Funky Cold Medinar Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 * DDT Site Member Info: “Bill of Attainder” (No Dinar-Specific Tax Law Allowed) January 24th, 2011 11:12 pm · Posted in CASH-IN (Dinar Revaluation), CHATS & POSTS (Iraqi Dinar Info), MEMBERS (Dinar & Iraq Insight), WEALTH (Currency Revaluation) Howdy, Because of my job in the investment industry, I’m not allowed to talk about investing etc. over chat rooms etc., due to compliance reasons. I read, but must remain silent/invisible. What I did want to say is, if anyone is still “worrying” about Congress enacting tax legislation targeted at Dinar investors, no, they can’t do that, and yes, a 2nd year law student could shoot it down. As you may know (but most of your guest/listeners may not), the formal reason is that it would be considered a “Bill of Attainder.” Obviously, that is a piece of legislation designed to target and punish (ie. through unfair tax legislation) a specific group or individual and it is completely illegal, as is listed in Article 1 Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution. Anyway… “Bill of Attainder” is the formal name of it, so, if anyone asks, you can give it to them. Thanks for everything you do. Go Dinar! Just passing this on, I have heard a few people wondering about this. This isn't really an official atricle but I believe it to be true. Countless blessings and endless peace to ALL....GO RV! 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pt49 Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 (edited) As you may know (but most of your guest/listeners may not), the formal reason is that it would be considered a “Bill of Attainder.” Obviously, that is a piece of legislation designed to target and punish (ie. through unfair tax legislation) a specific group or individual and it is completely illegal, as is listed in Article 1 Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution. Anyway… “Bill of Attainder” is the formal name of it, so, if anyone asks, you can give it to them.Thanks for everything you do. Go Dinar! Just passing this on, I have heard a few people wondering about this. This isn't really an official atricle but I believe it to be true. Countless blessings and endless peace to ALL....GO RV! The US courts no longer recognise the Constitution, they only recognise statutes, as I understand. They are not constitutional courts, they are statutory courts, and as such only recognise statutory law. Edited January 25, 2011 by pt49 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desert Medic Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 Funky... do you ever sleep? oh, cool post, thanks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funky Cold Medinar Posted January 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 Funky... do you ever sleep? oh, cool post, thanks. Who can sleep when they are RV'amped up plenty of time for sleep after cash-in, lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booseman Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 That is a great post Funky. But you know our govt. they will create whatever suites them. If they do create a law that specifically states a special tax on Dinar investors I am sure they will exclude themselves. That in of itself is illegal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slaydadea Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 * DDT Site Member Info: “Bill of Attainder” (No Dinar-Specific Tax Law Allowed) January 24th, 2011 11:12 pm · Posted in CASH-IN (Dinar Revaluation), CHATS & POSTS (Iraqi Dinar Info), MEMBERS (Dinar & Iraq Insight), WEALTH (Currency Revaluation) Howdy, Because of my job in the investment industry, I’m not allowed to talk about investing etc. over chat rooms etc., due to compliance reasons. I read, but must remain silent/invisible. What I did want to say is, if anyone is still “worrying” about Congress enacting tax legislation targeted at Dinar investors, no, they can’t do that, and yes, a 2nd year law student could shoot it down. As you may know (but most of your guest/listeners may not), the formal reason is that it would be considered a “Bill of Attainder.” Obviously, that is a piece of legislation designed to target and punish (ie. through unfair tax legislation) a specific group or individual and it is completely illegal, as is listed in Article 1 Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution. Anyway… “Bill of Attainder” is the formal name of it, so, if anyone asks, you can give it to them. Thanks for everything you do. Go Dinar! Just passing this on, I have heard a few people wondering about this. This isn't really an official atricle but I believe it to be true. Countless blessings and endless peace to ALL....GO RV! Worthy post! Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimsdandy Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 The US courts no longer recognise the Constitution, they only recognise statutes, as I understand. They are not constitutional courts, they are statutory courts, and as such only recognise statutory law. I see they can't even recognise a fake Birth Certificate, but thats on another thread. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1risktaker Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 I see they can't even recognise a fake Birth Certificate, but thats on another thread. Amen to that...... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usndiver Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 Excellent information, thanks for sharing. One thing to remember is that the IRS can seize anything that it wants to. Once an asset is confiscated it's your burden to get it back, years of court battles and the subsequent legal fees will either make it not worth the fight or quickly eat away at the assets they seize. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sneakey Posted January 26, 2011 Report Share Posted January 26, 2011 Excellent information, thanks for sharing. One thing to remember is that the IRS can seize anything that it wants to. Once an asset is confiscated it's your burden to get it back, years of court battles and the subsequent legal fees will either make it not worth the fight or quickly eat away at the assets they seize. No doubt. There answer would be "legal shmeagle" "Have your lawyer call our 15 bored Piranas" Let us know how it goes for ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePhantomRider Posted January 26, 2011 Report Share Posted January 26, 2011 That's why my CPA is a former IRS Investigator. With his signature, the IRS avoids me like the plague...LOL Great article BTW. TPR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts