Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,246 Excellent

About climber7

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Monopolistic Power Is Growing Around the World, IMF Says But a new study from the International Monetary Fund cautions against rushing to judgment A new report from the IMF says rising market power may not necessarily reflect weakening antitrust policy. PHOTO: YURI GRIPAS/REUTERS By Greg Ip Apr 4, 2019 7:50 am ET 0 COMMENTS Declining competition throughout the economy isn’t just an American phenomenon. It’s true throughout much of the rich world, the International Monetary Fund has found. Still, the IMF, in a study accompanying its latest World Economic Outlook released Wednesday, says rising market power may not necessarily reflect weakening antitrust policy and advises against drastic action designed to curb or break up big companies. A company has market power if it can charge more than a purely competitive market would permit. The authors of the study test for the presence of market power in 27 countries, two-thirds advanced and one third emerging, by measuring “markups”: how much companies charge for a product above the cost of producing one. In theory, excessive markups should quickly disappear as new competitors undercut incumbents. Yet the IMF found between 2000 and 2015, companies’ markups in advanced economies rose eight percentage points. In other words, for every dollar of cost per unit, they were able to charge an additional eight cents. Markups didn’t rise in emerging countries, perhaps because they were relatively high to start with. This alone, they note, doesn’t prove declining competition hurt consumers. It’s possible that more productive firms with higher markups took market share from less efficient, less profitable firms. This explains much of the rise of in the U.S. Moreover, businesses with high fixed and low variable costs naturally have higher markups. A social-media company, for example, invests heavily in its website, content and software, while incurring almost no cost each time a member is added or a web page viewed. Such industries tend toward “winner-take-all” or “winner-take-most” outcomes. Yet even when markups and corporate concentration rise for benign reasons, it can extract a cost. Firms with few competitors don’t have to innovate as much. They have less incentive to invest since added production could flood the market, driving prices and profits down. The IMF concludes the rise in corporate markups since 2000 has hurt business investment, leaving gross domestic product 1% smaller than otherwise. It has contributed to at least a tenth of the narrowing in workers’ share of GDP. These trends, by reducing the need for capital and the economy’s underlying growth rate, have also depressed the so-called neutral interest rate, which keeps growth steady without spurring inflation, though only slightly. These effects are pretty small so far, but the IMF warns that if markups keep rising, so will the harm. So what should governments do? Around the world they face growing calls for antitrust authorities to block more mergers and acquisitions, even of small companies that may one day be a competitor to the big tech company acquirer. The IMF, however, is reluctant to join those calls. It notes that a merger may both reduce competition and yield more efficient and innovative companies. Whether the net result is good or bad “warrants investigation.” Rather, it recommends other steps to invigorate competition: ensuring intellectual property rights don’t slow the adoption of innovation, and taxing only those profits that come from market power (for example, from a patent-protected monopoly).
  2. Sorry, that was meant for LB also lol
  3. Yes, what's your opinion on how long?
  4. Wow, I feel overwhelmed with gratitude for this prayer, and the prayer on the other thread, and ALL of your kind thoughts and prayers. I'm so very grateful and would appreciate continued prayers till this season of financial struggle is over. I honestly feel despair on a daily basis now but am trying to keep my faith strong in the midst of confusion why God is allowing me to go through this. I'm not lazy or delinquent. I've built three businesses with employees in the past and was once very successful and used my businesses as a ministry. After selling my last business things have been extremely rough and not sure why or what God's doing but I appreciate the prayers for relief and prosperity again. God's richest blessings on all of you!
  5. Genuinely grateful for the prayers! I know there are a lot of Christians on this forum, so I'm going to do something I don't usually do and step out and ask for specific prayer. I got one confirmed job offer today and another pending but almost guaranteed offer today as well. I'm going to have to decide between the two soon. My prayer request is that God give me discernment which one to choose, and if neither of them are His will, then that He reveal the right job for me quickly. I am in a bit of a financial crisis and need something fast. Thank you and blessings to all my DV family here! Jeff
  6. So does this mean if I had bought some ZIM years ago, I would be wealthy now? Like what we're waiting for with dinar?
  7. Wow, blessings on everyone's interviews! May God bless us with the right jobs for the right time
  8. Blessings on your interview today! I have two interviews myself....
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.