Allawi and Maliki's meeting ends with "predecessor" and in a shorter time

[sunshinelvr]

Allawi and Maliki's meeting ends with "predecessor" and in a shorter time

Author: MK Editor: NK | MF Tuesday, 29 حزيران 2010 16:24 GMT

Alsumaria News / Baghdad

An official at the Information Office in the list of Iraq, on Tuesday that the meeting between Chairman of the list by Iyad Allawi and the president of a coalition of law Nuri al-Maliki ended did not last long, and it was like its predecessor, with stated that the two sides agreed to continue their meetings and the involvement of all components in the formation of the government.

The official said in an interview with "Alsumaria News", "The President of the Iraqi List, Iyad Allawi discussed this evening during a meeting with president of a coalition of law Nuri al-Maliki at the menu in Baghdad the issue of forming the government and stressed that the government is a national partnership, without marginalization of one of the particular winners elections. "

The official, who asked not to be named "The meeting lasted about half an hour and was attended from the list, the Iraqi President Iyad Allawi, and two leading figures Rafie al-Issawi and Osama Nujaifi, while attended by a State law, all of Nuri al-Maliki, Hussein Shahristani, Ali al-Dabbagh and Khudair Khuzaie and Hasan al."

He pointed out that "The meeting was preceded by the protocol, Kallqa", indicating at the same time that "the conferees stressed the continuation of their meetings."

The meeting between the leader of the Iraqi List, Iyad Allawi, leader of coalition rule of law, Nuri al-Maliki took place at about the sixth quarter of the evening at the headquarters of the menu (in the street olive area Harthiya central Baghdad), according to the announcement of the "Alsumaria News" member of the Iraqi List, the victory of Alawi, It expected that the deal "to discuss common issues between the two lists and to accelerate the formation of a national government".

And was a member of the National Coalition for the Sadrists Habib Terminal has been reduced in an interview with "Alsumaria News", earlier in the day, the impact of any dialogue between the Iraqi List and a coalition of state law, the cohesion of the National Alliance, while stressing the need to involve all political blocs in a matter of choosing a candidate for the coalition prime minister.

Prior to the Sadr movement, WIN within the National Coalition, Sunday, played down the importance of the upcoming meeting between the President of the Iraqi List Iyad Allawi and the president of a coalition of law Nuri al-Maliki, as will not result in the formation of the government, since both parties insist on the prime ministership, and it is not known what If the Kurds would accept the post of chairman of the parliament and give up the presidency, according to the spokesman for the Salah al-Obeidi power.

The leader of a coalition of law Nouri al-Maliki and Iraq's Ayad Allawi, met in the twelfth month of June for the first time since the parliamentary elections in the seventh of last March, and the meeting lasted for 45 minutes, as he considered members of the coalitions are positive, said the timely statement by the prime minister that the parties agreed during the meeting the necessity to maintain the gains achieved in the country during the last period.

The attention to observers, most of the political groups is also claimed to assume the government apart from the election results and the number of seats, as do all sort of equal political weight through the imposition of impossible conditions or of Vito and red lines on the filter or block, which urged the candidate rule of law, Nuri al Maliki to wonder with amazement the rationale for the waiver has many seats for those who got a few of them.

The announcement comes on the meeting between the second-Maliki, Allawi, amid a political point to the imminent failure of the National Alliance (the coalition of law and national) in the selection of a candidate for the post of prime minister next week and expectations of the collapse of the coalition, as it comes after criticism of Maliki, in his final press conference in the second twenty-June current to the National Coalition on urged him to give up as he wondered surprising from "give to whom? who has the seats more for the one who has less than him?!", as redefined in this forum is of a proposed new U.S. side by the last few days the Assistant U.S. Secretary of State Jeffrey Feltman Iraqi Alliance and the rule of law to form a government and share power to end the crisis in the country.

The question being debated among the winners in the elections on the text of the constitutional entitlement Cluster winning the formation of the government, Iraqi constitution in accordance with Article 76 on the eligibility of the parliamentary majority of the formation of the government, while insisting coalition Iraqi (91 seats) that the text refers to the list of winning elections at the time of the rule of law is a coalition (89 seats) that the text means any farm that may arise as a result of a merger or alliance winning any of the blocks after the election.

http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&sl=ar&tl=en&u=http://www.alsumarianews.com/ar/1/8378/news-details-.html&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&usg=ALkJrhjSNOazCMJH29Ll2dVq8hqkQPkyEw

[pitboss]

This is amazing, a whole thiry minutes. When will these guys realize it's time to get their sh$t togther for the good of the Iraqi people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Edited June 29, 2010 by pitboss

[Trimark]

Talk about a short meeting. It probably went like this:

14 minutes of making nice-nice like most politicians do with hello's, greetings, serving of drinks, etc.

A 1 minute conversation of:

Allawi: "Give up."

Maliki: "No, you give up."

Allawi: "Not happening."

Maliki: "Not happening here either."

Then another 15 minutes of saying good-byes.

Sheesh.

[Doc31]

We expect nothing more from these guys ... 30 minutes ... peanut bladders do you think? ... Unbelievable

Thanks for the post

[k98nights]

Talk about a short meeting. It probably went like this:

14 minutes of making nice-nice like most politicians do with hello's, greetings, serving of drinks, etc.

A 1 minute conversation of:

Allawi: "Give up."

Maliki: "No, you give up."

Allawi: "Not happening."

Maliki: "Not happening here either."

Then another 15 minutes of saying good-byes.

Sheesh.

I believe you probably nailed it on the head. Looks like there's only two ways to end this... the UN & USA step in... or assassination.

[Teresa82]

IDIOTS!

[Squaredaway]

As in any war, the victor has always maintained a military government until it was ready to turn the country back to the people. That means, we, the United States and those allies with the courage to support us, who got rid of a totalitarian government in Iraq, should be leading the government before turning the country back to them. We're the insane ones for thinking that a nation of people who for generations have been under the thumbs of merciless, murdering warlords can suddenly break the mold and start behaving like civilized, ethical people without having a cattle prod guiding them in that direction.

In the meantime, our presence should be there to remind the vanquished people and their so-called leaders that we won't tolerate the same barbarism, political intrigues and lack of care for the people that is obviously still going on in Iraq. We lost a lot of solid, good kids there in order to help make the country an autonomous, free democracy. Now our leaders are allowing their "leaders" to behave like the warlords that we just eliminated. I can only foresee more internal killings being expanded as their way of gaining power. We've got to step back in and hold the adversaries back from each other and make the choices for them. We should then leave, only when there is a presence of ethical, loyal and dedicated Iraqi police there to pick up where our military leaves off.

As far as the RV is concerned, that should have happened several years ago. By now, Iraq would at least have been able to emerge from the stone age that they were and evidently still are in. The RV should be happening, now, to get Iraq in synch with the rest of the countries who are trying to maintain some monetary equilibrium with the rest of the world community.

Rumor as of today, Saturday, July 3, 2010, is that there is a large number of countries RV'ing their currency, and that Iraq is one of them. Let's hope that's a reality.

[krmayo]

This is amazing, a whole thiry minutes. When will these guys realize it's time to get their sh$t togther for the good of the Iraqi people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Maliki is stubborn in the extreme.

[Dryden01]

As in any war, the victor has always maintained a military government until it was ready to turn the country back to the people. T......................

You state a valid appraisal Squaredaway since America is invested with the lives of our military and our national resources from the treasury. Did we go to Iraq and get rid of one dictator only to enable another set of grafters in his place? It is difficult to imagine that President Bush, or for that matter LBJ, would allow this circus situation to continue. As we sit here, the bumbler BIden is mucking things up further, no doubt, in Baghdad. In the old days, the CIA would have "settled out of court; ala Joe Pesci in the movie Casino" and progress would be made. Today we have an effeminitized, politically correct agency that can't even give the enemy a good old fashioned waterboarding. They would rather continue to lose the precious lives of our men and women in the U.S. military than even dream of pushing along the despots.

Edited July 3, 2010 by Dryden01