New Hampshire Legislature Reveals U S Federal Government is a Corporation Operating within their Own Fraudulent Constitution

[Peace]

New Hampshire Legislature Reveals U S Federal Government is a Corporation Operating within their Own Fraudulent Constitution

April 4, 2013I M Power1 CommentNews

New Hampshire Legislature Reveals U S Federal Government is a Corporation Operating with a Fraudulent Constitution -

“the Act of 1871, created a corporation in the District of Columbia called the United States of America. The act revoked prior legislation relative to the district’s municipal charter and, most egregiously, led to adoption of a fraudulent constitution in which the original Thirteenth Amendment was omitted.”

The current status of the New Hampshire House Bill 638

Update :  The Legislature voted to TABLE-- “Moth Ball” the  New Hampshire House Bill 638, on March 20, 2013 – and it was to Recognize the original 13th Amendment to the Constitution NH HB638 | 2013 | Regular Session. Even though the measure had a vote to Table it brings all of this information forward into a legislative body for all to see.

NH Legislature Page for HB638 – PermaLink

Status:

March 20 2013 – Laid on Table (Rep Vaillancourt): Motion Adopted Division Vote 275-64; House Journal 27, PG.890

Summary:

Recognizing the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Tracking Information www.legiscan.com/NH/bill/HB638

Tittle: Recognizing the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Sponsors: Rep Stella Tremblay Rep Alfred Baldasaro Rep Lars Christiansen

History:

Date of Chamber Action:

2013-03-20 House Laid on Table (Rep Vaillancourt): Motion Adopted Division Vote 275-64; House Journal 27, PG.890

2013-03-07 House Minority Committee Report: Ought to Pass; House Calendar 23 PG.597

2013-03-07 House Majority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate for Mar 20 (Vote 10-5; Part II, Regular Calendar); House Calendar 23 PG.597

2013-02-05 House Executive Session: 3/7/2013 10:00 Amendment Legislative Office Building 203

2013-02-05 House Public Hearing: 2/28/2013 10:00 Amendment Legislative Office Building 203

2013-01-03 House Introduced 1/3/2013 and Referred to State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs; House Journal 12, PG.204

New Hampshire House Bill 638

Bill Title: Recognizing the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Track Bill

Status: 2013-03-20 – Laid on Table (Rep Vaillancourt): Motion Adopted Division Vote 275-64; House Journal 27, PG.890

Download:  New_Hampshire-2013-HB638-Introduced.html

HB 638 – AS INTRODUCED

2013 SESSION

13-0796

09/01

 

HOUSE BILL 638

AN ACT recognizing the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

SPONSORS: Rep. Tremblay, Rock 4; Rep. Baldasaro, Rock 5; Rep. Christiansen, Hills 37

COMMITTEE: State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs

ANALYSIS

This bill recognizes the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.

Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]

Matter which is either (a) all new or ( repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.

13-0796

09/01

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Thirteen

AN ACT recognizing the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 Preamble and Statement of Intent. The general court hereby finds that:

I. In 1810, a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibited titles of nobility and which later became known as the original Thirteenth Amendment, was introduced, passed both houses of Congress, and was sent to the states for ratification. On December 9, 1812, shortly after ratification by Virginia, New Hampshire became the thirteenth state to ratify the amendment. The amendment was therefore ratified by the requisite number of states and became Article XIII of the United States Constitution.

II. During the War Between the States, otherwise known as the Civil War, the country was under martial law, and all executive orders made by President Lincoln were, in effect, law. After the war, laws made during that period were to be abated; yet, vestiges of martial law remained and presidents continued to write executive orders.

III. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, otherwise known as the Act of 1871, created a corporation in the District of Columbia called the United States of America. The act revoked prior legislation relative to the district’s municipal charter and, most egregiously, led to adoption of a fraudulent constitution in which the original Thirteenth Amendment was omitted.

IV. Today, what appears to the public as the United States Constitution is not the complete document, as it was never lawfully amended to remove the Thirteenth Amendment. Instead, the document presented as the United States Constitution is merely a mission statement for the corporation unlawfully established in the Act of 1871.

V. The purpose of this act is to recognize that the original Thirteenth Amendment, which prohibits titles of nobility, is properly included in the United States Constitution and is the law of the land. The act is also intended to end the infiltration of the Bar Association and the judicial branch into the executive and legislative branches of government and the unlawful usurpation of the people’s right, guaranteed by the New Hampshire constitution, to elect county attorneys who are not members of the bar. This unlawful usurpation gives the judicial branch control over all government and the people in the grand juries. As long as the original Thirteenth Amendment is concealed from the people, there shall never be justice or a legitimate constitutional form of government.

2 New Chapter; Thirteenth Amendment. Amend RSA by inserting after chapter 1-A the following new chapter:

CHAPTER 1-B

ORIGINAL THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT

1-B:1 Original Thirteenth Amendment. The following shall be recognized as the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution:

Article XIII

If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any Emperor, King, Prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them or either of them.

3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.

Source of article http://legiscan.com/NH/text/

This is what is going to bring us all together, most of us will unite when this catches on.

[leanonme]

I have heard of this before but first time it has been brought out into the light to see this corupt government wanting to take control and enslave us all. Nice find!

[Peace]

"UNITED STATES" All Caps is a corporation. Read Organic Act of 1871 to see how the Corporation of the "UNITED STATES" has allowed its "departments are allowed to have seals.

We are not operating under our ""de jure" Constitution for the united states for America!!!!

We stand united to tear down these corporations...DHS, TSA, FBI, IRS, ect...

NEWSFLASH

As of December 25, 2012 the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) has LAWFULLY Foreclosed on all Corporations and Banks!

This applies to every country, you have all been touched by this.

So when you understand what has happened a weight will be lifted and the veil removed, you will know what you have to do.

[puckster_guy]

The sooner the better

[Peace]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/133814371/IRS-Certificate-of-Incorporation

IRS Certificate of Incorporation

[dinar_stud]

Dear Friends,

 

For an entity to become a corporation under federal law,

there must be an Act of Congress creating that corporation.

 

There are no Acts of Congress expressly incorporating

either the "United States" or the "United States of America".

 

In 1871 Congress did expressly incorporate the District

of Columbia, but D.C. and the "United States" are not

one and the same.  In that Act of 1871, Congress also

expressly extended the U.S. Constitution into D.C.:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/intentm3.filed.htm#1871

 

In United States v. Cooper Corporation, 312 U.S. 600 (1941),

the Supreme Court wrote:

 

http://laws.findlaw.com/us/312/600.html

 

"We may say in passing that the argument that the

United States may be treated as a corporation

organized under its own laws, that is, under the

Constitution as the fundamental law, seems so strained

as not to merit serious consideration ."

 

 

Some of the confusion rampant on this subject may have

originated in the definition of "UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA" in Bouvier's Law Dictionary here:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/dict/bldu1.htm#union

 

See Paragraph 5 quoted here:

 

"5.  The United States of America are a corporation

endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey

and receive property.  1 Marsh. Dec. 177, 181.

But it is proper to observe that no suit can be brought

against the United States without authority of law."

 

Note that the plural verb "are" was used, providing further

evidence that the "United States of America" are plural,

as implied by the plural term "States".  Also, the author

of that definition switches to "United States" in the second

sentence.  This only adds to the confusion, because the

term "United States" has three (3) different legal meanings:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/hooven/hooven.htm#united.states

 

However, the decision cited above is Justice Marshall issuing dictum,

and it is NOT an Act of Congress.  Here, again,

be very wary of courts attempting to "legislate" in the absence

of a proper Act of Congress.  See 1 U.S.C. 101 for the

statute defining the required enacting clause:

 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/1/101.html

 

And, pay attention to what was said in that definition here:

"no suit can be brought against the United States

without authority of law".  That statement is not only

correct;  it also provides another important clue:

Congress has conferred legal standing on the "United States"

to sue and be sued at 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1346, respectively:

 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1345.html

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1346.html

 

Congress has NOT conferred comparable legal standing

upon the "United States of America" to sue, or be sued,

as such.

 

Furthermore, under the Articles of Confederation, the term

"United States of America" is the "stile" or phrase that was used

to describe the Union formed legally by those Articles:

 

Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union between the States

of New Hampshire, Massachusetts bay, Rhode Island and Providence

Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,

Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and

Georgia.

 

Article I.  The Stile of this Confederacy shall be

"The United States of America."

 

Article II.  Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom,

and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right,

which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated

to the United States, in Congress assembled.”

 

[end excerpt]

 

 

When they came together the first time to form

a Union of several (plural) States, they decided

to call themselves the "United States of America".

 

Note also that those Articles clearly distinguished

"United States of America" from "United States"

in Congress assembled.  The States formally

delegated certain powers to the federal government,

which is clearly identified in those Articles as the

"United States".

 

Therefore, the "United States of America" now refer to

the 50 States of the Union, and the term "United States"

refers to the federal government.

 

The term "United States" is the term that is used consistently now

throughout Title 28 to refer to the federal government domiciled

in D.C.  There is only ONE PLACE in all of Title 28 where the

term "United States of America" is used, and there it is used

in correct contradistinction to "United States":

 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1746.html

 

Because Title 28 contains statutes which govern all federal courts,

the consistent use of "United States" to refer to the federal

government carries enormous weight.  Title 28 is the latest word

on this subject, as revised, codified and enacted into positive law

on June 25, 1948.  Moreover, the Supremacy Clause elevates

Title 28 to the status of supreme Law of the Land.

 

To make matters worse and to propagate more confusion,

the entity "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"

incorporated twice in the State of Delaware:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp

 

 

The main problem that arises from these questions is that

United States Attorneys are now filing lawsuits and

prosecuting criminal INDICTMENTS in the name of the

"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" [sic]

but without any powers of attorney to do so.  Compare

28 U.S.C. 547 (which confers powers of attorney to represent

the "United States" and its agencies in federal courts):

 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/547.html

 

They are NOT "United States of America Attorneys", OK?

 

First of all, they do NOT have any powers of attorney

to represent Delaware corporations in federal courts;

Congress never appropriated funds for them to do so

and Congress never conferred any powers of attorney

on them to do so either.

 

Secondly, the 50 States are already adequately represented

by their respective State Attorneys General;  therefore,

U.S. Attorneys have no powers of attorney to represent

any of the 50 States of the Union, or any of their agencies,

either.

 

They are "U.S. Attorneys" NOT "U.S.A. Attorneys", OK?

 

Accordingly, it is willful misrepresentation for any U.S. Attorney

to attempt to appear in any State or federal court on behalf

of the "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" [sic].  And,

such misrepresentation is actionable under the McDade Act

at 28 U.S.C. 530B:

 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/530B.html

 

 

There are quite a few "activists" running around the Internet

claiming that the "United States" and the "United States of

America" are both corporations.  These claims are not correct,

for the reasons already stated above.

