Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Obama Will Give Missile Tech To Russia


DinarMillionaire
 Share

Recommended Posts

It appears that Barack Obama has again ignored the rule of law by signing a defense appropriations bill that prohibits him sharing vital United States leading-edge strategic US missile technology with Russia, yet he has told both houses of Congress that he plans to share the US missile technology anyway. Why is this important? Because it goes light-years beyond partisan politics and into an area where our national defense will be put at unreasonable risk. It is believed that the Russians will pass this technology onto China, Iran and North Korea.

I find it bitterly ironic that this president pushes an agenda of excessive government regulation and oversight under the guise of consumer safety. Virtually everything in our homes, offices and automobiles is regulated to some extent by federal bureaucracy. Yet at the same time, he’s subjecting tens of millions of American lives to unreasonable risk by unilaterally giving away our deepest US missile technology to nations hostile to American interests.

Read more...

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears that Barack Obama has again ignored the rule of law ......................................... he has told both houses of Congress that he plans to share the US missile technology anyway. It is believed that the Russians will pass this technology onto China, Iran and North Korea.

I he’s subjecting tens of millions of American lives to unreasonable risk by unilaterally giving away our deepest US missile technology to nations hostile to American interests.

Read more...

Is this not TREASON???? It is amazing to me the damage that this one individual has and is doing to this great Nation, or what will be left of it. He also left a downed drone plane in Iran for them to have instead of destroying it or recovering it. So the question is, "Why aren't folks rising up against him?" I guess he really is that scary. :(:unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our military are the ones who have to lock this guy and the administration allowing this treason up. We need someone now. Get this man out of office. He is guilty of treason and America wants him held accountable. This has gone too far. Way too far. We have a nation still for a very short time only though if our military does not step in and protect our constitution.. If you do not what will our children be given. These controllers who have a puppet on a chain is seeing how far they can go with no retaliation. They know Obama will never serve another elected term. They are testing the waters to see what all they will be allowed to do. Stop this now. Again we need the ones who protect our nation to stop this mad man and his treasonous agenda and administration. Civil war can be averted if we stop this group of Anti-American traitors now. Our nation is being sold down the river and where are our protectors who have sworn to uphold our constitution and freedoms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just so FRUSTRATING... that as each day goes by, change for the worst is happening to our America. Everything we say or do falls on death ears. Our representative are weak. We really need to clean house come this election. Just hope and pray the election goes the peoples way. :(

I agree with you totally!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DiveDeepSix, I agree with you agreeing with me...I just shake my head in disgust. Oh Boy Whats Next on his agenda. :angry:

I think the only thing that will make O happy is to complete his plan for total destruction of our great country! He is well on his way to achieving his goal. I used to think he was just that stupid, but now the more damage he does the more my mind is changing. He is a mastermind and he knows exactly what he's doing to us and he's doing it on purpose, and what's worse is he doesn't care so blind is he with his hatred of America. Hopefully we the people will come to our senses in 2012 and knock that smug arrogant look off of his face permanently in the poll beatdown he's going to take, he will go down in history as the worst president we have ever had, what a mistake! :angry:

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take a long look at third world countries America. A long hard look. The people become so repressed they fight with rocks and sticks against guns and shields. They have no guns. They would rather die than be the vassals of these corrupt people anymore. The most beautiful children are exploited for the despotic leaders and their friends. People protest and are mass murdered and put in mass graves and nobody even knows. They live high and eat and drink and rape, pillage and plunder their constituents. If a citizen discovers something good or profitable it is taken away and the credit is given to a Government employed persona. That citizen is then killed lest the truth be discovered. They make sure the citizens have no money as they believe hunger is the greatest motivator. Ever wondered why our government pays farmers more money to not grow crops than they do for the crops themselves. When a nation can defend itself there is less tyranny on a governmnetal scale. This new treaty with the UN is just the beginning of new demands for the disarming of America. They cannot proceed with their diabolical plans if Americans have weapons. We have not been exposed to civil war because of political cruelty therefore we are being led as a docile group of sheep to the slaughter. When they take your daughters and your sons to destroy their bodies and their souls it will be too late then, America. It will be too late when you cannot drive across a state without permission from a government representative. It will be too late when your home can be invaded at any time and any posession you have taken from you without reason. It will be too late when you are appointed a job and your pay is the bread you eat. It will be too late when Mom and Dad have become too old and are exterminated because they are not productive. It will be too late because you are weak and afraid and will not defend yourself.. Because you refuse to look at the proof all around you and just want to hide and then it will all go away. This is not going away. If we do not fight for ourselves nobody will fight for us. If our military will not stand up to these corrupt losers and America just gives in we are doomed. Take a long hard look at third world countries America for we are becoming them.

