Trailers For Sale Or Rent

Nobody was owed anything, everybody got payed off including the proprietor that used the hundred dollars given to him to pay off a debt.

It would sure be a dream come true for me and allow me to rest my mind, body and soul a little, after that I don't plan on not working, in fact, quite the opposite, I am going to work my ass off, except this time I will enjoy doing it "my way!!!" and on my schedule and take many vacations, I love to travel, and sex!!!!!!

Quite possible their "Rat Race Government" might never be formed and announced to the world, it doesn't seem to be a priority for them

Great Post, Thanks Scarp.

What doesn't kill you makes you "STRONGER", that being said why let post's you don't like or agree with upset you to the extent of bashing, you should know that when it truly does happen, that "that" news will be splattered all over every news paper and every media in the "UNIVERSE". So just relax, have a bud, life's to short.

I LOVE THIS CAT.

Amen to that Brookes, Amen to that.

Yeah cousin, I is goin nanners over this dinar bizz.

I entered 1170 and came up with 0.99 cents, where's the increase?

Who was the a**hole that gave jswilson a minus for being optimistic?????

Totally Agree

Well I need some opinions, some perspective, besides the most logical reasons for a dinar rv/ri hold-em-up, where do you think we stand on who plays a bigger role in the rv hold-up, The GOI?, or the CBI?

Great Quote I Agree!

Quit whining like a girl man, I ain't gonna loose any sleep on whether their is or isn't an exchange in the airports malls banks car dealership's, just don't care enough to let it ruffle my feathers, you dig.

1988: In early 1988, the official dinar-dollar exchange rate was still Iraqi dinar (ID)1 to US$3.22; however, with estimates of the nation’s inflation rate ranging from 25 percent to 50 percent per year in 1985 and 1986, the dinar’s real transaction value, or black market exchange rate, was far lower-only about half the 1986 official rate. 1986 - 2003: between .33 cents to 1.32 to a dollar. The Potential of the Dinar Prior to United Nations sanctions, the Iraqi dinar traded at 3.35 per U.S. dollar, and prior to the war in Iraq, the Iraqi dinar traded at .33 U.S. Dollars. During major combat operations, the Iraqi dinar declined to an all time low. However, after major combat operations, the value of the dinar increased 25%. Countries such as Germany (post WWII) and Kuwait (post Iraqi invasion) experienced a similar devaluation of their currency, but both countries recovered. Today, the dinar has increased from 3,500 against the dollar during the U.S. led invasion last year to 1,400 against the U.S. dollar. Imagine the growth potential of the Iraqi dinar once Iraq recovers and begins to enjoy the potential revenue of a country rich in oil and other natural resources. http://www.edinarfin...net/history.php

You Monkey, their in all the major airports.

Well, I guess after your remarks, I got to admit it still sounds like sh** to me!! 82Corn

HOMELAND SECURITY BOYS

Yep!

Originally Posted by Frank26 View Post Greetings Family, Patterns…….I like them………I follow them. Come with me as I share a pattern my Team and I are following. Go back to the day when the Emir from KU showed up at M’s doorstep……….in less than 24 hours he accomplished something with M behind closed doors and RUSHED back home. Add 24 more hours and the Emir of KU tells his people that he is spreading the wealth but not how he is acquiring this wealth. He RUSHED the announcement to his people as soon as he got off the airplane. Since then calling cards along with jack in the boxes have exploded now and then in Iraq. One PM doesn’t like the other PM so he does everything possible to embarrass that PM especially since he has them by the strategic soccer balls of the Asian soccer cup tournament. Add another 24 hours and an economic summit in Egypt becomes as successful as Howard Hughes selling airplanes. When last year’s economic summit in Baghdad was ………boring!!! Add 24 more hours and we see the IQD go from a fixed rate to a float rate on to counter sites. But of course that was a mistake on their behalf. Add 24 more hours again and we see at the crack of dawn the IQD go live on Forex. What does live mean? For the first time in many years we are seeing the IQD being constantly updated with its true rate of 1170 on Forex. Yes …….the value is still worthless……..but it is now LIVE and ACTIVE. In other words ……when you call Forex they say that it is not a glitch…….a mistake or……..they have no idea what to tell you. This is important because S told the CBI last summer that they need to work hand in hand with the Trade Bank of Iraq AND FOREX!!! Forex has one of it’s largest branches just built in Baghdad. You can find the branch address on the CBI website. Okay……it’s live…….the constant updated rates are true but when you see movement on the IQD at Forex do not get overly excited. The IQD is paired to the Euro and USD therefore when these two currencies have a change due to buy and sell ……..it is reflected on the IQD because of its pairing. It does not mean that the IQD is increasing in value. But what is of great value here is that what S wanted in order to release the RI rate is well established. IMO……S still waits for the GOI but I am convinced that all systems to bring forth the rate are well in place. South America never played fairly with its oil. They didn’t help with the coalition force. They know very well about the basket with 18 currencies. But they decide to revalue their currency today. Out of step with the rest of the world. Fine. Add another 24 more hours and it will be tomorrow……let’s see what it brings. Iraqi TV is going nuts about the summit. TV also said that as of today for the first time in a long time ALL oil equipment arrived necessary to build rigs and drill for oil. This is huge. This equipment has been sitting in US docks and Iraqi docks. Every 24 hours turns over another rock. There is no more pretending on Forex Family. Even the banks now see the IQD with live constant updates. You……I and they await a rate. One last thing but it’s nothing to get excited about. We noticed the VND shadowing every movement that the IQD is doing. But remember it is due to its pairing’s activities. I will see you Monday Family. I plan to have a CC that evening. I have green eyes and I also have Samson eyes and I also have shameful eyes. But when you come to my home regardless if you agree with what I share with you all I ask in return is ……..respect. God bless you all. My Christian love and Aloha. KTF, Frank

This just isn't the Presidential forum for whiners to talk about BC issue's, It's a DINAR SITE ABOUT DINAR ISSUES, if you want so badly to show your Barrack Obama BC Issues go join a Barrack Obama official BC presidential president BC Bash Bashing Bashididindang Website forum, their are plenty of them out their that are more suited and dedicated to your taste of issues. For me, I JUST DON'T GIVE A ****, I didn't join this forum to discuss the president, it's not called President Vets or Dinar President's or BC President's, it's called DINAR VETS, you hear me!!, DIN - AR - VETS, lets try and keep the subject kinda close to home, home being the IRAQI DINAR.

Amen!!!!

Thanks Vern

Ok, that sounds more natural and realistic, and the facts are, weather this info is real or not, the message "IS" absolutely for real, we should know just from the news media and not from the bullshit Intel that this will happen, we just need to relax and take it easy. He is right about the fact that all involved in this major event will not jeopardize themselves by leaking such information, it just wont happen. When they are ready to RV, then and only then will the news spread like wildfire. Don't let the pumpers and all the bullshit Intel consume your lives, it's not gonna make it revalue any sooner. Take it all with a grain of salt and know that your riding the wave of a wonderful event soon to be.

What If Obama Really Were Born in Kenya? An Explainer thought experiment. By Brian PalmerPosted Monday, Aug. 3, 2009, at 5:54 PM ET President Barack Obama. Click image to expand.President Barack Obama Despite a congressional resolution affirming President Obama's U.S. birth and a reaffirmation of his birth certificate's authenticity from Hawaiian officials, media outlets continue to air frivolous allegations that the president was born in Kenya, rendering him ineligible for the presidency. Let's pretend, for just a moment, that the birthers had credible evidence that Obama was foreign-born. Then what would happen? Resignation, impeachment, or nothing. If Obama stood his ground, and Congress stood by him, then the only way to legally remove him from office would be for someone to sue. Problem is, no one would have standing to bring such a lawsuit. To establish standing, a plaintiff must show that he has suffered an injury personal to him, that the defendant caused the injury, and that the court could provide a remedy. That turns out to be an impossible task. PRINTDISCUSSE-MAILRSSRECOMMEND...REPRINTSSINGLE PAGE FacebookDiggRedditStumbleUponCLOSE Average citizens could not show a personalized injury because Obama's allegedly illegitimate presidency would impact everyone in roughly the same way. Courts invariably dismiss such claims, like the 1937 case alleging that Justice Hugo Black was ineligible to serve because as a member of Congress he had voted to increase the justices' salaries. Even membership in much smaller aggrieved groups generally doesn't work. The Supreme Court rejected a suit brought by parents of African-American children challenging the IRS's lax enforcement of anti-discrimination laws and another by legislators who claimed their voting rights were diluted by the line-item veto. In both cases, the communal nature of the injury precluded standing. Thus the lawsuit of Army Maj. Stefan Cook, who argued that his pending deployment to Afghanistan by an illegitimate president constituted a particularized injury, was doomed to failure. (The case was mooted when the Pentagon canceled his deployment.) Obama's opponents in the 2008 presidential election can show injury, since their personal presidential ambitions were thwarted. Indeed, Alan Keyes has filed a lawsuit making just that claim. In order to get Obama out of the White House, however, Keyes would have to show that his injury could be redressed by the court. But the most a judge could do would be to remove Obama from office, making Joseph Biden the president. Keyes would be in the same boat he's in now. Advertisement Even if someone could establish standing for such a case, the courts might refuse to hear it under a prudential limitation called the political question doctrine. This states that courts will not settle questions that the Constitution clearly assigns to other branches. Because Congress can challenge the president's credentials during the vote-counting process and impeach him at any time, presidential eligibility is a classic political question. (Before the Inauguration, some argued that state courts, which operate under different rules from federal courts, might hear cases challenging the candidates' eligibility to appear on state ballots. This is highly unlikely now that Congress has ratified the election results.) Related in Slate Andy Isaacson interviewed Obama's family in Kenya. David Weigel chronicled the movement to challenge Obama's eligibility. Christopher Hitchens lamented our obsession with Obama's race. Of course, Congress could always vote to impeach Obama. In the words of then-Rep. Gerald Ford, R-Mich., during his attempt to impeach Justice William Douglas for questionable financial dealings, "an impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers [it] to be at a given moment in history." Just as the political question doctrine would prevent Orly Taitz from removing Obama from office, it would stop him from challenging his impeachment in court. (Impeachment would not invalidate the actions Obama took while in office.) Obama is not the first to face these allegations. President Chester Arthur endured years of unsubstantiated rumors that he was born on the wrong side of the Vermont-Canada border. Some opponents questioned Herbert Hoover's eligibility as well. Hoover met the Constitutional requirement of having been a resident within the United States for 14 years, but those years were not consecutive, and the Founding Fathers weren't clear on whether the distinction matters. Neither case made it to court. Got a question about today's news? Ask the Explainer. Explainer thanks Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of California-Irvine School of Law and Rick Shenkman of George Mason University. http://www.slate.com/id/2224167/