Sniper_Wife

Ok someone help me here. In every way I translate this part, it doesnt sound good to me "Iraqi dinar against the dollar OVER the next two years after the implementation of the project to delete three zeros from the Iraqi currency." Isnt this saying they have two years to work it up to the dollar? So they can RV at 10 cents and work its way up? My brain is fried from reading so much news

Are you being serious???

Advisor to the Central Bank's (people): withdrawal cause America to build the Iraqi economy تاريخ النشر 20/11/2011 05:37 PM Posted 20/11/2011 05:37 PM Baghdad _ people أHe adviser to the CBI the appearance of Mohammed Saleh in an interview with Al (people) that "the withdrawal of U.S. forces this year signal the end of the transition to the economics of peace and economic development in Iraq." He added that "there is a war economy and the economy of peace; and the withdrawal of U.S. troops is the signal to begin to reflect the image of the country supporting Iraq to world peace and that the U.S. civilian administrator in Iraq will go." Noting that "the completion of the withdrawal process that will drive the United States to move towards building the Iraqi economy and reducing from Chapter VII, which languish under the burden of the country two decades ago." The Ministry of Federal Planning, obtaining Cabinet approval to extend the recycling of funds into the middle of next February. " The central bank, said the budget in 2011 has achieved development in the oil sector in the country. " The government says the budget in 2011 was a preliminary budget to balance in 2012 and was able to attract international contractors and international companies known to operate in Iraq and break the economic blockade. " The estimated budget for Iraq in 2012 to $ 112 billion, including 17 billion for security and arms, up 36% from last year, but a deficit of $ 20 billion. " http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alnaspaper.com%2Finp%2Fview.asp%3FID%3D5543 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ya, I thought the "mysterious circumstances" was interesting. I think everyone likes to play cover-up.

Newspaper: Pentagon reveals receipt of Baghdad, the $ 6.6 billion program of "reconstruction" 29/10/2011 13:15 29/10/2011 13:15 Beirut, October 29, 2011 (Akanyu) - The newspaper "Los Angeles Times," U.S. to fund reconstruction program the U.S. provided to Iraq in 2004 and is said to have been lost in mysterious circumstances, were not lost was not stolen, but was transferred to the Central Bank of Iraq . The newspaper pointed out that the U.S. "Audit the U.S. in the war on Iraq proved that the $ 6.6 billion, which raises the financial crisis between Baghdad and Washington have been handed over to Iraqi authorities between 2003 and 2004. The newspaper considered that "the discovery of the federation, which was formed to scrutinize how the disappearance of the funds allocated for the reconstruction of Iraq, is a testament to the chaos that had prevailed in the early days of the invasion." She explained, "Los Angeles Times" that the Pentagon has transferred funds under his supervision to Iraq in packs cash of 100 $ on board the aircraft "Hercules C-130," but failing to maintain documentation to demonstrate how the distribution of money or benefit from reinforced doubts that some of This money was stolen, if not the whole. " The paper says that after the uproar caused by the subject, and the threat of the Iraqi government to resort to the courts to collect the amount, gave in the Iraqi Central Bank and U.S. Federal Reserve to requests from investigators and provided them with the records that helped them to clarify the fate of the money. Investigators have confirmed it Ptbarham that there is sufficient evidence to prove that the entire amount has been transferred to the CBI. But the paper stresses that "the investigation and found it difficult to determine the fate of a large portion of these funds, since you can not find out what happened to PAL $ 217 million that was delivered to the Pentagon to be deposited in a vault in the basement of the presidential palace in Baghdad." The investigators also an example of a violation of the laws of the U.S. authorities when in December / December 2003 to transfer $ 150 million in cash to Iraqi Minister of Finance in Baghdad International Airport. And draws the paper that the results of the investigation will help to defuse the crisis between the U.S. and Iraqi authorities, which is classified in the category of "financial crimes". She explained that "the Coalition Provisional Authority led by Paul Bremer, set up by the United States to run Iraq after the invasion in 2003, it controlled during their rule of 14 months, $ 20.7 billion, within the $ 6.6 billion lost," though it is resolved in the June 28th of 2004. The newspaper quoted Inspector General Stuart Bowen that "money is not missing, and we have enough information to confirm that most of them around to the Central Bank of Iraq, and the other to the Board of Directors of Federal Reserve Bank of New York." Bowen was considered that "any doubts about how to dispose of that money after it emerged from the United States are the responsibility of the Baghdad government, not the U.S. government." . It is expected to issue another report on the audit in January 2012, on the amount of $ 2.8 billion used by the agencies under the Ministry of Defense, including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, for the implementation of reconstruction projects in Iraq. The daily reminds that the Development Fund for Iraq "DFI" was established in May / May 2003, by the Director of the Coalition Provisional Authority was recognized, by a decision of the Security Council of the United Nations 1483. After the dissolution of the Coalition Provisional Authority in June of 2004, was mandated by the U.S. government by the Government of Iraq to manage the funds of the Development Fund for Iraq, which were made available for reconstruction projects, and the U.S. Department of Defense Department funds the fund on behalf of the U.S. government, has been the withdrawal of the authorization As of December 31 / December 2007. From: Khalil al-Khalil, the Open: Peace Baghdadi http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=ar&tl=en&u=http://www.aknews.com/ar/&act=url go half way down the page and on the left there is a picture of money that says "Newspapers"

