Stronger Women Rights may have adverted both WW I & II

[Tiffany23]

http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/europe/5876151/Royal-succession-rule-changed

A few days ago the law that governs the line of success to British Monarchy was changed, allowing the first born girl to become the Monarch. According to this article, if Queen Victoria had been able to pass her crown to her firstborn, Britain's Princess Victoria, who had but a brief reign before her death in 1901, that would have made her son — Wilhelm II, who at that time was the German Kaiser — king.

With Wilhelm II ruling both Germany and Britain, there may not have been two world wars.

Missed it by that much!

[Jaxinjersey]

"New Zealand will now chair a working group of Commonwealth countries to discuss how to accomplish the reforms."

Rumor has it, Tenacious Tiff will be at the head of the table!

[dtard]

Womens lib was funded by the Rothchilds....Mrs. magazine....Glamour....ect. Their upset in not being able to tax 50% of the population.To break up the family unit. You need to research before you make broad statements

[gymrat76541]

WOW

Stronger Womens Rights may have adverted both WWI & II??????????????

Why not go a step further, if women were in charge the world would be a better place! LOL

Seriously?????????

We can second guess history in a million ways.

[kenbo]

I read an interesting story the other day that claimed their were a lot of women converting to Islam. It seems that these women tended to prefer that men held more control over their lives. They said that they felt more secure. Now...that is sad...A femine movement seemingly designed to create independance for all women has resulted in causing many to abandon that liberty

I looked but cant find that article.. but there are several if you google western women converting to islam for security

here is one

http://standpointmag.co.uk/features-may-10-why-do-western-women-convert-julie-bindel-islam-female-conversion

[Jaxinjersey]

Ummm... with all due respect to all previous posts... I believe you've misunderstood the point of the original post. It had nothing to do with women's lib... but simply the new British law of Monarchy succession...

So, yes, in hindsight... had the law been in place at the turn of the last century... the dynamics of both World Wars could very well have been different. We will of course we will never know... but it certainly makes for a good History Channel program! I enjoyed the article posted, as I have an affinity for history... real history, not that of the revisionist type. But, it's always good to surmise the "what ifs"...

Edited November 1, 2011 by Jaxinjersey

[Mongo]

Off with their heads Edited November 1, 2011 by Mongo

[caz1104]

"stronger womens rights"????? We gave them rights....................................umm now its all starting to make sense....................ughhhhhhhhh-JK I love women