trooper Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim5400 Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 1 day older and deeper in debt 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lomeygoat Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Our government is a horses a$$. They give everyone monetery help exept us. The worst part is, we dont have any money. Ask a family who has just lost there house and job if its OK with them to send money to these rag heads. We need to get our prioritys right. We need a new government who cares about its people!!! 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinarMillionaire Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 I'm beginning to believe O'dramma is taking care of his own. And just how much has he spent on refurbishing Christian churches? 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon2222 Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 And The Drones will still vote for him... They just don't get it. Look at the Dems on this sight. It doesn't matter what you tell them about O, they will still vote for him. I really don't get it. I guess they are just selfish and don't care about our future generations. That's the only rational decision I can come up with. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiveDeepSix Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Well said peeps! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojack Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Okay, found a couple of reference points but frankly I think we should control the spending and redirect to the U.S.: The program isn’t the brainchild of President Barack Obama. The program was created by Congress in late 2000 under President Bill Clinton, and the first grants were announced under President George W. Bush in 2001. The State Department says that, in total, the fund has contributed nearly $26 million to approximately 640 cultural heritage sites in more than 100 countries, and more than half was given before Obama took office. It’s true that mosques are among the cultural sites that have received grant money under this program. But temples and churches around the world also have received funding, contrary to AFA’s claim that the "secular left" would be upset if "these monies had been spent to repair Christian churches." When we searched the State Department’s database and lists of 2009 and 2010 projects for "mosque" and "minaret," we found that 30 mosques or minaret restoration projects had received funding under Bush, and seven such sites had been funded under Obama. Also, 29 projects for churches and cathedrals were funded under Bush and 13 under Obama. News anchor Justin Farmer said that the State Department’s Agency for International Development gave money to mosques in Cairo, Cyprus, Tajikistan and Mali. He said that the money given to the Cairo mosque was "part of" a $770 million program to fix the city’s sewer system. We spoke with a USAID official, who told us that the Cairo sewer project, which did total about $770 million, began in 1984 and ended in 2006. It was a major undertaking that wasn’t specifically directed to the mosque, though about $2.3 million was used "to help lower the groundwater at the mosque area, replacing the old sewage collector, and providing a healthier environment for people living in the area," the official, who would not be identified by name, said. USAID official: A high level of groundwater, resulting in part from leaking sewers and the rise and fall of the Nile, had been threatening the structural integrity of many of the buildings in this area. USAID did not pick and choose which buildings to rescue, based on religious or any other criteria. Rather, the broad effort was intended to improve the sewage system for everyone. 4 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon2222 Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Okay, found a couple of reference points but frankly I think we should control the spending and redirect to the U.S.: The program isn’t the brainchild of President Barack Obama. The program was created by Congress in late 2000 under President Bill Clinton, and the first grants were announced under President George W. Bush in 2001. The State Department says that, in total, the fund has contributed nearly $26 million to approximately 640 cultural heritage sites in more than 100 countries, and more than half was given before Obama took office. It’s true that mosques are among the cultural sites that have received grant money under this program. But temples and churches around the world also have received funding, contrary to AFA’s claim that the "secular left" would be upset if "these monies had been spent to repair Christian churches." When we searched the State Department’s database and lists of 2009 and 2010 projects for "mosque" and "minaret," we found that 30 mosques or minaret restoration projects had received funding under Bush, and seven such sites had been funded under Obama. Also, 29 projects for churches and cathedrals were funded under Bush and 13 under Obama. News anchor Justin Farmer said that the State Department’s Agency for International Development gave money to mosques in Cairo, Cyprus, Tajikistan and Mali. He said that the money given to the Cairo mosque was "part of" a $770 million program to fix the city’s sewer system. We spoke with a USAID official, who told us that the Cairo sewer project, which did total about $770 million, began in 1984 and ended in 2006. It was a major undertaking that wasn’t specifically directed to the mosque, though about $2.3 million was used "to help lower the groundwater at the mosque area, replacing the old sewage collector, and providing a healthier environment for people living in the area," the official, who would not be identified by name, said. USAID official: A high level of groundwater, resulting in part from leaking sewers and the rise and fall of the Nile, had been threatening the structural integrity of many of the buildings in this area. USAID did not pick and choose which buildings to rescue, based on religious or any other criteria. Rather, the broad effort was intended to improve the sewage system for everyone. Seems like your stuck in the past man... Just wanting to point out the clear differences in Republicans and Democrats. I think most people these days are leaning independent but mostly conservative as I am. I really don't think many care what bush did VS what Obama is Doing or Rep's did this Dems did that rhetoric. The point is they BOTH have sucked and we need a REAL change. Sorry but Barack is trying to control everyone all the way down to the food you eat! I'm tired of it! Get the GOV out of my life Please!! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojack Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 And The Drones will still vote for him... They just don't get it. Look at the Dems on this sight. It doesn't matter what you tell them about O, they will still vote for him. I really don't get it. I guess they are just selfish and don't care about our future generations. That's the only rational decision I can come up with. Does this mean you agree to the news article? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlablum Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 So very sad to see what Obama is doing to our country He just doesn't get it. He has had his chance to prove himself and has failed! What a poor example of a leader. I do hope we have a huge change as in changing presidents!!! Carla 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon2222 Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Does this mean you agree to the news article? No I understand it's flaws in reporting. I don't agree with people who don't agree with Freedom and Liberty! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willy1der Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Okay, found a couple of reference points but frankly I think we should control the spending and redirect to the U.S.: The program isn’t the brainchild of President Barack Obama. The program was created by Congress in late 2000 under President Bill Clinton, and the first grants were announced under President George W. Bush in 2001. The State Department says that, in total, the fund has contributed nearly $26 million to approximately 640 cultural heritage sites in more than 100 countries, and more than half was given before Obama took office. It’s true that mosques are among the cultural sites that have received grant money under this program. But temples and churches around the world also have received funding, contrary to AFA’s claim that the "secular left" would be upset if "these monies had been spent to repair Christian churches." When we searched the State Department’s database and lists of 2009 and 2010 projects for "mosque" and "minaret," we found that 30 mosques or minaret restoration projects had received funding under Bush, and seven such sites had been funded under Obama. Also, 29 projects for churches and cathedrals were funded under Bush and 13 under Obama. News anchor Justin Farmer said that the State Department’s Agency for International Development gave money to mosques in Cairo, Cyprus, Tajikistan and Mali. He said that the money given to the Cairo mosque was "part of" a $770 million program to fix the city’s sewer system. We spoke with a USAID official, who told us that the Cairo sewer project, which did total about $770 million, began in 1984 and ended in 2006. It was a major undertaking that wasn’t specifically directed to the mosque, though about $2.3 million was used "to help lower the groundwater at the mosque area, replacing the old sewage collector, and providing a healthier environment for people living in the area," the official, who would not be identified by name, said. USAID official: A high level of groundwater, resulting in part from leaking sewers and the rise and fall of the Nile, had been threatening the structural integrity of many of the buildings in this area. USAID did not pick and choose which buildings to rescue, based on religious or any other criteria. Rather, the broad effort was intended to improve the sewage system for everyone. Thanks mo for shedding more light (truth) on this. This has been going on for a while and we can't keep blaming this admin. My point is washington needs to be cleaned up/out. that''s just the tip of the ice berg. There has to be a cultural change in the way washington does business and that's hard to do. People become very complacent when comfortable. It will take the tea party and ows coming together to start this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojack Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 No I understand it's flaws in reporting. I don't agree with people who don't agree with Freedom and Liberty! K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chocolate1 Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 http://youtu.be/AfntnL2S91Y Troop: i always enjoy your posts, my friend. Did you know that our Gov have been sending bundles of money to abortion mills like Planned Parenthood et al for decades, yet you hardley ever hear about American "chistian" Patriots moving their bums to oppose that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tampa1000 Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 This is crazy!!!!!!! What else will he waste the tax payer money on!!! Please America WAKE UP!!! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojack Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 This is crazy!!!!!!! What else will he waste the tax payer money on!!! Please America WAKE UP!!! Read post #8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trooper Posted February 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Really missing the point on this... Who's fault is it? Who really cares.. The facts are that we as a Nation need the money.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinarMillionaire Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Okay, found a couple of reference points but frankly I think we should control the spending and redirect to the U.S.: I gotta give credit where credit is due. +1 on the find Mojack. Also, I concur with your above statement. Charity begins at home. Why when we're broke, are we sending money to oil rich nations and/or anyone else for that matter? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojack Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 I gotta give credit where credit is due. +1 on the find Mojack. Also, I concur with your above statement. Charity begins at home. Why when we're broke, are we sending money to oil rich nations and/or anyone else for that matter? Stuck in a old cycle of being a rich nation providing aid to the world. Are there enough benefits for saving old constructions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sxsess Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Dont you just love this Muslim in the White House. Whats scary about this is that people voted and will still vote for this moron 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shick Posted February 14, 2012 Report Share Posted February 14, 2012 Just imagine another four more years and we're be in so much hock until the hock on our shoes will start to look good. And who's to come is no better. He's gonna blame the previous and the previous on top of that. Peace in the Middle East! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPSprayduster Posted February 14, 2012 Report Share Posted February 14, 2012 You Tube, a great news source and if you want to throw a story out there it will go viral until someone does some research. NUFF Said. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojack Posted February 14, 2012 Report Share Posted February 14, 2012 You Tube, a great news source and if you want to throw a story out there it will go viral until someone does some research. NUFF Said. See post #8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPSprayduster Posted February 14, 2012 Report Share Posted February 14, 2012 Okay, found a couple of reference points but frankly I think we should control the spending and redirect to the U.S.: The program isn’t the brainchild of President Barack Obama. The program was created by Congress in late 2000 under President Bill Clinton, and the first grants were announced under President George W. Bush in 2001. The State Department says that, in total, the fund has contributed nearly $26 million to approximately 640 cultural heritage sites in more than 100 countries, and more than half was given before Obama took office. It’s true that mosques are among the cultural sites that have received grant money under this program. But temples and churches around the world also have received funding, contrary to AFA’s claim that the "secular left" would be upset if "these monies had been spent to repair Christian churches." When we searched the State Department’s database and lists of 2009 and 2010 projects for "mosque" and "minaret," we found that 30 mosques or minaret restoration projects had received funding under Bush, and seven such sites had been funded under Obama. Also, 29 projects for churches and cathedrals were funded under Bush and 13 under Obama. News anchor Justin Farmer said that the State Department’s Agency for International Development gave money to mosques in Cairo, Cyprus, Tajikistan and Mali. He said that the money given to the Cairo mosque was "part of" a $770 million program to fix the city’s sewer system. We spoke with a USAID official, who told us that the Cairo sewer project, which did total about $770 million, began in 1984 and ended in 2006. It was a major undertaking that wasn’t specifically directed to the mosque, though about $2.3 million was used "to help lower the groundwater at the mosque area, replacing the old sewage collector, and providing a healthier environment for people living in the area," the official, who would not be identified by name, said. USAID official: A high level of groundwater, resulting in part from leaking sewers and the rise and fall of the Nile, had been threatening the structural integrity of many of the buildings in this area. USAID did not pick and choose which buildings to rescue, based on religious or any other criteria. Rather, the broad effort was intended to improve the sewage system for everyone. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPSprayduster Posted February 14, 2012 Report Share Posted February 14, 2012 Okay, found a couple of reference points but frankly I think we should control the spending and redirect to the U.S.: The program isn’t the brainchild of President Barack Obama. The program was created by Congress in late 2000 under President Bill Clinton, and the first grants were announced under President George W. Bush in 2001. The State Department says that, in total, the fund has contributed nearly $26 million to approximately 640 cultural heritage sites in more than 100 countries, and more than half was given before Obama took office. It’s true that mosques are among the cultural sites that have received grant money under this program. But temples and churches around the world also have received funding, contrary to AFA’s claim that the "secular left" would be upset if "these monies had been spent to repair Christian churches." When we searched the State Department’s database and lists of 2009 and 2010 projects for "mosque" and "minaret," we found that 30 mosques or minaret restoration projects had received funding under Bush, and seven such sites had been funded under Obama. Also, 29 projects for churches and cathedrals were funded under Bush and 13 under Obama. News anchor Justin Farmer said that the State Department’s Agency for International Development gave money to mosques in Cairo, Cyprus, Tajikistan and Mali. He said that the money given to the Cairo mosque was "part of" a $770 million program to fix the city’s sewer system. We spoke with a USAID official, who told us that the Cairo sewer project, which did total about $770 million, began in 1984 and ended in 2006. It was a major undertaking that wasn’t specifically directed to the mosque, though about $2.3 million was used "to help lower the groundwater at the mosque area, replacing the old sewage collector, and providing a healthier environment for people living in the area," the official, who would not be identified by name, said. USAID official: A high level of groundwater, resulting in part from leaking sewers and the rise and fall of the Nile, had been threatening the structural integrity of many of the buildings in this area. USAID did not pick and choose which buildings to rescue, based on religious or any other criteria. Rather, the broad effort was intended to improve the sewage system for everyone. Thanks 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts