Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BJinMontreal

  1. Yeah - look at the creepy Chucky Shumer guy - if he ain't the epitome of a pedophile ... I'm not sure who else would be.
  2. Holy FAKE NEWS Ivanka .... " She also said her father is “incredibly optimistic” following the congressional testimony, in which Comey claimed Trump had directed him to shut down an investigation into a former senior White House official, and lied to smear Comey after he was fired. " Excuse me? Didn't anybody at the guardian watch the testimony? At NO point during his testimony did Comey say he was directed to shut down the investigation - he was asked if he had been directed to shut it down, and Comey said "NO" If you try to find the C-Span video which references this though - the algorithms are all skewed into the Fake Stream Media's written lies about him saying it without showing the video which proves otherwise.
  3. Someone mention dropping a puck ... Or should I say ... Dropping a right ... .
  4. Once again - the Lame-Stream Media wants to control the narrative. The lady is being charged with issuing death threats. (As she should be!!) NOT because she's a conspiracy theorist - which is a person's right to question the facts (or lack thereof). Sandy Hoodwinked: Sandy Hook 3rd Anniversary – 33 Unanswered Questions Sandy Hook 3rd Anniversary: this list of 33 unanswered questions indicates Sandy Hook was a false flag op, most likely a false flag hoax, where no one died. As the Sandy Hook 3rd anniversary rolls around this December 14th, 2015, it is well worth remembering what a strange, unique, manipulative and horrific event occurred on December 14th, 2012. When I say horrific, I am not referring to what you may think was the horrific aspect of the event: the gunning down of 20 innocent children and 6 innocent adults. That is unquestionably horrific, but to date there has hardly been enough evidence to prove beyond all doubt that actual people were gunned down. Sandy Hook has become colloquially known as the Sandy Hook Hoax or Sandy Hoax, the first false flag in recent history to be exposed as an entirely fabricated event, replete with a fake setting (a fake school) and fake victims. It marks the first in a series of false flag hoaxes where fake victims and fake victims’ families (crisis actors) have been used. Since the majority of people still cannot fathom that Sandy Hook was a staged event, the template of using crisis actors has been used again and again (e.g. at the Boston Marathon). Now that we are passing the Sandy Hook 3rd anniversary, it’s time to turn back the clock and re-examine some unanswered questions pertaining to the event. By the way, if you think Sandy Hook no longer matters, ask yourself why Amazon (on behalf of the US Government) felt so scared it had to engage in censorship by trying to ban Jim Fetzer’s book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook (available for free here). Sandy Hook is still very relevant, because it was a scam of massive proportions. Take a look how many false flag mass shootings are still being carried out monthly and even weekly (e.g. Paris, San Bernardino) to terrorize the public, push gun control and achieve other political and geopolitical aims. Sandy Hook: 33 Unanswered Questions There are still some who cannot bring themselves to believe that criminal elements within the US Government could pull off a false flag hoax like this. Yet, it must be remembered that in this day and age it is all too easy to fake photographic and video evidence. Photoshop and other software programs allow the user to construct any kind of photo they want. If you want to know some of the truth about what really happened at Sandy Hook, 2 of the best documentaries (out of many) that expose the absurdity of the official narrative and provide alternative theories are We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook (various independent media analysts) and Unraveling Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4 and 5 Dimensions (Sofia Smallstorm). Here is a list of 33 unanswered questions about Sandy Hook: Google caught evidence of foreknowledge: this United Way charity website page was launched on Dec. 11th, 2012, a full 3 days before the mass shooting at Sandy Hook actually occurred! Sandy Hook: Foreknowledge and Preparation 1. Why was a FaceBook webpage for the alleged dead teacher Victoria Soto of Sandy Hook Elementary School posted before the event occurred? 2. Why was the United Way charity webpage for Sandy Hook posted before the event occurred? 3. How did the Arlington Red Devils website post the book on Talking With Children/Students About the Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting on 12/10/2012 (which was contained in the page url), 4 days before the event occurred? If this were some kind of technical glitch, then how did Google’s bots manage to record a cached page for 12/13/2012, still 1 day before the Sandy Hook shooting happened? 