Shabibilicious Posted July 12, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 12, 2017 14 minutes ago, rw.sutton said: Shabs, letting it get to you, isnt good for your health, BC Powders will help with that stress! Been doing this a long time, I'm good....it's all of you who should be setting huffy straight with regards to Indy. Go RV, then BV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted July 12, 2017 Report Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Shabibilicious said: I have no idea as to the authenticity of the pic. It would stand to reason though that Russians would be in the audience of a congressional hearing on RUSSIA....as for the seating arrangements, I'm not privy to those charts, are you? If nothing else though, it does appear that Jr. accepted a meeting with a woman who may indeed be a Russky operative, for the purpose of receiving dirt on H. It don't look good for the kid, that's for sure. GO RV, then BV You have no idea of the authenticity of the picture? I can't believe you came back with that lame explanation. As for meeting with what may be a Russian operatives let me ask you a question. Is the Russian ambassador to the United States of America not a Russian operative? And does not every member of Congress the Senate and the president have the ability to meet with him? Meeting with somebody is not a crime. Attempting to get information that might defame your political enemies in a campaign is called politics not a crime. Being stupid enough to think that you are actually doing damage to the president of the United States with the incessant lame stream media psychotic attacks that should be a crime. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BJinMontreal Posted July 12, 2017 Report Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Shabibilicious said: I have no idea as to the authenticity of the pic. It would stand to reason though that Russians would be in the audience of a congressional hearing on RUSSIA....as for the seating arrangements, I'm not privy to those charts, are you? If nothing else though, it does appear that Jr. accepted a meeting with a woman who may indeed be a Russky operative, for the purpose of receiving dirt on H. It don't look good for the kid, that's for sure. GO RV, then BV Sorry Shabs - that's normal political strategy these days ... Hitlery's team did it too!! What's good for the goose is good for the gander!!! http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/341493-opinion-forget-don-jrs-email-its-Hillarious-clinton-who-colluded-with 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabibilicious Posted July 12, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 12, 2017 44 minutes ago, BJinMontreal said: Sorry Shabs - that's normal political strategy these days ... Hitlery's team did it too!! What's good for the goose is good for the gander!!! http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/341493-opinion-forget-don-jrs-email-its-Hillarious-clinton-who-colluded-with Apology accepted. GO RV, then BV 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabibilicious Posted July 12, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 12, 2017 59 minutes ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said: You have no idea of the authenticity of the picture? I can't believe you came back with that lame explanation. As for meeting with what may be a Russian operatives let me ask you a question. Is the Russian ambassador to the United States of America not a Russian operative? And does not every member of Congress the Senate and the president have the ability to meet with him? Meeting with somebody is not a crime. Attempting to get information that might defame your political enemies in a campaign is called politics not a crime. Being stupid enough to think that you are actually doing damage to the president of the United States with the incessant lame stream media psychotic attacks that should be a crime. Past and present dictators of the world would approve of your last statement. Congrats GO RV, then BV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted July 12, 2017 Report Share Posted July 12, 2017 Atta Boy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonangler Posted July 12, 2017 Report Share Posted July 12, 2017 4 hours ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said: Meeting with somebody is not a crime. Attempting to get information that might defame your political enemies in a campaign is called politics not a crime. Actually it may be a crime... "No person shall knowingly solicit, accept or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation," reads Title 11 in the Code of Federal Regulations, section 110.20 (g). A contribution can be "anything of value," including negative information about a political opponent. It is unlawful to "provide substantial assistance in the solicitation, making, acceptance or receipt of a contribution or donation," reads 11 CFR 110.20 (h). 4 hours ago, BJinMontreal said: Sorry Shabs - that's normal political strategy these days ... Hitlery's team did it too!! What's good for the goose is good for the gander!!! And that is exactly why I didn't vote for that criminal either... Soon many will regret voting for the new criminal or as I like to call him... "The One Term Wonder" B/A 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted July 12, 2017 Report Share Posted July 12, 2017 15 minutes ago, bostonangler said: "No person shall knowingly solicit, accept or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation," reads Title 11 in the Code of Federal Regulations, section 110.20 (g). A contribution can be "anything of value," including negative information about a political opponent. It is unlawful to "provide substantial assistance in the solicitation, making, acceptance or receipt of a contribution or donation," reads 11 CFR 110.20 (h). ACTUALLY, I'd be interested in a link if you would please. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonangler Posted July 12, 2017 Report Share Posted July 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said: ACTUALLY, I'd be interested in a link if you would please. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/11/110.20 Quite interesting and yes the left and right are guilty as defined by law... Let's lock them all up. B/A 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nstoolman1 Posted July 13, 2017 Report Share Posted July 13, 2017 (edited) http://www.newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/crime-meeting-lawyer-collusion/2017/07/11/id/801123/?ns_mail_uid=29723978&ns_mail_job=1741328_07122017&s=al&dkt_nbr=4eljg7tl Edited July 13, 2017 by nstoolman1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted July 15, 2017 Report Share Posted July 15, 2017 On 7/12/2017 at 3:10 PM, bostonangler said: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/11/110.20 Quite interesting and yes the left and right are guilty as defined by law... Let's lock them all up. B/A I saved my response to this for the weekend where I would have more time to research the claims that a violation of the law was committed by Trump Jr. And it saddens me to think that you B/A are being somewhat misleading in your attempt here to prove your point. You are better than that. So how are you misleading? In that what you quoted and what you provided links for, are not from the same source. And no doubt that you fully know that. Your first quote is from an ABC news report, link found here. "No person shall knowingly solicit, accept or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation," reads Title 11 in the Code of Federal Regulations, section 110.20 (g). A contribution can be "anything of value," including negative information about a political opponent. While according to the Cornell Law link that you provided the claim by ABC news is somewhat misleading as ABC is referencing this part of the law,(b)Contributions and donations by foreign nationals in connection with elections. A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a contribution or a donation of money or other thing of value, or expressly or impliedly promise to make a contribution or a donation, in connection with any Federal, State, or local election. Here we see that the phrase ,"OTHER THING OF VALUE", is being misrepresented to indicate information about a political opponent as something of,"MONETARY VALUE ". I point out the unwritten word ,"MONETARY", as that is clearly what the law is referring to when read in it's entirety. I choose not to post the entirety of the law so as not to take away from the power point of this post with too much information. Those willing to seek more evidence of the truth may use your Cornell link. The ABC news story is pure living in their dreams of political ecstasy that President Trump will be impeached for this. However, as the intent of the law is not in violation by Donald Trump Jr then I can assure you that nothing will come of this for the Trumps. Nevertheless, I cannot say the same for the Left Stream Media or you B/A as all of you have lost all credibility with reference to anything political. And if this post is offensive to any SNOWFLAKES then get over it. I HAVE A RIGHT TO MY OPINION, and I'll be danged if I left some snowflake silence me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonangler Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabibilicious Posted July 17, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 (edited) On 7/15/2017 at 10:30 AM, ladyGrace'sDaddy said: Here we see that the phrase ,"OTHER THING OF VALUE", is being misrepresented to indicate information about a political opponent as something of,"MONETARY VALUE ". I point out the unwritten word ,"MONETARY", as that is clearly what the law is referring to when read in it's entirety. I choose not to post the entirety of the law so as not to take away from the power point of this post with too much information. Those willing to seek more evidence of the truth may use your Cornell link. Opinionated interpretations.....opinionated interpretations everywhere. As always, just my opinionated interpretation. GO RV, then BV Edited July 17, 2017 by Shabibilicious 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 1 minute ago, Shabibilicious said: Opinionated interpretations.....opinionated interpretations everywhere. As always, just my opinionated interpretation. GO RV, then BV WEAK, VERY WEAK. Opinions hold little weight were law is concerned. Facts applied with intellectual common sense and a dash of moral integrity though will go a long way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 15 minutes ago, bostonangler said: True , but I am trying to work a miracle were you are concerned. Hey, God can do anything. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonangler Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 On 7/15/2017 at 10:30 AM, ladyGrace'sDaddy said: I saved my response to this for the weekend where I would have more time to research the claims that a violation of the law was committed by Trump Jr. And it saddens me to think that you B/A are being somewhat misleading in your attempt here to prove your point. You are better than that. So how are you misleading? In that what you quoted and what you provided links for, are not from the same source. And no doubt that you fully know that. Your first quote is from an ABC news report, link found here. "No person shall knowingly solicit, accept or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation," reads Title 11 in the Code of Federal Regulations, section 110.20 (g). A contribution can be "anything of value," including negative information about a political opponent. While according to the Cornell Law link that you provided the claim by ABC news is somewhat misleading as ABC is referencing this part of the law,(b)Contributions and donations by foreign nationals in connection with elections. A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a contribution or a donation of money or other thing of value, or expressly or impliedly promise to make a contribution or a donation, in connection with any Federal, State, or local election. Here we see that the phrase ,"OTHER THING OF VALUE", is being misrepresented to indicate information about a political opponent as something of,"MONETARY VALUE ". I point out the unwritten word ,"MONETARY", as that is clearly what the law is referring to when read in it's entirety. I choose not to post the entirety of the law so as not to take away from the power point of this post with too much information. Those willing to seek more evidence of the truth may use your Cornell link. The ABC news story is pure living in their dreams of political ecstasy that President Trump will be impeached for this. However, as the intent of the law is not in violation by Donald Trump Jr then I can assure you that nothing will come of this for the Trumps. Nevertheless, I cannot say the same for the Left Stream Media or you B/A as all of you have lost all credibility with reference to anything political. And if this post is offensive to any SNOWFLAKES then get over it. I HAVE A RIGHT TO MY OPINION, and I'll be danged if I left some snowflake silence me. Title 11 in the Code of Federal Regulations, section 110.20 (g). A contribution can be "anything of value," including negative information about a political opponent. Reading and comprehension is a wonderful thing.... B/A 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabibilicious Posted July 17, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 5 minutes ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said: WEAK, VERY WEAK. Opinions hold little weight were law is concerned. Facts applied with intellectual common sense and a dash of moral integrity though will go a long way. You're a constitutional law expert now, eh? AWESOME, VERY AWESOME. GO RV, then BV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 12 minutes ago, bostonangler said: Title 11 in the Code of Federal Regulations, section 110.20 (g). A contribution can be "anything of value," including negative information about a political opponent. Reading and comprehension is a wonderful thing.... B/A As I have already clearly pointed out that is not what the law says. Your attempt to deceive people by using ABC's miss representation is noted. You are deceitful and dishonest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 12 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said: You're a constitutional law expert now, eh? AWESOME, VERY AWESOME. GO RV, then BV I fear you have lost your ability to be objective. Or to understand simple English. Doesn't take a law professor to understand English. It does take somebody willing to embrace truth and reality. And that is easier come by when you listen to the Holy Spirit. Your insults and others insults only prove that I have made the point and won the case. As you could no longer debate the issue I have resorted to name-calling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabibilicious Posted July 17, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 5 minutes ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said: I fear you have lost your ability to be objective. Or to understand simple English. Doesn't take a law professor to understand English. It does take somebody willing to embrace truth and reality. And that is easier come by when you listen to the Holy Spirit. Your insults and others insults only prove that I have made the point and won the case. As you could no longer debate the issue I have resorted to name-calling. Tell that to your fearless leader.....talk about bad at English. And please, tell me where God says it's okay for you to resort to name-calling. GO RV, then BV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said: Tell that to your fearless leader.....talk about bad at English. And please, tell me where God says it's okay for you to resort to name-calling. GO RV, then BV I make my post using a Dictaphone during the day. Sometimes in the noise of everything around me the words are wrong. What I said was you have resorted to name-calling. I challenge you to show me in the recent post of this thread where I have called you any name. But I can show you where you and Boston angler both have just insulted me and called me names. your incessant badgering and insults without attempting to prove your point shows you're serious lack of integrity and morals. Tell me where does Jesus Christ say that is okay? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonangler Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 13 minutes ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said: As I have already clearly pointed out that is not what the law says. Your attempt to deceive people by using ABC's miss representation is noted. You are deceitful and dishonest Dude I took the words directly from the law as it is written.... If you feel deceived, call your Congressman... I'm sorry if you don't like, but it is what it is. The real issue is the Trumps are lying non-stop... If they would just be truthful, and had nothing to hide, the media would move on. Sadly, Trump supporters believed their guy was different from the Clintons, but we now see he is just as bad. B/A 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 13 minutes ago, bostonangler said: Dude I took the words directly from the law as it is written.... If you feel deceived, call your Congressman... I'm sorry if you don't like, but it is what it is. The real issue is the Trumps are lying non-stop... If they would just be truthful, and had nothing to hide, the media would move on. Sadly, Trump supporters believed their guy was different from the Clintons, but we now see he is just as bad. B/A DUDE, I quoted the law above directly from the link at Cornell Law School which you provided. What you are quoting is a comment made by ABC News which I also found and posted. You need to understand that just because ABC News wants to spread hatred and tell lies about what the law doesn't and doesn't say doesn't make it law. Look at what Cornell Law School, the link you provided, says and you will understand that you are misquoting the law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabibilicious Posted July 17, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 17 minutes ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said: I make my post using a Dictaphone during the day. Sometimes in the noise of everything around me the words are wrong. What I said was you have resorted to name-calling. I challenge you to show me in the recent post of this thread where I have called you any name. But I can show you where you and Boston angler both have just insulted me and called me names. your incessant badgering and insults without attempting to prove your point shows you're serious lack of integrity and morals. Tell me where does Jesus Christ say that is okay? By all means.....show me where I insulted you and called you names in these recent posts. GO RV, then BV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 50 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said: ....talk about bad at English Insult 1 hour ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said: You're a constitutional law expert now, eh? Another insult Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.