Why are you here?? Do you have so much time on your hands that you decided to one day join something you don’t believe in just to tell people they are stupid. All of your posts say the same thing. You are like a stocker, spending time reading everyone’s posts just to throw in a few times that all of this is bogus and we will find out soon, we don’t need your advice. Please go away, you need to get a life, seriously!!!!! Your scary

Exactly!!!! Thats what i was saying, we wont know a thing until it goes. Maybe we shouldnt get too worked up over somethings we hear. It may all be lies, no one but a few know the truth for sure ....

I agree.........Didnt the Royal Family come out and say there would not be an RV two days before it did RV in Kuwait??!!! I also thought Adam said something about Kuwait having an auciton the day it RVed also.

what website does "Eagle has landed" come from? Is he one of Okies boys?

You arent talking about me are you? My feelings arent hurt. I cant stand okie, and all his bs, I was just asking because I do like Thomas Kincade. I would be disappointed

How do you know all this? Thomas Kinkade really? I thought Okie was old?!

Ashur: refusing political accordance means refusing Erbil agreement 04/09/2011 12:12:00 Baghdad (NINA) – The Iraqiya Slate stressed any violation for the Erbil agreement, which the government was formed as a result of it, is an announcement of refusing the agreement. The IS advisor, Hani Ashur, told NINA “not committing to Erbil agreement means announcing non commitment to national partnership a matter that would push the country into a new crisis.” As for the statements aired by the State of Law Coalition in which it stressed that the political accordance does not replace the constitution, Ashur confirmed that the accordance does not replace the constitution, but, the Iraqi constitution does not forbid the accordance to get out of crises, therefore, the IS thinks that holding on to the constitution and guarantee its continuation comes from commitment to it and never neglect it. /End/ http://www.ninanews.com/English/News_Details.asp?ar95_VQ=FHMGKL

Changing of Iraq’s currency represents largest corruption process in country’s history, official says 9/4/2011 10:04 AM BAGHDAD / Aswat al-Iraq: The Economic Advisor of Iraq’s Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, has described the plan of the Central Bank of Iraq (CBI) to change the Iraqi currency as “the worst corruption and money-laundering process in the history of Iraq.” “The CBI must understand that it is playing with fire and undermining the course of the consumers, producers and the economic changes in the country,” Abdul-Hussein al-Anbaky told Aswat al-Iraq news agency on Sunday, adding that the said step was taking place “at a time when the Iraqi economy was suffering from instability and chaos.” Anbaky’s statement was issued after one day had passed on an announcement by the Central Bank of Iraq of its intention to cancel the zeros from the Iraqi currency and to change it, in order to ease out the current inflation, and to encourage citizens to use their own currency, instead of depending on the US dollar. “The changing of the currency shall be the greatest corruption process in the history of Iraq, because the currency counterfeiting Mafias are ready to change the counterfeited currency with the new currency,” Anbaky said, adding that “the money-laundering merchants would come with trillions of dinars to change them.” Anbaky, at his position as the government’s economic advisor, had called on the Economic Committee of the Council of Ministers “not to respond to the draft-law for changing the Iraqi currency, raised by the CBI to the Council for ratification.” SKH (RT) http://en.aswataliraq.info/Default1.aspx?page=article_page&id=144626&l=1

Bondlady- Is that the wrong link? It goes to something completly different then what you quoted?? This link talks about "Government adviser calls for private banks to merge to provide large amounts of capital" Am I the only one this happened to?