Danishere4news2

Oh MarkZ, you & your contacts have never been right on anything. The egg has already been on their faces from the beginning, it is a permanent fixture.

Agree. The budget is a key factor imo. A budget is what itemizes, allocates funds. No rate change would ever happen without a budget, even if it's just a slight change in the exchange rate. The white paper is like a blueprint imo. It identifies your available capital, estimates your spending, and helps you predict revenue. A budget can help you plan your business activities and can act as a yardstick for setting up financial goals. It can help you tackle both short-term obstacles and long-term planning.

I agree that this time around seems to be much more focus & progress. I just hope & pray that this is our year. After 18+ years I am ready for this ride to end & NEVER think about Iraq EVER again. 😄

Umm ok lol

Although this is positive news, I would love to see the oil & gas law passed prior to or with the budget. This would get me a little excited. Time will tell.....& the budget opening will tell all, to what we can expect this year imo

Love that movie....but I get your point & agree 😄

Same here. I would love to be able to bless friends, family & the ones I have yet to meet.

This made me think of the numerous people who would quote Frank exactly, he then claimed they misunderstood him. Ultimately it caused an argument which he then banned them from his site. He is the only one you can quote exactly & he will deny it.

No need for correction. Frank changes his stories daily

Thanks for the reply Luigi1. It's nice being on this site able to debate this investment with intelligent people who can think on their own. Also a shout out to Ron for bringing these other Guru theories here....although much of what they say is complete nonsense, it opens things up for respectful debate.

I do not like where things appear to be going with this investment in the near future.

First off, this does not sound like WS, it's likely Frank posing as WS, which he admitted he does often. Secondly, for the last couple of months or so these two (or one lol) "gurus" have been claiming that the IQD de-pegged from the USD. How can the IQD fluctuate against something it is not even pegged to according to them? Maybe someone here more knowledgeable in this area can chime in if my thinking is correct or not.

The budget & the opening is still needed with any kind of a change in rate. You can't just hand out money for things & not know where funds are going, etc

The point I was making is BOTH are needed. You simply cannot have one without the other......something many of the gurus on other site try to convince their sheeple with.

Well....yes & no imo. Sure the rate can change prior to budget, however it is not "usable" without an open budget. The budget holds all expenses, etc.

Sounds like this banker was giving a standard answer to a question of exchanging foreign currency in general & not specific to the Iraqi dinar. Just another silly bank story imo

Kind of funny you bring this up because a site I used to belong to, I had said over & over again how the majority of articles they claimed as "trash" were proven accurate, yet no one would admit it. To top it off they continue saying the same about the legit articles. The bottom line is that some of these other sites "leaders" do not really care what happens to this investment as long as they can keep the sheeple believing & not have to get a normal job like the rest of us!

But F26 just said yesterday (sent from a friend) that the elusive "second article" finally showed. With that said, imo it was not what these clowns were pushing it to be for the past year. Now keep in mind that supposedly WS had said that once the "second article" comes out we are within days of receiving this blessing. Get ready for their story to change once again if the budget opens at a program rate such as mentioned in the above articles. They will begin to say that even after the budget opening it can change at anytime. This is a boneheaded statement they have used before. For them to push that idea, something that makes zero sense is twisted. To claim they will send the budget to parliament for readings & then a vote, signed, opened, start disbursing monies.....only to then change the rate. It would need to be amended, re-voted on. Does anyone really think this kind of crazy babble makes any sense? F26's sheeple believe anything he says. The truth....the reality is a rate change will happen prior to budget opening whenever they get their act together. If something sounds illogical, it's likely because it is not true. If people would use some common sense, these gurus from other sites would have been put out of business long ago. Whatever the 2023 budget opens at, will likely be for the year. If they release the 20k note, that would be a serious red flag.

Well connected source? Your source has been 100% wrong 😆 Your magic eight-ball is broken you fool

NDA 😆 These clowns have called this hundreds if not thousands of times over the years, another dozen or so more times won't do jack

I agree with this statement from Nader about the 20k note. I am not certain if the 20k note has been printed yet, if that is the option they end up going with. When I was a member of Frank26's site, he had mentioned the 20k is a good thing. The following week an article came out saying releasing a 20k was a bad idea & it should not happen & of course Frank chimed in saying he knew that. The following we another article was posted about the 20k & Frank once again changed his story saying the 20k is a good thing & that the 20k will lose 3 zeros & become 20. Take note that if this 20k has already been printed, it was printed LONG after the claim that the NSCN's ( new small currency notes )were printed. This should not make sense to anyone. If the 20k was to become a small 20 note, it would have been included in the printing of the NSCN's that is claimed had been done so years ago. I don't really know if Frank is just a clueless nut job or has dementia or all of the above, but I do know he is making bank "teaching" on an investment he has absolutely no idea of.

The two sets of books came from Frank, so I am curious as to why you believe this statement? Nothing against you but the two sets of books theory has always seemed a bit unrealistic & potentially illegal.

Just throwing this bit of info out that some may not be aware of. Frank was caught at least one time pretending to be WS, he even admitted in doing so & he also stated he has & continues to do so. Now some may ask why Frank does this....it's quite simple, Frank knows that what WS has to say has more weight than what Frank could ever say. Unfortunately with what I stated above, no one can ever be certain if it is actually WS or not. With that said, the WS post does not sound like WS......it is likely Frank posing as WS again.

This garbage originally came from Frank26 is my guess. Frank claims superior accuracy, yet is proven wrong most of the time. He states things & never verifies....because he made it up. Literally the only thing Frank has been correct on is what he reads in articles & then he constantly misinterprets them. He gets articles days before he releases them on the forum, this allows his "I told you so" that he loves to say. This only proves he can read, his comprehension is another story.

Why people ask this clueless clown anything is beyond me. The ONLY thing that I await on is the opening of the 2023 budget......this will reveal our position for this year imo.