4. How did John Trentacosta (whose house was next to the Lanzas with a lot of activity occurring there at the time), who was CEO of the local Newton bank, start a victims’ fund on the same day so quickly after the event, after receiving in his words “countless requests” to do so? Is it just a coincidence that Trentacosta was also a member of a new council of the New York Federal Reserve, the Community Depository Institutions Advisory Council? 5. According to various researchers, why was the Newtown community seeded with new families in the years leading up to the event? 6. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why were 16 state troopers pre-positioned 45-60 minutes before the alleged shooting? Sandy Hook 3rd Anniversary: still many unanswered questions. Sandy Hook: Media Switching Stories 7. Why did the media keep switching its narrative as the story unfolded regarding the actual weapon used? Finally they settled upon a rifle. But how could a rifle kill 26 people in such quick succession? Sandy Hook: Inconsistencies with Witness Stories 8. Why did known actor and Sandy Hook witness Gene Rosen keep changing his story about how he encountered the 6 kids who allegedly came to him? In different interviews he variously claims he found the kids just after feeding his cats in the loft, just after going to breakfast and just after coming home from breakfast. His testimony completely conflicts with that of the school bus driver and the official report. There is also video of him near the fire house walking around slowly, plus a video of him rehearsing his lines with the cameraman … Sandy Hook: where on earth were all the 600+ children that day? Sandy Hook: Lack Of Evidence 9. How was a skinny 19-year-old boy with no military training capable of killing 26 people clean while injuring none? (Trained military veterans have claimed it was highly unlikely or even impossible for someone with the weight of Adam Lanza to execute that many people in so short a time.) 10. Why was there no evidence of blood? A total of 26 fatalities (children and adult) would produce at least at a conservative estimate 20 gallons (75 liters) of blood. Thus would require a concerted blood cleanup (blood is considered a biohazard in this type of situation), yet when Sofia Smallstorm asked who did the cleanup, all the departments were ignorant of it and even claimed that no one did the cleanup. 11. Where are the alleged 600+ children of Sandy Hook Elementary School? Why is there absolutely no photo or video evidence of any dead bodies? Why did coroner and chief medical examiner Wayne Carver say the following? “Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We have, uh, uh—it’s easier on the families when you do that. Un, there is, uh, a time and place for the up close and personal in the grieving process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be best to do it this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a situation depending on the photographer, and I have very good photographers. Uh, but uh—” 12. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why do the records show no social security numbers for the dead students? 13. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why do the records show no report of actual shots fired? 14. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why does the Sandy Hook shooting crime not exist on the FBI 2012 crime report? 15. According to Wolfgang Halbig, why does the tax accessor’s website shows the victims’ families got free houses on Christmas day when all Government offices are closed? This video shows many Sandy Hook “victim’s” families having their mortgages magically paid off on 12/25/2009! 16. Why were all the ambulances parked at the fire house away from the crime scene (except one on Dickinson Dr. which was also too far removed to be helpful)? Why were so few EMTs (Emergency Medical Technicians) allowed in the school? The iconic image of Sandy Hook – the evacuation – shows numerous signs of fakery, from Photoshop doctoring to EXIF data. Sandy Hook: Faked Photos and Evidence of a Drill 17. Why does the iconic image of the teacher leading kids out of school contain evidence of Photoshop doctoring and fakery? 18. Why does the Sandy Hook Timeline of Evacuation not match the video evidence from the trooper’s car stationed at the Sandy Hook Elementary School car park? 19. Why was there a big electronic sign erected at the entrance to the Sandy Hook Elementary school stating “EVERYONE MUST CHECK IN” if the event were real and not a drill? 20. Why was there an active shooter drill at around the same place and the same time as the Sandy Hook event? Every recent false flag since at least 9/11 has had this element. 21. Why are people walking around the Sandy Hook fire house in circles like a movie set? Why was there such a lack of urgency in the emergency personnel who were responding for many hours after 10am when people were still unaccounted for (e.g. nurse Sally Cox who claims she hid in a closet for 4 hours until 1:15pm)? Sandy Hook: If this were a real mass shooting and not a drill, why must everyone check in? Sandy Hook: Coverup 22. If Sandy Hook Elementary School was a legitimate and operational school at the time of the event, why is there evidence that the school shut in 2009 due to asbestos, was reinspected in 2011, and was flooded again with Hurricanes Irene and Sandy? We know FEMA and the US Federal Government supplied money to Newtown to revitalize it. Why does the local business Apex Glass claim they were using the school premises for their glass business (apologies but the interview revealing this information has been taken down by YouTube [])? 23. Why were the entire school grounds of what we were told was “Sandy Hook Elementary School” demolished and rebuilt? Does this remind you of how the metal scraps from 9/11 were immediately shipped off to China before they could be examined for evidence? 24. Why did Newtown Town Clerk Debbie Aurelia and Connecticut State Attorney Kevin Kane refuse to release the death certificates and the names of the “victims”? Why did Connecticut officials conspire to pass an unprecedented bill banning FOIA requests and access to death certificates and other information, normally part of the public record as a matter of course for centuries? Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy signed the bill on June 5th, 2013. 25. Why were there so many black and silver (Government-type) cars around the school and fire house in place before the event? 26. According to Sofia Smallstorm, why were the exact number (26) of Christmas trees for the memorial already sitting outside the fire house before the event occurred? 27. Why do so many of the victims’ family members appear to be acting, smirking, giggling, snickering and outright laughing after the event, such as Robbie Parker? Even Sandy Hook is infected with the ubiquitous one eye Illuminati-Masonic symbolism. Just a coincidence? Sandy Hook: Strange Comments by Officials 28. How does one explain the highly strange behavior of coroner Wayne Carver? Why did Carver say that “you can control a situation depending on your photographer, and I have very good photographers”? Why did Carver say that “I hope the people of Newtown don’t have it crash on their heads later”? 29. Why did Lieutenant Paul Vance threaten to prosecute as a crime anyone who reported information that contradicted the official narrative? 30. Why did the Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy say that “The Lieutenant Governor and I have been spoken to in an attempt that we might be prepared for something like this playing itself out in our state”? Sandy Hook: Aftermath 31. Why did no one sue the school or the estate of Nancy Lanza? 32. How is it that no parent wanted to see the dead bodies of their children in the school? 33. Why were all the funerals conducted with closed caskets? Conclusion: Sandy Hook – The Template for the False Flag Hoax Sandy Hook smells rotten, and just as 9/11 was a template and justification for future transgressions against liberty, so too was Sandy Hook to become the template for the false flag hoax. Let us always remember what happened and continue to investigate it, so that future false flag events, and false flag hoax events, can be quickly spotted. ***** Want the latest commentary and analysis on Conspiracy, Natural Health, Sovereignty, Consciousness and more? Sign up for free blog updates! Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative news / independent media site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at, writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the global conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance. Sources: * * * * * * * * * *
  5. With all due respect to gregp - his story WAS NOT a whacked out cash-in story - he was relating an event that happened to an acquaintance of his. IF you read the whole thread instead of jumping to a conclusion you'd have found out that his friend and others were deceived into handing over their dinar on the promise of a higher rate. Sadly, they fell for the ruse - hopefully others will learn from that mistake and hold their dinar until an RI or RV has been officially announced and 'real' banks are cashing in dinars for dollars.
  6. I didn't neg you - but the issue seems to be - Snowden should have used the whistleblower program because he knew (and had proof) that the deep state was spying on Americans despite not having the authority to do so!! He was trying to wake up the American people to the inherent corruption within the three-letter agencies and the threats to their freedoms and liberty.
  7. Not sure who begged Karsten's post - as it speaks to the real problem in US politics ... but I fixed it
  8. I hear ya Snow - the Comey testimony going on right now is proof in point!!! Everyone is using phoney reports and fake news as cover for continuing the lies that the Russians did hacked the election and colluded with Trump to defeat Hitlery!!! NOT one question concerning Hitlery's email scandal and why he gave her a pass!!!
