Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content

Theseus

Members
  • Posts

    3,319
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Theseus

  1. 1991 I was still recovering from the effects of Decompression Sickness Type II and fighting for VA Benefits.
  2. Its great that ISIS has been violently expelled from Mosul and now they can start picking up the pieces. However, I recall hearing a news report in between the Wire tapping news about how the US has gone beyond counseling and that ISIS was still giving Iraq trouble. The next target for Iraq to reclaim is Hiwaji or however you spell the town. ISIS need to be expelled from Iraq. It is not with victory over Mosul. Another report I heard was that the road to the capital city for ISIS had been blocked. This was near the time the Syrian jet was shot down and they were looking for the pilot whom was found after a 9 hour search.
  3. When the vast majority of users will be inside the country? Does Amazon deliver to Iraq? What about other International companies that are vital to the everyday person? Do they deliver inside and outside of Iraq? A lot more needs to be done to make things "international" and right now the dollar is their choice of international currency. Change that and things will eventually change on Iraq's timeline.
  4. DEMOCRATS FOUGHT FOR MUSLIM KEPT OUT BY TRUMP, THEN HE MOLESTED A LITTLE GIRL March 5, 2017 Daniel Greenfield 20 Share to Facebook235Share to TwitterShare to More83Share to Print This is a deeply heartwarming story about overcoming prejudice and learning that the people we are afraid are really... child molesters. That's how the media originally spun the story of Tanveer Hussain. Hussain was originally denied a visa, supposedly because of President Trump's migration pause, to come and compete in the World Snowshoe Championships in New York. Senator Gillibrand and Senator Schumer sprang into action. Elise Stefanek's office even supposedly got involved. And a wonderful Muslim whom we had absolutely no reason to keep out of the country came to New York showing us how silly our fears were. Then he molested a 12-year-old girl. The parents complained to the police. Khan, the other Muslim who was only allowed in because of the interview of the two senators, claimed that it was the girl's fault. Because that is how Muslims view sexual abuse. It's always the fault of the victim. Also Khan claimed that Hussain had no idea that the 12-year-old girl was a minor. How are you supposed to know that a little girl is a minor if you don't speak English? So the current excuses are that 1. It's the girl's fault 2. Hussain had no idea she was too young to molest because he doesn't speak English This is usually how most Muslim sexual abuse defenses go. Yes, they introduced them to middle schoolers. They got seventh-graders to write letters for them. And then the inevitable happened. Will they be held accountable? They certainly ought to be. Hussain and Khan come from a culture where the abuse of children is normal, where unaccompanied women are considered fair game and a religion whose founder married a 7-year-old girl. It's not a question of what they were thinking. The question is what were their sponsors thinking? If you bring a wolf into a schoolroom and a child gets mauled, is it the fault of the wolf or the man who introduced him into the classroom? Gillibrand tried to build her brand by claiming to have been sexually harassed in the Senate. Then she brought an actual child molester to America. But Trump is the bad guy.
  5. I asked myself the question, “Can a former President invoke Executive Privilege once out of office?” I then set out to find the answer. Here is what I found from Library of Law and Liberty website under an article titled “The Constitution and Executive Privilege” (Rozell, 2012) “President George W. Bush was not so reluctant to claim executive privilege. Bush moved on several fronts to reestablish executive privilege as a customary presidential power. Yet his efforts were highly controversial. In one case, he expanded the scope of executive privilege for former presidents, and even to allow them to transfer this constitutional authority under Article II to designated family representatives. Bush issued an executive order in 2001 that effectively revised the intent of the Presidential Records Act of 1978 in a way that made it harder for the public to get access to the papers of past presidential administrations. In another case, the Bush administration tried to expand executive privilege to protect Department of Justice (DOJ) documents from investigations long ago closed. This claim was particularly bothersome because the longstanding practice was to claim a right to withhold information about ongoing investigations that could be compromised by public disclosure. The most significant Bush-era executive privilege controversy surrounded the president’s efforts to prevent the release of subpoenaed documents and then testimony of certain White House aides regarding the politically motivated firings of several U.S. attorneys. The president claimed absolute immunity for White House aides, although the U.S. district court of D.C. ultimately rejected that argument. These uses of executive privilege by the Bush (43) administration showcase how the political give-and-take of our system of separated powers often resolves such controversies. In the former example, the president initially prevailed in large part due to a tepid response from Congress and a lack of significant opposition outside of the academic community. President Obama eventually overturned the Bush executive order. In the second example, a spate of negative publicity and aggressive efforts by a congressional committee to get access to the disputed documents resulted in the administration agreeing to turn over most of the materials it had tried to conceal.” I bet Obama is going to rue the day he turned over this Executive Order. Elections do indeed have consequences. - See more at: http://www.libertylawsite.org/2012/07/12/the-constitution-and-executive-privilege/#sthash.mc7UWKVo.dpuf
  6. It wont happen anywhere there is ccw or open carry. Why? Because its much easier to fight those who are unarmed than get yourself killed. Its why this only happened in Berkley.
  7. I have been thinking hard on this all day and reviewed Levin's interview with Fox News. I actually watched it live. I want to counter a narrative that is going on right now in the news and I am sure even you might have guessed this by now. What is the narrative? The narrative is that the sitting President covered up the wiretapping of then Presidential Candidate Donald J Trump. The counter to this narrative I am postulating is this: there is no cover up by then President Obama. That is not to say what Obama did was wrong, because it is certainly an abuse of power. I believe everyone agrees this is highly suspicious in nature but there is no cover up. Why? Today Mark Levin exhibited, if you will, various articles from various “reputable” sources including the New York Times about the wiretap I believe in August of 2016. So let’s take a look at how this all happened. Some say this started in the Spring of 2015. However, I firmly believe it really gained traction when then Presidential Candidate Trump jokingly uttered those infamous words about how the Russians should find the missing 30K Clinton emails. Also a narrative was then being thrown out that Russia hacked into Hillarious Clinton’s private server she kept in the basement. Some of the media at the time were saying China, Iran and others hacked into it too. However, you notice by the time we get to the Conventions the only country mentioned was Russia. No China. No Iran. No others. In almost every article the hacking done was strictly done by Russia. This becomes important later. Let’s fast forward to the Summer of 2016 but before the DNC Convention, Obama’s Administration went to the FISA court to get a wiretap warrant signed by a judge. It was denied because it was too broad in scope (I am assuming they asked for this based on several nations, not just Russia). This was reported on per Mark Levin’s interview today with Fox News. Now, right before the Democrat National Convention. WikiLeaks releases a bombshell of emails which cost Debbie Wasserman Schulz her position at the DNC. Almost instantaneously, the Russians were blamed for this. Even Fox News reported on this and unknowingly were complicit in the plot. Notice the reports on Hillarious Clinton’s server being hacked, the reports are only about the Russians doing the hacking. The narrative becomes focused solely on the Russians, no more China, no more Iran, no more others. Yeah, they get a brief mention here and there but the focus is solely on Russia, at this point. If the original request was too broad, the narrative had to be narrowed to fit the next request. However the request wasn’t done immediately. Obama let this fester in the public eye for a while. This is the most important part of this. He let Hillarious Clinton and her followers, including the MSM and everyone who reported on this, beat the narrative, focusing solely on Russia, in the minds of the public opinion so that when investigating the hacking of her server and emails, the public would then only refer to the perpetrators as the Russians. Once this narrative had time to ferment in the court of public opinion, Obama’s administration then went back to the FISA Court and requested another wiretap, which was narrowed in scope to only the Russians this time. The emails from WikiLeaks also added to this case giving it further traction. However, Sean Hannity did an interview with Julian Assange that adamantly denied the source of the emails were not the Russians. Those covering the story, went on and on about how the Russians were the hackers in question and ignored Assange’s interview. In this time, various news outlets had reported that the first wiretap authorization was turned down. These reports, too, were largely ignored. A second wiretap warrant was then requested and granted in October 2016. However, by that time it was too late for the election. Notice Obama had assured the nation Trump was not going to be elected. He knew what was going on, I can only assume at this juncture. He also knew he was on his way out. Up to this point there is no cover up. None. Zilch. People knew that a second wiretap had been requested and the investigation was ongoing because it was reported in the media. Also, the server, in Trump Tower, in which the Russian Banks appeared on, were the catalyst to expand the narrowed wiretap warrant to then include other Senior members of Trump’s administration. Once they found this on the server the wiretap authority was expanded. Which is how the Obama Administration were able to record Flynn and Sessions and others. In December, Obama, as well as others in his Administration, came out and said the matter had been investigated and there was no evidence of the hacking by Russians. Now we have the cover up. Why would Obama come out in December 2016 and say there is no evidence? The answer is rather simple, so once Donald Trump took the oath of office, he would do so under the guise that the matter into the Russian Hacking was settled and more than likely not investigate the matter. Then leaks started happening and cost Flynn his position. Something was not right. Everyone sensed it. Rumors about a shadow government was being formed etc. The cover up was not until the Obama administration came out, around December 16, 2016, saying there was no evidence to impugn the Russians for the hacking. By then, it was too late for anyone to do anything as the transition was fully underway. It all fits. There was no cover up of the wiretapping until December 2016. It was reported on by various news agencies when it occurred and it was right in front of our faces the entire time. The cover up did not happen until December 2016 and only then the cover up was about whom the wiretaps were on. All in all, both requests for wiretaps were requested fraudulently. They used first the narrative of the several foreign nations hacking and when this didn’t work they narrowed the scope and re-requested knowing full well what they asked of the FISA Court to approve was not the intended purpose of the wiretaps. It is my belief this is how the pieces fit in and how the analysis in the public arena has it almost right but is off by a smidgen. What Obama did, tapping a political opponent, was abuse his power, he might not have ordered the wiretaps but he could have requested the current AG to go to the FISA Court on his behalf as is the law of the land. It would be remiss to say Obama was unaware of this, due to the nature of the daily intelligence briefings and the subject of the wiretaps. I am postulating this at this juncture because I have not seen the FISA request. I doubt anyone outside of the those in the power to do so will be the only ones to see these. Give this some serious thought and I know you will see it after I have. I also know this is still raw as it only came to light today so things might shift here and there, but in generality, this is most likely how things transpired.
  8. Most people think American refersto thosewholive in the United States when in fact there are North and South Americans. Just like there are Europeans that are French, German, Irish, Italians and Asians and Pacific Islanders. People who livein the United States grew up learning that Americans is just the United States. Another falsehood taught in our public schools. Lol your laststatement. Been sying tht for months maybe over a year onhere.
  9. Some of the smartest men in America when asked if they would run for president replied in the similar fashion. No! Not just no but an ah Hell no! I am sure if you put in 135K H1-B visa apps you might get a visa. Putting in just one wont work.
  10. I didn't sense a civil war either until a person taught me a particular things on what to start looking for. You think it is tinfoil hat nutjob conspiracy theory until your eyes see it happening. We draw closer does not mean civil war will happen only the probability for it grows stronger. A civil war if happens will occur from the squeezing of the bottom up and top down. This is happening as groups on the bottom arebeing funded and organized in alinsky-style. Indivisible, a far left wing group, is distributing training manuals compiled by the OFA, the Obama organization deemed tobe the "shadow government" run from his tax payer funded DC bungalow. So we have the top funding and training the bottom. Then 501C3 organizations (non-profit) organizations who form and organize the bottom conduct riots and bait others into violent conflicts in hopes one event will be a tipping point and will move others not to words but to action which then promulgates more violent action. This is the Nazi Party tactics and communist party tactics. Something also you might not be aware of and should give you pause is this, the DOJ slush fund. When a company is fined where does that money go? Not where you think. A company fined letssay 150 billion dollars can be approached by the DOJ and they say, hey company, I know you don't want to pay 150 million dollars. So if you pay 15 million dollars to a group we, the DOJ, designates we will consider the fine paid. Now the numbers are hypothetical but this slush fund is not. What is of importtance here isi that the DOJ can designate any organization they prefer to receive this money. Second important item is that there is no corporate accountability after the organization receives the money. So if an organizationsuch as the Sierra Leone Club receives 42 million dollars they can do with it whatever they please, like then funnel the money to another organization(s). This comes the top down. All wars, insurgencies require planning, organization and money. 0bummer shored up the money aspect along with Soros. Organizations such as Indivisible and OFA are planning, coordinating and organizing the bottom organizations by training and paying protestors to create chaos and wreak havoc. The BLM movement has gone beyond fighting for civil rights by their manifesto stated on their website just like MoveOn.org has done. Protestors who have gone from peaceful gatherings covered under the Constitution to that of agitators and rioters destroying private property and now are attacking people physically and verbally. Given the pattern of escalation and human behavior, this squeeze from the top down to urge the bottom to push up are all the hallmarks throughout history leading to violent overthrows of the current seat of power. This happened in the French Revolution that led to the Terrible 100 daysin which people associated with those in power were beheaded. This happened in the Roman Empire several times. This has most noteriety and gives up images of the worsekind through the actions of the Nazi Party in the 1930s. This is how the USSR fell. This is how despots are removed in violent coup d'etats. Even the mere whisper of a silent coup in the USA is seditious when a peaceful transfer of power took place. If need to know more I suggest you to read the Federalist Papers and review the histories and treatises of governments of the world. They need to put world historyback into the classroom, which is another part of this overall plan to change the government of the USA.
  11. I am surprised there was no comment on this. ROE has definately changed. When our soldiers were fighting inthe second gulf war, mosques were off limits. Something that tied the hands of our fighting men and women. Good to see that if they hide in a mosque then that willbe their final resting place as mosques are more than just a place of worship but also a command center. Notice the Sauds, is the KSA really an ally to the west?
  12. A day without women? Hmmm. Is this nirvana? Well lets see howmuch do those sex robots cost? J/k women can't live with them, and well that's enough about that, just ask my wife! disclimer the opinions of this post are in no way representativeof the opinionsfpr this station. If you are a divorce lawyerthis post is a nothingburger please move along. If youare a feminazi, we would say don't get your panties in a wad, but lets face facts you don't wear panties.
  13. We are a Constitutional Republic. A democracy would require every single citizen to vote on every single bill and thing instead of elected representatives to act in our stead.
  14. Anyone notice that the message states they called Harry Reid? Why call Harry Reid and tell him that they are coming for him? Something about this is highly suspicious. By the way, Harry Reid is no longer a sitting member of the Senate. He is gone, vamoos, nada. To me this reeks of fake news to the nth degree. They should really read instead of copyingand pasting, then changing the date before posting toa website to give the illusion thisishappening. I find the retorts to this fakery quiteinterestingas this is definately fake. didanyone noticethedate as well, 2013? Good god people this was 3 years ago. Date changed and then bolded. Again this is fake. The reason the date is bolded is because mostdon't read but only skim. Theysee the bold for a current date and say yeah this is happening its on. Dont buy into the trickery!
  15. For those who don't think America is closer to a civil war thanany time in history since the war between the North and South only need to turn the Facebook page for the Democratic Party and view the short video in which Lynch makes an impassionate plea to "we can do it again". http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/loretta-lynch-need-more-marching-blood-death-on-streets/ LORETTA LYNCH: NEED MORE MARCHING, BLOOD, DEATH ON STREETS Senate Dems post her impassioned plea on Facebook page as 'words of inspiration' 'The video is less than a minute long and begins by stating that people are experiencing “great fear and uncertainty,” with the unstated implication it is due to Donald Trump’s takeover of the White House. Without offering any specifics, Lynch goes on to say that “our rights” are “being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back.” But the strongest words come in a statement that seems to suggest the answer is street action that will inevitably turn bloody and deadly. “I know that this is a time of great fear and uncertainty for so many people,” Lynch says. “I know it’s a time of concern for people, who see our rights being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back. I know that this is difficult, but I remind you that this has never been easy. We have always had to work to move this country forward to achieve the great ideals of our Founding Fathers.” “Subversion, Inc.” outs the radical thugs who’ve always been part of the Obama apparatus. Lynch, who is scheduled to receive the Thomas Jefferson Foundation Medal of Law from the University of Virginia, goes on to say: “It has been people, individuals who have banded together, ordinary people who simply saw what needed to be done and came together and supported those ideals who have made the difference. They’ve marched, they’ve bled and yes, some of them died. This is hard. Every good thing is. We have done this before. We can do this again.” Lynch succeeded Eric Holder as Barack Obama’s attorney general in 2014. Lynch is most well-remembered for her famous private meeting with Bill Clinton, her former boss, on her airplane while a federal investigation into his wife, Hillarious Clinton, and the private email server she maintained as secretary of state was under way. Obama stood behind her when the news leaked out about the secret meeting on her plane sitting on the tarmac of Phoenix airport. Lynch said her conversation with Bill Clinton did not touch on the FBI’s investigation into his wife’s private email setup at State. Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts! Lesser known about Lynch’s history is that she was the prosecutor assigned to the biggest bank scandal in history – the probe of HSBC’s involvement in money laundering for terrorists and drug cartels lodged in 2012 and a scandal revealed first in WND, long before she was nominated for the post of attorney general. While large fines were levied against the biggest bank in the world, no officials were charged or prosecuted by Lynch. While the subject was raised in Senate confirmation hearings, 10 Republicans approved her nomination — Kelly Ayotte, Ron Johnson, Mark Kirk, Rob Portman, Thad Cochran, Susan Collins, Jeff Flake, Lindsey Graham, Orrin Hatch and Mitch McConnell. When WND revealed the evidence provided by a whistleblower inside the giant global bank, HSBC used its immense power to persuade bandwidth providers to take WND offline – a situation that was remediated within hours. Click here for reuse options! Copyright 2017 WND Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/loretta-lynch-need-more-marching-blood-death-on-streets/#P3AzowkeAB6Vdld6.99
  16. For those who don't think America is closer to a civil war thanany time in history since the war between the North and South only need to turn the Facebook page for the Democratic Party and view the short video in which Lynch makes an impassionate plea to "we can do it again". http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/loretta-lynch-need-more-marching-blood-death-on-streets/ LORETTA LYNCH: NEED MORE MARCHING, BLOOD, DEATH ON STREETS Senate Dems post her impassioned plea on Facebook page as 'words of inspiration' Published: 6 hours ago 3K Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email 3K image: http://www.wnd.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-print/images/printer_famfamfam.gif Print WASHINGTON – The Obama administration’s former Attorney General Loretta Lynch has made an impassioned video plea for more marching, blood and death on the streets – a video that was later posted on the Facebook page of Senate Democrats as “words of inspiration.” The video is less than a minute long and begins by stating that people are experiencing “great fear and uncertainty,” with the unstated implication it is due to Donald Trump’s takeover of the White House. Without offering any specifics, Lynch goes on to say that “our rights” are “being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back.” But the strongest words come in a statement that seems to suggest the answer is street action that will inevitably turn bloody and deadly. “I know that this is a time of great fear and uncertainty for so many people,” Lynch says. “I know it’s a time of concern for people, who see our rights being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back. I know that this is difficult, but I remind you that this has never been easy. We have always had to work to move this country forward to achieve the great ideals of our Founding Fathers.” “Subversion, Inc.” outs the radical thugs who’ve always been part of the Obama apparatus. Lynch, who is scheduled to receive the Thomas Jefferson Foundation Medal of Law from the University of Virginia, goes on to say: “It has been people, individuals who have banded together, ordinary people who simply saw what needed to be done and came together and supported those ideals who have made the difference. They’ve marched, they’ve bled and yes, some of them died. This is hard. Every good thing is. We have done this before. We can do this again.” Lynch succeeded Eric Holder as Barack Obama’s attorney general in 2014. Lynch is most well-remembered for her famous private meeting with Bill Clinton, her former boss, on her airplane while a federal investigation into his wife, Hillarious Clinton, and the private email server she maintained as secretary of state was under way. Obama stood behind her when the news leaked out about the secret meeting on her plane sitting on the tarmac of Phoenix airport. Lynch said her conversation with Bill Clinton did not touch on the FBI’s investigation into his wife’s private email setup at State. Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts! Lesser known about Lynch’s history is that she was the prosecutor assigned to the biggest bank scandal in history – the probe of HSBC’s involvement in money laundering for terrorists and drug cartels lodged in 2012 and a scandal revealed first in WND, long before she was nominated for the post of attorney general. While large fines were levied against the biggest bank in the world, no officials were charged or prosecuted by Lynch. While the subject was raised in Senate confirmation hearings, 10 Republicans approved her nomination — Kelly Ayotte, Ron Johnson, Mark Kirk, Rob Portman, Thad Cochran, Susan Collins, Jeff Flake, Lindsey Graham, Orrin Hatch and Mitch McConnell. When WND revealed the evidence provided by a whistleblower inside the giant global bank, HSBC used its immense power to persuade bandwidth providers to take WND offline – a situation that was remediated within hours. Click here for reuse options! Copyright 2017 WND Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/loretta-lynch-need-more-marching-blood-death-on-streets/#P3AzowkeAB6Vdld6.99
  17. Idjits! Big difference between a private server in your basement and the AOL public server. Hitlary had federal secrets whereas it was against the law to use campaign emails on the state email. Pence had to use a different email. Pence didn't delete emails with bleachbit. He handed all emails, 13 boxes, when asked promptly.
  18. the night before Jesus was arrested he told his disciples there would come a time they would need to sell their cloaks and buy a sword. This was not in the usual parable that he normally spoke. He knew that there would be a time when defense required more than words. He also said turn the other cheek, i guess when you run out of cheeks you need to stand and confront them. Jesus was not against the use of force when warranted. The Vatican also justifies war based on this story. In other words Jesus said to love thy enemy, not lie down and die for your enemy. Trump needs to fight he has no more cheeks to turn.
  19. He did not ie, he answered the question as presented to him which was about a breaking CNN news story which he was not informed about until asked in a truthful answer. He did not disclose the two meetings. As Pehosi stated she didn't meet with Russians then when asked bout it she clarified one-on-one. So i guess she should resign too!
  20. Same Russian Ambassador was caught on Camera sitting with his Democrat cohorts at the POTUS speech Feb 28. Pehoski and McCaskillinsky was also caught meeting with Russians as was Schumer with Putin and 30 other Senators. They should all resignski!
  21. You need to post the picture where before this one she is actually taking a picture of the group that some of them asked questions like Did you get a good picture? Try to get a good picture etc.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.