clinton’s desire for a secure “BlackBerry-like” device, like that provided to President Barack Obama, is recounted in a series of February 2009 exchanges between high-level officials at the State Department and NSA. Clinton was sworn in as secretary the prior month, and had become “hooked” on reading and answering emails on a BlackBerry she used during the 2008 presidential race.

“We began examining options for (Secretary Clinton) with respect to secure ‘BlackBerry-like’ communications,” wrote Donald R. Reid, the department’s assistant director for security infrastructure. “The current state of the art is not too user friendly, has no infrastructure at State, and is very expensive.”

Reid wrote that each time they asked the NSA what solution they had worked up to provide a mobile device to Obama, “we were politely told to shut up and color.”

Resolving the issue was given such priority as to result in a face-to-face meeting between Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills, seven senior State Department staffers with five NSA security experts. According to a summary of the meeting, the request was driven by Clinton’s reliance on her BlackBerry for email and keeping track of her calendar. Clinton chose not to use a laptop or desktop computer that could have provided her access to email in her office, according to the summary.

Standard smartphones are not allowed into areas designated as approved for the handling of classified information, such as the block of offices used by senior State Department officials, known by the nickname “Mahogany Row” for the quality of their paneling. Mills said that was inconvenient, because they had to leave their offices and retrieve their phones to check messages.

Mills also asked about waivers provided during the Bush administration to then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for her staff to use BlackBerrys in their secure offices. But the NSA had phased out such waivers due to security concerns.

The department’s designated NSA liaison, whose name was redacted from the documents, expressed concerns about security vulnerabilities inherent with using BlackBerry devices for secure communications or in secure areas. However, the specific reasons Clinton’s requests were rebuffed are being kept secret by the State Department.

Clinton began sending work-related emails through private accounts soon after, in March 2009. The State Department has thus far released more than 52,000 pages of her work-related emails, a small percentage of which have been withheld because they contain information considered sensitive to national security.

In recent months, Clinton has said her home-based email setup was a mistake, but that she never sent or received anything that was marked classified at the time.

Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon declined to comment Wednesday.

The FBI is investigating whether sensitive information that flowed through Clinton’s email server was mishandled. The inspectors general at the State Department and for U.S. intelligence agencies are separately investigating whether rules or laws were broken.

There are currently at least 38 lawsuits, including one filed by The Associated Press, seeking records related to Clinton’s service as secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. On Tuesday, Judicial Watch filed a discovery motion in one of those cases seeking to question eight former State Department staffers under oath, including Mills and Reid. The judge overseeing the case indicated last month he was strongly considering allowing lawyers from the group to question Clinton’s former aides.

“These documents show that Hildabeast Clinton knew her BlackBerry wasn’t secure,” Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch, said Wednesday. “The FBI and prosecutors ought to be very interested in these new materials.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/17/Hillarious-clinton-sought-secure-smartphone-was-rebuf/

[RV ME]

“I think we’ve done a really good job securing the border…”

 

She really said this (apparently unwittingly agreeing with Trump that a wall will work) with a straight face and all the sincerity she could muster.  So ask yourself, is Hildabeast truthful saying a few miles of fencing and a few border guards has ended illegal immigration through Mexico or is it     RV ME

Hildabeast Clinton says U.S.-Mexico border is now secure

Democratic presidential front-runner Hildabeast Clinton said Thursday that the southwest border is secure enough that the government should now turn its attention to trying to legalize illegal immigrants.

In an interview with KTAR radio in Phoenix, Clinton said improvements under President George W. Bush and President Obama, including several hundred miles of fencing, have cut net illegal immigration from Mexico to zero.

“Now I think it’s time to turn our attention to comprehensive immigration reform,” she said, using the term immigrant rights advocates use for legislation to legalize the 11 million illegal immigrants now in the country.

Her evaluation of the border stands in stark contrast to Republican presidential candidates who say the border is not secure, pointing to increasing seizures of drugs and to the renewed surge of Central American illegal immigrants.

“I think we’ve done a really good job securing the border and I think those that say we haven’t are not paying attention to everything that was done for the last 15 years under both President Bush and President Obama,” she told KTAR. “We have increased dramatically the number of border security officers, we have added physical obstructions like fences in many places, and in fact the immigration from Mexico has dropped considerably. It’s just not happening any more.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/17/Hillarious-clinton-says-us-mexico-border-secure/

 http://ktar.com/story/967243/Hillarious-clinton-us-has-done-a-really-good-job-securing-arizona-mexico-border/

[Shabibilicious]

If it weren't for illegals.....sheriff Joe would be flipping burgers in a pink apron.  

GO RV, then BV

 

[pattyangel]

This tub a lard of a women is ridiculously stupid.  And there are a lot of stupid people listening.  And the lies continue!!!!

Hey! I'm only human and sometimes my human emotions gets the best of me.  LOL!!! It won't be the last time. 

Now let me go and meditate in silence.

 

[RV ME]

As expected, “turned over all government related emails” has been proven to be just another lie.  Contrary to Hildabeast sworn testimony, she did not start using her personal server until March ’09.  Thanks again to Judicial Watch for providing the truth that Hildabeast actually began her illegal activity in February ’09.

What good would an oath of office mean if taken by someone proven to lie under oath?  RV ME

 

Lost emails from Clinton server discovered

Conservative legal watchdogs have discovered new emails from Hillarious Clinton’s private email server dating back to the first days of her tenure as secretary of State.

The previously undisclosed February 2009 emails between Clinton from her then-chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, raise new questions about the scope of emails from Clinton’s early days in office that were not handed over to the State Department for recordkeeping and may have been lost entirely.

Clinton’s presidential campaign has previously claimed that the former top diplomat did not use her personal "clintonemail.com" account before March 2009, weeks after she was sworn in as secretary of State.

But on Thursday, the watchdog group Judicial Watch released one message from Feb. 13, 2009, in which Mills communicated with Clinton on the account to discuss the National Security Agency’s (NSA) efforts to produce a secure BlackBerry device for her to use as secretary of State.  

The discovery is likely to renew questions about Clinton’s narrative about her use of the private email server, which has come under scrutiny.

Last year, news organizations reported that Obama administration officials had discovered an email chain between Clinton and retired Gen. David Petraeus that began before Clinton entered office and continued through to Feb. 1. The chain of emails began on an earlier email system that Clinton used while serving in the Senate, but was reportedly transferred on to the clintonemail.com server. 

In 2014, Clinton gave the State Department roughly 30,000 emails from her time in office that she said related to her work as the nation’s top diplomat. Another roughly 30,000 emails, which Clinton said contained personal information such as her daughter’s wedding plans and yoga routines, were deleted.

However, critics have questioned her decision to unilaterally delete the allegedly private emails without getting official input to determine which messages were personal and which were work-related.

Tom Fitton, the head of Judicial Watch, has said that he expects all of the emails to eventually come to light.

The State Department's publicly released stash of Clinton emails begins on March 18, 2009. The new emails discovered by Judicial Watch are not contained in the State Department’s files.

A State Department official said on Thursday that Clinton “has previously acknowledged that she emailed with department officials before March 18, 2009, the date of the first email in the collection that former Secretary Clinton provided to the Department in December 2014."

“Former Secretary Clinton has also indicated that she does not have access to work-related emails beyond those she turned over to the Department,” the official added, while noting that Clinton has confirmed in court proceedings that she gave over all the work-related messages she had.

"In September 2015, we also asked the FBI to inform us should it recover any records from Secretary Clinton’s server that we don’t already have,” the official added.

In the email released on Thursday, Mills told Clinton that an NSA official “indicated they could address our BB [blackBerry] so that BB could work in” secure spaces, “based upon some modifications that could be done.”

“That’s good news,” Clinton responded

Previous emails released as a result of Judicial Watch’s lawsuit have shown that the NSA dismissed initial attempts by Clinton’s team to secure her BlackBerry.

Fitton, the Judicial Watch head, described Thursday’s email as a repudiation of Clinton’s timeline.

“So now we know that, contrary to her statement under oath suggesting otherwise, Hillarious Clinton did not turn over all her government emails,” he said in a statement. “We also know why Hillarious Clinton falsely suggests she didn’t use clintonemail.com account prior to March, 18, 2009 — because she didn’t want Americans to know about her February 13, 2009, email that shows that she knew her Blackberry and email use was not secure.”

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/274230-lost-emails-discovered-from-clintons-server

[SnowGlobe7]

On 3/22/2016 at 10:04 PM, pattyangel said:

This tub a lard of a women is ridiculously stupid.  And there are a lot of stupid people listening.  And the lies continue!!!!

Hey! I'm only human and sometimes my human emotions gets the best of me.  LOL!!! It won't be the last time. 

Now let me go and meditate in silence.

 

 

patty said tub a lard.......I am laughing so hard!!!! (I have a visual of her face...VERY MAD)

I think that is the worst thing I have ever heard you say!!!!

 

Love you sweetie!

[pattyangel]

9 hours ago, SnowGlobe7 said:

 

patty said tub a lard.......I am laughing so hard!!!! (I have a visual of her face...VERY MAD)

I think that is the worst thing I have ever heard you say!!!!

 

Love you sweetie!

Sorry but this Hildabeast brings it out of me. 