  9. ummm ... NOT new ... and NOT this weekend ...
  10. Top intel chief shoots down Washington Post scoop Coats contradicts report Trump pressured him on Russia investigation Published: 52 mins ago Garth Kant About | Email | Archive Garth Kant is WND Washington news editor. Previously, he spent five years writing, copy-editing and producing at "CNN Headline News," three years writing, copy-editing and training writers at MSNBC, and also served several local TV newsrooms as producer, executive producer and assistant news director. His most recent book is "Capitol Crime: Washington's cover-up of the Killing of Miriam Carey." He also is the author of the McGraw-Hill textbook, "How to Write Television News." Follow Subscribe to feed WASHINGTON – The nation’s top intelligence official essentially shot down a bombshell report that President Trump tried to interfere in the FBI’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and possible collusion by his associates with Moscow. Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats testified before the Senate Intelligence committee on Wednesday morning that, “In my time of service, which is interacting with the President of the United States or anybody in his administration, I have never been pressured, I’ve never felt pressure to intervene or interfere in any way with shaping intelligence in a political way or in relationship to an ongoing investigation.” Coats initially declined to make any comment at all on the matter, stating, “I do not feel it is appropriate for me in a public session to breach confidential conversations between the president and myself in a public session,” and, “I don’t think this is the appropriate venue to do this in.” However, under persisting grilling by the committee’s top Democrat, Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va, Coats then issued what appeared to be a blanket denial of a Washington Post report that Trump had tried to get him to interfere in the FBI’s Russia probe. Coats even indicated he did not find the Post always credible. When Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called the report detailed and disturbing, if true, Coats replied, with a smile, that he had been in Washington long enough not to take everything the paper reports “at face value.” On Tuesday, the Post claimed that in a one-on-one meeting with Coats on March 22, Trump “asked him if he could intervene with then-FBI Director James B. Comey to get the bureau to back off its focus on former national security adviser Michael Flynn in its Russia probe.” Basing its story on anonymous “officials,” the Post reported, “The events involving Coats show the president went further than just asking intelligence officials to deny publicly the existence of any evidence showing collusion during the 2016 election.” Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts! But Coats appeared to flatly contradict that with his blanket statement that he never felt pressured to interfere or intervene in any investigation by the president or anyone in his administration. Warner got an even more forceful denial from National Security Agency Director Michael Rogers, who also initially declined to comment, saying, “I’m not going to discuss the specifics of any conversations with the president of the United States.” But Rogers seemed visibly irritated when Warner continued to press him on the subject, finally stating with a flash of apparent anger, “In the three plus years that I have been the director of the National Security Agency, to the best of my recollection, I have never been directed to do anything I believe to be illegal, immoral, unethical or inappropriate.” He added, “And to the best of my recollection, during that same period of service, I do not recall feeling ever pressured to do so.” After repeatedly trying to get Coats to confirm the Post story, even after he had apparently flatly contradicted it, a frustrated Warner gave up, commenting, “At some point, these facts have to come out.” He was, no doubt, expressing hope he will get a different answer from former FBI Director James Comey, who is scheduled to testify before the committee on Thursday. But Warner may be in for more frustration. ABC News reported late Tuesday evening that there will be much in Comey’s testimony “that will make the White House uncomfortable, but he will stop short of saying the president interfered with the agency’s probe into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.” ABC said “a source familiar with the former FBI director’s thinking,” revealed that Comey “has told associates he will not accuse the president of obstructing justice.” The New York Times has reported that on Feb. 14, the day after firing his national security director, Trump told Comey, “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go.” But the Times reporting was based on a memo of the meeting Comey supposedly drafted, a memo the Times did not see, but said was described to reporters by two anonymous sources. Click here for reuse options! Copyright 2017 WND
  11. by Jerome Corsi WASHINGTON, D.C. – FBI Director James Comey is a Clinton-fixer with a long history of running interference within the Department of Justice to make sure the Clintons are never prosecuted – a loyalty that the Clintons have repaid in corporate board appointments that have earned Comey millions of dollars. Early encounters: Whitewater and Marc Rich Comey’s involvement protecting Hillarious goes back to the mid-1990s and Whitewater, when Comey served as a special counsel to the Senate Whitewater Committee. We now know from the 246 pages of previously undisclosed internal memos released by Judicial Watch from Ken Starr’s Office of Independent Council investigation in 1998 that DOJ prosecutors had evidence that Hillarious Clinton and her associate Webb Hubbell at the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas, were guilty of criminal fraud in the Whitewater affair. From 1987 to 1993, Comey, working in the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York, served as the DOJ prosecutor who oversaw the prosecution of Marc Rich, the billionaire oil trader convicted of tax fraud and trading with Iran during the embassy hostage crisis. But in 2001, when Bill Clinton decided on his last day in office to pardon Marc Rich, Comey oversaw the criminal investigation, but decided there was no wrongdoing on Bill Clinton’s part, “despite public outcry over the evidence that Rich’s ex-wife had donated to Hillarious Clinton’s Senate campaign.” The Sandy Berger case Arguably, in 2004, Comey, then serving as a deputy attorney general in the Justice Department, limited the criminal investigation of Sandy Berger so as to protect anyone in the former Clinton administration who may have coordinated with Berger in his removal and destruction of classified records from the National Archives. The documents Berger purloined from the Archives in his socks are believed to have contained incriminating evidence linking the Clinton administration to the terrorist build-up in the United States that culminated in the 9/11 terrorist attack. On April 1, 2005, Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of intentionally removing documents from the National Archives and destroying some of them, for which he was fined $50,000, sentenced to 100 hours of community service and probation for two years, with his national security license stripped for two years. Berger’s email correspondence with Hillarious Clinton found stored on her private email server made clear that Berger, a convicted thief of classified documents who had been advising Clinton while she served as Secretary of State, had access to emails containing classified information. For example, in an email dated Sept. 22, 2009, Berger advised Secretary Clinton advised her how she could leverage information to make Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu more cooperative in discussions with the Obama administration over a settlement freeze. Law firm ties together Berger, Loretta Lynch, and Cheryl Mills Curiously, Sandy Berger, Loretta Lynch, and Cheryl Mills all worked as partners in the Washington law firm Hogan & Hartson – the law firm that prepared tax returns for the Clintons, did patent work for a software firm that played a role with Secretary Clinton’s private email server, and was one of the biggest contributors in the legal industry to Hillarious Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign. Berger worked as a partner in the Washington law firm Hogan and Hartson from 1973 to 1977, before taking a position as the deputy director of policy planning at the State Department in the Carter administration. When Carter lost his re-election bid, Berger returned to Hogan and Hartson, where he worked until he took leave in 1988 to act as foreign policy advisor in Gov. Michael Dukakis’ presidential campaign. When Dukakis was defeated, Berger returned to Hogan and Hartson until he became foreign policy advisor for Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign in 1992. On March 28, WND reported Lynch was a litigation partner for eight years working in the Washington office of Hogan & Hartson from March 2002 through April 2020. Cheryl Mills also worked at Hogan & Hartson, for two years, starting in 1990, before she joined then President-elect Bill Clinton’s transition team, on her way to securing a position as White House deputy counsel in the Clinton administration. According to documents Hillarious Clinton’s first presidential campaign made public in 2008, Hogan & Hartson’s New York-based partner Howard Topaz was the tax lawyer who filed income tax returns for Bill and Hillarious Clinton beginning in 2004. In addition, Hogan & Hartson in Virginia filed a patent trademark request on May 19, 2004, for Denver-based MX Logic Inc., the computer software firm that developed the email encryption