 

A similar error occurs when these so-called “activists” cite

the federal statute at 28 U.S.C. 3002 as their only “proof”

that the “United States” was incorporated by Congress.

Here’s the pertinent text of that statute:

 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/3002.html

 

As used in this chapter:

...

(15)  "United States" means --

(A)  a Federal corporation;

(  an agency, department, commission, board, or

other entity of the United States;  or

©  an instrumentality of the United States.

 

[end excerpt]

 

 

First of all, note well that the stated scope of this definition

is limited to “this chapter” i.e. CHAPTER 176 of Title 28 –

Federal Debt Collection Procedures.  Overlooking the

limited scope of such definitions is a very common error

among many, if not all self-styled experts.  At best, this section

cannot be used as evidence that the federal government

should be treated as a valid corporation for all other intents

and purposes.  It takes a LOT more text than this one limited

definition to create any federal corporation!  Compare the

original Statutes at Large that created the Union Pacific

Railroad Company, for example.

 

Secondly, from the evidence above it should already

be clear that the “United States” (federal government)

is not now, and never has been, a federal corporation.

The statute at 28 U.S.C. 3002 merely defines the

term “United States” to embrace all existing federal

corporations.  Because the United States was not

an existing corporation when Congress enacted

section 3002, that statute did not create and could

not have created the United States as a federal

corporation in the first instance.

 

Thirdly, in Eisner v. Macomber the U.S. Supreme Court

told Congress that it was barred from re-defining

any terms that are used in the federal Constitution.

“United States” occurs in several places, because it is central

to the entire purpose of that Constitution.  Therefore,

the legislative attempt to re-define “United States” at

section 3002 is necessarily unconstitutional, because

it violates the Eisner Prohibition.

 

Fourthly, section 3002 also exhibits 2 subtle tautologies,

which render it null and void for vagueness.  Here they are,

in case you missed them:

 

“United States” means … an agency, department, commission,

board, or other entity of the United States;

or

“United States” means … an instrumentality of the United States.

 

It is a fundamental violation of proper English grammar to use

the term being defined in any definition of that term, and such a

violation has clearly happened here.  If you don’t yet recognize

the tautologies, then change one part of this definition to read:

 

The term “United States” here also embraces any instrumentality

of the federal government.

 

At the very least, this minor change eliminates the tautology and

removes the vagueness.  Nevertheless, such an attempt to re-define

the term “United States” still violates the Eisner Prohibition.

 

For a newspaper-level Press Release which further explores some

of the many legal ramifications of these widespread errors, please

see this Internet URL:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/cracking.title.28.htm

 

 

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and

Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudic

[Peace]

We can go back and forth all day....bottom line is there is a UNITED STATES corporation masquerading as a defacto government. For everyone who goes " how in the hell did thy pass that!" it's because they re not operating within "de jure"Constitution.

The "UNITED STATES" Corporation is operating outside their 10 mile jurisdiction within DC.

The Organic Act of 1871 was enacted.

the State of New Hamshire understands that at least a few of their legislatures do.

Mi info is coming from an Act that was passed and enacted.

If I'm getting my facts from a website titled "supremelaw" "factcheck" or all their other BS scheme names....there should be a red flag! Just saying.

My very problem is with all those posers who are fascist whores working for the CEO of their company.

[PartyTime]

It was definitely interesting to see this being exposed by actual State legislatures, but as far as the fraud part goes, there was no fraud about it. What most don't comprehend is even the so-called original organic CONstitution was created as a foreign corporation and the "We the People" that it starts out with did NOT mean the private free people. It only meant those people who created it, i.e., the founders of it who actually signed onto to that document.

 

The court in 1854 has even confirmed this when it stated that we the Private people have NO RIGHT to complain for any breach to that CONstitution because we the Private people are NOT a party to it!

 

Padelford, Fay & Co. v. Mayor and Aldermen of City of Savannah, 1854

"*55 But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The States are the parties to it. And they may complain."

 

The new CONstitution that replaced the original had to be created due to the fact the original CONstitutional foreign corporate government had completely dissolved when the CONgress (foreign corporate board members) from the foreign corporate subsidiary States walked out never to return and declared their own foreign subsidiary corporate States to become independant from the senior foreign corporation United States.

 

This is why the civil war started. It never had anything to do with slavery. It was all over the southern State corps wanting to become indepedent from the senior corp. This left the President/CEO Lincoln with no choice but to turn the nation over to the control of the military because their original corporation was dissolved. The war was to go in and conquer the southern States to gain control over the entire nation. The new CONstitution disguised by the District of Columbia Act is a military corporation that controls this nation today. Why do you think the military receives so much of the funding that comes into their corporation? Because the United States, Inc is their corporation and the President/CEO is the chief executive officer of that corporation.

 

Just walk into any government building and court room and you can see proof that they are all operating under military control. In every government building and court room you will see the Presidential flag displayed which is the American flag with a Gold Eagle on top and the State flags all have a spearhead on top. These flags are clearly defind as flags representing an Army Organization which you can find in the Army field manual titled Army Regulation 840-10.

 

Army Regulation 840–10

 

8–2. Flagstaff head (finial)

The flagstaff head (finial) is the decorative ornament at the top of a

flagstaff. This does not restrict the display of a State flag from a

staff bearing a State device when National and other State flags are

displayed from adjacent flagstaffs; however, the Army does not

provide such devices. ONLY THE FOLLOWING finials are authorized on

the flag used by ARMY ORAGANIZATIONS:

(1) Eagle (Presidential flagstaffs). (See fig 8-1.)

(2) Spearhead (The spearhead is the only device used with Army

flags). (See fig 8-2.)

(3) Acorn (Markers and marking pennants flagstaffs.) (See fig 8-

3.)

(4) Ball (Outdoor wall mounted for advertising or recruiting.)

(See fig 8-4.)

 

As you can clearly see here the EAGLE on top of the American flag represents the Presidential flag which in the commander in chief of the military and the spearhead on top of the State flag represents an Army flag used by Army organizations.

 

You will also find the American flag that is outside every Post Office has the BALL on top which represents an Army aganization for advertising and recruiting. Where does one get and file for selective service? The post office!

 

This nation has but under the control of the military ever since Lincoln was the President and they did all this under their reCONstruction acts to set everything up.

 

They are in fact operating under the Lieber Code to this day and because they are a BANKRUPT corporation, as a foreign occupier of this nation and under their rules of war on land, they have SEIZED all PRIVATE PROPERTY from everyone in this nation. They have seized all TITLES to all Private Property which is why all property is registered today.

 

Private property also includes the fictitious legal Name on the birth certificate. That commercial legal Name (First Middle Last) is not YOU. YOU are not a Name. A Name is just a TITLE and to be allowed to conduct any type of commerce within their foreign corporate system one must have a LAST Name attached. The Surname was created solely for the purpose of conducting commerce which anyone can research by researching how last names came into being. They were created solely for commerce.

 

In the old days man owned title to his fictious legal Name and as the title holder to his legal Name he was personally liable for everything he did in that Name. Today man no longer holds title to that fictitious Name because the foreign corporation, United States, Inc., through its 50 foreign subsidiary corporate States, they have SEIZED all the TITLES to all the fictitious Names by seizing the ORIGINAL birth certificates to every Name and then merely issuing you a certified COPY of that Title for your USE to USE that fictitious Name as a transmitting utility to peacefully surrender over ALL property to the State!

 

This was all done by Acts of CONgress and by executice orders issued by the President/CEO of United States, Inc., which under their War Powers via the rules of war on land AKA General Orders 100 (Lieber Code) section 38, ALL Private property was SEIZED out of necessity to support the United States, Inc., and its Army!

 

The lieber code section 38 states:

 

38. Private property, unless forfeited by crimes or by offenses of the owner, can be seized only by way of military necessity, for the support or other benefit of the Army or of the United States.

If the owner has not fled, the commanding officer will cause receipts to be given, which may serve the spoliated owner to obtain indemnity.

 

The fact they have seized all private property is also confirmed in the Senate records in Senate Doc 43.

 

Senate Doc #43, page 9, second paragraph in the right column.

"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance  with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State."

 

This also conforms with Congressional Record March 9th, 1933

 

Congressional Record - House - March 9, 1933

"The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.

The money so issued will not have one penny of gold coverage behind it. because it is really not needed. We do not need gold to back our internal currency."

 

They SEIZED ALL Private Property by seizing all TITLES to everything and requiring everything to be registered with the STATE where all Deeds to property is registered with their foreign State through its subsidiary foreign State COUNTY OF Xxxxx, and all vehicles are registered through their foreign corporate Secretary of State.

 

When you acquire a new vehicle the original TITLE to that vehicle is the manufacturers certificate of origin. The dealer sends that original Title to the State and the State keeps that Title so they can securitize off it and you are merely issued a CERTIFICATE of Title which is issued in the Name you USE that was originated on the original birth certificate the State seized. The State owns everything.

 

When the State seized original Title to the Name (keeping the original birth certificate) EVERYTHING you ever do in that Name AUTOMATICALLY vests in the State! Just like they exposed in the above Senate Doc 43 and the March 9th, 1933 CONgressional record.

 

By executice order ALL gold was seized removing all money from the Private sector and replaced with their INTERNAL currency because MONEY was no longer needed to be used by the private sector since their corporation has SEIZED EVERYTHING!

 

We the Private people were NEVER suppose to have Federal Reserve Notes in our pockets. CONgress never authorized Federal Reserve Notes to be put into the private sector.

 

The fact Federal Reserve Notes are only an INTERNAL currency is shown from the above March 9th, 1933 CONgressional record, and shown in the 1934 Act of CONgress to protect their INTERNAL currency system of the United States, Inc., as shown and defined in Section 15 of that Act.

 

January 30, 1934. [H. R. 6976.]

An Act to protect the currency system of the United States

 

Sec. 15 - As used in this Act the term "United States" means the Government of the United States ;

 

the term "currency of the United States" means currency which is legal tender IN the United States, and includes United States notes, Treasury notes of 1890, gold certificates, silver certificates, Federal Reserve notes, and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations;

 

They tell you everything within in their own published laws. Their currency is an INTERNAL currency created to ONLY be used WITHIN their government and government controlled banking system. It was never authorized to be used by the private sector! In the entire Act cited above the term "United States" within that act MEANS the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES! Meaning ONLY the government. We the Private people are NOT the Government of the United States!

 

The use AUTHORIZED for Federal Reserve Notes is also found in the Federal Reserve Act AND found in 12 USC 411

 

"Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth AND FOR NO OTHER PURPOSE, ARE AUTHORIZED. The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank."

 

What does FOR NO OTHER PURPOSE AUTHORIZED mean?

 

Are YOU the Government of the United States? Are you IN the Government? Are you a federal reserve bank or a federal reserve agent? Are you a national bank regulated by a federal reserve bank? If not, then YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED to have any federal reserve notes!

 

And what exactly IS federal reserve NOTES? They are DEBT OBLIGATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES! They are NOT debt obligations of the Private people, but solely debt obligations of the foreign United States, Inc.!

 

18 USC § 8 - Obligation or other security of the United States defined

The term “obligation or other security of the United States” includes all bonds, certificates of indebtedness, national bank currency, Federal Reserve notes, Federal Reserve bank notes, coupons, United States notes, Treasury notes, gold certificates, silver certificates, fractional notes, certificates of deposit, bills, checks, or drafts for money, drawn by or upon authorized officers of the United States, stamps and other representatives of value, of whatever denomination, issued under any Act of Congress, and canceled United States stamps.

 

They tell you right in their own code federal reserve notes are obligations of the United States, not the private people!

 

They also tell us how they accomplished all this in their code found in their banking regulations under 12 USC 95a sec. 2

 

12 USC § 95a - Regulation of transactions in foreign exchange of gold and silver; property transfers; vested interests, enforcement and penalties

(1) During the time of war, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, and under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of instructions, licenses, or otherwise—

 

(2) Any payment, conveyance, transfer, assignment, or delivery of property or interest therein, made to or for the account of the United States, or as otherwise directed, pursuant to this section or any rule, regulation, instruction, or direction issued hereunder shall to the extent thereof be a full acquittance and discharge for all purposes of the obligation of the person making the same; and no person shall be held liable in any court for or in respect to anything done or omitted in good faith in connection with the administration of, or in pursuance of and in reliance on, this section, or any rule, regulation, instruction, or direction issued hereunder.

 

The provided SOURCE for this code shows:

 

Source

(Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, § 5(,40 Stat. 415; Sept. 24, 1918, ch. 176, § 5,40 Stat. 966; Mar. 9, 1933, ch. 1, title I, § 2,48 Stat. 1; May 7, 1940, ch. 185, § 1,54 Stat. 179; Dec. 18, 1941, ch. 593, title III, § 301,55 Stat. 839; Proc. No. 2695, eff. July 4, 1946, 11 F.R. 7517, 69 Stat. 1352; Pub. L. 95–223, title I, §§ 101(a), 102, 103 (,Dec. 28, 1977, 91 Stat. 1625, 1626; Pub. L. 100–418, title II, § 2502(a)(1),Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1371; Pub. L. 103–236, title V, § 525((1),Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 474.)

Codification

 

If you look these up you will see a lot of this under their trading with the enemy act and also shows Mar. 9, 1933, ch. 1, title I, § 2,48 Stat. 1; which this stat is the bankruptcy of 1933.

 

Under 12 USC 95a sect 2 the original birth certificate was transferred and delivered by the hospital to the STATE thereby transferring and surrendering all interests therein over to the United States by way of Acts of CONgress and Executive Orders by their President, where ANYTHING that YOU do in that birth certificate Name YOU are to receive "full acquittance and discharge for all purposes of the obligation" and the United States is obligated to settle any and all claims against that Name!

 

The reason why this is not being done is because the people are acting as belligerants against the foreign occupancy of the United States. Inc., under its military control and are warring against their conquest which they are doing simply by wanting to claim ownership of stuff!

 

To end the CONquest and establish PEACE one MUST surrender to their CONquest by GIVING ALL THEY HAVE simply by acknowleding their seizure of ALL property where ALL property is vested in the STATE and once that occurs one will find peace and heaven on earth where you will be left alone and actually be protected by their foreign corporate system in accord with their rules of war on land!

 

That certified COPY of that Certificate of Live Birth is your RECEIPT for you to USE for YOU to obtain INDEMNITY against ALL CLAIMS AND CHARGES that ever brought against that Name you are USING that is on that birth certificate, which is merely just a TITLE you USE. That Name is NOT YOU! It is NOT YOURS. The STATE has SEIZED the Title to it by seizing the original title to it and issuing you merely a COPY of it for your USE to come in, peace by surrendering ALL YOU HAVE to the STATE where the STATE is the Beneficial Owner of that Name and the STATE having received ALL the benefits of ownership to ALL property regiastered in that Name, it is the STATE who has full liability for everything you do in that Name. This is also why the people (living beings) have been declared CIVILLY DEAD within their system where they nor their private corporate courts have any power or jurisdiction over the private people!

 

They get their power and jurisdiction merely by YOUR CONSENT! You give them your CONSENT by making false CLAIMS! You CLAIM you either ARE that Name or you CLAIM that IS YOUR Name which it is NOT YOU NOR YOURS because you were never issued the original TITLE to it and it has been SEIZED by the STATE. You give your CONSENT by CLAIMING any property registered in that Name is YOUR property when in fact it is NOT YOURS and does belong to the STATE simply because the STATE holds title to that Name which automatically makes everything in that Name property of the STATE!

 

By your MISUSE of that Name and by your own actions acting as a VOLUNTEER of that Name by freely volunteering to administrate the affairs of that Name, you are being merely PRESUMED to be an Executor, Trustee and/or Beneficiary of that Name where under their TAX CODE that makes YOU the liable party to it!

 

We the private people are NOT an Executor, Administrator, Trustee, nor Beneficiary of that Name! Only the corporate elected and appointed officials of their foreign corporation can be executors, administrators and trustees of that Name and the STATE is the Beneficiary of it all! They protect the beneficial interest of the STATE which is what they serve as public officials of tha6t STATE!

 

We the PRIVATE people are NOT a party to any of it! We have been merely SPOLIATED as a result of their foreign occupancy and seizure of ALL private property and our remedy is the RECEIPT we were issued for our USE to obtain indemnity against any all charges or claims ever brough against that Name we USE!

[Peace]

Well that problem has been taken care of as well. The UCC Filing has foreclosed upon that corporation and banks.

[PartyTime]

We can go back and forth all day....bottom line is there is a UNITED STATES corporation masquerading as a defacto government. For everyone who goes " how in the hell did thy pass that!" it's because they re not operating within "de jure"Constitution.

The "UNITED STATES" Corporation is operating outside their 10 mile jurisdiction within DC.

The Organic Act of 1871 was enacted.

the State of New Hamshire understands that at least a few of their legislatures do.

Mi info is coming from an Act that was passed and enacted.

If I'm getting my facts from a website titled "supremelaw" "factcheck" or all their other BS scheme names....there should be a red flag! Just saying.

My very problem is with all those posers who are fascist whores working for the CEO of their company.

 

 

 

Even the original organic CONstitution operated as a DE FACTO government! They were ALWAYS a foreign corporation from the beginning!

 

The people were declared FREE by the KING! At that moment in time, did a United States government even exist? NO! There was NO Government! It was later a group of dudes decided to get together and create for THEMSELVES their own foreign corporation called a federal government. The ONLY people who were ever a party to that federal government were only those who SIGNED that CONstitution!

 

By what AUTHORITY did those guys have to create a government that could possiblt bind ME to that, especially when I have not yet been born into this world? When did my creator God ever grant those select men any such authority to bind every free man and women and every future man and woman yet to be born? Never happened!

 

That means the ONLY way "I" can personally ever become bound to THEIR foreign so called De Jure or De Facto government is by me going down and SIGNING UP by SIGNING ONTO their CONstitution to become a party to it, OR, by me becoming an elected or appointed official to it by becoming and executor, administrator or trustee of that foreign corporation whereby becoming an official MEMBER to it that would bind me to it in any way shape or form! That has never happened! I was born as a FREE MAN as stated in the Bible where I as a FREE born Man was given COMPLETE DOMINION over this earth along with the other 7 billion born people on this earth, and there is NO piece of paper created by OTHER men that change this fact without MY personal CONSENT by granting them any such authority over ME!

 

To serve ANY man-made government is to serve a FALSE GOD and REJECT our creator God. The Bible clearly tells us all this! You cannot serve two masters, but whichever one YOU freely CHOSE to serve then that is the one you must obey! I chose to serve my one and only God which is the God that created me. Not some imaginary made up false GOD called Government or King!

 

But you are FREE to chose YOUR GOD/God and far be it from me to try to interfere with your free choice!

Well that problem has been taken care of as well. The UCC Filing has foreclosed upon that corporation and banks.

 

 

NO IT HAS NOT! That UCC filing has done absolutely NOTHING and even the courts have said so and called that filing a bunch of gobblygoogook!

 

How does one who is FOREIGN to a corporation get authority over it? It doesn't! Unless they gave their CONSENT to anything, which they have not given, you have no more authority to foreclose on them they do to foreclose on you! We are FOREIGN to each other. You have NO AUTHORITY to use THEIR private copyright laws for anything!

[Peace]

Even the original organic CONstitution operated as a DE FACTO government! They were ALWAYS a foreign corporation from the beginning!

 

The people were declared FREE by the KING! At that moment in time, did a United States government even exist? NO! There was NO Government! It was later a group of dudes decided to get together and create for THEMSELVES their own foreign corporation called a federal government. The ONLY people who were ever a party to that federal government were only those who SIGNED that CONstitution!

 

By what AUTHORITY did those guys have to create a government that could possiblt bind ME to that, especially when I have not yet been born into this world? When did my creator God ever grant those select men any such authority to bind every free man and women and every future man and woman yet to be born? Never happened!

 

That means the ONLY way "I" can personally ever become bound to THEIR foreign so called De Jure or De Facto government is by me going down and SIGNING UP by SIGNING ONTO their CONstitution to become a party to it, OR, by me becoming an elected or appointed official to it by becoming and executor, administrator or trustee of that foreign corporation whereby becoming an official MEMBER to it that would bind me to it in any way shape or form! That has never happened! I was born as a FREE MAN as stated in the Bible where I as a FREE born Man was given COMPLETE DOMINION over this earth along with the other 7 billion born people on this earth, and there is NO piece of paper created by OTHER men that change this fact without MY personal CONSENT by granting them any such authority over ME!

 

To serve ANY man-made government is to serve a FALSE GOD and REJECT our creator God. The Bible clearly tells us all this! You cannot serve two masters, but whichever one YOU freely CHOSE to serve then that is the one you must obey! I chose to serve my one and only God which is the God that created me. Not some imaginary made up false GOD called Government or King!

 

But you are FREE to chose YOUR GOD/God and far be it from me to try to interfere with your free choice!

 

 

NO IT HAS NOT! That UCC filing has done absolutely NOTHING and even the courts have said so and called that filing a bunch of gobblygoogook!

 

How does one who is FOREIGN to a corporation get authority over it? It doesn't! Unless they gave their CONSENT to anything, which they have not given, you have no more authority to foreclose on them they do to foreclose on you! We are FOREIGN to each other. You have NO AUTHORITY to use THEIR private copyright laws for anything!

It is a tool for those who live in he system that they are enslaved to. Im all about being free, the reality for most is they have to see the shiz in writing. Their own tool has been turned against them. The judge who called it "gobblygoogook" is working in their unlawful criminal court. Yes there is gonna be hiccups....

Tell me what do you think about the queen and ratzinger being convicted of genocide...and citizens arrests being implemented...

Common law is the law.

Oh and that hiccup I speak of has only awakened even more people to the fraud that is.

It's all fraud. We have been led astray time to understand Common Law.

[PartyTime]

It is a tool for those who live in he system that they are enslaved to. Im all about being free, the reality for most is they have to see the shiz in writing. Their own tool has been turned against them. The judge who called it "gobblygoogook" is working in their unlawful criminal court. Yes there is gonna be hiccups....

Tell me what do you think about the queen and ratzinger being convicted of genocide...and citizens arrests being implemented...

Common law is the law.

Oh and that hiccup I speak of has only awakened even more people to the fraud that is.

 

 

There is no arrest! That so called common law crap has no authority against that foreign power. Wake up! People have been attempting this crap for years and they never get anywhere with it!

 

There is no piece of paper that can set you free. It is all upon your own free will and choice. It is sooooooooooo freaking SIMPLE yet most just cannot SEE IT! People remain blind and deaf and conitue to run themselves down rabbit holes. Same song, different tune, and the results are the same which is nothing is accomplished!

 

You cannot use their foreign private laws for your benefit. Those laws apply to them, not you.

 

I recently heard the FBI is investigating Jim McBride now because the documents he has cites their laws in it and because he is citing those laws and selling that paper work the FBI is investigating him. So look to see him being arrested and charged next and I won't be surprised to see these people claiming this UCC stuff next to be charged.

 

 

Learn WHO YOU ARE and what you are NOT! If you rely on ANY of their laws, procedures, public record domains, ANYTHING within their system, then you still have not yet learned who you truly are!

 

 

[Peace]

International tribunal of crimes into church and state.... How else are these animals held accountable?

[PartyTime]

International tribunal of crimes into church and state.... How else are these animals held accountable?

 

 

People simply need to look into the mirror and see who the real problem is. Until they are able to do this they will always remain enslaved to the system which is by their own doing. The problem is not the government. The problem is us and always has been us. This seems to be the hardest thing for people to see.

[leanonme]

PartyTime I have read what you have to say several times over so that I can understand. I think I get it. Sooooo, moving forward here the loans and credit card debt and taxes are all the responsiblity of the state to settle. Because I was merely using a copy of a name that the state owns and is liable for. Also this property can not be seized unless I flee or abandon the property and I shall have "full aquitance and discharge for the purpose of obligation.." If I receive a bill or a notice to vacate due to foreclosure I will not have to vacate because the name on it is not MY name but a name that belongs to the state. And since I am not fleeing the property it is now my spoliated property and I will be protected from seizure by the State. Expanding on this now; Tomorrow I can go to the car dealership and buy a new car, sign a loan that is using the name on a driver license that the state actually owns and drive it home and I will have dominion of the vehicle for as long as I desire because the state owns the title already. Will the credit score for the state owned name be effected by the non payment of the loans that the state is liable for? I have heard that people with a bad credit score are not able to get a loan to receive dominion of the property in question.

Since the state owns all the titles to everything, how can I get a bigger house if I want to?  I am not trying to ne a smart a$$, please don't take me that way. So the big $65,000 question is, can I choose to have "dominion" of what ever I want, all that is needed is state to the seller that the state will pay whatever debt the state owned name of my birth certificate I shall receive it?

[blugrass60]

Bump.

Id Love To Know The Same Thing Lean On Me. This Has My Attention..

[PartyTime]

PartyTime I have read what you have to say several times over so that I can understand. I think I get it. Sooooo, moving forward here the loans and credit card debt and taxes are all the responsiblity of the state to settle. Because I was merely using a copy of a name that the state owns and is liable for. Also this property can not be seized unless I flee or abandon the property and I shall have "full aquitance and discharge for the purpose of obligation.." If I receive a bill or a notice to vacate due to foreclosure I will not have to vacate because the name on it is not MY name but a name that belongs to the state. And since I am not fleeing the property it is now my spoliated property and I will be protected from seizure by the State. Expanding on this now; Tomorrow I can go to the car dealership and buy a new car, sign a loan that is using the name on a driver license that the state actually owns and drive it home and I will have dominion of the vehicle for as long as I desire because the state owns the title already. Will the credit score for the state owned name be effected by the non payment of the loans that the state is liable for? I have heard that people with a bad credit score are not able to get a loan to receive dominion of the property in question.

Since the state owns all the titles to everything, how can I get a bigger house if I want to?  I am not trying to ne a smart a$$, please don't take me that way. So the big $65,000 question is, can I choose to have "dominion" of what ever I want, all that is needed is state to the seller that the state will pay whatever debt the state owned name of my birth certificate I shall receive it?

 

"Sooooo, moving forward here the loans and credit card debt and taxes are all the responsiblity of the state to settle. Because I was merely using a copy of a name that the state owns and is liable for."

 

Correct! This was part of the 1933 bankruptcy found in statutes at large March 7th, 1933. In that banking emergency act and by executive orders the US Inc., seized all private property and all money from the private sector (gold and silver) which they replaced with their INTERNAL currency called federal reserve notes. Within that act it states the comptroller of currency is to pay ALL the bills! In other words, the US Inc has bought the entire farm by buying everything in sight taking everything over to support their foreign occupancy over this nation. Since US Inc has seized and taken everything from the people, US Inc along with all its corporate States, Counties and Cities are receiving all the benefits off the people and under international law per the 1907 Hague Convention which all the bankrupt nations are signatories to, per article 55, everything is subject to the rules of usufruct. The STATE (i.e., Federal, State, County, City, etc.) having receive all the titles to all property and all the benefits from it, the STATE is the usufructary liable for ALL taxes and dues for all the Names held by the STATE via the original titles AKA birth certificates to the Names.

 

 

"Also this property can not be seized unless I flee or abandon the property and I shall have "full aquitance and discharge for the purpose of obligation.."

 

There is the "property" and there is the "land". The "property" is the FICTION which is the DEED, MORTGAGE and NOTE. If you read any deed, mortgage or note you will see that everything described on it is all imaginary. It describes the fictious Name you use, and describes a fictitious property located in a fictitious place, i.e. two letter abreciated STATE and zip code, which is all an imaginary military and federal zone that only exists within the minds of men. It does not describe YOU the living man nor the real land and home you live in. The imaginary "property" which only exists within the fictional world of "PAPER:" belongs to the STATE. The problem is everyone goes to court laying claims against the PAPER AKA, Deed, Mortgage, Note. It is never about the actual land. By making a false claim against THEIR PAPER you consent to give up the land home as surety to pay for your SIN of having made a false claim against their PAPER! Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's! Stop claiming their property! Then there is no controversy. Present the RECEIPT to show it is the STATE'S property (certificate of live birth) so the you the living man can receive full aquitance and discharge. Of course they ARE AND WILL TEST YOU when you first try all this. They test you to make sure you know what you are really doing and not just someone who has found something on the internet wanting to just get out of something. They will first make sure you are who you say you are and really understand all this.

 

This whole thing is treated as matter of State trade secrets as a matter of National Security to protect the system. They have to do this because if the truth was to get out to the masses it would mean total anarchy because everyone would quickly discover there are no laws that apply to them as living beings. Go watch the youtube videos by searching "Black Friday" and watch those people how they behave. Then ask yourself, would you want people that behave that way to know there is no laws that actually apply to them where they could behave and act any way they wanted and there is no one that can do anything about other than to take matters into their own hands to do something about it? This is exactly why they treat this as State trade secrets as a matter of national security. To protect the peaceful inhabitants from the people like that. So they will never reveal this truth to you in any open public forum. This is why courts will immediately stop any proceedings in open court when someone who knows this truth begins to address these issues in open court. The courts will wait until they clear out the court room to get all the other people out of there then address that party. They don't want everyone to hear what these people who know have to say. This is why you will never see any of this in any court record.

 

 

"If I receive a bill or a notice to vacate due to foreclosure I will not have to vacate because the name on it is not MY name but a name that belongs to the state. And since I am not fleeing the property it is now my spoliated property and I will be protected from seizure by the State"

 

This is the basics on how it suppose to work, but a lot depends on how you deal with it. It is always better to try and deal with it through the alleged lender before they file a court action to foreclose. Then if need be deal with the clerk of court and judge assigned to the case PRIVATELY. As far as unsecured debts and traffic tickets go, there has been a great amount of success dealing with those. As for secured debts it appears to be more tricky. I have dealt with this myself on secured debt and I have a friend who has so far been successful dealing with a foreclosure in California which is a non-judicial State. The State I am in is a judicial State.

 

"Expanding on this now; Tomorrow I can go to the car dealership and buy a new car, sign a loan that is using the name on a driver license that the state actually owns and drive it home and I will have dominion of the vehicle for as long as I desire because the state owns the title already. Will the credit score for the state owned name be effected by the non payment of the loans that the state is liable for? I have heard that people with a bad credit score are not able to get a loan to receive dominion of the property in question."

 

This would be one way to do it, but like you said, not everyone can get a loan because of the credit reports. Technically you should be able to just go to a dealer and have them provide you with a BILL. Not a purchase order, but an actual invoice of a bill for the vehicle. Then you should be able to take that bill to your local bank and DEPOSIT that with the bank in accord with their banking regulation 12 USC 342 which basically states ANY bank or financial institution may take deposits of bills or "other items" for the federal reserve bank in their district where that local bank sends the bill to the federal reserve bank where a federal reserve agent can take care of getting that bill paid through the Treasury. Of course finding a bank willing to accept the bill and send it to the federal reserve bank is another matter. Since this is not a known thing publically most banks may refuse to take it. If that is the case then another option is try sending to the federal reserve bank yourself to the attention of a federal reserve agent of that branch and see what happens.

 

 

"Since the state owns all the titles to everything, how can I get a bigger house if I want to?"

 

Same as above for a vehicle. Get an invoice billing the name for the house. Deposit the bill with a bank to be deposited to the federal reserve bank in accord with 12 USC 342. Or try sending it directly to the federal reserve yourself if a bank will not take it. Send a note with the bill and copy of birth certificate. Please settle the enclosed debt obligation of the Unites States and have the property title put in the Name on the attached certificate, and provide me with confirmation sent to "address".