TPSprayduster Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 The Supreme Court has struck down most of the controversial Arizona immigration law, but upheld a key provision. The provision that was upheld requires state and local police officers, during routine stops, to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect could be in the country illegally. Other provisions, though, were struck down. The federal government claimed the law encroached on its authority to enforce immigration law. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/25/supreme-court-strikes-down-most-arizona-immigration-law-upholds-key-provision/#ixzz1yodwjSkp 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropics Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 The Supreme Court has struck down most of the controversial Arizona immigration law, but upheld a key provision. The provision that was upheld requires state and local police officers, during routine stops, to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect could be in the country illegally. Other provisions, though, were struck down. The federal government claimed the law encroached on its authority to enforce immigration law. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/25/supreme-court-strikes-down-most-arizona-immigration-law-upholds-key-provision/#ixzz1yodwjSkp Kind of difficult to encroach on a law that the feds are not enforcing. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wpsmit Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 Kind of difficult to encroach on a law that the feds are not enforcing. Hey great! And while we are at it, let's just open up the southern borders and provide each illegal alien an AK47, along with a voter registration card that allows them to vote for only democrats while we are at it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinarMillionaire Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 The federal government claimed the law encroached on its authority to enforce immigration law. But since the Obama administration won't do it's Constitutional duties, what does the NOT-SO Supremes expect the country to do? Have us go down to the border and defend our country from invasion ourselves? I'm ready. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltori Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 Seriously this legal loophole political crap seems to be creating a lot of frustration in the population. "Encroaching" on a the FED powers to enforce laws they refuse to enforce? This kind of crap is what leads to revolution. When people start scratching their heads and going "wait whaaaat" we're being bamboozled...then the silent majority begins allocating energy towards creating change in corrupt governments...kicking the deceptive/corrupt bastar*s out of office....at least thats what we need to be doing. Force them to stop lying to us instead of taking it on the chin like we have for over a century. Get back to the basics that made this country great in the first place and we will correct our course. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dog53 Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 Seriously this legal loophole political crap seems to be creating a lot of frustration in the population. "Encroaching" on a the FED powers to enforce laws they refuse to enforce? This kind of crap is what leads to revolution. When people start scratching their heads and going "wait whaaaat" we're being bamboozled...then the silent majority begins allocating energy towards creating change in corrupt governments...kicking the deceptive/corrupt bastar*s out of office....at least thats what we need to be doing. Force them to stop lying to us instead of taking it on the chin like we have for over a century. Get back to the basics that made this country great in the first place and we will correct our course. +1 Very very well put Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cris Posted June 26, 2012 Report Share Posted June 26, 2012 No big deal folks, the important part is in there, and this ruling doesnt effect the other laws we have here....Its currently against the law for an employer to hire illegal aliens, (big fines if they're caught) and illegals aren't able to get benefits either.....most have left for Cali or back across the border.....So were really only worried about controlling the ones trying to move through the state.....which is what the Supreme Court upheld. All bets are off after Nov anyway, with the Communist Regime being ousted, were going to have a new interest in guarding the border IMO SB 1070 ruling expected to have little effect on law enforcement by JJ Hensley - Jun. 25, 2012 01:20 PM The Republic | azcentral.com Arizona law-enforcement agencies can begin enforcing more aspects of Senate Bill 1070 as soon as a lower court's injunction on the law is lifted following a Supreme Court ruling Monday, but that enforcement will not change President Barack Obama's immigration priorities, according to senior administration officials. The court's ruling upheld one key provision of the law -- requiring officers to make a reasonable attempt to determine the immigration status of a person stopped, detained or arrested if there's reasonable suspicion that person is in the country illegally -- but federal immigration officials will take action only if they conclude that the suspect is a violent criminal, has repeatedly violated immigration laws or recently crossed the border without authorization, a Department of Homeland Security official said in a conference call on Monday. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jg1 Posted June 26, 2012 Report Share Posted June 26, 2012 Seriously, I would rather not hear the word Obama anymore, it makes me sick. This was just one more reason why. Divide and concur should be his new words not unite and transparent. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPSprayduster Posted June 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2012 jg1, i am afraid after the split vote in November you will continue to hear Obama. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonjon Posted June 26, 2012 Report Share Posted June 26, 2012 jg1, i am afraid after the split vote in November you will continue to hear Obama. I don't think the vote will be jeopardized. The country is not inundated with as many mentally challenged individuals as some of the dinar sites might imply. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts