divemaster5734 Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 (edited) This is scary stuff folks. Now that the warmongers have been caught trying to frame Syria, they know the need something big to sway public opinion. Is this a false flag about to take place on American soil? Watch the video and decide for yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9-QgMMIa_sk SENATOR WARNS OF NUKE STRIKE ON S. CAROLINA AFTER MISSING NUKE REPORT by Anthony Gucciardi September 5th, 2013 Updated 09/06/2013 at 10:09 am Senator Lindsay Graham has warned South Carolinians about the threat of a ‘terrorist nuclear attack’ on the same day that our exclusive high level military intel revealed to us that nuclear warheads were being shipped to South Carolina from a major Texas airforce base under an ‘off the record’ black ops transfer. Found in the CBS report entitled ‘Graham: Nukes In Hands Of Terrorists Could Result In Bomb Coming To Charleston Harbor’, the report details Graham’s warning that a lack of military action in Syria could result in a nuclear ‘bombing’ in Charleston, South Carolina — the very destination of the black ops nuclear transfer. The CBS report reads: Graham is quite literally saying that if we do not launch a war with Syria, South Carolina may be nuked. And this ultimately reeks of yet another false flag being orchestrated by the United States government in order to send us into war, or at the very least a threat. Except this time, we’re talking about nuclear weapons. Amazingly, we were the first to get intel on this from our credible and extremely high level military source, who told us the following: “He [Graham] says if there is no U.S. response [to Syria], Iran will not believe America’s resolve to block Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Graham also says those nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists could result in a bomb coming to Charleston Harbor.” This was sent to us before the Graham report came out warning about the nuclear attack on South Carolina, and coincides exactly with what Graham is saying. I am deeply concerned by these findings, and ask everyone to spread the word on this information immediately. Whether or not Graham is receiving intel from higher ups and believes in a legitimate terror attack on the horizon is unknown, but the reality here is that we have intelligence that has linked the unsigned transfer of nuclear warheads to this exact location. “Dyess is beginning to move out nuclear war heads today. I got a tap from DERMO earlier. He said it was the first time they have been even acknowledged since being put there in the 80′s. No signature was required for transfer… There was no directive. He said that Dyess Commander was on site to give authority to release. No one knew where they were going really, but the truck driver said to take them to South Carolina and another pick up will take them from there.” Here is the video report we did on Tuesday regarding the missing nuclear warheads: Now, we need answers. The entire event is eerily similar to the unsigned nuke transfer that is now known as the ’2007 United States Air Force nuclear weapons incident’, in which nuclear warheads went ‘missing’ from Minot Air Force Base and Barksdale Air Force Base back in August of 2007. The Minot event, however, was major national news and was even covered by the mainstream media extensively. Disturbingly, however, numerous individuals from the base began dying like flies and committing suicide after the event — and that’s even when it wasin the mainstream. Hopefully, this entire thing will amount to nothing and pass by without any form of ‘terror’ attack. Hopefully the attendee during the speech who told the US News publication that Graham’s speech was ‘absolute fear mongering’ is right. Unfortunately, the military source revealing this information is extremely accurate and is absolutely certain that a black ops nuclear transfer did indeed take place. And what’s more concerning is the fact that we have not heard from the source in quite some time. We are risking our lives bringing you this report on the high level intel and connecting the dots here to what Lindsay is saying. You won’t hear about this in the mega media unless we force them to cover it, and it’s up to us to get this out there. For the first time, we may be able to utilize this high level intelligence to get answers and stop a potential attac Edited September 7, 2013 by divemaster5734 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waterman13 Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 I do believe there will be another 911, bigger than 2001. I hope they don't do something until after the RV, I'm out of here because when they do something it will create a reason to declare martial law. Just my thoughts WM13 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coldwarvet Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 Ladies and Gentlemen of Dinarvets, My username on this site, coldwarvet, is due to the fact that I served for 20 years in the Air Force, from 1972 til 1992. Over half my career was as a B-52 pilot, pulling nuclear alert duty throughout the United States. There is a factual error in this post that I must, in good conscience, correct. The narrative asserts that nuclear weapons were only located at Dyess Air Force Base starting in the 1980s. I know for a fact that Dyess was a B-52 base, supporting our nuclear deterrence mission, long before the 1980s. Perhaps this is an inadvertent error, but it calls into question the veracity of the remainder of the post. Check your facts before you post, folks. If you want to be believed, you need to ensure your facts can be verified. 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wpsmit Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 Exactly, waterman....And it will make that "phony" scandal at the embassy look like a picnic..Charleston? who knows, but I really wonder how many folks would have scoffed and ridiculed anyone who might have warned that the twin towers would come down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waterman13 Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 (edited) coldwarvet, There are nukes everywhere. I worked on subs in the 70-80's every boomer base has nukes, every boomer (ballistic missile sub) has many missiles with multiple warheads. WM13 Edited September 7, 2013 by waterman13 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dog53 Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 Ladies and Gentlemen of Dinarvets, My username on this site, coldwarvet, is due to the fact that I served for 20 years in the Air Force, from 1972 til 1992. Over half my career was as a B-52 pilot, pulling nuclear alert duty throughout the United States. There is a factual error in this post that I must, in good conscience, correct. The narrative asserts that nuclear weapons were only located at Dyess Air Force Base starting in the 1980s. I know for a fact that Dyess was a B-52 base, supporting our nuclear deterrence mission, long before the 1980s. Perhaps this is an inadvertent error, but it calls into question the veracity of the remainder of the post. Check your facts before you post, folks. If you want to be believed, you need to ensure your facts can be verified. Thank you for the info and thank you for your service. I thought it was BS the moment I read it. Thats off a website known for fear tactic`s and doom and gloom the sky is falling tomorrow. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muleslayer Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 CRAP! I am going to be in Hilton Head on 9/11. That will ruin my vacation! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wpsmit Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 Well, Gee Wally..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waterman13 Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 Don't look at the flash .... Duck and Cover WM13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muleslayer Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 (edited) Duck and cover what? Obama has my six! Bwahahahahahaha! My nose just grew 6 inches! Edited September 7, 2013 by Muleslayer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saradise Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 Stuff is getting really scary...seriously! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crewdog Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 I was stationed at Dyess airforce base until i got out in 2004. I was a crewchief on c130 and it was common knowledge that there were no nukes on base. As i understood it the B1 bomber was originaly made to take over the B52's job with the nukes but the B1 could not carry the nuke. It is not equiped to carry nukes but only conventional bombs. When the B52 moved off base the nukes went with them from what i was told. I visited the place where they practice loading the bombs on the B1 bomber and they explained the same things as well. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waterman13 Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 Stuff is getting really scary...seriously! You got that right Sara WM13 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billy goat Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 I'm a U.S. senator from Dinarhopiumland and I should tell you that if we don't intervene in Syria - well - I tell you what - nukes could drop on Mt. Rushmore. Graham is fear mongering to the marginally underinformed (Obama gets away with it and he thinks he can as well) in an effort to garner support for intervention. He must think we Americans are stupid. It was our president who placed us in this dilemma. His ring kissing antics have fueled and emboldened splinter, extremist groups throughout the world and I fear there is no turning back. The above issue (if valid) can be used to fuel Obama's decision if he lacks congressional support. He is trying to build credibility, yes - a silk purse from a sow's ear. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDS396 Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 I WAS IN THE U S NAVY DOING THE VIETNAM WAR ON A AIRCRAFT CARRIER AND WE ALWAY HAD THREE PLANES IN THE HANGER BAY SETTING WITH NUKE READY TO GO ANYTIME SO YOU KNOW THEY STILL DO TODAY 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 ***/// One of us was also in the nuclear end of the "Triad" when we served back in the day... You'd be shocked if you knew where some of these things are "kept". and whilst we're talkin' old home week... the "Nautilus"... one helluva a sub, folks ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
divemaster5734 Posted September 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 Ladies and Gentlemen of Dinarvets, My username on this site, coldwarvet, is due to the fact that I served for 20 years in the Air Force, from 1972 til 1992. Over half my career was as a B-52 pilot, pulling nuclear alert duty throughout the United States. There is a factual error in this post that I must, in good conscience, correct. The narrative asserts that nuclear weapons were only located at Dyess Air Force Base starting in the 1980s. I know for a fact that Dyess was a B-52 base, supporting our nuclear deterrence mission, long before the 1980s. Perhaps this is an inadvertent error, but it calls into question the veracity of the remainder of the post. Check your facts before you post, folks. If you want to be believed, you need to ensure your facts can be verified. As a FADAC and CRYPTO repairman, I was aware of a good many things that were not publicly admitted by the government for decades. As a pilot, you were also privy to many issues. How many debriefings were you instructed to maintain silence? I can accept the base could easily have been use for nukes before the admitted time. Are you SURE you are not confusing YOUR known fact with what was allowed public knowledge? I worked on systems in the 70's that the gov didn't even admit existed until the 90's. As a pilot, I'm sure you did too. Are you actually willing to just discount the entire content of this post just to spite a minor technicality? Really? That's about the same as refusing to leave a burning house because the neighbor that ran into your home to tell you didn't bother to knock, so, since he wasn't polite enough to knock first then the house can't possibly be on fire.. yeah right. Really????? A simple MINOR error and you imply the entire post is therefore false? Thats the problem today, all people look for is an excuse, it's a lot easier that bothering to do anything else... just saying.... 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 ***/// DIVEMASTER ... yup, exactly. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desimo Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 Even terrorist would not be so stupid as to nuke South Carolina. Tick off a bunch of good ole boys who would clean their clock by noon and then have enough time to get a bunch of crawdads for supper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted September 7, 2013 Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 (edited) Even terrorist would not be so stupid as to nuke South Carolina. Tick off a bunch of good ole boys who would clean their clock by noon and then have enough time to get a bunch of crawdads for supper. ***/// The fallout could go all the way to Mayberry and Floyd's Barber Shop, the Golf Courses, and Skyline Drive & the Shenandoah... hitting at the hearts of the hammocks of Patriotism.... exacting their revenge on the bastions of Liberty. Notice he didn't say Washington DC would get it....? Now why do you suppose THAT is? Because they won't go after their masters -- they want US, the heart of US, obummer's enemies! Remember obummer's own speech in Egypt to the muslim brotherhood when he said he would punish their enemies? He was talking about US, folks. Edited September 7, 2013 by SgtFuryUSCZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
divemaster5734 Posted September 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2013 Even terrorist would not be so stupid as to nuke South Carolina. Tick off a bunch of good ole boys who would clean their clock by noon and then have enough time to get a bunch of crawdads for supper. I agree. unless you are talking about the terrorists that hang out in DC. The 535 anti-American bastards that life in luxury by destroying our economy. I'm not saying this is a given. Of course not, and I pray a month from now someone finds this post and cracks a joke about it. I know you were only making a humorous comment and not discounting the post. I was hesitant to even post it, but I'll guarantee there have been a lot of false flag events that were cancelled due to someone whistle blowing about it. If this information getting out has caused the planners to cancel the plans, I'm good with folks laughing at me. I spent years telling people about the lies and deceptions with our government and getting laughed at. Now, some of the stuff we were laughed at 10 years ago is common knowledge fact. So those that desire to live in ignorance will always find a way. And no, I'm not saying that about you Desimo, I just hijacked your comment to make a point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts