MyGoogle

like most middle east leaders he hates AMERICA and GOD

has anyone thought the reason the wealth managers tell these guys they will help them is because 21million dinar is still close to $21K USD. This is still a lot of money to most people. just a thought. If i am a banker and someone tells me they have 50 million dinar, this first thing i think is this guy has almost $50,000 in liquid assests.

thats funny While I am sure that all of us would like to see our Dongs grow strong

lol yeah in dinar not dollars, how to i begin to invest, can i invest through a US site or company, or do i have to get a passport and all that other stuff to begin to invest would i be able to deposit dinars or wire dinars to a new account. I'm not an investor by any means, a friend made me drink the $4-5 koolaid and i bought in only with $500, i know this thing is speculative so i have always remained grounded, but i dont want to wait for the RV to come to me if i am able to use my dinar and re-invest into the ISX. Which i see as the better of the investments to increase my capitol. I have done some looking into it and what im coming up with is sending 3 forms of ID to an Iraqi Bank like Warka. Im not completely comfortable with this, so i wonder if there is a way to invest from the US into the ISX. My opinion is the ISX is only going to explod into a great stock market, with all the overseas investors being drawn to Iraq. So i would like to get involved asap.

im writing in Okie the Oil Man, he will give us a 43 to 1 RV rate, im sticking to that

The name is Jarrod. Im fairly young guy trying to get in a better financial situation. I know the Dinar is speculative and a roller coaster at times. It seems like the ISX is a safer bet to make a little bit of money. I just read a thread about investing in shares for 1IQD; I hold $475,000 so if i understand it correctly i could potentialy have 475K of possible stocks through the ISX. I dont know much about investing, other than the dinar "kool-aid" a friend gave me to drink on and on impulse bought what i could afford to be without at the time. So if there are any ISX veterans who know where i could look to do research or if they have a stock broker they trust, or any insight at all i would greatly appreciate it. Thanks in advance

so the U.S.of.A owes Asia over $5 Trillion??????????

can anyone give a simple explanation of whats going? im lost

maybe the rest of parliment wants to come out high and get the big money right away, and Shabbs knows they can't do it like that and have to come out low initially

i used to listen to clark howard for a while until he would go on rants and raves about AT&T and debt collectors. Being a debt collector manager and using AT&T this upset me for some reason, maybe it was him giving false hope advise to his callers about debt collectors or giving advice to make my job tougher. im a cool ass collector ill work with your budget i know not everyone has $10K to pay right away to an old debt. The point is Clark Howard is as biased as they come, he isn't invested thats why he shares this opinion, if he was invested he would sell the dream just like every other guru.

let those two have their fun its enjoyable reading a lovers spat about dinar, maybe a book should be in the making, The Oydessy of Okie and Bulldog

CELEBRATE ... CELEBRATE DANCE TO THE RV, C'MON AND CELEBRATE ... CELEBRATE

OF COURSE, Thats why its in the rumor section ... just saying

is anyone checking the USD to other currencies to verify if its the ID thats gain value or USD losing value, IE if the dollar continues to stay strong against the Euro or Pound maybe it is the IQD ... just an Idea

It will RV once the "gurus" stop predicting it

can someone catch me up on the global download what did i miss?

Calm down unirod, im taking back my "your welcome" ... your welcome for nothing now

Holy Crap it is lol didn't catch it my bad guys

Your Welcome uinrod

No Doubt

Politics End of Iraq Sanctions Reflects Progress Since Saddam Era, Analysts Say By Stephen Clark Published December 15, 2010 | FoxNews.com sorry i should have included that -- dont know what to make of it though, seems like it is more about weapons than anything else, but i could be reading it wrong, what is everyoone's take on this?

End of Iraq Sanctions Reflects Progress Since Saddam Era, Analysts Say Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/15/end-iraq-sanctions-reflects-progress-saddam-era-analysts-say/#ixzz1gih9rHa3 By Stephen Clark Published December 15, 2010 The U.N. Security Council's decision on Wednesday to lift a trio of Saddam Hussein-era sanctions against Iraq, including a ban on acquiring weapons of mass destruction, might send shivers down the spine of anyone fearful that the country could eventually fall back into the hands of another ruthless dictator. But U.S. officials and analysts say the council's actions reflect the progress made in Iraq and, if anything, help prevent a sequel to the Saddam era. "This basically is a recognition by the international community of the efforts and progress that has been made in Iraq up to this point to rejoin the international community and their commitment to living within the guidelines of the international community," a State Department official told FoxNews.com. "It's a new day for Iraq," the official said. "It obviously lifts them from the many restrictions that were there under a different era." The council lifted sanctions that have been in place since Hussein's 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Iraq will now be able to pursue a civilian nuclear program and take control of its oil and natural gas revenue on June 30, 2011. The council also terminated all remaining activities of the controversial oil-for-food program which ran from 1996-2003 and helped ordinary Iraqis cope with sanctions. The U.S. holds the Security Council presidency this month and pressed for adoption of the three resolutions at a high-level meeting presided over by Vice President Biden, who called the actions Wednesday an important milestone for Iraq. "The three resolutions we've passed bring an end to the burdensome remnants of the dark era of Saddam Hussein," Biden said. "In recent years, the Iraqi people have emerged from the depths of sectarian violence and they have flatly rejected the grim future offered by extremists, and they have earned themselves a chance for much better days ahead." The U.N.'s most powerful body voted a day after a deadlock on forming a new Iraqi government ended and a year before the United States is scheduled to pull its last troops out of the country. Marisa Cochrane, deputy director of the Institute for the Study of War and an expert on Iraq, said the presence of the U.S. forces in Iraq and its involvement in lifting the sanctions should assuage any concerns about a setback. She noted that Iraq's constitution bars the country from acquiring weapons of mass destruction, "I think there is a framework within Iraq that will mitigate concerns over lifting these sanctions," she said. Iraq is also a party to the main nuclear, chemical, biological and missile treaties. Stephen Biddle, a senior fellow for defense policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, told FoxNews.com that the intent of the council's actions is to "reduce the likelihood that Iraq return to dictatorship" by integrating Iraq into the international economic system. He also said the original intent of the sanctions themselves was not a response to Iraq inherently being a hostile place but rather to Hussein adopting "hostile policies." "You no longer have a Saddam Hussein threatening his neighbors," he said, adding that the sanctions are punishing policymakers for decisions they didn't make and are unlikely to make anytime soon. The resolution approved Wednesday terminates provisions of two resolutions adopted in 1991 under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter -- which is militarily enforceable -- banning Iraq from using, developing, constructing or acquiring nuclear, chemical and biological weapons or material to make them and ballistic missiles with a range greater than 150 kilometers. A second resolution, adopted unanimously, ends the international management of the Development Fund for Iraq on June 30, 2011. It was set up in 2003 to try to ensure that the proceeds of the country's gas and oil sales were used to help its people and restore its economy. The resolution, which will end Iraq's immunity from claims on the funds after June 30, calls on Iraq to set up a successor mechanism. A U.S. official said the resolution ensures that 5 percent of oil and gas revenue will still go into a compensation fund, used mainly to pay Kuwaiti claims from the war. Under the oil-for-food program, which ran from 1996 to 2003, Iraq was allowed to sell oil provided most of the money went to buy humanitarian goods. It was aimed at easing Iraqi suffering under U.N. sanctions and was a lifeline for 90 percent of the country's population. But an 18-month U.N.-sanctioned investigation found massive corruption in the program. Its final report in October 2005 accused more than 2,200 companies from some 40 countries of colluding with Saddam's regime to bilk the humanitarian program of $1.8 billion. The Associated Press contributed to this report. not putting a link up just google " Iraq Ch7 lifted "

so what do we do with the old currency if they roll out a new currency?

lmao thanks for posting this