parmenio Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 Whether I am a 'newt fan' or not is immaterial. I really am tired of the self righteous who like to pick people apart. If you are for Obama I can tear him apart. If you are for Rommney, I can tear him apart, etc etc. It really does not matter. Everyone has skeletons. I really do not think Obama would want to harp on Newt's marriages because it would not take much digging to raise some real questions about Obama's ethics. ..., like Obama's cocaine use and allegations of a homosexual affair with Lawrence Sinclair. Know exactly what you mean!! Where was the "media" back then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojack Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 "monster"really? have'nt seen that printed anywhere even by the left swingin media. You know of anywhere I could go to read up on "monster" Newt? Caz we wouldn't agree so let's not bother But if you want a quick reminder this link will sum it up: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/11/1044071/-Newt-Gingrich-is-a-lousy-human-being 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caz1104 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 Caz we wouldn't agree so let's not bother But if you want a quick reminder this link will sum it up: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/11/1044071/-Newt-Gingrich-is-a-lousy-human-being Mo, I'm not a Newt fan at all. I just had'nt seen the term "monster" used when descibing a candidate by the media.I started to read the article you linked from Kos but had to stop,it started to make feel sorry for Newt cause of its bias. See we can disagree and get along,best to all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojack Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 Mo, I'm not a Newt fan at all. I just had'nt seen the term "monster" used when descibing a candidate by the media.I started to read the article you linked from Kos but had to stop,it started to make feel sorry for Newt cause of its bias. See we can disagree and get along,best to all. Yep - I didn't want to post the link because those offsites are normally very biased. That's the kinda stuff we see here all the time and it drives me crazy (you already know that). The media normally describe Newt as being a demonizer. The person who first started demonizing candidates running for office. Well - Tee Time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiffany23 Posted January 25, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2012 Exactly...if he asked God to forgive him then who are we to judge?? Renee...I understand and appreciate your comment about making peace with God. But I would also be curious if he went back to the women he wronged and asked for forgivenes...and not at a time when he was under the spot light of running for President. From the interview of his ex wife, I don't think this was done, but perhaps I'm missing it. For the record, I like Newt...he's smart, doesn't take a bunch of crap and he is very familar with how the system works. IMHO, he has the best chance to face Obama head on in various debates. Note to the RP group, I have no issues with him, and will gladly support him as well if he ends up being the Republican contender. Tiff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasGranny Posted January 25, 2012 Report Share Posted January 25, 2012 Yep - I didn't want to post the link because those offsites are normally very biased. That's the kinda stuff we see here all the time and it drives me crazy (you already know that). The media normally describe Newt as being a demonizer. The person who first started demonizing candidates running for office. Well - Tee Time! Why don't you read a honest article on Newt's "Ethics" Violations that were nothing more then unproven allegations. Then consider that this is the motus operandi of the democratic party when they set their "crosshairs" on a republican opponent. If you can keep from thinking Sarah Palin and the flood of ethics charges filed against her by the democrats in Alaska, you are truly blind to liberal bias. Washington Examiner 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojack Posted January 26, 2012 Report Share Posted January 26, 2012 Why don't you read a honest article on Newt's "Ethics" Violations that were nothing more then unproven allegations. Then consider that this is the motus operandi of the democratic party when they set their "crosshairs" on a republican opponent. If you can keep from thinking Sarah Palin and the flood of ethics charges filed against her by the democrats in Alaska, you are truly blind to liberal bias. Washington Examiner Now Granny you know that's the modus of operandi for the Republicans as well. That's basically what I stated when I posted Yep - I didn't want to post the link because those offsites are normally very biased. That's the kinda stuff we see here all the time and it drives me crazy (you already know that). I usually don't post that junk. You've seen my posts and know my MO. It was a mistake but I'm not saying any of it was incorrect. People on this site get 100's of plus ones for the off media, anti, slanted and opinionated blogs. (non news) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinarDebbie Posted January 26, 2012 Report Share Posted January 26, 2012 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasGranny Posted January 26, 2012 Report Share Posted January 26, 2012 DinarDebbie - I certainly hope that you have never had more than one relationship in your life. If you have then you should apply the rule about people in glass houses. Since I have been married 3 times myself, I have a different view about people that have to go through divorce. Life happens, people make mistakes and if God is willing to forgive the sinner then I certainly don't feel that I should counteract that forgiveness. I can guarantee you that my first two husbands would certainly have a lot of negative things to say about our marriages but that doesn't mean either of them would be telling the truth. May God forgive you for judging others - that is his job! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinarDebbie Posted January 26, 2012 Report Share Posted January 26, 2012 (edited) DinarDebbie - I certainly hope that you have never had more than one relationship in your life. If you have then you should apply the rule about people in glass houses. Since I have been married 3 times myself, I have a different view about people that have to go through divorce. Life happens, people make mistakes and if God is willing to forgive the sinner then I certainly don't feel that I should counteract that forgiveness. I can guarantee you that my first two husbands would certainly have a lot of negative things to say about our marriages but that doesn't mean either of them would be telling the truth. May God forgive you for judging others - that is his job! I'm still with high school bf 24 years later, but what does that have to do with anything. First, it is not my picture, and second, how much do you know about him? What did he say about Reagan? What did he do during those years? Unless you turn away from your TV and try doing research for yourself you will keep believing everything the "MSM" media tells you. If you knew half the stuff Clinton was behind in his early years, you would vomit and shake. I do wish people can learn to communicate without shoving GOD into every conversation, start thinking and doing for yourself. If you choose to stay asleep and be blind to who the "chosen" ones are for the Presidency, then you are part of the reason these Elite Zionist banksters are destroying your country. We, the ones who are awake, are doing far more to save this country because we care and know the truth, we don't sit back and expect GOD to do it all. Good day. I support Ron Paul Because I support the troops and the USA.. Edited January 26, 2012 by DinarDebbie 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts