Tehran Maliki received two letters did not disclose their contents

[yota691]

Tehran Maliki received two letters did not disclose their contents

SUNDAY, 08 SEPTEMBER / SEPTEMBER 2013 12:36   

Twilight News / Iranian press reports revealed, that Tehran's foreign minister handed the Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's meeting with two letters, but they did not disclose their contents.

Being Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif visit to Iraq, saluting met and Foreign Minister and the Prime Minister and the President of the House of Representatives.

According to diplomatic officials, the visit will focus on three files, bilateral relations and the Syrian issue, and the nuclear file.

The agency Mehr in a report seen by "Twilight News", Zarif blessings of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki letters from President Hassan Rohani and his assistant first Isaac Jhangeri.

IRNA did not reveal the content of the letters.

The visit comes at a time when the United States intends U.S. military strike against the regime of Bashar al-Assad on the background of the use of the latter what you are saying and Washington chemical weapons in the armed struggle against his opponents, but the positions of the countries of the region and the world mixed on this resolution.

Among the most prominent opponents of the direct those strike Iraq, Iran, Russia, China, Iran has threatened to strike U.S. interests in the region in the event of the implementation of what they are bent.

Edited September 8, 2013 by yota691

[Butifldrm]

I'm not sure what these letters may entail, but I bet they may have something to do with a strike on our US embassy in Baghdad

 

 

Unintended Consequences, Blowback Already Brewing From Potential Syria Strike

John Glaser, September 06, 2013

Print This | Share This

 | Comment

The Wall Street Journal reports on intelligence suggesting militants in the region will abruptly go on the offensive against the U.S. if the Obama administration bombs Syria:

The U.S. has intercepted an order from Iran to militants in Iraq to attack the U.S. Embassy and other American interests in Baghdad in the event of a strike on Syria, officials said, amid an expanding array of reprisal threats across the region.

Military officials have been trying to predict the range of possible responses from Syria, Iran and their allies. U.S. officials said they are on alert for Iran’s fleet of small, fast boats in the Persian Gulf, where American warships are positioned. U.S. officials also fear Hezbollah could attack the U.S. Embassy in Beirut.

…Syrians could also respond with “a vicious offensive” against the opposition inside Syria, said Aaron David Miller, a former top Middle East negotiator in the State Department who now is a vice president at the Woodrow Wilson Center. Such a move, he said, would be a way “to demonstrate defiance” without running the risk of hitting American targets.

Throughout the whole debate on Syria there has been no public acknowledgement by Obama officials that these kind of consequences are likely to occur in the event of a U.S. attack. Such officials, like Kerry, Hagel, and Dempsey, are too busy downplaying all the negative aspects of intervention.

But such consequences were not difficult to predict. As Zbigniew Brzezinski wroteseveral months ago, “American involvement would simply mobilize the most extreme elements of these factions against the U.S. and pose the danger that the conflict would spill over into the neighborhood and set Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon on fire.”

Not only are there risks of violent repercussion in the immediate sense of the Syrian conflict, but this would also add one more grievance to a list of many that disgruntled terrorists will cite as justification for attacking Americans, whether in Times Square, on a plane over Detroit, or an embassy abroad.

If there is anyone who still believes a “limited,” punitive attack on the Assad regime is going to be clean and quick and free of an entangling backlash, they need to pull their head out of John Kerry’s rear.

 

 

 

http://antiwar.com/blog/2013/09/06/unintended-consequences-blowback-already-brewing-from-potential-syria-strike/

 

[sandfly]

WAITING ON OB

[skeetdog]

The ME extremist have made it a ritual to impale a brainwashin' hatrage toward anybody that does not comply with their twisted beleifs. The US has stuck our nose in every conflict these idiots don't agree on. Kind of glad we weren't a super power back when a little guy took out this big dude with a rock in a slingshot. We're soooo worried that these extremist will rule the world...just look at the way they act toward their own people. These people have a self destructing type of mentality toward anyone that doesn't conform to every aspect of thier beleifs. We don't have to win every battle the world gets into...we need to focus on the war and pick our battles. We lose our US troops that have NO issues, other than honor and duty, toward the pity differances these mentaly deprived fools folster. It's sad to know true victums will suffer as a lack of action but these people's beleifs have them trapped in a mental brain washing that is thier own demise. As long as Islam is considered a valid religion there will always be the next generation to deal with. We as a cilvilized nation that has deminstrated that a religion of Love has the ability to show compassion must also show the ability to administrate 'Tough Love'. Let the world know we have had enough of the abuse they keep piling on our good faith attitude. It's time for the United States to draw a hard line and say enough is enough. Stop foreign aid to countries that spit at the troopers that do the transporting. Stop all aid to countries that have a differant agenda other than peace on earth. There's a problem with greed and morals within our own government and I say,''Let's start cleanin' up our own back yard first''.....

[Butifldrm]

Zarif, speaking of targeting U.S. interests: Tehran will not undertake any action aimed at Iraq's sovereignty

 

08-09-2013 | (Voice of Iraq) -  Add a comment -    Twilight News 

Denied Iranian Foreign Minister his country's intention to target U.S. interests in Iraq as a reaction to a possible strike on Syria. 

The U.S. reports talked about Iran's threat to strike U.S. interests in the region in the event of the implementation of any military strike on Syria. 

And Mohammad Javad Zarif said in a press conference held together with his Iraqi counterpart Hoshyar Zebari attended the "Twilight News", hyped by targeting U.S. interests in Iraq is not unfounded. 

He added that Iran would not take any action aimed at Iraq's sovereignty. 

And "No one should knocks the drums, and that take into account the risks that will occur in the region. 

For his part, Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, a comment on the subject that Iraq will never be any military strike on Syria. 

The United States plans to U.S. military strike against the regime of Bashar al-Assad on the background of the use of the latter what you are saying and Washington chemical weapons in armed struggle against his opponents, but the positions of the countries of the region and the world mixed on this resolution. 

Among the most prominent opponents of the direct those strike Iraq, Iran, Russia and China. 

Read more: http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ar&tl=en&u=http://www.sotaliraq.com/mobile-news.php%3Fid%3D115254&usg=ALkJrhhvgFfJH1Ix6f2_8bUM5PT0-XUvbA#ixzz2eJahMNS7