Rasica

Well the Feds initiated the Iraq monetary system by buying trillions of artificially valued IQDs.

What the article states is that the IQDs you hold, would only be subject to a 3:1 valuation based upon present day $.00086 USD which = roughly $.003 USD. This means that under 'tight monetary control' the 25K = $75 'tight monetary control' means IQD not released to Iraq's gnp/gdp. But the article states that the LOP comes first to the currency and not the nominal value of $.00086. LOPs have never occurred under the financial parameters that Iraq is in ~ 'tight monetary control' unpegged from gnp/gdp. However, if they want to start a precedence and with a new currency, who are we to say they cannot under 'tight monetary policy'? It would be nothing more than counterfeiting in reverse a criminal act. Article goes on to say that after a LOP, Iraq will have a new currency [ and a new 25 IQD note worth $75 ] which would equal the value of an old 25,000 IQD multiplied by $.003 So you'll only be given a $.003 value for your old dinars, while they start out with a new value of $3 for new 1 IQD note. Again, this would be counterfeiting in reverse, as the IQD is not pegged to their gnp/gdp, it would be an illusion/deception. In this example above, the note of Iraq that was purchased by investors, never was allowed to fulfill its intended usage/promise of being pegged to Iraq's GNP/GDP for valuation in the Global Market. IOWs, a LOP is after fact, not prior to. Iraq is outside the parameters of a LOP, which is to remedy multi pegged currencies, run away pegged inflation, etc etc. The article should have used the example based upon the 50 IQD or the 250, or the 500 ~ it would have ran into a convoluted mess.

It also still shows the 50 IQD.

The crisis in Iraq and the centrality of Israel’s national interest. Zionist war criminal Avi Dichter, the former Israeli Minister of Internal Security, former head of Shin Bet (Shabak) from 2000-2005, and current member of the Knesset, issued an ominous speech to the Israeli National Security Research Center on May 26, 2010. Dichter told the audience: Shin Bet aka; ISIS head Avi Dichter admitted to the destruction of Iraq at the hands of Tel Aviv. “We have achieved in Iraq more than we expected and planned. Iraq has vanished as a military force and as a unified country. Our strategic option is to keep it divided. Our strategic goal is to not allow Iraq to take its regional and Arabic role back. Iraq must stay divided and isolated from its regional environment. Nobody can ignore what we have achieved in this field. Iraq can never be the same Iraq before 2003.” Not only has Tel Aviv repeatedly admitted that it has benefitted greatly from the destruction of Iraq, it has openly admitted to being the cause of its destruction, though Zionist-owned mainstream media and alternative news networks have both downplayed it. Dichter would say throughout his speech that Iraqi oil from Kirkuk, controlled by Kurdish collaborators, would flow into occupied Palestine into the hands of the Zionists. He would also boastfully say that Israel is still active in Iraq and Zionist operatives move in the shadows to secure political and economic benefits from the puppet regime; not only from the Kurdish collaborators who have been consistently supported by Mossad since the end of the 1950s, but also from traitorous elites in Baghdad. As evidenced by the recent developments in Iraq since the new year began, Israel is still active in occupied Iraq indeed. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OBAMA AND ISIS: THE EVIDENCE! C-SPAN 1990 ISRAEL’S INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY: THE AMAN, THE SHIN BET, & MOSSAD THE ISRAELI SECRET INTELLIGENCE SERVICE AKA; ISIS.

Recover all absconded money!

People are fighting back!

Iraqi Hospitals Shutting Down: Leaving Millions Of Citizens Without Care!

Pure and simple ~ this is the mechanism to restrain ~ so as to bilk the Iraqi economy. Look how Kurdistan has started paying the oil companies profit sharing off of oil sales.

This article seems to me to be way out of reality. Iraq just signed last summer a $1 Billion military armament package with Russia. Iraq is paying Kuwait $7 Billion in 2015 and then wants to borrow a few $million for a [$million dollar emergency fund?] ~ defies logic!

Money ultimate comes from the US taxpayer via Obama to CIA ISIS and then to Netanyahu's Mossad ISIS & Kiev coup. C-Span 1990 Israel’s Intelligence Community: The Aman, The Shin Bet, & Mossad The Israeli Secret Intelligence Service aka; ISIS.

Circulation is not supply. Circulation includes [supply + digital fractional banking] Value of an IQD is based upon supply not circulation. IQD has no value presently in the world market place, as it has not been tagged to GNP/GDP. 4 pip movement is artificial and based upon auction activity only. So if NWO wants to change the game in mid stream and attach [upon release] the IQD to include [digital fractional banking aka derivatives] then again this is pure highway robbery of the highest order. Supply of IQD [the physical IQD note] has been brought way down since 2008. While the bankers indebt Iraq exponentially and artificially by 'digital fractional banking] aka; borrowing fractionally from each and every IQD in the system supply. This is why M2 increases but MO +M1 does not or stays relatively the same. http://www.nytimes.c...gewanted=3&_r=0 For example the USD M0 +M1 has gone up slightly in comparison to America's M2 M3 etc etc multi trillion debt. Don't forget that the traitor who signed in the Rothschild Fed. Reserve of 1913 was British linked Woodrow Wilson who was on the USD 100K note.

Thats hard to imagine in light of Baghdad selling bonds! How can they allocate when Baghdad is not even allocating sales to Kurdistan? Complete dysfunction/tension described in this article.

Iraq Must Stay Divided & Isolated From Its Regional Environment: Israeli Minister of Internal Security Shin Bet aka; ISIS. http://politicalvelcraft.org/2015/05/23/iraq-must-stay-divided-isolated-from-its-regional-environment-israeli-minister-of-internal-security-shin-bet-aka-isis/

House of Cards IMO.

The UN Security Council on Wednesday extended for another year the United Nations Assistance Mission in Iraq (UNAMI) and expressed its intention to review the operation’s mandate in 12 months or sooner, if requested by the Iraqi Government. Adopting a resolution, the Council extended UNAMI’s mandate through 31 July 2016, and, in line with the recommendations in the Secretary-General’s latest report to revise and prioritize the Mission’s tasks, requested the UN chief, in full consultations with the Iraqi Government, to report back with further details within the next 90 days. In the report, the Secretary-General describes a UN strategic assessment mission conducted from 21 to 29 April. Based on an overview of the current situation in Iraq as a point of departure, as well as extensive consultation with the Iraqi authorities and key national and international partners on the ground, the strategic assessment mission report endeavoured to look beyond the current crisis and to provide recommendations for UN strategy and configuration in Iraq in the next several years. The Secretary-General noted that while the current mandate of UNAMI would benefit from some streamlining, any changes to the mandate be made in full consultation with the Iraqi Government in order to complement its priorities. To that end, his recommendations included, among others, for UNAMI to maintain its focus on political good offices, as well as to facilitate humanitarian assistance, enhance mission activities in human rights and the rule of law and play a support role in specialized areas such as electoral assistance, and stabilization activities in areas liberated from the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). In the resolution adopted today, the Security Council noted that the presence of ISIL on Iraq’s territory is “a major threat” to the country’s future, and underscored that the only way to address such a threat is for all Iraqis to work together by addressing both security and political concerns. The long-term solution to instability, the Council stressed, will require Iraq’s political leadership to make decisions that will united the country. The Council emphasized the support of the international community in this regard. http://www.iraq-businessnews.com/2015/07/30/security-council-renews-unami-mandate/

Either the dinar is released to the global market or it is not. It is my understanding that the dinar is not released to the global market and as such still under "tight monetary control" until it is released. If that is such the case, relating strength of IQD to gold prices is purely ficticious. It sounds to me that a lot of money is being spent on gold purchases via 'at the expense of the Iraqi citizen'. Why? Because the people are being disconnected from their own country's wealth under the guise of 'tight monetary policy'. Where did the money come from for such purchases? The M2 has grown exorbitantly via 'digital fractional banking' aka 'derivative scheme' [building debt against the country] where with the banks stand to gain while the citizens are kept down like zombies walking around with IQD toilet paper. M2 is NOT the physical supply of IQD [though a part] it is mostly the debt owed to borrowing from the physical IQD while it is not even "released" to the market place. Ask yourself why is that? The derivatives is 'banking by debt' the IQD is NOT backed by anything, while under 'tight monetary control'. The article talks as though the IQD is backed by gold and thus lower market prices. That is so lame! So is it released w/o us knowing or is it not? Same argument can be made for oil. How does lower gold prices or lower oil prices really translate to lower market place prices when the citizens are not really buying gold on the streets with IQD and this can translate with oil though if you own a car instead of a camel. This begs the question about the lunacy of embracing 'debt bonds' for the international community while using all their current wealth to purchase gold. Bottom line, the article holds no water for lower market prices and stronger IQD ~ it does not translate in 'tight monetary control'. Sure buying gold is good if the NWO is not going to drive the gold price to zero via 'debt paper gold derivatives'. Physical gold prices are going down due to the selling of 'paper derivative promissory gold' into the COMEX by the banksters manipulating the price of gold to artificially keep interests down. This makes it appears as though there is more gold than there really is via 'paper selling'. If Gold was allowed to be in the supply/demand cycle, the U.S. would enter the black hole of a huge crash. Because the U.S. could not even pay the interest rate on this fraud debt let alone the principal. Here is where the 'paper printers' are trying to drive the precious metals market to zero for a world run strictly by paper/currency scheme then cashless. This is the one tool hiding all the banksters thievery by 'derivative' schemes. Flip Side is to shore up their currency, but just remember how they exploded the M2 into multiple trillions when the IQD is not even released and then Bonds too? Its ridiculous. Throw in the NWO ISIS trained and outfitted by U.S. & Israel and you have an extravaganza of manipulation holding the citizens down while their country is raped by the NWO banksters. In October the IMF may issue an announcement of a new 'reserve currency' probably the Chinese Yuan and who is pumping most of the oil out of Iraq? China! So as I see it, they may stop and desist the currency manipulation of the IQD soon or they may just keep it down via derivatives while they exploit the oil & gold to payback the derivatives. There are articles out there that explains why they want to keep Iraq down so as not to grow powerful over riding Israel.

UNAMI (@UNIraq) 7/21/15, 3:27 AM @Volubrjotr UNAMI SRSG Ján Kubiŝ will brief UN Security Council on 22 July 2015, ahead of expected renewal of mandate.bit.ly/1NA1JUf

UNAMI (@UNIraq) 7/21/15, 3:27 AM @Volubrjotr UNAMI SRSG Ján Kubiŝ will brief UN Security Council on 22 July 2015, ahead of expected renewal of mandate.bit.ly/1NA1JUf

Do your own vetting! Its your future!

It truly is a good thing to do, but according to Obama Iran is 2-3 months away from a Nuclear bomb. That was at the end of April 2015, so that puts the timeline around August 1st. BUT Obama does a Nuclear Deal, this is suppose to keep the peace. One glaring problem with this mindset for public consumption, is that we have a war criminal in Israel called Netanyahu. I believe everyone knows there is a crunch reset window between July 31 thru October 2015 including UNAMI 7/31, Possible [market crash aka default] September 2015, Greece [still may default at anytime], Netanyahu doesn't buy into agreement and states"stopping Iran is paramount" ~> so we have a loose screw wild card in this period [possible attack], so reopening files of corruption since 2003 NOW? Well ok.

U.N. Security Counsel Had Extended UNAMI Mandates In Iraq Until July 31, 2015. I wrote UNAMI to see if they will be extending UNAMI mandates on July 31, 2015. I received a note back from them and they told me that they are expecting to extend the mandates. Just another piece of the puzzle. My take is that Iraq is not quit ready to be left on their own!

I propose do some reading on invalid syllogisms..it will poke holes in your response.

Issuing 50K & 100K does not reduce note count aka money supply. It does make it however easier to carry less notes in one's pocket since the nominal value is held at an artificial 1166 iqd to 1 usd. This is a carnival act imo as there is no mention of monetary buck which is the only way to reduce money supply. Increasing the money supply be an introduction of 50K or 100K is downward pressure on nominal value even though nominal value is artificial controlled by "tight monetary policy" even when or if there is an RI aka; release of IQD to represent the country's GNP/GDP. This introduction if real and not a head fake, is only a facilitator [convenience] to carry less in one's pocket until "change" is disbursed when making a purchase with a 50K or 100K note. Thus logic dictates that they are stream lining the IQD notes with a real possibility to institute a LOP if they should have that in mind. The 25 & 100 Dinar coins are already there to replace the 25K or 100K if it was done. Only a "buy back" or a uniform LOP reduces money supply and the IQD has not even been released to their GNP/GDP. Their inflation is almost non-existent and that is based upon artificiality as the IQD has not been released to true supply/demand. So even thinking of a LOP is ridiculous, BUT corruption is rampant and they appear to be going after that. If they were to do a LOP. The INTRODUCED 100K becomes the 100 dinar coin showing on The CBI site. [not in circulation *yet*] The INTRODUCED 50K becomes 50 either a note or coin *???* The 25K becomes the 25 dinar coin showing on The CBI site. [not in circulation *yet*] The 10K becomes 10 The 5K becomes the 5 The 100 becomes the 1 The 500 becomes the .50 The 250 which is a wild card like the 25K becomes .25 The 50 which is still showing on The CBI will become .05 OR REAPPORTIONED INTO ANOTHER CATEGORY Iraq "bought back" IQD off the street at a rate of $1.5B - $1B / month in 2008 to reduce money supply. This was validated by the NYT. Alleged removal of 50 [which is still showing on the CBI site CBI.iq] so as to print 50K & 100K is inconsistent with "reduction" of money supply aka "physical" note count. This whole process actually increases the money supply [if significant enough to cause/facilitate an easier form to carry for the whole population]. No Buy Back is mentioned, thus a simple carnival act that causes downward pressure. This process if real, is saying we are going to continue impoverishing Iraq by fascilitating notes to represent ever more increasing supply at 1166.

A 50K and 100K note could be lopped into the 50 dinar & 100 Dinar providing the avenue for a lop. Only the 250 & 500 out there are stumbling blocks for all to stay in note form. All other arguments to date for a 50K 100K I do not find credible. In fact, I do not believe the 50 dinar was pulled, unless it was for the purpose to construct all IQDs to flow through a lop seamlessly. sure the 50 could have devolved to a nickel so to speak. None of it really makes any sense, Iraq has virtually no inflation, so suggesting pulling the 50 and introducing 50K/100K is ludicrous to me. If it happens, I suggest a criminal intent. That would not surprise me as Iraq doesn't need to 'pre' diversify into agricultural and manufacturing for releasing the IQD to their GNP. Oil would bring in the wealth and agriculture/manufacturing would follow by supply/demand.

During an exchange in the House Armed Services Committee last Wednesday, US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter announced that the Obama administration was prepared to accept the break-up of Iraq as a unified national-state. “What if a multi-sectarian Iraq turns out not be possible?” Carter asked rhetorically. “That is an important part of our strategy now on the ground. If the government can’t do what it’s supposed to do, then we will still try to enable local ground forces, if they’re willing to partner with us, to keep stability in Iraq—but there will not be a single state of Iraq.” Carter’s brazen statement underscores, once again, the predatory and colonial character of decades of US interventions in the Middle East—as well as the endless lies utilized to justify them. Just 10 months ago, the American people were told by the Obama administration that US military operations were resuming in Iraq in order to defend it against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), which was threatening its survival. As recently as April, with Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi standing beside him, Obama declared at the White House that “United States’ prime interest,” alongside defeating ISIS, was “to respect Iraqi sovereignty.” A few months later, the Obama administration has signalled that it is indifferent to the country’s sovereignty and even its existence. The change in US rhetoric follows the Iraqi army’s retreat from Ramadi in western Anbar province, which left the Sunni-majority city and vast amounts of US-supplied equipment in ISIS hands. In response, Obama’s promises that American ground troops would not be sent back into combat to Iraq are being cast aside. Last week, the White House authorised 450 personnel to deploy to a base between Ramadi and Fallujah. From their stronghold, the American “advisors” will be tasked with paying local Sunnis to end their collaboration with ISIS against the Shiite-dominated Iraqi government and join US-armed militias that will fight the Islamic extremists. The so-called “lilypad” concept will be broadened in the coming weeks, and the advisors will accompany their Iraqi mercenaries into combat zones in order to direct supporting air strikes. In northern Iraq, Carter effectively announced that the US will begin to send arms and supplies directly to the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG), which already rules its territory as a de-facto separate state. Just days earlier, he had stated that arming the KRG directly was “inconsistent with the longstanding US foreign policy of working to maintain a stable, unified Iraq.” Through the KRG, however, assistance is being provided to Kurdish rebel forces in northern Syria, which have inflicted significant defeats on ISIS in recent weeks. In Syria, the US is responding, not only to the advances by Kurdish militia in the north against ISIS, but to victories in the south of the country by Sunni rebels—trained and supplied by US allies Jordan and Saudi Arabia—against the Iranian-backed Syrian government of President Bashir al-Assad. Assad’s forces have lost control over most of the country. The shift in US policy also comes amid the growing importance of Iranian assistance in defending Abadi’s government in the territory it still controls. Shiite-based militias, aided by Iranian advisors, have borne the brunt of fighting to drive back ISIS incursions close to Baghdad and the majority Shiite-populated areas of Iraq. Tehran’s efforts to save the Iraqi state, however, are denounced by Carter and the US military as “Iranian malign influence.” In a comment on Carter’s statements and the situation in the Middle East, Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer pointed to the conclusions that are being drawn in US ruling circles. American policy toward Iraq and Syria, he wrote, must begin “by admitting that the old borders are gone, that a unified Syria and Iraq will never be reconstituted, that the Sykes-Picot map is defunct.” Sykes-Picot was the sordid imperialist agreement, between Britain and France, to carve up and divide the Middle East between them at the end of World War I. It resulted, after considerable bloodshed and colonial repression, in the establishment of nation-states such as Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan and Kuwait. A century later, in pursuit of its imperialist agenda today, the United States is more than prepared to tear these states apart. From the time of the first Iraq War in 1990-1991, the only “prime interest” of US imperialism in the Middle East has been to ensure that it exerts unchallenged military domination over the Persian Gulf and the world’s major reserves of oil. The illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003, justified with the lies over “weapons of mass destruction,” was followed by the systematic persecution of supporters of the former regime of Saddam Hussein, above all in the Sunni population. The successive puppet governments formed in Baghdad were based on coalitions between Shiite religious parties and Kurdish nationalists. The departure of US forces in 2011, after nine years of mass killing and repression, which claimed as many as one million Iraqi lives, was followed by the further sectarian marginalisation of the Sunni population by the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. ISIS had its origins among the Sunni-based extremists who fought the US occupation and the Shiite-dominated government in Iraq. In Syria, however, such forces became a useful pawn in Washington’s agenda of regime-change. The US facilitated Islamist militias emerging as the leading force in the armed rebellion that developed after 2011 against the Russian and Iranian-backed Assad government. ISIS, in particular, received large quantities of weapons and funds through US allies in the region. In June 2014, as a result of tacit US support, ISIS was able to cross back into Iraq with substantial strength and capture the major northern city of Mosul. The utter debacle of US policy nevertheless became the Obama administration’s pretext for not only returning forces to Iraq, in order to undermine growing Iranian influence, but initiating direct air strikes in Syria—which at a certain point will be unleashed against what remains of Assad’s military. The US violence in the Middle East, and its intrigues with various ethno-sectarian factions, is a crime of immense dimensions. It has resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths, incalculable suffering and the greatest refugee and displacement crisis since World War II. Any attempt by Washington to preside over a new colonial carve-up and re-division of the region’s borders raises the danger of even greater carnage for the region’s—and the world’s—population. Wsws.org http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/06/22/pers-j22.html