Edited by CrappieShark
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Obama is the only traitor. I see Reid and most of the rest of the gutless, spineless blobs we call Congress. They all see what Obama is doing yet kiss up to the utter of their party instead of doing what they were hired to do and what the Constitution demands of them.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Obama is the only traitor. I see Reid and most of the rest of the gutless, spineless blobs we call Congress. They all see what Obama is doing yet kiss up to the utter of their party instead of doing what they were hired to do and what the Constitution demands of them.

No doubt!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LIKE I SAID TIME AND AGAIN DO NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA AGAIN!!!!!! This guy is bringing the US down, this is what he wants to do! This is in his plans!!!

STOP THIS MEN! :angry: Our CHILDREN will have nothing left to work with, he is taken us down with him! WHERE IS OUR SECRET SERVICE? I really

can't stand this guy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You people are funny so quick to jump on this ridiculus dribble, this isnt the first time this has been tried, got to give it to you though you don't give up..... funny but you don't give up, maybe if you put the effort toward something constructive, and REAL our country would be in a much better position: see below, same old "bunk" just a diffrent little spin nothing new:

Right-Wing Media Falsely Claim Obama "Betrayed" Britain By Complying With Treaty Language

February 07, 2011 1:07 pm ET — 7 Comments

The right-wing media have seized on a Wikileaks cable to claim the Obama administration "betrayed" the United Kingdom by revealing data to Russia regarding the sale of nuclear material. In fact, the information was passed in compliance with nuclear arms treaties and "with respect to the longstanding pattern of cooperation," as officials in both the U.S. and U.K. governments have confirmed.

EMBED

Embed this video:

Telegraph Falsely Reports "US Secretly Agreed" To "Tell Russia Britain's Nuclear Secrets"

Telegraph: "The US Secretly Agreed To Give The Russians Sensitive Information On Britain's Nuclear Deterrent." A February 4 article in the U.K. newspaper The Telegraph claimed that "[t]he US secretly agreed to give the Russians sensitive information on Britain's nuclear deterrent to persuade them to sign a key treaty, The Daily Telegraph can disclose." The article further claimed, "Defence analysts claim the agreement risks undermining Britain's policy of refusing to confirm the exact size of its nuclear arsenal." The article referenced leaked cables indicating that the United States provided Russia with information regarding the transfer of Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missiles (SLBM) to the United Kingdom. [The Telegraph, 2/4/11, cables accessed 2/7/11]

In Fact, The Information Released Was In Compliance With Existing Treaty Elements

1991 START Treaty Language Requires Notification For "Movement Of Items Subject To The Limitations Provided For In The Treaty." The 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) requires both the United States and Russia to provide detailed information regarding the transfer of items. According to the treaty:

Each Party shall provide to the other Party, pursuant to subparagraph 3(a) of Article VIII of the Treaty, the following notifications concerning data with respect to items subject to the limitations provided for in the Treaty, according to categories of data contained in the Memorandum of Understanding and other agreed categories of data:

[...]

(8) notification, no later than 48 hours after it has been completed, of the transfer of items to or from a third State in accordance with a pattern of cooperation existing at the time of signature of the Treaty referred to in Article XVI of the Treaty and the First Agreed Statement in the Annex to the Treaty on Agreed Statements. Such notification shall include: the number and type of items transferred; the date of transfer; and the location of transfer; [Department of Defense, accessed 2/7/11]

New START Language Also Requires Revealing "Unique Identifiers" For Transferred SLBMs. According to the New START treaty, the transfer of SLBMs to third parties requires:

Notification, to be provided no later than five days after it has been completed, of the transfer of SLBMs to or from a third State in accordance with an existing pattern of cooperation. [Department of State, accessed 2/7/11]

According to an analysis by the State Department, this "pattern of cooperation" includes:

