adlon Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Just heard on news (KFI - Los Angeles) that Iraq is buying 18 F-16 fighter jets from US. Doesn't conflict with Chapt 7 sanctions? If not, explain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kandi77 Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 I think i heard, maybe from Adam, I can't remember, that they could "buy" them but not "have or use" them yet. But they need to be ready when they can. Hopefully that is soon!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markinsa Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Just heard on news (KFI - Los Angeles) that Iraq is buying 18 F-16 fighter jets from US. Doesn't conflict with Chapt 7 sanctions? If not, explain. http://dinarvets.com/forums/index.php?/topic/85921-payments-for-f-16s-made-by-iraq/page__view__findpost__p__688470 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chumleyex Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Howz aboot you read the previous posts on this eh? Buddy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlintNPebbles Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Just heard on news (KFI - Los Angeles) that Iraq is buying 18 F-16 fighter jets from US. Doesn't conflict with Chapt 7 sanctions? If not, explain. This has been discussed before and I believe the general concensus is that A: as long as they are not arming them they are not in violation and/or B: that by the time they are delivered to Iraq the Chapter 7 sanctions should be lifted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chumleyex Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 http://dinarvets.com/forums/index.php?/topic/85921-payments-for-f-16s-made-by-iraq/page__view__findpost__p__688470 Jinx? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adlon Posted September 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 This has been discussed before and I believe the general concensus is that A: as long as they are not arming them they are not in violation and/or B: that by the time they are delivered to Iraq the Chapter 7 sanctions should be lifted. Unarmed F-16s or F-16s that are not capable of being armed are useless. Something is up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakedog Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Kool ,,, we will be fighting those in 10 years with our F-22s HISTORY ALLWAYS REPEAT ITSELF !!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren77th Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Unarmed F-16s or F-16s that are not capable of being armed are useless. Something is up. They have ordered them only not taken possession of them and they probably wont until CH 7 is lifted. I also liked the way were selling F16 talk about obsolete Kool ,,, we will be fighting those in 10 years with our F-22s HISTORY ALLWAYS REPEAT ITSELF !!!!!!! Talk about a real quick battle. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts