Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Recommended Posts

August 26 2015

 

 

 

I've always believed that democracy was the best form of government because people can change it. And like a lot of us, I was taught that the American form of democracy was the model that should be imitated by nations across the planet. Especially ingenious was the system of "checks and balances." This arrangement means that no one branch of government can singularly decide a political course without the consent of the others.

 

This much-praised system was adopted to prevent the re-emergence of an autocracy. But checks and balances also worked to keep the practice of slavery alive up until the Civil War. And in the wake of abolition, when corporations became the dominant form of business organization, the same systems were used to exploit the labor force. Even as the country's wealth grew, the gap between rich and poor widened. It took more than half a century of effort and the devastation of the Great Depression before important reforms like a minimum wage, child labor protections, the 40-hour work-week and the right to organize became federal law.

 

Political scientists have begun to research the issues that arise around veto power in multiple branches of government. Studies have shown that the more capacity a democracy has for blocking changes, the more income inequality the nation is likely to have. Harvard historian Jill Lepore wrote about this phenomenon in a recent New Yorker piece. Drawing on the work of several scholars using different analytical tools, she says that income inequality is greater in the United States than any other democratic country in the developed world. In fact, we regularly hold the record for inequality across 40 countries on six continents.

 

This inequality ranking also correlates with the number of ways democracies block change. Lepore reviews the work of two scholars of comparative politics who studied 23 long-time democratic countries with developed economies. They counted the number of "veto players" or choke points in each form of democratic government. Most democracies have parliaments with one body (not two), and therefore only one house with veto power. A few countries have two veto points. Australia and Switzerland have three. Of those democracies with developed economies, only the United States has four. The scholars found a correlation between the size of the income inequality in a democracy and the number of choke points in the system. The more veto players a government has, the greater the income inequality gap.

 

To compound the problem, the American system not only contains the most veto players, it has the most malapportioned legislative body. Among the eight economically developed democracies in the world with an upper house, the U.S. Senate is the most unrepresentative. California, with almost 40 million residents, has two senators, as does Hawaii, with less than a million and a half. The Senate simply does not represent the population the way upper houses in other democratic countries do.

 

That distortion helped keep slavery going for decades after the British had outlawed both the trading and owning of human beings. It also means that any legislative attempt to change the rules of the economy that might narrow income inequality or stop human-caused climate change or do any other big job will require the four veto players to line up in agreement - including the one that represents dramatic population disparity. That's been rarely possible in our history.

 

To get all four lined up in this country usually takes a crisis, a strong grassroots movement and elected officials willing to push for change. Even then, there is no guarantee. This month marks the fiftieth anniversary of the signing of the Voting Rights Act. But even after it was renewed by a sizable majority in both the House and Senate, and then signed by the president, the Supreme Court voted 5 to 4 to eviscerate its key section. That's what happens when a system includes as many veto players as ours does.

 

Sad that our democracy is so cluttered by checks and balances that it stymies justice. From slavery to workers' rights to saving the planet, it has kept the blocks in place that hold us back from making changes, even when they are so obviously necessary. But it feels better to know what's required for change to occur than to live in a fog of constant frustration. Our situation is ominous, but it isn't hopeless.

 

Rev. Jim Conn is the founding minister of the Church in Ocean Park and served on the Santa Monica City Council and as that city's mayor. He helped found Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice, Los Angeles, and was its second chair, and was a founder of Santa Monica's renters' rights campaign.

Reprinted by kind permission of the author and Capital and Main.

 

 

veto520.jpg

 

 

http://www.peoplesworld.org/the-united-states-of-no/

  • Downvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO, this all speaks of socialism or communism. If you believe in that stuff and want to do away with our democracy or republic, vote for Sanders. He was a communist, then a socialist and then a democrat. 

 

When the spokesman for the democratic party was asked to explain the difference between a socialist and a democrat, she became flustered and couldn't answer. IMO, that was an answer. 

 

I agree the wealthy should pay more in taxes without the loopholes, and lower incomes should pay proportionately less. 

 

Trump is an anti-politician candidate for president, I think if you're as tired of all the political BS from Washington as I am and want some real "Change", vote for him and "dump all the incumbents". Might help for the next four years, and if it doesn't, fire whoever is not doing their job. 

 

I was a life-long democrat and voted for the party's candidate for O's first term. Was very unhappy and changed my affiliation to independent. Lots of scrutiny and sorrow made that necessary so I could live with myself.

 

Vote as you choose, but I hope you choose to vote.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

We need to return to a legitimate Constitution Republic where the power is at the local and state level. The Fed govt needs to be downsized, and simply function as to what they were originally intended for, protecting our borders, raising an army in wartime, not interfering with free market and the economy It was never meant to become the bloated life and money sucking entitlement factory catering to the the deluded masses. America was never meant to be a mob rule democracy. The Constitution was put in place to protect the little guy, not special interests.

  • Upvote 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

August 26 2015

 

 

 

I've always believed that democracy was the best form of government

 

 

There you go, in the first sentence this moron demonstrated he is totally IGNORANT of the how, what, and why of America, which then indicated every word written after that first sentence was just so much wasted time, or propaganda.

 

Reverend Conn, how flippin ironic.

 

America is not a democracy.

Never was, and as long as we can stop brain dead feckless zombies, it never will be.

 

America is a democratic republic.

That means we are supposed to have a representative presence in both houses.

The Senate was DESIGNED to only have 2 per state, ON PURPOSE!

That way, no matter how big the mob becomes in the big cities, they will not be able to drown out the less populated, BUT EQUALLY REPRESENTED AND JUST AS IMPORTANT lower populated rural states.

The Congress is represented by population. While they do have some authority, the Senate was given the higher authority in order to protect a fair and balanced vote.

While you obviously don't like it, America was formed TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL!!!!!!

 

if you want pure democracy, look up communism, that's total mob rules.

 

You can take this ignorant babble and shove it.

 

 

 

We need to return to a legitimate Constitution Republic where the power is at the local and state level. The Fed govt needs to be downsized, and simply function as to what they were originally intended for, protecting our borders, raising an army in wartime, not interfering with free market and the economy It was never meant to become the bloated life and money sucking entitlement factory catering to the the deluded masses. America was never meant to be a mob rule democracy. The Constitution was put in place to protect the little guy, not special interests.

 

Well said, and I agree.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.