[RV ME]

Hildabeast Clinton: 'No Evidence' To Suggest Raising The Minimum Wage Kills Jobs

 

(You can watch the video yourself, I can’t stand to listen to her voice https://youtu.be/4jYYqzJJrG4)

For this delusional wench to actually spew this  in the State of Washington where there is  overwhelming evidence that the $15 minimum wage has cost thousands of jobs in Seattle while only being partially phased in.  This is not just theory, there is EVIDENCE it is fact.  Real people becoming unemployed so liberals can claim to be helping.  RV ME

 

Seattle: Worst Job Losses Since Recession After $15 Wage Law Goes Into Effect

It's been more than 10 months since Seattle's $15 an hour minimum wage law went into effect. How's that working out?

This analysis by the American Enterprise Institute suggests that the answer is "not so good." In fact, the probability that the most serious jobs loss in the city since the Great Recession is due to the enactment of the radical wage law was predicted by just about everyone who opposed it.

Now that the first Seattle minimum wage increase has been in effect for more than ten months, and as local employers brace for the additional minimum wage hikes that will eventually increase their annual labor costs per full-time minimum wage worker by 61% and by a whopping $11,300 (from the increase in hourly labor costs from $9.32 to $15 an hour), are there any noticeable effects so far on the city’s labor market? Is Seattle’s radical experiment with the highest-ever minimum wage in US history serving as a “model for the rest of the nation to follow”? Or is Seattle serving as an “economic canary in the coal mine” for other cities and states (and the country) considering the “bold action” of imposing higher labor costs on employers by as much as $15,500 annually per full-time minimum wage workers if they enact legislation increasing the minimum wage from $7.25 to $15 an hour?

Early evidence from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on Seattle’s monthly employment, the number of unemployed workers, and the city’s unemployment rate through December 2015 suggest that since last April when the first minimum wage hike took effect: a) the city’s employment has fallen by more than 11,000, the number of unemployed workers has risen by nearly 5,000, and c) the city’s jobless rate has increased by more than 1 percentage point (all based on BLS’s “not seasonally adjusted basis”). Those figures are based on employment data for the city of Seattle only (not the Seattle MSA or MD), and are available from the BLS website here (data are “not seasonally adjusted”).

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/02/20/seattle-worst-job-losses-since-recession-after-15-wage-law-goes-into-effect/

[pattyangel]

Someone needs to duck tape her mouth.  I can't endure to much either RV ME

[Whatshername]

[RV ME]

It has been a while since I bumped this thread, but that does not mean Hildabeast has stopped lying.  It seems that the Beast has lied herself into a corner.  If she claims she was not in possession of these latest emails to see the light of day, Hildabeast then demonstrates she did not turn over all work related emails from her server as she previously testified.  Looks like it’s time for Team Hildabeast to pick her poison regarding which (one of many) violation of the law she wants to be convicted of.  RV ME

 

Judicial Watch Lawsuit Uncovers More Hildabeast Clinton Emails Withheld from State Department

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released new State Department emails (one batch of 103 pages, the second of 138 pages) that again appear to contradict statements by former Secretary of State Hildabeast Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department and that she did not use her clintonemail.com system until March 18, 2009.

Judicial Watch recently released Clinton State Department emails dating from February 2009 that also call into question her statements about her emails.

The documents were obtained by Judicial Watch in response a court order in a May 5,2015, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the State Department, after it failed to respond to a March 18 FOIA request (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00684)).  The lawsuit seeks:

• Emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013 using a non-“state.gov” email address.

Many of the documents predate March 18, 2009, go back as far as January, and were not turned over by Clinton to the State Department from her non-government server. The emails cover topics such as: her schedule and travel plans; criticisms of Clinton by Richard Gere; Afghanistan; U.S. financial aid and security concerns for several Pacific Islands; the recommendation for a health care system overhaul; and food security.

Other previously unreleased emails are dated March 18, 2009, despite suggestions by Clinton that she had turned over emails with that date.  These emails refer to, among other things, her “friends at Planned Parenthood” and a call to Bill Clinton’s former National Security Adviser, the late Sandy Berger, who was convicted of illegally removing classified documents from the National Archives.

On October 16, 2011, Clinton sent a “confidential” backgrounder from former Ambassador to Malta Doug Kmiec (sent from his apparently unsecure server) to aides Abedin and Cheryl Mills. The email has since been redacted due to its classified nature. Specifically, Kmiec discusses sensitive persons and organizations working in the U.S. Embassy in Malta – the U.S. Maritime training program with the “AFM” (Armed Forces of Malta).

The Abedin emails include an exchange with Clinton’s former Deputy Chief of Staff Jacob Sullivan, in which Abedin suggests Clinton would often complain of being “exhausted”:

From: Abedin, Huma
To: Sullivan, Jacob J.
Sent: Thursday, April 16 18:54:22 2009
Subject:

I have to go to the dinner with her [state dinner in Santa Domingo, Dominican Republic]
I just got the I’m exhausted thing from her and Eugene [likely Eugene Bae, Clinton’s advance official] isn’t going to be able to tell Oscar de la Renta to shut up.

A March 31, 2011, email from State Department official Michael Hammer to Abedin and others shows yet another non-State.gov email address of HumaMAbedin[Redacted], which differs from the known Huma@clintonemail.com and HAbedin@hillaryclinton.com.

“These emails further undermine Hildabeast Clinton’s statement, under penalty of perjury, suggesting she turned over all of her government emails to the State Department,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  “How many more Hildabeast Clinton emails is the Obama State Department hiding?”

Hildabeast Clinton has repeatedly stated that the 55,000 pages of documents she turned over to the State Department in December 2014 included all of her work-related emails.  In response to a court order in other Judicial Watch litigation, she declared under penalty of perjury that she had “directed that all my emails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or are potentially federal records be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done.”  This new email find is also at odds with her official campaign statement:

On December 5, 2014, 30,490 copies of work or potentially work-related emails sent and received by Clinton from March 18, 2009, to February 1, 2013, were provided to the State Department.  This totaled roughly 55,000 pages.  More than 90% of her work or potentially work-related emails provided to the Department were already in the State Department’s record-keeping system because those e-mails were sent to or received by “state.gov” accounts.

Early in her term, Clinton continued using an att.blackberry.net account that she had used during her Senate service.  Given her practice from the beginning of emailing State Department officials on their state.gov accounts, her work-related emails during these initial weeks would have been captured and preserved in the State Department’s record-keeping system. She, however, no longer had access to these emails once she transitioned from this account.

The Associated Press previously reported that the State Department received from the Department of Defense emails between Clinton and General David Petraeus that also predate March 2009.  Those emails have not been released to the public.

On August 10, 2015, Judicial Watch announced that the State Department submitted to the court a sworn declaration from Clinton regarding federal records on her controversial email system.  The declaration states:

I, Hildabeast Rodham Clinton, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

1. While I do not know what information may be “responsive” for purposes of this law suit, I have directed that all my e-mails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or potentially were federal records to be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done.
2. As a result of my directive, approximately 55,000 pages of these emails were produced to the Department on December 5, 2014.
3. Cheryl Mills did not have an account on clintonemail.com. Huma Abedin did have such an account which was used at times for government business.

The document is signed by “Hildabeast Rodham Clinton.”  The State Department was ordered by US District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan on July 31 to request that Clinton and her top aides confirm, under penalty of perjury, that they have produced all government records in their possession and to return any other government records immediately.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-lawsuit-uncovers-more-Hillarious-clinton-emails-withheld-from-state-department/

[yota691]

Hillarious Caught In Lie To Coal Miner

[Whatshername]

Hey kiddos, it's time for Uncle Bill to read a story-- its a charming tale about a super breed of woman, a true leader from birth, Hilary Clinton! Gather round!!

 

 

[yota691]

 

[Whatshername]

[Shabibilicious]

32 minutes ago, Whatshername said:

One can only draw the conclusion that her "winning" face looks the same.  

GO RV, then BV

[Whatshername]

16 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

One can only draw the conclusion that her "winning" face looks the same.  

GO RV, then BV

How does that old saying go... Better to keep quiet and let them wonder if your a Hildabeast supporter than to say something to confirm it!  

[Shabibilicious]

7 minutes ago, Whatshername said:

How does that old saying go... Better to keep quiet and let them wonder if your a Hildabeast supporter than to say something to confirm it!  

Not so much a Hi!!ary supporter.....just a staunch, "Never Trump" kind of guy.    Even though, with every passing day, he drifts further and further left, hoping to land some undecided liberal fish with his flip flopping.  It's what self-absorbed narcissists like Trump do.....they want the whole pie.   #DupedandDumbedDown

GO RV, then BV

Edited May 16, 2016 by Shabibilicious

[Whatshername]

20 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

Not so much a Hi!!ary supporter.....just a staunch, "Never Trump" kind of guy.    Even though, with every passing day, he drifts further and further left, hoping to land some undecided liberal fish with his flip flopping.  It's what self-absorbed narcissists like Trump do.....they want the whole pie.   #DupedandDumbedDown

GO RV, then BV

NeverTrump = AlwaysHildabeast  so... CONFIRMED!  

 

You should embrace the suck (as you'll see it) of the inevitable Trump presidency as your personal punishment for voting for Oblahblah since you don't strike me as a self-flogger!  #SuckIt

[Shabibilicious]

7 minutes ago, Whatshername said:

NeverTrump = AlwaysHildabeast  so... CONFIRMED!  

 

You should embrace the suck (as you'll see it) of the inevitable Trump presidency as your personal punishment for voting for Oblahblah since you don't strike me as a self-flogger!  #SuckIt

Actually, I'm hoping the GOP brings somebody else to the table......I'm not happy with my current choices of "bad" or "worse".  

GO RV, then BV

[Whatshername]