yota691 Posted August 12, 2014 Report Share Posted August 12, 2014 Exxon American Refining: I will not buy crude Shikan Kurdish without agreement Baghdad and Erbil Author: Editor: hay reporter: arNumber of readings: 66 12/08/2014 12:26 Tomorrow's Press / Baghdad: Company announced ACCION Brodakedz of America, which is defined as the stated purchase Kurdish oil, on Tuesday, unwillingness to buy crude oil Shikan Kurdish government in Baghdad refuses to sell federal mechanism. A statement from the Exxon Brodakedz seen by "Tomorrow's Press," said that "the company will not buy raw disputed in favor of its refineries in New Jersey in Bosboro American." The company said in a statement on its official website that "in light of the dispute over the rights of sale of crude oil extracted from the Kurdish region in Iraq, the ACCION will not buy or accept delivery of any shipments of crude neither those are fully resolve the matter between the parties to the relationship." Iraq was a fad told American government refusing to sell crude Kurdish without the knowledge and consent of the center, in Erbil lawsuit filed in Texas courts to stop the shipment against Kurdish oil anchored at American ports since last June. Shaikan crude in what is known as a medium of heavy oils prices, which is not acceptable in the majority of the refineries working. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted August 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 Informed sources: oil tanker carrying 300 thousand barrels of oil Kurdish headed to Gibraltar 14:56 08/16/2014 According to informed sources, the Sabbath, that the oil tanker carrying 300 thousand barrels of crude oil extracted from the Kurdistan region headed to Gibraltar after failing to unload its cargo in the disputed oil refinery in New Jersey on the east coast of the United States. The sources added that "the tanker (Minerva Joey) heading towards Gibraltar means they may unload its cargo at any time in the Mediterranean, Europe, or to the east of the European continent," pointing out that "the tanker was anchored outside Bosboro in New Jersey and began to move eastward 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontlop Posted August 16, 2014 Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 Ya I heard its got another buyer in Croatia or some place like that I think they should light a fire under the Supreme Court justices arse on the oil sales Unless they are being told to wait so they can change some laws to allow some kind of deal A deal would be good if they have opposing audits of all the oil sales contracts and reciepts The Kurds audit Baghdad and Baghdad audit the Kurds To keep them honest But then we still have the old. Bribery crap to deal with I'm sure Maliki got a nice bribe to drop his law suit 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandfly Posted August 16, 2014 Report Share Posted August 16, 2014 THANKS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kinematik Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 Hehe, interesting U.S. court scraps order to seize Kurdish crude from tanker near Texas. The Kurdistan Regional Government can bring $100 million of crude ashore in Texas after a U.S. judge threw out a court order that would have required federal agents to seize and hold the cargo for the Iraqi Oil Ministry until a court there decided which government owns it 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontlop Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 HOUSTON (Reuters) - A U.S. court on Monday threw out an order to seize some 1 million barrels of disputed Iraqi Kurdish crude oil from a tanker near Texas, a move that could allow the cargo to be delivered and end a nearly month-long impasse. The United Kalavrvta tanker, carrying about $100 million worth of Kurdish crude, has been anchored in the Gulf of Mexico for weeks, as the Iraqi region of Kurdistan wages a legal battle over ownership with the central government of Iraq. At the request of Baghdad, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas in July ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to take control of the cargo, part of a broader strategy by Iraq to push back against Kurdish exports. But a few days later the court said it lacked jurisdiction to carry out the seizure as the tanker was about 60 miles offshore. That prompted the Kurds to file a request to vacate the order. "Kurdistan's motion to vacate is granted," U.S. District Judge Gray Miller said in his ruling. The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) has claimed the right to export oil under Iraq's constitution and said it plans to deliver the oil soon. Baghdad says all oil sales outside its control are illegal. The tanker is too large to enter the port of Galveston near Houston, and companies that provide offloading services to bring cargoes ashore have steered clear of the dispute. U.S. refiner LyondellBasell has said it had recently bought cargoes of Iraqi Kurdistan crude for its Houston refinery, but said it would halt future purchases and not accept any deliveries until the dispute was settled. The company did not explicitly say if it had agreed to buy the crude on the United Kalavrvta, and it is not clear if it might now accept delivery of the cargo. Reuters shiptracking data showed the tanker is still anchored in the Gulf of Mexico. The judge said Iraq could amend its complaint in the next 10 days, leaving the country's lawyers with an avenue to potentially keep pressing their case. The Kurds say control over their oil is crucial for their own dreams of independence and because Baghdad has responded weakly to Islamist militants who overran parts of the country in recent months. Washington has refused to intervene in commercial sales, saying the oil belongs to all Iraqis and supporting a unified Iraq, while warning companies about dealing directly with Kurdistan. Kurdish authorities meanwhile have continued to make new efforts to get their crude to market even though several vessels carrying their oil have been stuck in limbo. http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0GQ05620140826?irpc=932 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeepguy Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 (edited) hahaha exxon American ! we will not buy oil from tanker , { BUT OUR SISTER COMPANY --EXXON EXXON WILL BUY IT } you can bet if any oil company can make a big profit off other peoples oil shipment , they will be in the mix in a quick second .... Edited August 26, 2014 by jeepguy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 Oil and politics. And you thought religion was a taboo subject. LOL PRAY FOR REVIVAL EVERYDAY 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts