Gasketman Posted June 2, 2011 Report Share Posted June 2, 2011 http://www.mop.gov.iq/mop/index.jsp?sid=1&id=308&pid=295&lng=en 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor363 Posted June 2, 2011 Report Share Posted June 2, 2011 Thanks for the post, but that's ancient news and was posted before. Love to see that rate though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatMan Posted June 2, 2011 Report Share Posted June 2, 2011 GREAT POST! I Like It! +1 Krem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soldier Posted June 2, 2011 Report Share Posted June 2, 2011 couple of years old Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
menholt Posted June 2, 2011 Report Share Posted June 2, 2011 Good research but was published in 2010... Estimate the amended exchange rate of the Iraqi dinar to be used in technical and economical feasibility studies and for (1.134) dollar per dinar. This price should be approved for 3 years until re-appreciation by the competent authorities. The Ministry In Brief | COSQC | COSIT | NCCMD | Home I Site Map I FAQ I Newsletters I Contact Us I INQUIRIES / COMMENTS I DISCUSSION FORUM I Login Copyright © MoP Iraq 2010 Powered by Synergy Portal from Synergy International Systems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new york kevin Posted June 2, 2011 Report Share Posted June 2, 2011 Good to be reminded of this info. it is technical and easyt to follow/understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmw Posted June 2, 2011 Report Share Posted June 2, 2011 at least 2 years old and might be 3... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandyf Posted June 3, 2011 Report Share Posted June 3, 2011 at least 2 years old and might be 3... Could be a lot older. It is demonstrated in this context to call for assessing the dinar for less than (3.208) dollar (official exchange rate) when assessing project outputs and inputs of traded goods of exports, substitute imports and imports... etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coldwarvet Posted June 3, 2011 Report Share Posted June 3, 2011 This is only a PLANNING ASSUMPTION! It's what exconomic planners use to CYA (that's cover your a**) so they don't get blamed if their forecasts don't pan out. GIven that planners like this use conservative assumptions, it's indicative that they may expect the IQD to RV higher than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alston82 Posted June 3, 2011 Report Share Posted June 3, 2011 Old old posted 4years ago so this is very old news Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappySteel Posted June 3, 2011 Report Share Posted June 3, 2011 Y'all got the rate all wrong. Don't you know that you read it backwards is what some guru said. That would be $431.10. I'd rather have that rate. Y'all got the rate all wrong. Don't you know that you read it backwards is what some guru said. That would be $431.10. I'd rather have that rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts