THIS IS CNN: Network Questions if US Will ‘Be a Democracy’ After MEMO Release

[MyLadiesDaddy]

THIS IS CNN: Network Questions if US Will ‘Be a Democracy’ After MEMO Release

By Hannity Staff - On February 2, 2018

     

The network questions the future of American democracy should Trump release FISA memo.

The mainstream media’s all-out panic attack over the impending FISA memo release reached a fever pitch Thursday night, with a CNN political analyst outright questioning the nature of American democracy should the President discloses the controversial document.

 

CNN analyst Brian Karem was speaking with a network panel when he made his outlandish claim; saying the release of the bombshell FISA memo may represent the end of the country as we know it.

“That is the most disingenuous piece of verbiage I’ve heard today,” said Karem. “This is a tipping point for our democracy. Are we going to be a democracy after today? Or is this going to be demagoguery and despotism?

“The simple fact of the matter is: he talks about transparency. This is an administration that hasn’t had a single solo press conference in a year,” he added. “By the way, if you’re going to be transparent, then release the Democratic version as well.”

[bohica]

Personally, I think that if there is to be a democracy, the memo must be released.  The government has gotten to the place where it has pitted itself against the people.  Obama used the FBI and IRS much like Hitler used the Gestapo and SS against the people of Germany and those who dared oppose him.  If there is to be future hope for America the truth has to come out.  Only then can there be change.   

[divemaster5734]

The only thing that bothers me about all this is the way they are throttling down the speed with which "revelations" are released.

I understand the need, every step away from the last few years of mainstream committed anti-Trump theme must be given time to be assimilated by the remaining left leaning public. After all, the fact there are still dedicated dems in defiance of the mountain of evidence of exposed corruption only demonstrates an inherent denial of reality in that persons perception, so the public must be weaned into a "new" perspective of accepting that the 2016 "election" was an even greater "upset" against odds, as it was also the most rigged election in American history. 

For the American people to have won against the immoral, unethical, and clearly illegal efforts of  so many embedded traitors holding high level government positions was a far more monumental task than what was acknowledged.

The only people that desired clinton were those deep state individuals who care for nothing but their own desires, and their minions of obedient mindless followers, who also demand  compensation for loyalty in the form of increased welfare or other entitlement programs. 

I'll acknowledge there were a few who simply voted against Trump's personality, but most of those have already acknowledged their error, and we have agreed that Trump is loud, but counter that anyone less would not have survived the devious plotting and subversive animus, besides, he is far less narcissist than the betrayer who preceded, and we are in harmony with the direction Trump is leading, for the most part.

I do recognize various facets that are disturbing, but when researched become apparently concessions made to the corporatists in our system whose vote must still  be bought with pork.

With luck, enough Americans have opened their eyes to identify, and vote them out.

 

The verifying data has to be carefully released so that except for those who are so proud of their stupidity they off handley  deny all evidence while desperately regurgitating some imagined and improbable cause while ignorantly thinking they must surely look like saviors to the dem party.

 

We must help those who may possibly still gather a coherent thought, and resign ourselves to accept some people are beyond help, especially when they have gone beyond accepting fact as reality.

 

  It's called cognitive dissonance,  the dem party is rife with persons affected, so we must be careful, else their goo filled brains may burst under the stress of originating a thought.. DM

[8th ID]

2 hours ago, bohica said:

Personally, I think that if there is to be a democracy, the memo must be released.  The government has gotten to the place where it has pitted itself against the people.  Obama used the FBI and IRS much like Hitler used the Gestapo and SS against the people of Germany and those who dared oppose him.  If there is to be future hope for America the truth has to come out.  Only then can there be change.   

I agree...Will Hurd from the Great State of Texas and on the committee I believe, said the Democratic letter would be released, they just had to go through and check everything that was classified in it as well. 

[Indraman]

3 hours ago, divemaster5734 said:

The only thing that bothers me about all this is the way they are throttling down the speed with which "revelations" are released.

I understand the need, every step away from the last few years of mainstream committed anti-Trump theme must be given time to be assimilated by the remaining left leaning public. After all, the fact there are still dedicated dems in defiance of the mountain of evidence of exposed corruption only demonstrates an inherent denial of reality in that persons perception, so the public must be weaned into a "new" perspective of accepting that the 2016 "election" was an even greater "upset" against odds, as it was also the most rigged election in American history. 

For the American people to have won against the immoral, unethical, and clearly illegal efforts of  so many embedded traitors holding high level government positions was a far more monumental task than what was acknowledged.

The only people that desired clinton were those deep state individuals who care for nothing but their own desires, and their minions of obedient mindless followers, who also demand  compensation for loyalty in the form of increased welfare or other entitlement programs. 

I'll acknowledge there were a few who simply voted against Trump's personality, but most of those have already acknowledged their error, and we have agreed that Trump is loud, but counter that anyone less would not have survived the devious plotting and subversive animus, besides, he is far less narcissist than the betrayer who preceded, and we are in harmony with the direction Trump is leading, for the most part.

I do recognize various facets that are disturbing, but when researched become apparently concessions made to the corporatists in our system whose vote must still  be bought with pork.

With luck, enough Americans have opened their eyes to identify, and vote them out.

 

The verifying data has to be carefully released so that except for those who are so proud of their stupidity they off handley  deny all evidence while desperately regurgitating some imagined and improbable cause while ignorantly thinking they must surely look like saviors to the dem party.

 

We must help those who may possibly still gather a coherent thought, and resign ourselves to accept some people are beyond help, especially when they have gone beyond accepting fact as reality.

 

  It's called cognitive dissonance,  the dem party is rife with persons affected, so we must be careful, else their goo filled brains may burst under the stress of originating a thought.. DM

 

Probably one of the most concise and well stated observations of our current status as a nation and the alternative reality that many are living in (I know you aren't supposed to end a sentence with a preposition, but it just sounds right...lol).

 

 

Indy

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///MAGA!

 

Hope our Leadership doesn't cave when the FACTS lead straight to the ho'bummer dicktatership.

 

Being afraid to prosecute the socialist hacks at the highest level for fear of alienating entire segments of the voting base

should not be a factor in bringing about Justice to all those who are attempting to destroy Our Republic.

 

The American People must understand that these criminals - regardless of colour -  must be stopped or we'll have no Country.

 

We have to lock up Valerie Jarrett - Ho'bummer - LowRenta Lynch - Eric Holder -- among others.

 

We know the kommies will start screaming "raciscm!" again.... 

It's imperative the message  be understood that they are not being locked up because of colour --

they are being locked up because they are enemies of The Republic and committed CRIMES AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

.

Edited February 4, 2018 by SgtFuryUSCZ

[bohica]

One thing is clear.  If Hillarious would have won, extending Obama's influence and reign, it would have meant to death to freedom in America for anyone who opposed her.  Obama was setting America up for a death blow and Hillarious was supposed to have delivered it.  

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

4 minutes ago, bohica said:

One thing is clear.  If Hillarious would have won, extending Obama's influence and reign, it would have meant to death to freedom in America for anyone who opposed her.  Obama was setting America up for a death blow and Hillarious was supposed to have delivered it.  

***///MAGA !

DING, DING, DING !

We have a winner !

Exactly right, BOHICA !

Edited February 4, 2018 by SgtFuryUSCZ