[N]otification of the transfer of SLBMs to or from a third State in accordance with an established pattern of cooperation existing at the time of signature of the Treaty, as referred to in Article XIII of the Treaty. The number, type, date, unique identifier, and location of the transferred SLBM must be provided. This notification will be used with respect to the longstanding pattern of cooperation that existed at the time of signature of the Treaty between the United States and the United Kingdom. [Department of State, accessed 2/7/11]

Officials From Both Nations Have Dismissed The Accusations As "Bunk" And "Nonsense"

Crowley: Telegraph Accusations Are "Bunk." Responding to the Telegraph article, State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley responded via Twitter that the claims made by the newspaper are "bunk" and that "we carried forward requirement to notify Russia about U.S.-UK nuclear cooperation from the 1991 treaty." Crowley also released the following statement to Time magazine:

This is bunk. Under the 1991 START Treaty, the U.S. agreed to notify Russia of specific nuclear cooperation with the United Kingdom, such as the transfer of SLBM's [submarine launch ballistic missiles] to the UK, or their maintenance or modernization. This is under an existing pattern of cooperation throughout that treaty and is expected to continue under New START. We simply carried forward and updated this notification procedure to the new treaty. There was no secret agreement and no compromise of the UK's independent nuclear deterrent. [Time, 2/5/11; P.J. Crowley, Twitter, 2/5/11, 2/5/11]

Tapper Reports Crowley And U.K. Official Both Dismissed Accusations. In a February 5 post on ABC News' Political Punch blog, ABC News senior White House correspondent Jake Tapper wrote that "oth the U.S. and British governments disputed on Saturday a London Telegraph report asserting that the 'U.S. secretly agreed to give the Russians sensitive information on Britain's nuclear deterrent to persuade them to sign a key treaty.' " Tapper further noted:

State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley called the report "nonsense," saying the information sharing about U.S. transfers of nuclear weapons to the U.K. dates back to the original START treaty, an assertion backed up by the White House and British government officials.

[...]

Crowley emailed ABC News that "Under the 1991 START Treaty, the U.S. agreed to notify Russia of specific nuclear cooperation with the United Kingdom, such as the transfer of SLBM's to the U.K., or their maintenance or modernization. This is under an existing pattern of cooperation throughout that treaty and is expected to continue under New START. We simply carried forward and updated this notification procedure to the new treaty. There was no secret agreement and no compromise of the U.K.'s independent nuclear deterrent."

A knowledgeable source with the British government, speaking anonymously because his government has a policy of not commenting on Wikileaks, says his understanding of the policy conforms with that asserted by the State Department. [ABC News, Political Punch, 2/5/11]

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sinus Tarsi Syndrome

Contributed by Richard Bouché, D.P.M., Past President AAPSM

What is the Sinus Tarsi Syndrome?

Definition:

Clinical disorder characterized by specific symptoms and signs localized to the sinus tarsi (known as the “eye of the foot”), which refers to an opening on the outside of the foot between the ankle and heel bone.

Treatment:

After a diagnosis is established conservative treatment can be initiated which is generally very effective in eliminating the problem. Treatment may include anti-inflammatories, stable shoes, period of immobilization, ankle sleeve and over-the-counter orthoses. Resistant cases may require a course of oral steroids, series of steroid injectionss, physical therapy or custom orthoses. Rarely is surgery indicated and if needed open surgery (through an incision) or closed surgery (via arthroscopy) can be considered. Excellent results should be expected but surgery is not a panacea and should be considered as a last resort.

Tarsi

Right wing or Left wing it's all apart of the same bird..

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again Trooper you prove my point exactly why you will never be taken serious, as usual when facts smack you in the face you can only respond with childish ignorant name calling, but that in itself is no suprise thats why you sit in the position you are in now whinning and crying and talking about ankles and shoes............ Point taken????? unbelievably Amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another story... same subject...

Strength Through Appeasement… Obama to Share US Missile Secrets With Russia

The Washington Times reported:

President Obama signaled Congress this week that he is prepared to share U.S. missile defense secrets with Russia.

In the president’s signing statement issued Saturday in passing into law the fiscal 2012 defense authorization bill, Mr. Obama said restrictions aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on U.S. Standard Missile-3 velocity burnout parameters might impinge on his constitutional foreign policy authority.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/01/unreal-obama-to-share-us-missile-secrets-to-russia/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.