system used to manage Clinton’s private email server beginning in July 2013. A tech expert has observed that employees of MX Logic could have had access to all the emails that went through her account. In 1999, President Bill Clinton nominated Lynch for the first of her two terms as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, a position she held until she joined Hogan & Hartson in March 2002 to become a partner in the firm’s Litigation Practice Group. She left Hogan and Hartson in 2010, after being nominated by President Obama for her second term U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, a position she held until President Obama nominated her to serve in her current position as Attorney General. A report published April 8, 2008, by The American Lawyer noted Hogan & Hartson were among Hillarious Clinton’s biggest financial supporters in the legal industry during her first presidential campaign. “Firm lawyers and staff have donated nearly $123,400 to her campaign so far, according to campaign contribution data from the Center for Responsive Politics,” Nate Raymond observed in The American Lawyer article. “Christine Varney, a partner in Hogan’s Washington, D.C., office, served as chief counsel to the Clinton-Gore Campaign in 1992.” While there is no evidence that Lynch played a direct role either in the tax work done by the firm for the Clintons or in linking Hillarious’s private email server to MX Logic, the ethics of the legal profession hold all partners jointly liable for the action of other partners in the business. “If Hogan and Hartson previously represented the Clintons on tax matters, it is incumbent upon U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch to [disclose] what, if any, role she had in such tax matters,” said Tom Fitton, president of Washington-based Judicial Watch. HSBC another common link between Lynch and Comey Crossing paths with Loretta Lynch in their various terms as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Loretta Lynch and James Comer again crossed paths with HSBC bank that curiously managed to avoid criminal charges in a massive money-laundering scandal for which the bank paid a $1.9 billion fine. When Lynch’s nomination as attorney general was considered by the Senate one year ago, as WND reported, the Senate Judiciary Committee examined her role in the Obama administration’s decision not to prosecute the banking giant HSBC for laundering funds for Mexican drug cartels and Middle Eastern terrorists. When I was working as Senior Staff Reporter for WND, I was the first to report, in a series of articles beginning in 2012, money-laundering charges brought by John Cruz, a former HSBC vice president and relationship manager, based on his more than 1,000 pages of evidence and secret audio recordings. The staff of the Senate Judiciary Committee focused on Cruz’s allegations that Lynch, acting then in her capacity as the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, engaged in a Department of Justice cover-up. Obama’s attorney general nominee allowed HSBC in December 2011 to enter into a “deferred prosecution” settlement in which the bank agreed to pay a $1.9 billion fine and admit “willful criminal conduct” in exchange for dropping criminal investigations and prosecutions of HSBC directors or employees. Cruz called the $1.92 billion fine the U.S. government imposed on HSBC “a joke” and filed a $10 million lawsuit for “retaliation and wrongful termination.” From 2002 to 2003, Comey held position of U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the same position held by Lynch. On March 4, 2013, Comey joined the HSBC board of directors, agreeing to serve as an independent non-executive director and a member of the bank’s Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee, positions he held until he resigned on Aug. 3, 2013, to become head of the FBI. Comey, Fitzgerald, and Valerie Plame After Attorney General Ashcroft recused himself in the Valerie Plame affair, Comer appointed special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald, who ended up convicting “Scooter” Liddy, a top aide to then Vice President Cheney, of perjury and obstruction of justice criminal charges, vindicating Plame and her former ambassador husband, Joe Wilson – both partisan supporters of Bill and Hillarious Clinton. Comey appointed Patrick J. Fitzgerald, a U.S. Attorney in Chicago, to act as special counsel in conducting the inquiry into what became called “Plamegate.” At the time Comey made the appointment, Fitzgerald was already godfather to one of Comey’s children. On April 13, 2015, co-authoring a USA Today op-ed piece, Valerie Plame Wilson and her husband, retired ambassador Joseph Wilson, made public their support for Hillarious Clinton’s 2016 presidential Clinton, openly acknowledging their political closeness to both Hillarious and Bill Clinton. The first two paragraphs of the editorial read as follows: We have known Hillarious Clinton both professionally and personally for close to 20 years, dating back to before President Bill Clinton’s first trip to Africa in 1998 — a trip that they both acknowledge changed their lives, and gave considerable meaning to their post-White House years and to the activities of the Clinton Foundation. Joe, serving as the National Security Council Senior Director for African Affairs, was instrumental in arranging that historic visit. Our history became entwined with Hillarious further after Valerie’s identity as a CIA officer was deliberately exposed. That criminal act was taken in retribution for Joe’s article in the New York Times in which he explained he had discovered no basis for the Bush administration’s justification for the Iraq War that Saddam Hussein was seeking yellowcake uranium to develop a nuclear weapon. On Jan. 11, Chuck Ross in the Daily Caller reported that Hillarious Clinton emails made public made clear that one of her “most frequent favor-seekers when she was secretary of state was former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, a longtime Clinton friend, an endorser of Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, and an Africa expert with deep business ties on the continent.” Ross noted that Wilson emailed Clinton on Dec. 22, 2009, seeking help for Symbion Power, an American engineering contractor for whom Wilson consulted, in the company’s bid to pursue a U.S. Agency of International Development, USAID, contract for work in Afghanistan. In the case of the Afghanistan project, Ross noted, Clinton vouched for Wilson and Symbion as she forwarded the request to Jack Lew, who served then as deputy secretary of state for management and resources. Ross further reported Wilson’s request might also have been discussed with President Obama, as one email indicates. In 2005, Fitzgerald prosecuted Lewis “Scooter” Libby, a prominent advisor to then Vice President **** Cheney, in the Valerie Plame investigation, charging him with two counts of perjury, two counts of making false statements to federal prosecutors, and one count of obstruction of justice. On March 6, 2007, Libby was convicted of four of the five counts and on June 5, 2007, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton to 2½ years in federal prison. On April 6, 2015, the Wall Street Journal reported the publication of New York Times reporter Judith Miller’s memoir, “The Story: A Reporter’s Journey,” exposed “unscrupulous conduct” by Special Counsel Fitzgerald in the 2007 trial of Libby. WSJ reporter Peter Berkowitz noted that Miller “writes that Mr. Fitzgerald induced her to give what she now realizes was false testimony. By withholding critical information and manipulating her memory as he prepared her to testify, Ms. Miller relates, Mr. Fitzgerald ‘steered’ her ‘in the wrong direction.’” Lockheed Board and Clinton Foundation pay-to-play Comey served as general counsel and senior vice president for Lockheed Martin from 2005 – 2010, for which he earned $6 million. In 2010, Lockheed Martin joined the Clinton Global Initiative and won 17 contracts from the State Department that at the time was headed by Secretary of State Hillarious Clinton.
  12. That guy has been saying gold is going to over $ 10,000 an ounce for as long as I can remember ... Hes like the dinar gurus - one day he may be right!! But I've still got a small amount of gold and silver and am always on the lookout for more ...
  13. You seem to have a very selective viewpoint as long as it fits your anti-Trump rhetoric. I wasn't complaining - just pointing out how your idiot liberals have destroyed the American values to the point where one needs permission from George Soros or Hitlery or Media Matters to have a voice!!! My point was you're not allowed to protest in america, unless you're the left who tend to be very nazi-ish in their ways!!! Since when I have said anything remotely in favour of BLM??
  14. There are those CNN unnamed US officials again ... It would be nice to know which officials they "made up" ... Just like this protest ...
  15. You sure about that? I'm not advocating for the KKK - just saying your liberal leaning media and brain-dead politicians seem to think they're the only ones allowed to protest and those usually turn violent!!!! Kind of the same mentality, don'tcha think!!!
  16. WOW - the Deep State is going all-out to push this Russian bullshyte - even going so far as to keep making stuff up!! Remember the NSA / CIA has the ability to hack systems and make it look like anyone they want did it ... I'll call phoney baloney on this one!!!
  17. Ha ha ha - Awesome Bigwave ... I know up here in Canada any scientist on the government payroll who refuted Harper's (and therefore the globalists's) opinion on global cooling er ... warming ... ummm ... what are we calling it now? ... was given the boot from their department ...
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.